Accommodating representation in the neuroscience of memory: a conceptual blending analysis of replay and preplay in hippocampal place cell research
-
Ben Berners-Lee
Abstract
Neurons called place cells are selectively activated in correspondence with the location or place field that a rodent occupies. In a phenomenon that neuroscientists call replay, place cell activation sequences rapidly repeat during subsequent periods of rest and grooming. Replay has been theorized as a mechanism for reinforcement learning of the spatial trajectories represented by place cell coactivation. Preplay is a competing theory that suggests that these sequences also occur before a novel run and that sequences are not recordings of position made in real time, but rather pre-made repertoires that an organism selects from as it makes a trajectory through space. The preplay theory maintains the language of representation while breaking from the entailment of the conceptual metaphor “MEMORIES ARE RECORDINGS” that recordings are produced simultaneously to the experiences that they represent. It does so through a conceptual blend that affords preplay researchers flexibility in their theorizing about memory without requiring a break from representationalism. Broadly, these findings demonstrate how the blending of conceptual metaphors is a viable approach for the implicit development and contestation of theories of representation in the neural and cognitive sciences.
Acknowledgments
Many thanks to Morana Alač, Seana Coulson, Akshita Sivakumar, Magdalena Donea and Yelena Gluzman for their helpful comments on drafts of the article, as well as to the anonymous reviewers who offered insightful responses and criticisms.
References
Abrahamsen, Adele & William Bechtel. 2012. History and core themes. In Frankish Keith & William M. Ramsey (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of cognitive science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139033916.003Suche in Google Scholar
Andersen, Hanne, Peter Barker & Xiang Chen. 2006. The cognitive structure of scientific revolutions. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511498404Suche in Google Scholar
Bechtel, William. 2016. Investigating neural representations: The tale of place cells. Synthese 193(5). 1287–1321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0480-8.Suche in Google Scholar
Black, Max. 1955. Metaphor. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series 5. 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/55.1.273.Suche in Google Scholar
Buzsáki, György. 1986. Hippocampal sharp waves: Their origin and significance. Brain Research 398(2). 242–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(86)91483-6.Suche in Google Scholar
Buzsáki, György. 1996. The hippocampo-neocortical dialogue. Cerebral Cortex 6(2). 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/6.2.81.Suche in Google Scholar
Chemero, Anthony. 2009. Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/8367.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Coulson, Seana. 2001. Semantic leaps: Frame-shifting and conceptual blending in meaning construction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511551352Suche in Google Scholar
Draaisma, Douwe. 2000. Metaphors of memory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Dragoi, George & Susumu Tonegawa. 2013. Distinct preplay of multiple novel spatial experiences in the rat. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110(22). 9100–9105. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1306031110.Suche in Google Scholar
Dragoi, George & Susumu Tonegawa. 2011. Preplay of future place cell sequences by hippocampal cellular assemblies. Nature 469(7330). 397–401. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09633.Suche in Google Scholar
Dudai, Yadin. 2012. The restless engram: Consolidations never end. Annual Review of Neuroscience 35(1). 227–247. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-062111-150500.Suche in Google Scholar
Egan, Frances. 2020. Content is pragmatic: Comments on Nicholas Shea’s Representation in cognitive science. Mind & Language 35(3). 368–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12276.Suche in Google Scholar
Eichenbaum, Howard. 2015. Does the hippocampus preplay memories? Nature Neuroscience 18(12). 1701–1702. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4180.Suche in Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner. 2008a. The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York, NY: Basic Books.Suche in Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner. 2008b. Rethinking metaphor. In Ray Gibbs (ed.), Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511816802.005Suche in Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry. 1981. Representations : Philosophical essays on the foundations of cognitive science. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry. 1992. A theory of content and other essays. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6765.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Foster, David J. 2017. Replay comes of age. Annual Review of Neuroscience 40(1). 581–602. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-072116-031538.Suche in Google Scholar
Foster, David J. & Matthew A. Wilson. 2006. Reverse replay of behavioural sequences in hippocampal place cells during the awake state. Nature 440(7084). 680–683. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04587.Suche in Google Scholar
Gentner, Dedre. 1983. Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science 7(2). 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0702_3.Suche in Google Scholar
Gentner, Dedre & Arthur B. Markman. 1997. Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist 12. 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.52.1.45.Suche in Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W. 2009. Why do some people dislike conceptual metaphor theory? Cognitive Semiotics. De Gruyter 5(1–2). 14–36. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem.2013.5.12.14.Suche in Google Scholar
Hampe, Beate. 2005. Has metaphor theory come full circle? In Outside-in inside-out, vol. 4, 39–66. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/ill.4.06hamSuche in Google Scholar
Johnson-Sheehan, Richard D. 1997. The emergence of a root metaphor in modern physics: Max Planck’s ‘Quantum’ metaphor. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 27(2). 177–190. https://doi.org/10.2190/LXWH-UXTL-2BBT-PRM5.Suche in Google Scholar
Koriat, Asher & Morris Goldsmith. 1996. Memory metaphors and the real-life/laboratory controversy: Correspondence versus storehouse conceptions of memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19(2). 167–188. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00042114.Suche in Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago press.Suche in Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.Suche in Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Rafael E. Núñez. 2000. Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. Nachdr. New York, NY: Basic Books.Suche in Google Scholar
Liu, Yunzhe, Marcelo G. Mattar, E. J. Timothy Behrens, Nathaniel D. Daw & Raymond J. Dolan. 2021. Experience replay is associated with efficient nonlocal learning. Science 372(6544). eabf1357. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abf1357.Suche in Google Scholar
Martin, Janet & Rom Harré. 1982. Metaphor in science. In David Maill (ed.), Metaphor: Problems and perspectives. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Mattar, Marcelo G. & Nathaniel D. Daw. 2018. Prioritized memory access explains planning and hippocampal replay. Nature Neuroscience 21(11). 1609–1617. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0232-z.Suche in Google Scholar
Miller, Arthur I. 2000. Metaphor and scientific creativity. Metaphor and analogy in the sciences, 147–164. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.10.1007/978-94-015-9442-4_9Suche in Google Scholar
Nersessian, Nancy J. 1992. How do scientists think? Capturing the dynamics of conceptual change in science. In Cognitive models of science: Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, 3–44. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Nersessian, Nancy J. 2015. The cognitive work of metaphor and analogy in scientific practice. Philosophical Inquiries 3(1). 133–156.Suche in Google Scholar
Noë, Alva. 2004. Action in perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar
O’Keefe, Jonathan & Jonathan Dostrovsky. 1971. The hippocampus as a spatial map. Preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely-moving rat. Brain Research 34(1). 171–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(71)90358-1.Suche in Google Scholar
O’Keefe, John. 1976. Place units in the hippocampus of the freely moving rat. Experimental Neurology 51(1). 78–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4886(76)90055-8.Suche in Google Scholar
Oliveira, Guilherme Sanches de. 2021. Representationalism is a dead end. Synthese 198(1). 209–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-01995-9.Suche in Google Scholar
Pavlides, Constantine & Jonathan Winson. 1989. Influences of hippocampal place cell firing in the awake state on the activity of these cells during subsequent sleep episodes. Journal of Neuroscience 9(8). 2907–2918. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.09-08-02907.1989.Suche in Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, Brad E. & David J. Foster. 2013. Hippocampal place-cell sequences depict future paths to remembered goals. Nature 497(7447). 74–79. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12112.Suche in Google Scholar
Piata, Anna. 2019. When time passes quickly: A cognitive linguistic study on compressed time. Metaphor and Symbol 34(3). 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2019.1649842.Suche in Google Scholar
Przybyslawski, Jean & Susan J. Sara. 1997. Reconsolidation of memory after its reactivation. Behavioural Brain Research 84(1–2). 241–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4328(96)00153-2.Suche in Google Scholar
Ramsey, William M. 2007. Representation reconsidered. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511597954Suche in Google Scholar
Roediger, Henry L. 1980. Memory metaphors in cognitive psychology. Memory & Cognition 8(3). 231–246. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197611.Suche in Google Scholar
Rothbart, Daniel. 1984. The semantics of metaphor and the structure of science. Philosophy of Science 51(4). 595–615. https://doi.org/10.1086/289207.Suche in Google Scholar
Scoville, William & Brenda Milner. 1957. Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 20(1). 11–21.10.1136/jnnp.20.1.11Suche in Google Scholar
Shea, Nicholas. 2018. Representation in cognitive science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198812883.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Singer, Annabelle C., Margaret F. Carr, Mattias P. Karlsson & M. Loren Frank. 2013. Hippocampal SWR activity predicts correct decisions during the initial learning of an alternation task. Neuron 77(6). 1163–1173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.01.027.Suche in Google Scholar
Sternberg, Robert. 1990. Metaphors of mind: Conceptions of the nature of intelligence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Suchman, Lucy. 2007. Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511808418Suche in Google Scholar
Sutherland, Gary R. & Bruce McNaughton. 2000. Memory trace reactivation in hippocampal and neocortical neuronal ensembles. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 10(2). 180–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-4388(00)00079-9.Suche in Google Scholar
Swoyer, Chris. 1991. Structural representation and surrogative reasoning. Synthese 87(3). 449–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00499820.Suche in Google Scholar
Teyler, Timothy J. & Jerry W. Rudy. 2007. The hippocampal indexing theory and episodic memory: Updating the index. Hippocampus 17(12). 1158–1169. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.20350.Suche in Google Scholar
Tolman, Edward C. 1948. Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review 55(4). 189. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0061626.Suche in Google Scholar
Van Gelder, Timothy & Robert F. Port. 1995. It’s about time: An overview of the dynamical approach to cognition. Mind as Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition 1. 43.Suche in Google Scholar
Vito, Stefania de & Sergio Della Sala. 2011. Predicting the future. Cortex 47(8). 1018–1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2011.02.020.Suche in Google Scholar
Watkins, Michael J. 1990. Mediationism and the obfuscation of memory. American Psychologist 45(3). 328–335. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.45.3.328.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Accommodating representation in the neuroscience of memory: a conceptual blending analysis of replay and preplay in hippocampal place cell research
- Linguistic typology of motion events in visual narratives
- Analysing the elements of a scene – An integrative approach to metaphor identification in a naturalistic setting
- Reading perspectives on feeling and the semiotics of emotion
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Accommodating representation in the neuroscience of memory: a conceptual blending analysis of replay and preplay in hippocampal place cell research
- Linguistic typology of motion events in visual narratives
- Analysing the elements of a scene – An integrative approach to metaphor identification in a naturalistic setting
- Reading perspectives on feeling and the semiotics of emotion
