Home Molecular dynamics simulations of water-ethanol droplet on silicon surface
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Molecular dynamics simulations of water-ethanol droplet on silicon surface

  • Rima Biswas EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: March 7, 2023
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Molecular dynamics simulations are used to explore the wetting behavior of a water-ethanol droplet on the silicon surface. The effect of ethanol concentration on the wettability of a water-ethanol droplet on the silicon surface was analysed by calculation of contact angle. At 30% ethanol concentrations, the water contact angle was 50.7°, while at 50% ethanol concentrations, it was 36°. The results showed that the contact angle of a droplet on a silicon surface decreases with increasing ethanol concentrations. The formation of hydrogen bonds (HBs) between water-water molecules was 677 for the 30% ethanol system, while at 50% ethanol concentrations, it was 141. The number of hydrogen bonds between water molecules reduces as the ethanol concentrations rise. The HBs between water molecules and the silicon surface is seen to grow as the ethanol concentration rises. The overall potential energies of pure water, 7:3 water-ethanol, and 1:1 water-ethanol systems are −74.4, −96.16, and −158.59 kcal/mol, respectively. The contact angle and number density of water molecules on the surface of the silicon revealed that at different ethanol concentrations, more water molecules are distributed on the silicon surface.


Corresponding author: Rima Biswas, Process Simulation Research Group, School of Chemical Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, 632014 Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

Vellore Institute of Technology is gratefully acknowledged for providing high performance computing technology for this work.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Cao, Q, Shao, W, Ren, X, Ma, X, Shao, K, Cui, Z, et al.. Molecular dynamics simulations of the liquid film evaporation heat transfer on different wettability hybrid surfaces at the nanoscale. J Mol Liq 2020;314:113610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.113610.Search in Google Scholar

2. Yin, X, Hu, C, Bai, M, Lv, J, Transfer, M. Effects of depositional nanoparticle wettability on explosive boiling heat transfer: a molecular dynamics study. Int Commun Heat Mass Tran 2019;109:104390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2019.104390.Search in Google Scholar

3. Song, Z, Shang, X, Cui, Z, Liu, Y, Cao, Q. Investigation of surface structure-wettability coupling on heat transfer and flow characteristics in nanochannels. Appl Therm Eng 2023;218:119362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.119362.Search in Google Scholar

4. Miwa, M, Nakajima, A, Fujishima, A, Hashimoto, K, Watanabe, T. Effects of the surface roughness on sliding angles of water droplets on superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 2000;16:5754–60. https://doi.org/10.1021/la991660o.Search in Google Scholar

5. Boreyko, JB, Baker, CH, Poley, CR, Chen, C-H. Wetting and dewetting transitions on hierarchical superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 2011;27:7502–9. https://doi.org/10.1021/la201587u.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Wang, Z, Elimelech, M, Lin, S. Environmental applications of interfacial materials with special wettability. Environ Sci Technol 2016;50:2132–50. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b04351.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Amani, H, Arzaghi, H, Bayandori, M, Dezfuli, AS, Pazoki-Toroudi, H, Shafiee, A, et al.. Controlling cell behavior through the design of biomaterial surfaces: a focus on surface modification techniques. Adv Mater Interfac 2019;6:1900572. https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.201900572.Search in Google Scholar

8. Knapczyk-Korczak, J, Ura, DP, Gajek, M, Marzec, MM, Berent, K, Bernasik, A, et al.. Fiber-based composite meshes with controlled mechanical and wetting properties for water harvesting. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2019;12:1665–76. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b19839.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Pinto, RM, Gund, V, Calaza, C, Nagaraja, K, Vinayakumar, KB. Piezoelectric aluminum nitride thin-films: a review of wet and dry etching techniques. Microelectron Eng 2022;257:111753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mee.2022.111753.Search in Google Scholar

10. Pourmadadi, M, Tajiki, A, Hosseini, SM, Samadi, A, Abdouss, M, Daneshnia, S, et al.. A comprehensive review of synthesis, structure, properties, and functionalization of MoS2; emphasis on drug delivery, photothermal therapy, and tissue engineering applications. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol 2022;76:103767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2022.103767.Search in Google Scholar

11. Wang, F, Zhao, K, Cheng, J, Zhang, J. Conciliating surface superhydrophobicities and mechanical strength of porous silicon films. Appl Surf Sci 2011;257:2752–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.10.056.Search in Google Scholar

12. Mourya, S, Kumar, A, Jaiswal, J, Malik, G, Kumar, B, Chandra, R. Development of Pd-Pt functionalized high performance H2 gas sensor based on silicon carbide coated porous silicon for extreme environment applications. Sensor Actuator B Chem 2019;283:373–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2018.12.042.Search in Google Scholar

13. Praveenkumar, S, Lingaraja, D, Mathi, PM, Ram, GD. An experimental study of optoelectronic properties of porous silicon for solar cell application. Optik 2019;178:216–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.09.176.Search in Google Scholar

14. Morales-Morales, F, Benítez-Lara, A, Hernández-Sebastián, N, Ambriz-Vargas, F, Jiménez-Vivanco, M, López, R, et al.. Study of zinc oxide/porous silicon interface for optoelectronic devices. Mater Sci Semicond Process 2022;148:106810.10.1016/j.mssp.2022.106810Search in Google Scholar

15. Ghrib, M, Alenizi, MA, Ghrib, T, Dimassi, W, Ouertani, R. Assess the performance of microstructural, optical and electrical properties of dual porous silicon decorated by ZrO2/Al2O3 nanoparticles. Inorg Chem Commun 2022;148:110315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2022.110315.Search in Google Scholar

16. O’Halloran, GM, Trimp, PJ, French, PJ. A porous silicon humidity sensor. In: ESSDERC’ 95: proceedings of the 25th European solid state device research conference. IEEE, The Hague, Netherlands; 1995:347–50 pp.Search in Google Scholar

17. Bjorkqvist, M, Paski, J, Salonen, J, Lehto, V-P. Studies on hysteresis reduction in thermally carbonized porous silicon humidity sensor. IEEE Sensor J 2006;6:542–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/jsen.2006.874029.Search in Google Scholar

18. Kovacs, A, Meister, D, Mescheder, U. Investigation of humidity adsorption in porous silicon layers. Phys Status Solidi A 2009;206:1343–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.200881106.Search in Google Scholar

19. Wenzel, RN. Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water. Ind Eng Chem Res 1936;28:988–94. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie50320a024.Search in Google Scholar

20. Cassie, A, Baxter, S. Wettability of porous surfaces. Trans Faraday Soc 1944;40:546–51. https://doi.org/10.1039/tf9444000546.Search in Google Scholar

21. Yoshimitsu, Z, Nakajima, A, Watanabe, T, Hashimoto, K. Effects of surface structure on the hydrophobicity and sliding behavior of water droplets. Langmuir 2002;18:5818–22. https://doi.org/10.1021/la020088p.Search in Google Scholar

22. Parvate, S, Dixit, P, Chattopadhyay, S. Superhydrophobic surfaces: insights from theory and experiment. J Phys Chem B 2020;124:1323–60. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b08567.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Ferrari, M, Ravera, F. Surfactants and wetting at superhydrophobic surfaces: water solutions and non aqueous liquids. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 2010;161:22–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2010.09.002.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Piret, G, Coffinier, Y, Roux, C, Melnyk, O, Boukherroub, R. Biomolecule and nanoparticle transfer on patterned and heterogeneously wetted superhydrophobic silicon nanowire surfaces. Langmuir 2008;24:1670–2. https://doi.org/10.1021/la703985w.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Piret, G, Drobecq, H, Coffinier, Y, Melnyk, O, Boukherroub, R. Matrix-free laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry on silicon nanowire arrays prepared by chemical etching of crystalline silicon. Langmuir 2010;26:1354–61. https://doi.org/10.1021/la902266x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Piret, G, Galopin, E, Coffinier, Y, Boukherroub, R, Legrand, D, Slomianny, C. Culture of mammalian cells on patterned superhydrophilic/superhydrophobic silicon nanowire arrays. Soft Matter 2011;7:8642–9. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1sm05838j.Search in Google Scholar

27. Coffinier, Y, Piret, G, Das, MR, Boukherroub, R. Effect of surface roughness and chemical composition on the wetting properties of silicon-based substrates. Compt Rendus Chim 2013;16:65–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crci.2012.08.011.Search in Google Scholar

28. Nagayama, G, Ando, R, Tsuruta, T. Microscopic wetting at microstructured surface of porous silicon. In: International conference on micro/nanoscale heat transfer. Shanghai, China: ASME; 2009.10.1115/MNHMT2009-18452Search in Google Scholar

29. Formentín, P, Marsal, LF. Hydrophobic/oleophilic structures based on MacroPorous silicon: effect of topography and fluoroalkyl silane functionalization on wettability. Nanomaterials 2021;11:670.10.3390/nano11030670Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

30. Alvarez, SD, Derfus, AM, Schwartz, MP, Bhatia, SN, Sailor, MJ. The compatibility of hepatocytes with chemically modified porous silicon with reference to in vitro biosensors. Biomaterials 2009;30:26–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.09.005.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

31. Muñoz-Noval, AI, Hernando Pérez, M, Torres Costa, V, Martín Palma, RJ, de Pablo, PJ, Manso Silván, M. High surface water interaction in superhydrophobic nanostructured silicon surfaces: convergence between nanoscopic and macroscopic scale phenomena. Langmuir 2012;28:1909–13.10.1021/la2041289Search in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Marston, J, Thoroddsen, ST, Ng, W, Tan, RBH. Experimental study of liquid drop impact onto a powder surface. Powder Technol 2010;203:223–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2010.05.012.Search in Google Scholar

33. Qin, M, Tang, C, Tong, S, Zhang, P, Huang, Z. On the role of liquid viscosity in affecting droplet spreading on a smooth solid surface. Int J Multiphas Flow 2019;117:53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2019.05.002.Search in Google Scholar

34. Negeed, E-SR, Hidaka, S, Kohno, M, Takata, Y. Effect of the surface roughness and oxidation layer on the dynamic behavior of micrometric single water droplets impacting onto heated surfaces. Int J Therm Sci 2013;70:65–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2013.03.004.Search in Google Scholar

35. Cossali, GE, Marengo, M, Santini, M. Secondary atomisation produced by single drop vertical impacts onto heated surfaces. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 2005;29:937–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2004.12.003.Search in Google Scholar

36. Cai, C, Si, C, Liu, H, Yin, H. Influence of alcohol additive and surface temperature on impact and spreading characteristics of a single water droplet. Int J Heat Mass Tran 2021;180:121795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.121795.Search in Google Scholar

37. Baek, S, Moon, HS, Kim, W, Jeon, S, Yong, K. Effect of liquid droplet surface tension on impact dynamics over hierarchical nanostructure surfaces. Nanoscale 2018;10:17842–51. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8nr04539a.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

38. Lundgren, M, Allan, NL, Cosgrove, T, George, N. Wetting of water and water/ethanol droplets on a non-polar surface: a molecular dynamics study. Langmuir 2002;18:10462–6. https://doi.org/10.1021/la026191w.Search in Google Scholar

39. Kalé, L, Skeel, R, Bhandarkar, M, Brunner, R, Gursoy, A, Krawetz, N, et al.. NAMD2: greater scalability for parallel molecular dynamics. J Comput Phys 1999;151:283–312.10.1006/jcph.1999.6201Search in Google Scholar

40. Humphrey, W, Dalke, A, Schulten, K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph 1996;14:33–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

41. Orsi, M. Comparative assessment of the ELBA coarse-grained model for water. Mol Phys 2014;112:1566–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/00268976.2013.844373.Search in Google Scholar

42. Petravic, J, Delhommelle, J. Influence of temperature, pressure and internal degrees of freedom on hydrogen bonding and diffusion in liquid ethanol. Chem Phys 2003;286:303–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-0104(02)00968-0.Search in Google Scholar

43. Ang, PK, Wang, S, Bao, Q, Thong, JT, Loh, KP. High-throughput synthesis of graphene by intercalation–exfoliation of graphite oxide and study of ionic screening in graphene transistor. ACS Nano 2009;3:3587–94. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn901111s.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

44. Darden, T, York, D, Pedersen, L. Particle mesh Ewald: an N log (N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J Chem Phys 1993;98:10089–92. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.464397.Search in Google Scholar

45. Essmann, U, Perera, L, Berkowitz, ML, Darden, T, Lee, H, Pedersen, LG. A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. J Chem Phys 1995;103:8577–93. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.470117.Search in Google Scholar

46. Martínez, L, Andrade, R, Birgin, EG, Martínez, JM. PACKMOL: a package for building initial configurations for molecular dynamics simulations. J Comput Chem 2009;30:2157–64.10.1002/jcc.21224Search in Google Scholar PubMed

47. Cruz-Chu, ER, Aksimentiev, A, Schulten, K. Water–silica force field for simulating nanodevices. J Phys Chem B 2006;110:21497–508. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp063896o.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

48. Werder, T, Walther, JH, Jaffe, R, Halicioglu, T, Koumoutsakos, P. On the water–carbon interaction for use in molecular dynamics simulations of graphite and carbon nanotubes. J Phys Chem B 2003;107:1345–52. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0268112.Search in Google Scholar

49. Khattab, IS, Bandarkar, F, Fakhree, MAA, Jouyban, A. Density, viscosity, and surface tension of water+ ethanol mixtures from 293 to 323 K. Kor J Chem Eng 2012;29:812–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-011-0239-6.Search in Google Scholar

50. Spencer, SJ, Andrews, GT, Deacon, CG. Contact angle of ethanol–water solutions on crystalline and mesoporous silicon. Semicond Sci Technol 2013;28:055011. https://doi.org/10.1088/0268-1242/28/5/055011.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-08-03
Accepted: 2023-02-23
Published Online: 2023-03-07

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 30.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cppm-2022-0040/html
Scroll to top button