Startseite Sozialwissenschaften In medias res – the mediation conundrum
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

In medias res – the mediation conundrum

  • Samuel Mateus EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 7. Februar 2020

Abstract

It was not until the emergence, in the 19th century, of new technical devices – such as the telegraph and the phonograph – that the term medius came to serve as a collective noun (media) for advanced communication technologies. Although mediation is extensively theorized in philosophy and sociology, and is approached by medium theory and media studies, the concept remains undertheorized in the field of communication theory.

By exploring the problem of mediation and by challenging its representationalist and transmissive accounts, this paper posits mediation beyond the medium. It traces mediation as a relational principle which can be best understood as modulation involving inherent translation, inflection and movement. Mediation is not a simple transportation of meaning through a passive intermediary. It is not just something which stands or comes between things otherwise separated or opposed. Mediation is neither a middle-thing linking separate entities, nor do things get mediated: They are already forms of mediation. Mediation is, foremost, a connecting mean that generates modified experiences and relations, a modulating process that re-connects at the moment it separates.

References

Horkheimer, M., Adorno, T. W. (1972). Dialectic of enlightenment. New York: Herder and Herder10.1515/9780804788090Suche in Google Scholar

Altheide, D. L., & Snow, R. P. (1988). Toward a theory of mediation. In J. A. Anderson (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 11 (pp. 194–223). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Suche in Google Scholar

Asp, K. (1986). Mäktiga massmedier: Studier i politisk opinionsbildning [Powerful mass media: Studies on political opinion-formation]. Stockholm: Akademilitteratur.Suche in Google Scholar

Barbero, M. J. (1997). Dos meios às mediações [From the media to mediations]. Rio de Janeiro: Editora da UFRJ.Suche in Google Scholar

Benjamin, W. (1968). Illuminations: Essays and reflections. Ed. Hannah Arendt. New York: Schocken Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Bolter, J. D., & Grusin, R. (2000). Remediation: Understanding new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.1108/ccij.1999.4.4.208.1Suche in Google Scholar

Cooren, F. (2012). Communication theory at the center: Ventriloquism and the communicative constitution of reality. Journal of Communication, 62, 1–20.10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01622.xSuche in Google Scholar

Cooren, F. (2015). In medias res: Communication, existence, and materiality. Communication Research and Practice. doi:10.1080/22041451.2015.111007510.1080/22041451.2015.1110075Suche in Google Scholar

Couldry, N. (2008) Mediatization or mediation? Alternative understandings of the emergent space of digital storytelling. New Media & Society, 10(3), 373–391.10.1177/1461444808089414Suche in Google Scholar

Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2013). Conceptualizing mediatization: Contexts, traditions, arguments. Communication Theory, 23(3), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.1201910.1111/comt.12019Suche in Google Scholar

Davallon, J. (2003). La Médiation: la communication en procès? [Mediation: Communication in process?]. Médiations & Médiateurs, 19.Suche in Google Scholar

Deacon, D., & Stanyer, J. (2014). Mediatization: Key concept or conceptual bandwagon? Media, Culture & Society, 36(7), 1032–1044.10.1177/0163443714542218Suche in Google Scholar

Deleuze, G. (1995). Mediators. Negotiations: 1972–1990. New York: Columbia University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Galloway, A. R., Thacker, E., & Wark, M. (2013). Excommunication: Three inquiries in media and mediation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226925233.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Gomes; P.G. (2016), Mediatization: a concept, multiple voices, ESSACHESS. Journal for Communication Studies, vol. 9, no. 2(18): 197–212 eISSN 1775-352XSuche in Google Scholar

Grusin, R. (2015). Radical mediation. Critical Inquiry, 42, 124–148.10.1086/682998Suche in Google Scholar

Guillory, J. (2010). Genesis of the Media Concept. Critical Inquiry, v. 36, n. 2, p. 321–362,10.1086/648528Suche in Google Scholar

2010Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. London: Polity Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (1969). Science of logic [trans. a. V. Miller]. London: George Allen and Unwin.Suche in Google Scholar

Hepp, A. (2013). The communicative figurations of mediatized worlds: Mediatization research in times of the ‘mediatization of everything’. European Journal of Communication, 28: 615–629.10.1177/0267323113501148Suche in Google Scholar

Hjarvard, S. (2008). The mediatization of society: A theory of the media as agents of social and cultural change. Nordicom Review, 29(2), 105–134.10.1515/nor-2017-0181Suche in Google Scholar

Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (1972). Dialectic of enlightenment. New York: Herder and Herder.10.1515/9780804788090Suche in Google Scholar

Innis, H. (1951). The bias of communication. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.10.2307/138041Suche in Google Scholar

Jansson, A. (2014). Indispensable things: On mediatization, materiality, and space. In K. Lundby (Ed.), Mediatization of communication. Handbook of communication science (pp. 273–296). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110272215.273Suche in Google Scholar

Lamizet, B. (1995). Les lieux de la communication [The places of communication]. Paris: Mardaga.Suche in Google Scholar

Lievrouw, L. A. (2009) New Media, Mediation and Communication study, Information, Communication & Society, 12:3, 303–325, DOI: 10.1080/1369118080266065110.1080/13691180802660651Suche in Google Scholar

Marcondes, C. (2005). Prefácio da edição brasileira de Luhman, Niklas, A realidade dos meios de comunicação [Preface of the Brazilian edition of Niklas Luhman’s ‘The reality of the mass media’]. São Paulo: Paulus.Suche in Google Scholar

McLuhan, M. (1962). The Gutenberg Galaxy: The making of typographic man. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.Suche in Google Scholar

McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. New York: McGraw-Hill.Suche in Google Scholar

Meyer, T. P. (1988). On mediated communication theory: The rise of format. In J. A. Anderson (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 11 (pp. 224–229), Newbury Park, CA: Sage.10.1080/23808985.1988.11678688Suche in Google Scholar

Peters, J. D. (1999). Speaking into the air: A history of the idea of communication. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226922638.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Quéré, L. (1982). Des miroirs équivoques [Equivocal mirrors]. Paris: Aubier.Suche in Google Scholar

Schulz, W. (2004). Reconstructing mediatization as an analytical concept. European Journal of Communication, 19(1), 87–101.10.1177/0267323104040696Suche in Google Scholar

Scolari, C., & Rodríguez-Amat, J. (2018). A Latin American approach to mediatization: Specifies and contributions to a global discussion about how the media shape contemporary societies. Communication Theory, 28, 131–154.10.1093/ct/qtx004Suche in Google Scholar

Serres, M. (1968). Hermès I. La communication [Hermes 1: Communication]. Paris: Editions de Minuit.Suche in Google Scholar

Serres, M. (1972). Hermès II. L’interférence [Hermes 2: The interference]. Paris: Editions de Minuit.Suche in Google Scholar

Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423, 623–656. doi:10.1002/bltj.1948.27.issue-310.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.xSuche in Google Scholar

Silverstone, R. (1999). Why study the media? Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781446219461Suche in Google Scholar

Silverstone, R. (2002). Complicity and collusion in the mediation of everyday life. New Literary History, 33, 745–764.10.1353/nlh.2002.0045Suche in Google Scholar

Silverstone, R. (2005). The sociology of mediation and communication. In C. Calhoun, C. Rojek & B. Turner (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of sociology (pp. 188–207). London: SAGE Publications. doi:10.4135/9781848608115.n1110.4135/9781848608115.n11Suche in Google Scholar

Simmel, G. (1994). Bridge and Door. Theory, Culture & Society, 11, 5–10.10.1177/026327694011001002Suche in Google Scholar

Stiegler, B. (2006). Réenchanter le monde: La valeur esprit contre le populisme industriel [The re-enchantment of the world: The value of spirit against industrial populism]. Paris: Flammarion.Suche in Google Scholar

Thompson, J. (1995). The media and modernity: A social theory of the media. Cambridge: Polity Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Verón, E. (1997). Esquema para el análisis de la mediatización. Diálogos [Scheme for the analysis of mediatization. Dialogues]. Lima: FELAFACS, 48, 9–17.Suche in Google Scholar

Verón, E. (2014). Mediatization theory: A semio-anthropological perspective. In K. Lundby (Ed.), Mediatization of communication (pp. 163–174). London: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110272215.163Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-02-07
Published in Print: 2021-03-08

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 29.1.2026 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/commun-2020-2079/pdf
Button zum nach oben scrollen