Startseite Simulation and Dynamic Optimization of an Industrial Naphtha Thermal Cracking Furnace Based on Time Variant Feeding Policy
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Simulation and Dynamic Optimization of an Industrial Naphtha Thermal Cracking Furnace Based on Time Variant Feeding Policy

  • S.M. Zaker Abbasali , M. Farsi EMAIL logo und M.R. Rahimpour
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 7. September 2017
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The main goal of this research is modeling and simulation of ethylene production through naphtha thermal cracking in a coil furnace reactor. The naphtha cracking and decoking processes are modeled based on the mass, energy and momentum balance equations considering a detail kinetic model at pseudo-dynamic condition. To develop a reliable and applicable model, a detail thermal model is considered to predict tube skin temperature. To prove accuracy of developed model and considered assumptions, the simulation results are compared with the plant data. In addition, the results of coke burning in the decoking cycle by mixture of air and steam are presented. It is appeared that ethylene production decreases during the process run time gradually. The simulation results proved that increasing feed temperature, feed pressure and combustion chamber temperature during the process run time is a practical solution to maintain production capacity at an acceptable level. Finally, the optimal operating condition of thermal cracking process is calculated during the process run time based on the time variant feeding policy to achieve maximum ethylene production capacity. It is appeared that applying optimal condition on the system could increase ethylene production capacity from 15.31 ton.h‒1 to 15.49 ton.h‒1.

References

[1] Yoshimura Y, Kijima N, Hayakawa T, Murata K, Suzuki K, Mizukami F, et al. Catalytic cracking of naphtha to light olefins. Catal Surv Jpn. 2001;4(2):157–167.10.1023/A:1011463606189Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Reyniers GC, Froment GF, F-D K, Zimmermann G. Coke formation in the thermal cracking of hydrocarbons. 4. Modeling of coke formation in naphtha cracking. Ind Eng Chem Res. 1994;33(11):2584–2590.10.1021/ie00035a009Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Pant KK, Kunzru D. Pyrolysis of methylcyclohexane: Kinetics and modelling. Chem Eng J. 1997;67(2):123–129.10.1016/S1385-8947(97)00023-5Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Towfighi J, Niaei A, Karimzadeh R, Saedi G. Systematics and modelling representations of LPG thermal cracking for olefin production. Korean J Chem Eng. 2006;23(1):8–16.10.1007/BF02705685Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Ghassabzadeh H, Darian JT, Zaheri P. Experimental study and kinetic modeling of kerosene thermal cracking. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2009;86(1):221–232.10.1016/j.jaap.2009.06.006Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Belohlav Z, Zamostny P, Herink T. The kinetic model of thermal cracking for olefins production. Chem Eng Process Intensif. 2003;42(6):461–473.10.1016/S0255-2701(02)00062-4Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Gao GY, Wang M, Ramshaw C, Li XG, Yeung H. Optimal operation of tubular reactors for naphtha cracking by numerical simulation. Asia-Pacific J Chem Eng. 2009;4(6):885–892.10.1002/apj.351Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Ghashghaee M, Karimzadeh R. Dynamic modeling and simulation of steam cracking furnaces. Chem Eng Technol. 2007;30(7):835–843.10.1002/ceat.200700028Suche in Google Scholar

[9] Keyvanloo K, Towfighi J, Sadrameli SM, Mohamadalizadeh A. Investigating the effect of key factors, their interactions and optimization of naphtha steam cracking by statistical design of experiments. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2010;87(2):224–230.10.1016/j.jaap.2009.12.007Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Keyvanloo K, Sedighi M, Towfighi J. Genetic algorithm model development for prediction of main products in thermal cracking of naphtha: Comparison with kinetic modeling. Chem Eng J. 2012;209:255–262.10.1016/j.cej.2012.07.130Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Barazandeh K, Dehghani O, Hamidi M, Aryafard E, Rahimpour MR. Investigation of coil outlet temperature effect on the performance of naphtha cracking furnace. Chem Eng Res Des. 2015;94:307–316.10.1016/j.cherd.2014.08.010Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Kumar P, Kunzru D. Kinetics of coke deposition in naphtha pyrolysis. Can J Chem Eng. 1985;63(4):598–604.10.1002/cjce.5450630411Suche in Google Scholar

[13] Kumar P, Kunzru D. Modeling of naphtha pyrolysis. Ind Eng Chem Des Dev. 1985;24(3):774–782.10.1021/i200030a043Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Zheng S, Zhang X, Qi C, Zhou H. Modeling of heat transfer and pyrolysis reactions in ethylene cracking furnace based on 3-D combustion monitoring. Int J Thermal Sci. 2015;94:28–36.10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2015.02.003Suche in Google Scholar

[15] Berreni M, Wang M. Modelling and dynamic optimization of thermal cracking of propane for ethylene manufacturing. Comput Chem Eng. 2011;35(12):2876–2885.10.1016/j.compchemeng.2011.05.010Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Seifzadeh Haghighi S, Rahimpour MR, Raeissi S, Dehghani O. Investigation of ethylene production in naphtha thermal cracking plant in presence of steam and carbon dioxide. Chem Eng J. 2013;228:1158–1167.10.1016/j.cej.2013.05.048Suche in Google Scholar

[17] Cai H, Krzywicki A, Oballa MC. Coke formation in steam crackers for ethylene production. Chem Eng Process Intensif. 2002;41(3):199–214.10.1016/S0255-2701(01)00135-0Suche in Google Scholar

[18] Mitchell M. An introduction to genetic algorithms. Cambridge, MA: MIT press, 1998.10.7551/mitpress/3927.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

[19] Haupt RL, Haupt SE. Practical genetic algorithms. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2004.10.1002/0471671746Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-5-12
Revised: 2017-7-22
Accepted: 2017-8-14
Published Online: 2017-9-7

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 30.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cppm-2017-0032/pdf?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen