References

[1] Wang T, Wang J, Jin Y. Slurry Reactors for Gas-to-Liquid Processes: A Review. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2007;46:5824–47.10.1021/ie070330tSuche in Google Scholar

[2] Tavasoli A, Tre´Panier M, Malek Abbaslou RMK, Dalai A, Abatzoglou N. FischereTropsch synthesis on mono- and bimetallic Co and Fe catalysts supported on carbon nanotubes. Fuel Technol. 2009;90:1486–94.10.1016/j.fuproc.2009.07.007Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Dry ME. The Fischer–tropsch synthesis. Catal Sci Technol. 1981;1:159–255.10.1007/978-3-642-49988-3_4Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Bartholomew CH. Recent Developments in Fischer–tropsch catalysis. Catal Let. 1990/1991;7(1–4):303–15.10.1007/BF00764511Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Nakhaei Pour A, Housaindokht MR, Tayyari SF, Zarkesh J, Kamali Shahri SM. Water-gas-shift kinetics over a Fe/Cu/La/Si catalyst in Fischer–tropsch synthesis. Chem Eng Res Design. 2011;8(9):262–69.10.1016/j.cherd.2010.07.008Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Adib H, Haghbakhsh R, Saidi M, Takassi MA, Sharifi F, Koolivand M, et al. Modeling and optimization of Fischer–tropsch synthesis in the presence of Co (III)/Al2O3 catalyst using artificial neural networks and genetic algorithm. J Nat Gas Sci Eng. 2013;10:14–24.10.1016/j.jngse.2012.09.001Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Rahimpour MR, Mirvakili A, Paymooni K. Simultaneous hydrogen production and utilization via coupling of FischereTropsch synthesis and decalin dehydrogenation reactions in GTL technology. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2011;3(6):2992–3006.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.11.099Suche in Google Scholar

[8] http://www.ripi.ir/index.php (Accessed 4 October 2017).Suche in Google Scholar

[9] Akhtar A, Pareek VK, Tade MO. Modern trends in CFD simulations: application to GTL technology. Chem Prod Modeling. 2006;2(1(1)). DOI: 10.2202/1934-2659.1000Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Eliason SA, Bartholomew CH. Reaction and deactivation kinetics for FischereTropsch synthesis on unpromoted and potassium-promoted iron catalysts. Appl Catal A Gen. 1999;186:229–43.10.1016/S0926-860X(99)00146-5Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Nowicki L, Ledakowicz SB, Bukur D. Hydrocarbon selectivity model for the slurry phase Fischer-Tropsch synthesis on precipitated iron catalysts. Chem Eng Sci. 2001;56:1175–80.10.1016/S0009-2509(00)00337-7Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Rahimpour MR, Elekaei H. A comparative study of combination of Fischer–tropsch synthesis reactors with hydrogen-permselective membrane in GTL technology. Fuel Process Technol. 2009;90:747–61.10.1016/j.fuproc.2009.02.011Suche in Google Scholar

[13] Rahimpour MR, Mirvakili A, Paymooni K. Differential evolution (DE) strategy for optimization of hydrogen production and utilization in a thermally coupled membrane reactor for decalin dehydrogenation and FischereTropsch synthesis in GTL technology. Int J Hydrogen Eenergy. 2011;3(6):4917–33.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.01.061Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Rahimpour MR, Mirvakili A, Paymooni K. A novel water perm-selective membrane dual-type reactor concept for FischereTropsch synthesis of GTL (gas to liquid) technology. Energy. 2011;36:1223–35.10.1016/j.energy.2010.11.023Suche in Google Scholar

[15] Rahimpour MR, Mirvakili A, Paymooni K, Moghtaderi B. A comparative study between a fluidized-bed and a fixed-bed water perm-selective membrane reactor with in situ H2O removal for FischereTropsch synthesis of GTL technology. J Nat Gas Sci Eng. 2011;3:484–95.10.1016/j.jngse.2011.05.003Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Jayhooni SMH, Mirvakili A, Rahimpour MR. Nanofluid concept for enhancement of hydrogen utilization and gasoline production in fixed bed reactor FischereTropsch synthesis of GTL (gas to liquid) technology. J Nat Gas Sci Eng. 2012;9:172–83.10.1016/j.jngse.2012.05.014Suche in Google Scholar

[17] Mazloomi K, Gomes C. Hydrogen as an energy carrier: prospects and challenges. Rene Sustain Energy Rev. 2012;16:3024–33.10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.028Suche in Google Scholar

[18] Shirasaki Y, Tsuneki T, Ota Y, Yasuda I, Tachibana S, Nakajima H,A. Development of membrane reformer system for highly efficient hydrogen production fromnatural gas. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2009;34:4482–87.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.08.056Suche in Google Scholar

[19] Khademi MH, Rahimpour MR, Jahanmiri A. Differential evolution (DE) strategy for optimization of hydrogen production, cyclohexane dehydrogenation and methanol synthesis in a hydrogen-permselective membrane thermally coupled reactor. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2010;3(5):1936 –50.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.12.080Suche in Google Scholar

[20] Rahimpour MR, Bayat M. Production of ultrapure hydrogen via utilizing fluidization concept from coupling of methanol and benzene synthesis in a hydrogen-permselective membrane reactor. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2011;3(6):6616–20 .10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.02.095Suche in Google Scholar

[21] Hodoshima S, Arai H, Saito Y. Liquid-film-type catalytic decalin dehydrogeno-aromatization for long-term storage and long-distance transportation of hydrogen. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2003;28:197–204.10.1016/S0360-3199(02)00032-0Suche in Google Scholar

[22] Hodoshima S, Arai H, Saito Y. Catalytic decaline dehydrogenation/naphthalene hydrogenation pair as a hydrogen source for fuel-cell vehicle. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2003;28:1255–62.10.1016/S0360-3199(02)00250-1Suche in Google Scholar

[23] Hodoshima S, Takaiwa S, Shono A, Satoh K, Saito Y. Hydrogen storage by decalin/naphthalene pair and hydrogen supply to fuel cells by use of superheated liquid-film-type catalysis. Appl Catal. 2005;283:235–42.10.1016/j.apcata.2005.01.010Suche in Google Scholar

[24] Mastalir A, Frank B, Szizybalski A, Soerijan H. Steam reforming of methanol over Cu/ZrO2/CeO2 catalysts: a kinetic study. J Catal. 2005;230:464–75.10.1016/j.jcat.2004.12.020Suche in Google Scholar

[25] Kyung Lee J, Bong Ko J, Hyun Kim D. Methanol steam reforming over Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst: kinetics and effectiveness factor. Appl Catal A Gen. 2004 ;278(1):25–35.10.1016/j.apcata.2004.09.022Suche in Google Scholar

[26] Rostrup-Nielsen JR. Conversion of hydrocarbons and alcohols for fuel cells. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2001;3:283–88.10.1039/b004660oSuche in Google Scholar

[27] Avci AK, Oensan ZI, Trimm DL. On-board hydrogen generation for fuel cell-powered vehicles: the use of methanol and propane. Top Catal. 2003;22(3–4):359–67.10.1023/A:1023504826480Suche in Google Scholar

[28] Lindström B, Pettersson LJ. Hydrogen generation by steam reforming of methanol over copper-based catalysts for fuel cell applications. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2001;26:923–3310.1016/S0360-3199(01)00034-9Suche in Google Scholar

[29] Agrell J, Boutonnet M, Fierro JLG. Production of hydrogen from methanol over binary Cu/ZnO catalysts: part II. Catalytic activity and reaction pathways. Appl Catal A Gen. 2003;253:213–23.10.1016/S0926-860X(03)00521-0Suche in Google Scholar

[30] Brown LF. A comparative study of fuels for on-board hydrogen production for fuel-cell-powered automobiles. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2001;26:381–97.10.1016/S0360-3199(00)00092-6Suche in Google Scholar

[31] Jiang CJ, Trimm DL, Wainwright MS. Kinetic mechanism for the reaction between methanoland water over a Cu-ZnO-Al2O3 catalyst. Appl Catal A Gen. 1993;97:145–58.10.1016/0926-860X(93)80081-ZSuche in Google Scholar

[32] Agrell J, Birgersson H, Boutonnet M, Melian I. Production of hydrogen from methanol over Cu/ZnO catalysts promoted by ZrO2 and Al2O3. J Catal. 2003b;219:389–403.10.1016/S0021-9517(03)00221-5Suche in Google Scholar

[33] Agrell J, Birgersson H, Boutonnet M. Steam reforming of methanol over a Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst: a kinetic analysis and strategies for suppression of CO formation. J Power Sources. 2002;106(1–2):249–57.10.1016/S0378-7753(01)01027-8Suche in Google Scholar

[34] Önsan ZI, Trimm DL. Onboard fuel conversion for hydrogen-fuel-cell-driven vehicles. Catal Rev Sci Eng. 2001;43:31–84.10.1081/CR-100104386Suche in Google Scholar

[35] Önsan ZI. Catalytic processes for clean hydrogen production from hydrocarbons. Turkish J Chem. 2007;31:531–50.Suche in Google Scholar

[36] Fierro ML, Cubeiro JL. Selective production of hydrogen by partial oxidation of methanol over ZnO-supported palladium catalysts. J Catal. 1998;179:150–62.10.1006/jcat.1998.2184Suche in Google Scholar

[37] Amphlett JC, Mann RF, Peppley BA, Thurgood CP. A deactivation model for methanol-steam reformation on Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst for optimizing the production of fuel-cell hydrogen. Stud Surf Sci Catal. 2001;139:205–12.10.1016/S0167-2991(01)80199-3Suche in Google Scholar

[38] Suh J-S, Lee M-T, Greif R, Grigoropoulos CP. A study of steam methanol reforming in a microreactor. J Power Sources. 2007;173:458–66.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.04.038Suche in Google Scholar

[39] Buxbaum RE, Kinney AB. Hydrogen transport through tubular membranes of palladium-coated tantalum and niobium. Ind Eng Chem Res. 1996;35(2):530–37.10.1021/ie950105oSuche in Google Scholar

[40] Asgari A, Rahimpour MR. Modeling and simulation of ammonia removal from purge gases of ammonia plants using a catalytic Pd–ag membrane reactor. J Hazard Mater. 2008;153:557–65.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.08.095Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[41] Rahimpour MR, Alizadehhesar K. Enhancement of carbon dioxide removal in a hydrogen-permselective methanol synthesis reactor. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2009;34:1349–62.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.10.089Suche in Google Scholar

[42] Itoh N, Membrane Reactor A. Using Palladium. AIChE J. 1987;33:1576–78.10.1002/aic.690330921Suche in Google Scholar

[43] Rahimpour MR, Khosravanipour Mostafazadeh A, Barmaki MM. Application of hydrogen-permselective Pd-based membrane in an industrial single-type methanol reactor in the presence of catalyst deactivation. Fuel Proc Technol. 2008;8(9):1396–408 .10.1016/j.fuproc.2008.06.013Suche in Google Scholar

[44] Forghani AA, Elekaei H, Rahimpour MR. Enhancement of gasoline production in a novel hydrogen-permselective membrane reactor in Fischer–Tropsch synthesis of GTL technology. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2009 5;34(9):3965–7610.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.02.038Suche in Google Scholar

[45] Rahimpour MR, Arab Aboosadi Z, Jahanmiri AH. Synthesis gas production in a novel hydrogen and oxygen perm-selective membranes tri-reformer for methanol production. J Nat Gas Sci Eng. 2012;9:149–59.10.1016/j.jngse.2012.06.007Suche in Google Scholar

[46] Wang YN, Xu YY, Xiang HW, Li YW, Zhang BJ. Modeling of catalyst pellets for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2001;40:4324–35.10.1021/ie010080vSuche in Google Scholar

[47] Gallucci F, Paturzo L, Basile A. Hydrogen recovery from methanol steam reforming in a dense membrane reactor: simulation study. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2004;43:2420–32.10.1021/ie0304863Suche in Google Scholar

[48] Ergun S. Flow through packed columns. Chem Eng Progress. 1952;48:89–94.Suche in Google Scholar

[49] Perry RH, Green DW, Maloney JO. Perry’s chemical engineers’ handbook, 7th ed. United States of America: McGraw-Hill, 1997Suche in Google Scholar

[50] Smith JM. Chemical engineering kinetics. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1980.Suche in Google Scholar

[51] Graaf GH, Scholtens H, Stamhuis EJ, Beenackers AACM. Intra-particle diffusion limitations in low-pressure methanol synthesis. Chel Eng Sci. 1990;45:773–83.10.1016/0009-2509(90)85001-TSuche in Google Scholar

[52] Fogler HS. Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering, 2nd ed. London: Prentice-Hall, 1992.Suche in Google Scholar

[53] Pandu Rangaiah G. Multiobjective optimization: techniques and applications in chemical engineering. Adv Process Sys Eng. 2008;1:29–155Suche in Google Scholar

[54] Price K, Storn R. Differential evolution e a simple evolution strategy for fast optimization. Dr Dobb’s J. 1997;78:2218–24.Suche in Google Scholar

[55] Babu BV, Angira R. Modified differential evolution (MDE) for optimization of non-linear chemical processes. Comput Chem Eng. 2006;30:989–1002.10.1016/j.compchemeng.2005.12.020Suche in Google Scholar

[56] Babu BV, Sastry KKN. Estimation of heat-transfer parameters in a trickle-bed reactor using differential evolution and orthogonal collocation. Comput Chem Eng. 1999;23:327–39.10.1016/S0098-1354(98)00277-4Suche in Google Scholar

[57] Storn R, Price K. Differential Evolution (DE). Journal of Global Optimization. 1997:341–359.10.1023/A:1008202821328Suche in Google Scholar

[58] Angira R, Babu BV. Optimization of process synthesis and design problems: A modified differential evolution approach. Chem Eng Sci. 2006;61:4707–21.10.1016/j.ces.2006.03.004Suche in Google Scholar

[59] Parvasi P, Khosravanipour Mostafazadeh A, Rahimpour MR. Dynamic modeling and optimization of a novel methanol synthesis loop with hydrogen-permselective membrane reactor. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2009;34:3717–33.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.02.062Suche in Google Scholar

[60] Rahimpour MR, Iranshahi D, Bahmanpour AM. Dynamic optimization of a multi-stage spherical, radial flow reactor for the naphtha reforming process in the presence of catalyst deactivation using differential evolution (DE) method. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2010;3(5):7498–511.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.04.177Suche in Google Scholar

[61] Rahimpour MR, Parvasi P, Setoodeh P. Dynamic optimization of a novel radial-flow, spherical-bed methanol synthesis reactor in the presence of catalyst deactivation using differential evolution (DE) algorithm. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2009;34:6221–30.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.05.068Suche in Google Scholar

[62] Khademi MH, Setoodeh P, Rahimpour MR, Jahanmiri AH. Optimization of methanol synthesis and cyclohexane dehydrogenation in a thermally coupled reactor using differential evolution (DE) method. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2009;34:6930–44.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.06.018Suche in Google Scholar

[63] Marvast A, Sohrabi M, Zarrinpashneh S, Baghmisheh GH. FischereTropsch synthesis: modeling and performance study for Fe-HZSM5 bifunctional catalyst. Chem Eng Technol. 2005;28(1):78–86.10.1002/ceat.200407013Suche in Google Scholar