Home Simulation and Optimization of the Utilization of Triethylene Glycol in a Natural Gas Dehydration Process
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Simulation and Optimization of the Utilization of Triethylene Glycol in a Natural Gas Dehydration Process

  • Zykamilia Kamin EMAIL logo , Awang Bono and Lek Yan Leong
Published/Copyright: July 27, 2017
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The dehydration unit of a plant that processes natural gas uses triethylene glycol (TEG) as an absorbent to remove water from the gas to prevent blockages in pipes due to the formation of hydrates. Although TEG is recyclable, it is usually lost in the system due to vaporization and carryover, which results in economic issues. Therefore, it is necessary to optimize the dehydration process to achieve the allowable water concentration in the gas, to minimize the use of energy, and to minimize the loss of TEG. Experimental set was designed using Design Expert software by utilising data from Farashband gas processing plant, Iran and subsequently, fed to ASPEN HYSYS to construct and simulate the dehydration process. The chosen affecting parameters to the process were the (1) lean glycol circulation rate, (2) the temperature of the reboiler, and (3) the number of trays in the contactor column. Whereas, the response parameters included the (1) amount of glycol that was lost, (2) the reboiler duty, (3) the concentration of water in the dry gas, and the (4) temperature at which the hydrate formed. Then, these data were optimized using the response surface methodology (RSM). The results indicated that the optimum conditions within the experimental range conducted in this study of process parameters chosen, of the lean glycol circulation rate, the temperature of the reboiler, and the number of trays in the glycol contactor column for the gas dehydration process for the plant were 3944 kg/hr, 180 °C, and three trays, respectively.

References

[1] Abdel-Aal HK, Aggour MA, Fahim MA. Gas dehydration. In: Abdel-Aal HK, Aggour MA, Fahim MA, editor(s). Petroleum and gas field processing. New York: CRC Press, 2003:285–317.10.1201/9780429258497Search in Google Scholar

[2] Rahimpour MR, Saidi M, Seifi M. Improvement of natural gas dehydration performance by optimization of operating conditions: a case study in Sarkhun gas processing plant. J Nat Gas Sci Eng. 2013;15:118–126.10.1016/j.jngse.2013.10.001Search in Google Scholar

[3] Ranjbar H, Ahmadi H, Khalighi Sheshdeh R, Ranjbar H. Application of relative sensitivity function in parametric optimization of a tri-ethylene glycol dehydration plant. J Nat Gas Sci Eng. 2015;25:39–45.10.1016/j.jngse.2015.04.028Search in Google Scholar

[4] Jacob NCG. Optimization of Triethylene Glycol (Teg) Dehydration in a natural gas processing plant. Int J Res Eng Res Eng Technol. 2014;3(6):346–35010.15623/ijret.2014.0306064Search in Google Scholar

[5] Gupta A, Ansari NAKR, Rai R, Sah AK.. Reduction of glycol loss from gas dehydration unit at offshore platform in bombay offshore – a case study. Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference [Internet], Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1996 [cited 2016 Mar 21].10.2118/36225-MSSearch in Google Scholar

[6] Saidi M, Parhoudeh M, Rahimpour MR. Mitigation of BTEX emission from gas dehydration unit by application of Drizo process: a case study in Farashband gas processing plant; Iran. J Nat Gas Sci Eng. 2014;19:32–45.10.1016/j.jngse.2014.04.008Search in Google Scholar

[7] Datta A. Glycol dehydration. In: Datta A, editor(s). Process engineering and design using visual basic (R). Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2007:369–418.10.1201/9781420045437.ch5Search in Google Scholar

[8] Sunny A, Solomon PA, Aparna K. Syngas production from regasified liquefied natural gas and its simulation using Aspen HYSYS. J Nat Gas Sci Eng. 2016;30:176–181.10.1016/j.jngse.2016.02.013Search in Google Scholar

[9] Jokar SM, Rahimpour HR, Momeni H, Rahimpour MR, Abbasfard H. Simulation and feasibility analysis of structured packing replacement in absorption column of natural gas dehydration process: A case study for Farashband gas processing plant, Iran. J Nat Gas Sci Eng. 2014;18:336–350.10.1016/j.jngse.2014.03.005Search in Google Scholar

[10] Parrish WR, Kidnay AJ. Gas Dehydration. In: Parrish WR, Kidnay AJ, editor(s). Fundamentals of natural gas processing. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2006:133–164.10.1201/9781420014044.ch6Search in Google Scholar

[11] Anyadiegwu CIC, Kerunwa A, Oviawele P. Natural gas dehydration using Triethylene Glycol (TEG). Pet Coal [Internet]. Slovnaft Vurup a.s. 2014;56(4):407–417.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Arubi TIM, Duru UI.. Optimizing glycol dehydration system for maximum efficiency: a case study of a gas plant in Nigeria. CIPC/SPE Gas Technology Symposium 2008 Joint Conference [Internet], Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2013 [cited 2016 Mar 21].10.2118/113781-MSSearch in Google Scholar

[13] Saalah S, Shapawi R, Othman NA, Bono A. Effect of formula variation in the properties of fish feed pellet. J Appl Sci. 2010;10(21):2537–254310.3923/jas.2010.2537.2543Search in Google Scholar

[14] Bono A, Maizura N, Anisuzzaman SM, Saalah S, Chiw HK. The performance of melamine–urea–formaldehyde resin with palm kernel as filler. Adv Mater Res [Internet]. 2011;3–10:233–235 Available from http://www.scientific.net/AMR.233-235.3.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.233-235.3Search in Google Scholar

[15] Rajin M, Bono A, Mun HC. Optimisation of natural ingredient based lipstick formulation by using mixture design. J Appl Sci. 2007;7(15):2099–210310.3923/jas.2007.2099.2103Search in Google Scholar

[16] Arifin B, Bono A, Yf Y, Ling ALL, Fui SY. Protein extraction from palm kernel meal. J Appl Sci. 2009;9(17):2996–300410.3923/jas.2009.2996.3004Search in Google Scholar

[17] Ismail NM, Bono A, R ACV, Nilus S, Chng LM. Optimization of reaction conditions for preparing carboxymethycellulose. J Appl Sci. 2010;21:2530–2536.10.3923/jas.2010.2530.2536Search in Google Scholar

[18] Bono A, Krishnaiah D, Rajin M. Products and process optimization using response surface methodology. Kota Kinabalu: Penerbit Universiti Malaysia Sabah, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-4-30
Accepted: 2017-7-7
Published Online: 2017-7-27

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 13.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cppm-2017-0017/pdf
Scroll to top button