Political content as opinion leaders: The ideological catalysis of discourse on social networks

References

Achen, C. H., & Bartels, L. M. (2016). Democracy for realists: Why elections do not produce responsive government. Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400882731Suche in Google Scholar

Alexandre, I., Yoo, J. J.-s., & Murthy, D. (2021). Make Tweets great again: Who are opinion leaders, and what did they tweet about Donald Trump? Social Science Computer Review, 40(6), 1456–1477. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439321100885910.1177/08944393211008859Suche in Google Scholar

Alsaad, A., Taamneh, A., & Al-Jedaiah, M. N. (2018). Does social media increase racist behavior? An examination of confirmation bias theory. Technology in Society, 55, 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.06.00210.1016/j.techsoc.2018.06.002Suche in Google Scholar

Antypas, D., Preece, A., & Camacho-Collados, J. (2023). Negativity spreads faster: A large-scale multilingual twitter analysis on the role of sentiment in political communication. Online Social Networks and Media, 33, 100242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.osnem.2023.10024210.1016/j.osnem.2023.100242Suche in Google Scholar

Barberá, P., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J. A., & Bonneau, R. (2015). Tweeting from left to right: Is online political communication more than an echo chamber? Psychological Science, 26(10), 1531–1542. https://doi.org/10.1177/095679761559462010.1177/0956797615594620Suche in Google Scholar

Barrigüete, J. L. A., Núñez-Mera, C. B., Labrador, J., & De Nicolas, V. L. (2023). Ideology, scientific literacy, and climate change: The case of Spain. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 13, 350–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-023-00814-z10.1007/s13412-023-00814-zSuche in Google Scholar

Beam, M. A., Hutchens, M. J., & Hmielowski, J. D. (2018). Facebook news and (de)polarization: Reinforcing spirals in the 2016 US election. Information, Communication & Society, 21(7), 940–958. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.144478310.1080/1369118X.2018.1444783Suche in Google Scholar

Boehmer, J., & Tandoc, E, C., Jr. (2015). Why we retweet: Factors influencing intentions to share sport news on Twitter. International Journal of Sport Communication, 8(2), 212–232. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2015-001110.1123/ijsc.2015-0011Suche in Google Scholar

Bolin, J. L., & Hamilton, L. C. (2018). The news you choose: News media preferences amplify views on climate change. Environmental Politics, 27(3), 455–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.142390910.1080/09644016.2018.1423909Suche in Google Scholar

Budge, I., & Farlie, D. (1983). Party competition: Selective emphasis or direct confrontation?: An alternative view with data. In H. Daalder, & P. Mair (Eds.), Western European party systems: Continuity & change (pp. 267–305). Sage.Suche in Google Scholar

Carlson, T. N. (2019). Through the grapevine: Informational consequences of interpersonal political communication. American Political Science Review, 113(2), 325–339. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305541900008X10.1017/S000305541900008XSuche in Google Scholar

Centro de Estudios Sociológicos. (2023). Estudio 3421: Estudio sobre audiencias de medios de comunicación social [Study 3421: Research on Social Media Audiences]. https://www.cis.es/es/detalle-ficha-estudio?origen=estudio&codEstudio=3421Suche in Google Scholar

Chadwich, A. (2006). Internet politics: States, citizens, and new communication technologies. Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Choi, S. (2015). The two-step flow of communication in Twitter-based public forums. Social Science Computer Review, 33(6), 696–711. https://doi.org/10.1177/089443931455659910.1177/0894439314556599Suche in Google Scholar

Choi, H., Kim, S.-H., & Lee, J. (2010). Role of network structure and network effects in diffusion of innovations. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(1), 170–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2008.08.00610.1016/j.indmarman.2008.08.006Suche in Google Scholar

Chopra, S. (2014). The big connect: Politics in the age of social media. Random House.Suche in Google Scholar

Cöster, A., & Shehata, A. (2024). From cultivation to self-cultivation: Alternative media and reinforcing spirals in a fragmented media environment. International Journal of Communication, 18, 1382–1404. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/19737Suche in Google Scholar

Dahlgren, P. (2004). Theory, boundaries and political communication: The uses of disparity. European Journal of Communication, 19(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/026732310404069110.1177/0267323104040691Suche in Google Scholar

Dayan, D., & Katz, E. (1994). Media events: The live broadcasting of history. Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Del Fresno García, M., Daly, A. J., & Sánchez-Cabezudo, S. S. (2016). Identifying the new influencers in the internet era: Social media and social network analysis. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 153, 23–40. https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.153.2310.5477/cis/reis.153.23Suche in Google Scholar

Dolezal, M., Ennser‐Jedenastik, L., Müller, W. C., & Winkler, A. K. (2014). How parties compete for votes: A test of saliency theory. European Journal of Political Research, 53(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.1201710.1111/1475-6765.12017Suche in Google Scholar

Du, Y., Zhou, Q., Luo, J., Li, X., & Hu, J. (2021). Detection of key figures in social networks by combining harmonic modularity with community structure-regulated network embedding. Information Sciences, 570, 722–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2021.04.08110.1016/j.ins.2021.04.081Suche in Google Scholar

Dubois, E., Minaeian, S., Paquet-Labelle, A., & Beaudry, S. (2020). Who to trust on social media: How opinion leaders and seekers avoid disinformation and echo chambers. Social Media + Society, 6(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/205630512091399310.1177/2056305120913993Suche in Google Scholar

Elsihar-Malka, V., Ariel, Y., & Weimann, G. (2020). Rethinking political communication in the digital sphere. The Journal of International Communication, 26(2), 190–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/13216597.2020.177139710.1080/13216597.2020.1771397Suche in Google Scholar

Enders, A. M., Gainous, J., & Wagner, K. M. (2022). Say it again with feeling: Issue ownership and candidate communication using Twitter. Social Science Quarterly, 103(4), 959–974. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.1317610.1111/ssqu.13176Suche in Google Scholar

Erisen, C., Redlawsk, D. P., & Erisen, E. (2017). Challenging people’s political views and values makes them think even harder and produce better arguments to defend themselves. USApp – American Politics and Policy Blog. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/2017/09/22/challenging-peoples-political-views-and-values-makes-them-think-even-harder-and-produce-better-arguments-to-defend-themselves/Suche in Google Scholar

Gaines, B. J., Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Peyton, B., & Verkuilen, J. (2007). Same facts, different interpretations: Partisan motivation and opinion on Iraq. The Journal of Politics, 69(4), 957–974. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00601.x10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00601.xSuche in Google Scholar

Gil de Zúñiga, H., Weeks, B., & Ardèvol-Abreu, A. (2015). Effects of the news-finds-me perception in communication: Social media use implications for news seeking and learning about politics. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(3), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.1218510.1111/jcc4.12185Suche in Google Scholar

Goggin, S. N., & Theodoridis, A. G. (2017). Disputed ownership: Parties, issues, and traits in the minds of voters. Political Behavior, 39, 675–702. https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs11109-016-9375-310.1007/s11109-016-9375-3Suche in Google Scholar

Goggin, S. N., & Theodoridis, A. G. (2018). Seeing red (or blue): How party identity colors political cognition. The Forum, 16(1), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2018-000610.1515/for-2018-0006Suche in Google Scholar

Green‐Pedersen, C. (2007). The growing importance of issue competition: The changing nature of party competition in Western Europe. Political Studies, 55(3), 607–628. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00686.x10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00686.xSuche in Google Scholar

Guarino, S., Trino, N., Celestini, A., Chessa, A., & Riotta, G. (2020). Characterizing networks of propaganda on Twitter: A case study. Applied Network Science, 5(59), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-020-00286-y10.1007/s41109-020-00286-ySuche in Google Scholar

Gutiérrez, I., Guevara, J. A., Gómez, D., Castro, J., & Espínola, R. (2021). Community detection problem based on polarization measures: An application to Twitter: The COVID-19 case in Spain. Mathematics, 9(4), 443–470. https://doi.org/10.3390/math904044310.3390/math9040443Suche in Google Scholar

Hemsley, J. (2019). Followers Retweet! The influence of middle-level gatekeepers on the spread of political information on Twitter. Policy & Internet, 11(3), 280–304. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.20210.1002/poi3.202Suche in Google Scholar

Himelboim, I., Gleave, E., & Smith, M. (2009). Discussion catalysts in online political discussions: Content importers and conversation starters. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 771–789. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01470.x10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01470.xSuche in Google Scholar

Hu, Y., & Sundar, S. S. (2010). Effects of online health sources on credibility and behavioral intentions. Communication Research, 37(1), 105–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365020935151210.1177/0093650209351512Suche in Google Scholar

Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59(2), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.xSuche in Google Scholar

Jackson, S. T., Crilley, R., Manor, I., Baker, C., Oshikoya, M., Joachim, J., Robinson, N., Schneiker, A., Grove, N. S., & Enloe, C. (2020). Forum: Militarization 2.0: Communication and the normalization of political violence in the digital age. International Studies Review, 23(3), 1046–1071. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viaa03510.1093/isr/viaa035Suche in Google Scholar

Johnson, T. J., & Kaye, B. K. (2013). The dark side of the boon? Credibility, selective exposure and the proliferation of online sources of political information. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1862–1871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.01110.1016/j.chb.2013.02.011Suche in Google Scholar

Johnson, T. J., & Kaye, B. K. (2015). Reasons to believe: Influence of credibility on motivations for using social networks. Computers in Human Behavior, 50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.00210.1016/j.chb.2015.04.002Suche in Google Scholar

Kadushin, C. (2012). Understanding social networks. Theories, concepts and findings. Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Kaiser, J., Vaccari, C., & Chadwick, A. (2022). Partisan blocking: Biased responses to shared misinformation contribute to network polarization on social media. Journal of Communication, 72(2), 214–240. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqac00210.1093/joc/jqac002Suche in Google Scholar

Kam, C. D., Archer, A. M. N., & Geer, J. G. (2017). Courting the women’s vote: The emotional, cognitive, and persuasive effects of gender-based appeals in campaign advertisements. Political Behavior, 39(1), 51–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-016-9347-710.1007/s11109-016-9347-7Suche in Google Scholar

Karlsen, R., & Aalberg, T. (2021). Social media and trust in news: An experimental study of the effect of Facebook on news story credibility. Digital Journalism, 11(1), 144–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.194593810.1080/21670811.2021.1945938Suche in Google Scholar

Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (2006). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communications. Transaction Publishers.Suche in Google Scholar

Kaufhold, K. (2019). Mediating empathy: The role of news consumption in mitigating attitudes about race and immigration. Newspaper Research Journal, 40(2), 222–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739532919835010.1177/0739532919835001Suche in Google Scholar

Klapper, J. T. (1960). The effects of mass communication. Free Press.10.1037/006189Suche in Google Scholar

Kumar, S., Saini, M., Goel, M., & Panda, B. S. (2021). Modeling information diffusion in online social networks using a modified forest-fire model. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 56, 355–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10844-020-00623-810.1007/s10844-020-00623-8Suche in Google Scholar

Langer, A. I., & Gruber, J. B. (2021). Political agenda setting in the hybrid media system: Why legacy media still matter a great deal. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 26(2), 313–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/194016122092502310.1177/1940161220925023Suche in Google Scholar

Larrondo-Ureta, A., & Meso-Ayerdi, K. (2021). Political communication evolution in the digital hybrid media system: Innovation and experimentation as strategies towards a new paradigm. In B. García-Orosa (Ed.), Digital political communication strategies. The Palgrave Macmillan series in international political communication (pp. 43–58). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81568-4_310.1007/978-3-030-81568-4_3Suche in Google Scholar

Lee, J. Y., & Sundar, S. S. (2013). To tweet or to retweet? That is the question for health professionals on Twitter. Health Communication, 28(5), 509–524 https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2012.70039110.1080/10410236.2012.700391Suche in Google Scholar

Lodge, M., & Taber, C. (2000). Three steps toward a theory of motivated political reasoning. In A. Lupia, M. D. McCubbins, & S. L. Popkin (Eds.), Elements of reason (pp. 183–213). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805813.00910.1017/CBO9780511805813.009Suche in Google Scholar

Losada Maestre, R., & Sánchez Medero, R. (2024). Color war. Does color influence the perception of political messages? Psychological Reports, 127(1), 235–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294122111441810.1177/00332941221114418Suche in Google Scholar

Magre-Pont, J., Magontier, P., & Solé-Ollé, A. (2024). Political parties and public policies. A review of the Spanish evidence. CESifo Economic Studies, 70(2), 216–239. https://doi.org/10.1093/cesifo/ifae01110.1093/cesifo/ifae011Suche in Google Scholar

Masroor, F., Khan, Q. N., Aib, I., & Ali, Z. (2019). Polarization and ideological weaving in twitter discourse of politicians. Social Media + Society, 5(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/205630511989122010.1177/2056305119891220Suche in Google Scholar

Mehra, A., Dixon, A. L., Brass, D. J., & Robertson, B. (2006). The social network ties of group leaders: Implications for group performance and leader reputation. Organization Science, 17(1), 64–79. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.015810.1287/orsc.1050.0158Suche in Google Scholar

Mosleha, M., Martel, C., Eckles, D., & Rand, D. G. (2012). Shared partisanship dramatically increases social tie formation in a Twitter field experiment. PNAS, 118(7), e2022761118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.202276111810.1073/pnas.2022761118Suche in Google Scholar

Neo, R. L. (2021). Linking perceived political network homogeneity with political social media use via perceived social media news credibility. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 18(3), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2021.188101610.1080/19331681.2021.1881016Suche in Google Scholar

Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Eddy, K., Robertson, C. T., & Nielsen, R. K. (2023). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2023. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2023Suche in Google Scholar

O’Keefe, D. J. (2002). Persuasion: Theory and research. Sage.Suche in Google Scholar

Osmundsen, M., Bor, A., Vahlstrup, P. B., Bechmann, A., & Petersen, M. B. (2021). Partisan polarization is the primary psychological motivation behind political fake news sharing on twitter. American Political Science Review, 115(3), 999–1015. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305542100029010.1017/S0003055421000290Suche in Google Scholar

Östman, J. (2012). Information, expression, participation: How involvement in user-generated content relates to democratic engagement among young people. New media & Society, 14, 1004–1021. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144481243821210.1177/1461444812438212Suche in Google Scholar

Ozer, A. L., & Wright, J. M. (2022). Partisan news versus party cues: The effect of cross-cutting party and partisan network cues on polarization and persuasion. Research & Politics, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168022107545510.1177/20531680221075455Suche in Google Scholar

Park, C. S. (2019). Revisiting the Two-Step Flow model on Twitter: Interconnection of self-identified South Korean Twitter opinion leadership, news consumption, news links, and news curation. Electronic News, 13(2), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/193124311880978010.1177/1931243118809780Suche in Google Scholar

Park, C. S., & Kaye, B. K. (2019). Mediating roles of news curation and news elaboration in the relationship between social media use for news and political knowledge. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 63(3), 455–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2019.165307010.1080/08838151.2019.1653070Suche in Google Scholar

Petrocik, J. R. (1996). Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 825–850. https://doi.org/10.2307/211179710.2307/2111797Suche in Google Scholar

Prasetya, H. A., & Murata, T. (2020). A model of opinion and propagation structure polarization in social media. Computational Social Networks, 7(2), 2–35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40649-019-0076-z10.1186/s40649-019-0076-zSuche in Google Scholar

Riedl M., Schwemmer C., Ziewiecki S., Ross L. M. (2021). The rise of political influencers-perspectives on a trend towards meaningful content. Frontiers in Communication, 6, 752656. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.75265610.3389/fcomm.2021.752656Suche in Google Scholar

Röchert, D., Cargnino, M., & Neubaum, G. (2022). Two sides of the same leader: An agent-based model to analyze the effect of ambivalent opinion leaders in social networks. Journal of Computational Social Science, 5, 1159–1205 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-022-00161-z10.1007/s42001-022-00161-zSuche in Google Scholar

Rodríguez-Teruel, J. (2022). Polarisation and electoral realignment: The case of the right-wing parties in Spain. In A. Bosco, & S. Verney (Eds.), The politics of polarisation (pp. 30–59). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003317012-710.4324/9781003317012-7Suche in Google Scholar

Ruiz-Sánchez, A., & Alcántara-Plá, M. (2019). Us vs. them Polarization and populist discourses in the online electoral campaign in Spain. In E. Hidalgo-Tenorio, M.-Á. Benítez-Castro, & F. D. Cesare (Eds.), Populist discourse. Critical approaches to contemporary politics (pp. 103–119). Routledge.10.4324/9780429026751-7Suche in Google Scholar

Said-Hung, E., Merino-Arribas, A., & Sánchez-Esparza, M. (2023). Polarization, misinformation and expressions of hate on Twitter case of nationalist and pro-independence political groups in Spain. Observatorio (OBS*), 17(2), 52–80. https://doi.org/10.15847/obsOBS1722023217910.15847/obsOBS17220232179Suche in Google Scholar

Sánchez Medero, R. (2021). Democratization in political communication. Political Studies Review, 19(4), 607–623. https://doi.org/10.1177/147892992092493010.1177/1478929920924930Suche in Google Scholar

Schumann, S., Thomas, F., Ehrke, F., Bertlich, T., & Dupont, J. C. (2022). Maintenance or change? Examining the reinforcing spiral between social media news use and populist attitudes. Information, Communication & Society, 25(13), 1934–1951. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.190743510.1080/1369118X.2021.1907435Suche in Google Scholar

Seeberg, H. B. (2017). How stable is political parties’ issue ownership? A cross-time, cross-national analysis. Political Studies, 65(2), 475–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/003232171665022410.1177/0032321716650224Suche in Google Scholar

Shin, J., & Thorson, K. (2017). Partisan selective sharing: The biased diffusion of fact-checking messages on social media. Journal of Communication, 67(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.1228410.1111/jcom.12284Suche in Google Scholar

Stefanone, M. A., Vollmer, M., & Covert, J. M. (2019). In news we trust?: Examining credibility and sharing behaviors of fake news. SMSociety ‘19: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Social Media and Society, Toronto. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328529.33285510.1145/3328529.3328554Suche in Google Scholar

Stieglitz, S., & Dang-Xuan, L. (2012, 4–7 January). Political communication and influence through microblogging – An empirical analysis of sentiment in Twitter messages and retweet behavior. 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, HI, United States. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2012.47610.1109/HICSS.2012.476Suche in Google Scholar

Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.xSuche in Google Scholar

Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2016). The illusion of choice in democratic politics: The unconscious impact of motivated political reasoning. Political Psychology, 37, 61–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.1232110.1111/pops.12321Suche in Google Scholar

Teng, X., Pei, S., Morone, F., & Makse, H. A. (2016). Collective influence of multiple spreaders evaluated by tracing real information flow in large-scale social networks. Scientific Reports, 6, 36043. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep3604310.1038/srep36043Suche in Google Scholar

Valenzuela, S., Arriagada, A., & Scherman, A. (2014). Facebook, Twitter, and youth engagement: A quasi-experimental study of social media use and protest behavior using propensity score matching. International Journal of Communication, 8, 2046–2070. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2022/1189Suche in Google Scholar

Valenzuela, S., Diehl, T., Lee, S., & Halpern, D. (2024). A panel study on the dynamics of social media use and conspiracy thinking. Media Psychology, 27(6), 817–841. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2023.229552210.1080/15213269.2023.2295522Suche in Google Scholar

Watts, D. J., & Dodds, P. S. (2007). Influentials, networks, and public opinion formation. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(4), 441–458. https://doi.org/10.1086/51852710.1086/518527Suche in Google Scholar

Walgrave, S., & De Swert, K. (2007). Where does issue ownership come from? From the party or from the media? Issue-party identifications in Belgium, 1991–2005. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 12(1), 37–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X0629757210.1177/1081180X06297572Suche in Google Scholar

Walgrave, S., Tresch, A., & Lefevere, J. (2015). The conceptualisation and measurement of issue ownership. West European Politics, 38(4), 778–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2015.103938110.1080/01402382.2015.1039381Suche in Google Scholar

Walter, S., & Brüggemann, M. (2020). Opportunity makes opinion leaders: Analyzing the role of first-hand information in opinion leadership in social media networks. Information, Communication & Society, 23(2), 267–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.150062210.1080/1369118X.2018.1500622Suche in Google Scholar

Whiteley, P., Clarke, H. D., Sanders, D., & Stewart, M. C. (2013). Affluence, austerity and electoral change in Britain. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978113916251710.1017/CBO9781139162517Suche in Google Scholar

Wijesekara, M., & Ganegoda, G. U. (2020). Source credibility analysis on Twitter users. http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/2308010.1109/SCSE49731.2020.9313064Suche in Google Scholar

Yin, F., Xia, X., Song, N., Zhu, L., & Wu, J. (2020). Quantify the role of superspreaders–opinion leaders–on COVID-19 information propagation in the Chinese Sina-microblog. Plos One, 15(6), e0234023. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.023402310.1371/journal.pone.0234023Suche in Google Scholar

Yoon, N., Hemsley, J., Smith, A., Simpson, E., & Eakins, J. (2022). Super-amplifiers! The role of Twitter extended party networks in political elections. Policy & Internet, 14(3), 711–730. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.29510.1002/poi3.295Suche in Google Scholar