Home Simultaneous Carbon Capture and Reuse Using Catalytic Membrane Reactor in Water-Gas Shift Reaction
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Simultaneous Carbon Capture and Reuse Using Catalytic Membrane Reactor in Water-Gas Shift Reaction

  • Shuey Zi Saw and Jobrun Nandong EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: July 27, 2017
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Hydrogen (H2) has been recognized as one of the attractive energy carriers due to its clean and environmentally friendly characteristics where the burning of H2 as a fuel produces zero waste emission. Water-gas shift reaction (WGSR) has been accepted as one promising pathway for producing hydrogen. Recently, membrane technology has emerged as a new way to improve high-purity H2 production via the WGSR. A substantial amount of research works has so far focussed on the production of H2 alone while often neglecting the emission of carbon dioxide (CO2), a greenhouse gas that is known to be the culprit responsible for global warming. Addressing the conflicting issues between clean H2 fuel and environmentally adverse CO2 emission requires a systematic engineering approach to carbon capture to be incorporated directly into H2 production plant. In view of this, the reuse of CO2 can be implemented by incorporating the dry methanation reaction. In the proposed reuse strategy, the WGSR uses carbon monoxide (CO) and water as the reactants while the dry methanation reaction uses CO2 and methane (CH4) to produce CO and H2. Based on two case studies of industrial plants, this paper presents a rigorous evaluation of the technical and economic feasibility of the implementation of this reuse strategy by using H2 selective membrane reactor (MR). Upon extensive analysis of different strategies with and without carbon capture technology, it is found that with the proposed carbon capture strategy, the industrial plants show positive improvement in terms of both technical and economic performances.

Funding statement: Fundamental Research Grant Scheme, (Grant / Award Number: ‘JPT.S Jld. 13(28)’) Curtin Sarawak Research Institute Grant, (Grant / Award Number: ‘no: CSRI-6002’)

References

[1] Kuramochi T, Ramírez A, Turkenburg W, Faaij A. Comparative assessment of co 2 capture technologies for carbon-intensive industrial processes. Prog Energy Combust Sci. 2012;38:87–112.10.1016/j.pecs.2011.05.001Search in Google Scholar

[2] Cuéllar-Franca RM, Azapagic A. Carbon capture, storage and utilisation technologies: A critical analysis and comparison of their life cycle environmental impacts. J CO2 Utilization. 2015;9:82–102.10.1016/j.jcou.2014.12.001Search in Google Scholar

[3] Kanniche M, Co Bouallou C. 2 capture study in advanced integrated gasification combined cycle. Appl Therm Eng. 2007;27:2693–2702.10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2007.04.007Search in Google Scholar

[4] Kentish SE, Scholes CA, Stevens GW. Carbon dioxide separation through polymeric membrane systems for flue gas applications. Recent Pat Chem Eng. 2008;1:52–66.10.2174/2211334710801010052Search in Google Scholar

[5] Campbell P, McMullan J, Williams B. Concept for a competitive coal fired integrated gasification combined cycle power plant. Fuel. 2000;79:1031–1040.10.1016/S0016-2361(99)00228-8Search in Google Scholar

[6] Liu H, Ni W, Li Z, Ma L. Strategic thinking on igcc development in china. Energy Policy. 2008;36:1–11.10.1016/j.enpol.2007.08.034Search in Google Scholar

[7] Henderson C. G8 case studies by the iea clean coal centre. In: Conference: clean coal technologies for our future. London: 2007:15–17.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Yang H, Xu Z, Fan M, Gupta R, Slimane RB, Bland AE, Wright I. Progress in carbon dioxide separation and capture: A review. J. Environ Sci. 2008;20:14–27.10.1016/S1001-0742(08)60002-9Search in Google Scholar

[9] Oda J, Akimoto K, Sano F, Tomoda T. Diffusion of energy efficient technologies and co 2 emission reductions in iron and steel sector. Energy Econ. 2007;29:868–888.10.1016/j.eneco.2007.01.003Search in Google Scholar

[10] Damen K, van Troost M, Faaij A, Turkenburg W. A comparison of electricity and hydrogen production systems with co 2 capture and storage. part a: Review and selection of promising conversion and capture technologies. Prog Energy Combust Sci. 2006;32:215–246.10.1016/j.pecs.2005.11.005Search in Google Scholar

[11] Turton R, Bailie RC, Whiting WB, Shaeiwitz JA. synthesis and design of chemical processes. Analysis. New Jersey: Pearson Education, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Hamelinck CN, Faaij AP. Future prospects for production of methanol and hydrogen from biomass. J. Power Sources. 2002;111:1–22.10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00220-3Search in Google Scholar

[13] Co Gielen D. 2 removal in the iron and steel industry. Energy Convers Manage. 2003;44:1027–1037.10.1016/S0196-8904(02)00111-5Search in Google Scholar

[14] Mukherjee R., et al. Effectively design shell-and-tube heat exchangers. Chem Eng Prog. 1998;94:21–37.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Bradford MC, Vannice MA. Catalytic reforming of methane with carbon dioxide over nickel catalysts i. catalyst characterization and activity. Appl Catal, A. 1996;142:73–96.10.1016/0926-860X(96)00065-8Search in Google Scholar

[16] Aboudheir A, Akande A, Idem R, Dalai A. Experimental studies and comprehensive reactor modeling of hydrogen production by the catalytic reforming of crude ethanol in a packed bed tubular reactor over a ni/al2o3 catalyst. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2006;31:752–761.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2005.06.020Search in Google Scholar

[17] Lombardi L. Life cycle assessment comparison of technical solutions for CO2 emissions reduction in power generation. Energy Convers Manage. 2003;44:93–108.10.1016/S0196-8904(02)00049-3Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-4-30
Accepted: 2017-7-7
Published Online: 2017-7-27

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 13.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cppm-2017-0018/pdf
Scroll to top button