Mathematical Modeling and Optimization of Syngas Production Process: A Novel Axial Flow Spherical Packed Bed Tri-Reformer

References

[1] Özkara-Aydınoğlu S. Thermodynamic equilibrium analysis of combined carbon dioxide reforming with steam reforming of methane to synthesis gas. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2012;35:12821–28.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.08.134Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Akbari-Emadabadi S, Rahimpour MR, Hafizi A, Keshavarz P. Production of hydrogen-rich syngas using Zr modified Ca-Co bifunctional catalyst-sorbent in chemical looping steam methane reforming. Appl Energy. 2017;206:51–62.10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.08.174Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Abbasi M, Farniaei M, Rahimpour MR, Shariati A. Simultaneous syngas production with different H 2/CO ratio in a multi-tubular methane steam and dry reformer by utilizing of CLC. J Energy Chem. 2015;24:54–64.10.1016/S2095-4956(15)60284-4Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Darzi E, Rahimpour MR. Investigation of syngas production from waste gas and ratio adjustment using a Fischer–Tropsch synthesis reactor. World Acad Sci Eng Technol. 2010;71:249–54.Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Farniaei M, Abbasi M, Rahnama H, Rahimpour MR, Shariati A. Syngas production in a novel methane dry reformer by utilizing of tri-reforming process for energy supplying: modeling and simulation. J Nat Gas Sci Eng. 2014;20:132–46.10.1016/j.jngse.2014.06.010Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Song C, Pan W. Tri-reforming of methane: A novel concept for catalytic production of industrially useful synthesis gas with desired H₂/CO ratios. Catalysis Today. 2004;98:463–84.10.1016/j.cattod.2004.09.054Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Chen WH, Lin BJ. Hydrogen and synthesis gas production from activated carbon and steam via reusing carbon dioxide. Appl Energy. 2013;101:551–59.10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.06.030Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Rodrigues LMTS, Silva RB, Rocha MGC, Bargiela P, Noronha FB, Brandao ST. Partial oxidation of methane on Ni and Pd catalysts: influence of active phase and CeO₂ modification. Catalysis Today. 2012;197:137–43.10.1016/j.cattod.2012.07.031Suche in Google Scholar

[9] Arab Aboosadi Z, Jahanmiri AH, Rahimpour MR. Optimization of tri-reformer reactor to produce synthesis gas for methanol production using differential evolution (DE) method. Appl Energy. 2011;88:2691–701.10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.02.017Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Jiang H, Li H, Xu H, Zhang Y. Preparation of Ni/Mg_xTi _1–xO catalysts and investigation on their stability in tri-reforming of methane. Fuel Process Technol. 2007;88:988–95.10.1016/j.fuproc.2007.05.007Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Solov’ev SA, Gubareni YV, Kurilets YP, Orlik SN. Tri-reforming of methane on structured Ni-containing catalysis. Theor Exp Chem. 2012;48:199–205.10.1007/s11237-012-9262-xSuche in Google Scholar

[12] Rahnama H, Farniaei M, Abbasi M, Rahimpour MR. Modeling of synthesis gas and hydrogen production in a thermally coupling of steam and tri-reforming of methane with membranes. J Ind Eng Chem. 2014;20:1779–92.10.1016/j.jiec.2013.08.032Suche in Google Scholar

[13] Mirvakili A, Khalilpourmeymandi H, Heravi M, Rahimpour MR. An environmentally friendly configuration for reduction of toxic products in a thermally coupled reactor of styrene and tri-reformer of methane. J Environ Chem Eng. 2017;5:1048–59.10.1016/j.jece.2017.01.020Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Song CS, Gaffney AM, Fujimoto K, CO₂ conversion and utilization. In: ACS Symposium Series 809. American Chemical Society, Washington DC. (2002) 2–30 (Chapter 1).10.1021/bk-2002-0809.ch001Suche in Google Scholar

[15] Song CS. Tri-reforming: a new process for reducing CO₂ emissions. Chem Innovation. 2001;31:21–26.Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Hong-Tao J, Hui-Quan L, Yi Z. Tri-reforming of methane to synthesis gas over Ni/Al₂O₃. Thermal distribution in the catalyst bed. J Fuel Chem Technol. 2007;35:72–78.10.1016/S1872-5813(07)60012-7Suche in Google Scholar

[17] Lee SH, Cho W, Ju WS, Cho BH, Lee YC, Baek YS. Tri-reforming of CH₄ using CO₂ for production of synthesis gas to dimethyl ether. Catalysis Today. 2003;87:133–37.10.1016/j.cattod.2003.10.005Suche in Google Scholar

[18] Lee SH, Cho W, Ju WS, Cho BH, Lee YC, Baek YS. Tri-reforming of CH₄ using CO₂ for production of synthesis gas to dimethyl ether. In: Proceedings of the seventh international conference on carbon dioxide utilization, Seoul, Korea, October (2003) 12–16, p. 203.Suche in Google Scholar

[19] Tomishige K. Syngas production from methane reforming with CO₂/H₂O and O₂ over NiO–MgO solid solution catalyst in fluidized bed reactors. Catalysis Today. 2004;89:405–18.10.1016/j.cattod.2004.01.003Suche in Google Scholar

[20] Izquierdo U, Barrio VL, Requies J, Cambra JF, Guemez MB, Arias PL. Tri-reforming: a new biogas process for synthesis gas and hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2013;38:7623–31.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.09.107Suche in Google Scholar

[21] Cho W, Song T, Mitsos A, McKinnon JT, Ko GH, Tolsma JE, et al. Optimal design and operation of a natural gas tri-reforming reactor for DME synthesis. Catalysis Today. 2009;139:261–67.10.1016/j.cattod.2008.04.051Suche in Google Scholar

[22] Rahimpour MR, Arab Aboosadi Z, Jahanmiri AH. Synthesis gas production in a novel hydrogen and oxygen perm-selective membranes tri-reformer for methanol production. J Nat Gas Chem. 2012;9:149–59.10.1016/j.jngse.2012.06.007Suche in Google Scholar

[23] Zaree S, Jafari M, Iranshahi D, Rahimpour MR. Comparison of one-dimensional and two-dimensional modeling of catalytic naphtha reforming process in axial flow spherical packed-bed reactor, International conference oil, gas, petrochemical and power plant 1, 2012.Suche in Google Scholar

[24] Rahimpour MR, Iranshahi D, Paymooni K, Pourazadi E. Enhancement in research octane number and hydrogen production via dynamic optimization of a novel spherical axial-flow membrane naphtha reformer. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2011;51:398–409.10.1021/ie2010912Suche in Google Scholar

[25] Iranshahi D, Rahimpour MR, Paymooni K, Pourazadi E. Utilizing DE optimization approach to boost hydrogen and octane number, through a combination of radial-flow spherical and tubular membrane reactors in catalytic naphtha reformers. Fuel. 2013;111:1–11.10.1016/j.fuel.2013.03.082Suche in Google Scholar

[26] Farsi M, Asemani M, Rahimpour MR. Mathematical modeling and optimization of multi-stage spherical reactor configurations for large scale dimethyl ether production. Fuel Process Technol. 2014;126:207–14.10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.04.029Suche in Google Scholar

[27] Jayhooni SMH, Rahimpour MR. Effect of different types of nanofluids on free convection heat transfer around spherical mini-reactor. Superlatt Microstruct. 2013;58:205–17.10.1016/j.spmi.2013.03.004Suche in Google Scholar

[28] Samimi F, Bayat M, Karimipourfard D, Rahimpour MR, Keshavarz P. A novel axial-flow spherical packed-bed membrane reactor for dimethyl ether synthesis: simulation and optimization. J Nat Gas Sci Eng. 2013;13:42–51.10.1016/j.jngse.2013.03.001Suche in Google Scholar

[29] Rahimpour MR, Pourazadi E, Iranshahi D, Bahmanpour AM. Methanol synthesis in a novel axial-flow, spherical packed bed reactor in the presence of catalyst deactivation. Chem Eng Res Des. 2011;89:2457–69.10.1016/j.cherd.2011.02.030Suche in Google Scholar

[30] Iranshahi D, Bahmanpour AM, Pourazadi E, Rahimpour MR. A comparative study on optimised and non-optimised axial flow, spherical reactors in naphtha reforming process. Can J Chem Eng. 2011;9999:1–10.10.1002/cjce.20627Suche in Google Scholar

[31] Iranshahi D, Pourazadi E, Paymooni K, Bahmanpour AM, Rahimpour MR, Shariati A. Modeling of an axial flow, spherical packed-bed reactor for naphtha reforming process in the presence of the catalyst deactivation. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2010;35:12784–99.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.08.124Suche in Google Scholar

[32] Rahimpour MR, Iranshahi D, Pourazadi E, Paymooni K, Bahmanpour AM. The aromatic enhancement in the axial-flow spherical packed-bed membrane naphtha reformers in the presence of catalyst deactivation. AIChE J. 2011;57:3182–98.10.1002/aic.12529Suche in Google Scholar

[33] Walker DM, Pettit SL, Wolan JT, Kuhn JN. Synthesis gas production to desired hydrogen to carbon monoxide ratios by tri-reforming of methane using Ni–MgO–(Ce,Zr)O₂ catalysts. Appl Catalysis. 2012;445– 446:61–68.10.1016/j.apcata.2012.08.015Suche in Google Scholar

[34] Aris R. The optimal design of chemical reactors. New York, London: Academic Press, 1961.Suche in Google Scholar

[35] Xu J, Froment GF. Methane steam reforming, methanation and water–gas shift: I. Intrinsic kinetics. AIChE. J. 1989;35:88–96.10.1002/aic.690350109Suche in Google Scholar

[36] Xu G, Li P, Rodrigues A. Sorption enhanced reaction process with reactive regeneration. Chem Eng Sci. 2002;57:3893–908.10.1016/S0009-2509(02)00245-2Suche in Google Scholar

[37] Trimm DL, Lam CW. The combustion of methane on platinum-alumina fiber catalysts—I. Kinetics and mechanism. Chem Eng Sci. 1980;35:1405–13.10.1016/0009-2509(80)85134-7Suche in Google Scholar

[38] Iranshahi D, Rahimpour MR, Asgari A. A novel dynamic radial-flow, spherical-bed reactor concept for naphtha reforming in the presence of catalyst deactivation. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2010;35:6261–75.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.03.021Suche in Google Scholar

[39] Iranshahi D, Bakhshi Ani A. A novel radial-flow, spherical packed bed reactor for the hydrocracking process. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2015;54:1748–1754.10.1021/ie5041786Suche in Google Scholar

[40] Rahimpour MR, Parvasi P, Setoodeh P. Dynamic optimization of a novel radial-flow, spherical-bed methanol synthesis reactor in the presence of catalyst deactivation using Differential Evolution (DE) algorithm. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2009;34:6221–30.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.05.068Suche in Google Scholar

[41] Rahimpour MR, Abbasloo A, Amin JS, Novel Radial-Flow A. Spherical-bed reactor concept for methanol synthesis in the presence of catalyst deactivation. Chem Eng Technol. 2008;31:1615–29.10.1002/ceat.200800284Suche in Google Scholar

[42] Rahimpour MR, Moghtaderi B, Jahanmiri A, Rezaei N. Operability of an industrial methanol synthesis reactor with mixtures of fresh and partially deactivated catalyst. Chem Eng Technol. 2005;28:226–34.10.1002/ceat.200407062Suche in Google Scholar

[43] Rahimpour MR, Iranshahi D, Bahmanpour AM. Dynamic optimization of a multi-stage spherical, radial flow reactor for the naphtha reforming process in the presence of catalyst deactivation using differential evolution (DE) method. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2010;35:7498–511.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.04.177Suche in Google Scholar

[44] Rahimpour MR, Iranshahi D, Pourazadi E, Bahmanpour AM. A comparative study on a novel combination of spherical and membrane tubular reactors of the catalytic naphtha reforming process. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2011;36:505–17.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.09.043Suche in Google Scholar

[45] Samimi F, Bayat M, Rahimpour MR, Keshavarz P. Mathematical modeling and optimization of DME synthesis in two spherical reactors connected in series. J Nat Gas Sci Eng. 2014;17:33–41.10.1016/j.jngse.2013.12.006Suche in Google Scholar

[46] Fogler HS. Elements of chemical reaction engineering, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1992.Suche in Google Scholar

[47] Perry RH, Green DW, Maloney JO. Perry’s chemical engineers’ handbook, 7th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1997.Suche in Google Scholar

[48] De Groote AM, Froment GF, Kobylinski TH. Synthesis gas production from natural gas in a fixed bed reactor with reversed flow. Can J Chem Eng. 1996;74:735–42.10.1002/cjce.5450740525Suche in Google Scholar

[49] Babu BV, Angira R. Modified differential evolution (MDE) for optimization of non-linear chemical processes. Comput Chem Eng. 2006;30:989–1002.10.1016/j.compchemeng.2005.12.020Suche in Google Scholar

[50] Angira R, Babu BV. Optimization of process synthesis and design problems: a modified differential evolution approach. Chem Eng Sci. 2006;61:4707–21.10.1016/j.ces.2006.03.004Suche in Google Scholar

[51] Khademi MH, Setoodeh P, Rahimpour MR, Jahanmiri A. Optimization of methanol synthesis and cyclohexane dehydrogenation in a thermally coupled reactor using differential evolution (DE) method. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2009;34:6930–44.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.06.018Suche in Google Scholar

[52] Storn R. Differential evolution–a simple and efficient heuristic strategy for global optimization over continuous spaces. J Global Optimization. 1997;11:341–59.10.1023/A:1008202821328Suche in Google Scholar

[53] Simsek E, Avci AK, Önsan ZI. Investigation of catalyst performance and microstructured reactor configuration for syngas production by methane steam reforming. Catalysis Today. 2011;178:157–63.10.1016/j.cattod.2011.08.021Suche in Google Scholar