Home Comparison of Turbulence Models for Single Sphere Simulation Study Under Supercritical Fluid Condition
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Comparison of Turbulence Models for Single Sphere Simulation Study Under Supercritical Fluid Condition

  • J. Malang EMAIL logo , P. Kumar , A. Saptoro ORCID logo and M. O. Tade
Published/Copyright: September 5, 2017
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In this paper, the comparison of turbulence models for fluid flow past single sphere under supercritical conditions is reported. Firstly, Dixon et al.’s models [1], which are under non-supercritical conditions, were used as benchmarks to validate the simulated results. Two turbulence models namely RNG k-ε and SST k-ω models parameters were fine-tuned accordingly in order to obtain almost comparable results generated by Dixon et al.’s models [1]. The simulation works were then extended to simulate flow of supercritical carbon dioxide. The second part of this paper, therefore, presents a comparative study of the turbulence models i. e. standard k-ε, RNG k-ε, realizable k-ε and SST k-ω models. This study emphasises on the predictions and evaluations of the velocity profiles at different flow regimes namely recirculation, recovery and near-wake. Simulations were carried out to determine the velocity profiles at subcritical and supercritical conditions by varying Reynolds numbers (2000 and 20,000), pressures (65 and 80 bar) and temperatures (283.15 and 308.15K). Simulation results indicate that the predicted results are consistent with the literature data. Interesting flow features were identified for all the simulations. The results of this study also reveal that the SST k-ω turbulence model was able to better capture the flow characteristics near-wake of the sphere.

References

[1] Dixon AG, Ertan Taskin M, Nijemeisland M, Stitt EH. Systematic mesh development for 3D CFD simulation of fixed beds: single sphere study. Comput Chem Eng. 2011;35(7):1171–1185.10.1016/j.compchemeng.2010.12.006Search in Google Scholar

[2] Fernandes J, Simões PC, Mota JP, Saatdjian E. Application of CFD in the study of supercritical fluid extraction with structured packing: dry pressure drop calculations. J Supercrit Fluids. 2008;47(1):17–24.10.1016/j.supflu.2008.07.008Search in Google Scholar

[3] Coussirat M, Guardo A, Mateos B, Egusquiza E. Performance of stress-transport models in the prediction of particle-to-fluid heat transfer in packed beds. Chem Eng Sci. 2007;62:6897–6907.10.1016/j.ces.2007.08.071Search in Google Scholar

[4] Logtenberg SA, Dixon AG. Computational fluid dynamics studies of fixed bed heat transfer. Chem Eng Process. 1998;37:7–21.10.1016/S0255-2701(97)00032-9Search in Google Scholar

[5] Van Der Merwe DF, Gauvin WH. Velocity and turbulence measurements of air flow through packed bed. Aiche J. 1971;17(3):519–528.10.1002/aic.690170309Search in Google Scholar

[6] Le Clair BP, Hamielec AE, Pruppacher HR. A numerical study of the drag on a sphere at low and intermediate Reynolds numbers. J Atmos Sci. 1970;27(2):308–315.10.1175/1520-0469(1970)027<0308:ANSOTD>2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

[7] Stokes GG. On the effect of the internal friction of fluids on the motion of pendulums. Cambridge Philos Soc Trans. 1851;9(8):287.10.1017/CBO9780511702266.002Search in Google Scholar

[8] Oseen CW. Neuere Methoden und Ergebnísse in der Hydrodynamik. Leipzig: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, 1927.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Goldstein S, Burgers J.. The forces on a solid body moving through viscous fluid. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character, 1931;198–208.10.1098/rspa.1931.0048Search in Google Scholar

[10] Proudman I, Pearson JR. Expansions at small Reynolds numbers for the flow past a sphere and a circular cylinder. J Fluid Mech. 1957;2(03):237–262.10.1017/S0022112057000105Search in Google Scholar

[11] Jenson V.. Viscous flow round a sphere at low Reynolds numbers (< 40). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, The Royal Society, 1959.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Rimon Y, Cheng S. Numerical solution of a uniform flow over a sphere at intermediate Reynolds numbers. Phys Fluids (1958-1988). 1969;12(5):949–959.10.1063/1.2163685Search in Google Scholar

[13] Carrier G. On slow viscous flow 1953. DTIC Document.10.21236/AD0016588Search in Google Scholar

[14] Maxworthy T. Accurate measurements of sphere drag at low Reynolds numbers. J Fluid Mech. 1965;23(02):369–372.10.1017/S0022112065001428Search in Google Scholar

[15] Steinberger EH, Pruppacher HR, Neiburger M. On the hydrodynamics of pairs of spheres falling along their line of centres in a viscous medium. J Fluid Mech. 1968;34(04):809–819.10.1017/S0022112068002259Search in Google Scholar

[16] Natarajan R, Acrivos A. The instability of the steady flow past spheres and disks. J Fluid Mech. 1993;254:323–344.10.1017/S0022112093002150Search in Google Scholar

[17] Tomboulides AG. Direct and large-eddy simulation of wake flows: flow past a sphere. PhD Thesis, Princeton University, 1993.10.1016/B978-0-444-89802-9.50030-7Search in Google Scholar

[18] Johnson TA, Patel VC. Flow past a sphere up to a Reynolds number of 300. J Fluid Mech. 1999;378:19–70.10.1017/S0022112098003206Search in Google Scholar

[19] Campregher R, Mansur SS, Silveira-Neto A. Numerical simulation of the flow around a sphere using the immersed boundary method for low Reynolds. Direct Large-Eddy Simulation VI. 2006;10:651–658 Springer, Netherlands.10.1007/978-1-4020-5152-2_75Search in Google Scholar

[20] Constantinescu G, Squires K. Numerical investigations of flow over a sphere in the subcritical and supercritical regimes. Phys Fluids. 2004;16(5):1449–1466.10.1063/1.1688325Search in Google Scholar

[21] Bakic VV, Schmid M, Stankovic B. Experimental investigation of turbulent structures of flow around a sphere. Thermal Sci. 2006;10(2):97–112.10.2298/TSCI0602097BSearch in Google Scholar

[22] Bingjie S, Weidong Z, Zeting Z, Enping Y. Hydrodynamics and mass transfer performance in supercritical fluid extraction columns. Chin J Chem Eng. 2002;10(6):696–700.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Eisenmenger MJ. Supercritical fluid extraction, fractionation and characterization of wheat germ oil. Oklahoma: Oklahoma State University, , 2005. Master of Science Thesis.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Zaidul IS, Norulaini NA, Omar AK, Smith RL. Supercritical carbon dioxide (SC-CO2) extraction and fractionation of palm kernel oil from palm kernel as cocoa butter replacers blend. J Food Eng. 2006;73(3):210–216.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.01.022Search in Google Scholar

[25] Zaidul IS, Norulaini NA, Omar AK, Smith RL. Supercritical carbon dioxide (SC-CO2) extraction of palm kernel oil from palm kernel. J Food Eng. 2007;79(3):1007–1014.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.03.021Search in Google Scholar

[26] Fernandes J, Lisboa PF, Simões PC, Mota JP, Saatdjian E. Application of CFD in the study of supercritical fluid extraction with structured packing: wet pressure drop calculations. J Supercrit Fluids. 2009;50(1):61–68.10.1016/j.supflu.2009.04.009Search in Google Scholar

[27] Stamenić M, Zizovic I. The mathematics of modelling the supercritical fluid extraction of essential oils from glandular trichomes. Comput Chem Eng. 2013;48(0):89–95.10.1016/j.compchemeng.2012.08.006Search in Google Scholar

[28] del Valle JM, De La Fuente JC, Cardarelli DA. Contributions to supercritical extraction of vegetable substrates in Latin America. J Food Eng. 2005;67(1–2):35–57.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.05.051Search in Google Scholar

[29] Bahadori A, Vuthaluru HB, Mokhatab S. New correlations predict aqueous solubility and density of carbon dioxide. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. 2009;3(4):474–480.10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.01.003Search in Google Scholar

[30] Heidaryan E, Hatami T, Rahimi M, Moghadasi J. Viscosity of pure carbon dioxide at supercritical region: measurement and correlation approach. J Supercrit Fluids. 2011;56(2):144–151.10.1016/j.supflu.2010.12.006Search in Google Scholar

[31] Abbas KA, Mohamed A, Abdulamir AS, Abas HA. A review on supercritical fluid extraction as new analytical method. Am J Biochemistry Biotechnol. 2008;4(4):345–353.10.3844/ajbbsp.2008.345.353Search in Google Scholar

[32] Sihvonen M, Järvenpää E, Hietaniemi V, Huopalahti R. Advances in supercritical carbon dioxide technologies. Trends Food Sci Technol. 1999;10(6–7):217–222.10.1016/S0924-2244(99)00049-7Search in Google Scholar

[33] Li R, Zhang J, Yong Y, Wang Y, Yang C. Numerical simulation of steady flow past a liquid sphere immersed in simple shear flow at low and moderate Re. Chin J Chem Eng. 2015;23(1):15–21.10.1016/j.cjche.2014.10.005Search in Google Scholar

[34] Clamen A, Gauvin WH. Effects of turbulence on the drag coefficients of spheres in a supercritical flow Ŕegime. AIChE J. 1969;15(2):184–189.10.1002/aic.690150211Search in Google Scholar

[35] Wadsworth J. Nat. Res. Council, Nat. Aeron. Estab. Rep. MT-39 1958.Search in Google Scholar

[36] Hoerner S. Versuche mit Kugeln betreffend Kennzahl, Turbulenz und Oberflachenbeschaffenheit. Luftfahrtforschung. 1935;12:42–54.Search in Google Scholar

[37] Clift R, Grace JR, Weber ME. Bubbles, drops and particles. New York: Academic Press, Inc., 1978.Search in Google Scholar

[38] Neve RS, Shansonga T. The effects of turbulence characteristics on sphere drag. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 1989;10(4):318–321.10.1016/0142-727X(89)90020-9Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-5-8
Accepted: 2017-7-7
Published Online: 2017-9-5

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 12.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cppm-2017-0026/pdf
Scroll to top button