Startseite Logical and practical advantages of double consciousness
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Logical and practical advantages of double consciousness

  • Donna E. West

    Donna E. West (PhD., Cornell University) is a Professor of Linguistics at the State University of New York, Cortland. For nearly forty years, she has presented and published internationally (70 plus articles/chapters) on Peirce’s semiotic. She currently serves on the Board of the International Association for Cognitive Semiotics, as well as several editorial boards. Her 2013 book, Deictic imaginings: Semiosis at work and at play, investigates the role of Index in the acquisition of demonstrative pronouns. Her 2016 edited volume on Peirce’s concept of habit is a global collaboration with twelve nations being represented. West has nearly completed her new book on scaffolding abductive reasoning via the narrative structure of Peirce’s double consciousness. She is presently editing the “Mathematics and cognition” section for the Handbook on cognitive mathematics (Springer, forthcoming). Her own contribution to the section entails a treatment of how chunking in working memory underlies abductive reasoning.

    EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 14. Juli 2021
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This account augments Peirce's concept of consciousness in two ways: 1) it highlights its double nature and 2) it explores how this two-sided consciousness advances modal logic. Double consciousness facilitates inferencing in that differences between old information and new information are noticed; logical conflicts between the two can then be explored and resolved expeditiously. This often natural but a forced need to consider new facts in light of old ones provides a scaffold for a higher level of consciousness, namely, self and heterocriticism — inciting interpreters to attend to the new facts, to intentionally compare facts and propositions, and to reflect upon the reasons for their comparative efficacy. In his call to double consciousness, Peirce enlivens us to draw deeply from the well of logical and practical affordances — surprising events and sustained interactive platforms. Peirce’s call requires us to utilize consciousness from its very basic level: attention to stimuli, awareness of unexpected facts, mental wrestling of effort and resistance, and finally synthetic consciousness which engenders binding frames of legitimate meanings from reliable genres. In this effort, Peirce informs us that the most reliable inferencing can only be ascertained by weighing ego with non-ego — through an active course of careful synthesis.


Corresponding author: Donna E. West, State University of New York at Cortland, Cortland, NY, USA, E-mail:

About the author

Donna E. West

Donna E. West (PhD., Cornell University) is a Professor of Linguistics at the State University of New York, Cortland. For nearly forty years, she has presented and published internationally (70 plus articles/chapters) on Peirce’s semiotic. She currently serves on the Board of the International Association for Cognitive Semiotics, as well as several editorial boards. Her 2013 book, Deictic imaginings: Semiosis at work and at play, investigates the role of Index in the acquisition of demonstrative pronouns. Her 2016 edited volume on Peirce’s concept of habit is a global collaboration with twelve nations being represented. West has nearly completed her new book on scaffolding abductive reasoning via the narrative structure of Peirce’s double consciousness. She is presently editing the “Mathematics and cognition” section for the Handbook on cognitive mathematics (Springer, forthcoming). Her own contribution to the section entails a treatment of how chunking in working memory underlies abductive reasoning.

References

Baddeley, Alan. 2007. Working memory, thought, and action. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198528012.001.0001.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198528012.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Bellucci, Francesco. 2014. Logic, considered as semeiotic: On Peirce’s philosophy of logic. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 50(4). 523–547. https://doi.org/10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.50.4.523.Suche in Google Scholar

Colapietro, Vincent. 1989. Peirce’s approach to the self: A semiotic perspective on human subjectivity. Albany: SUNY Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Cooke, Elizabeth F. 2012. Peirce on wonder, inquiry, and the ubiquity of surprise. Chinese Semiotic Studies 8. 178–200. https://doi.org/10.1515/css-2012-0037.Suche in Google Scholar

Davies, Martin & Max Coltheart. 2020. A Peircean pathway from surprising facts to new beliefs. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 56(3). 400–426. https://doi.org/10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.56.3.05.Suche in Google Scholar

Deely, John. 2015. From semiosis to semioethics. In Peter P. Trifonas (ed.), The international handbook of semiotics, 771–789. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9404-6_36.Suche in Google Scholar

Graybosch, Anthony. 1993. Abduction, justification, and realism. In Edward Moore (ed.), Charles S. Peirce and the philosophy of science: Papers from the Harvard Sesquicentennial Congress, 89–104. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Houser, Nathan. 1983. Peirce’s general taxonomy of consciousness. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 19(4). 331–359.Suche in Google Scholar

Ibri, Ivo Assad. 2015. Kósmos Noetós: The metaphysical architecture of Charles S. Peirce, Henry Mallett (trans.). Heidelberg: Springer.Suche in Google Scholar

Innis, Robert. 2014. The bottomless lake of consciousness. In Torkild Thellefsen & Bent Sørensen (eds.), Charles Sanders Peirce in his own words: 100 years of semiotics, communication, and cognition, 81–86. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9781614516415.81Suche in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1866–1913 (1931–1958). The collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Charles Hartshorne & Paul Weiss (eds. vols. I–VI), Arthur Burks (ed. vols. VII–VIII). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Cited as CP.Suche in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1866–1913 (1967–1971). Manuscripts held in the Houghton Library of Harvard University, as identified by Richard Robin. In Annotated catalogue of the papers of Charles S. Peirce, 37–57. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1967, and in The Peirce papers: A supplementary catalogue, Transactions of the C.S. Peirce Society 7: 37–57. Cited as R.Suche in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1866–1913 (1992–1998). The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, Nathan Houser & Christian Kloesel (eds. vol. 1), Peirce Edition Project (eds. vol. 2). Bloomington: University of Indiana Press. Cited as EP.Suche in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1903 (1997). Pragmatism as a principle and method of right thinking: The 1903 Harvard lectures on pragmatism, Patricia Turrisi (ed.). Albany: SUNY Press. Cited as PPM.Suche in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1882–1914 (2021). Logic of the future: Writings on existential graphs, Vol. 1: The Logical Tracts, Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen (ed.). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Cited as LoF.Suche in Google Scholar

Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko. 2006. Signs of logic: Peircean themes of the philosophy of language, games, and communication. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar

Saylor, Megan. 2004. Twelve- and 16-month-old infants recognize properties of mentioned absent things. Developmental Science 7(5). 599–611. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00383.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2015. Dicisigns: Peirce’s semiotic doctrine of propositions. Synthese 192. 1019–1054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0406-5.Suche in Google Scholar

Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2021. Conscious control as criterion for reasoning. Cognitive Semiotics. this issue.10.1515/cogsem-2021-2039Suche in Google Scholar

Tomasello, Michael. 2014. A natural history of human thinking. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674726369.Suche in Google Scholar

West, Donna. 2016a. Peirce’s creative hallucination in the ontogeny of abductive reasoning. Public Journal of Semiotics 7(2). 51–72.10.37693/pjos.2016.7.16469Suche in Google Scholar

West, Donna. 2016b. Indexical scaffolds to habit-formation. In Donna West & Myrdene Anderson (eds.), Consensus on Peirce’s Concept of Habit, 215–240. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45920-2_13.Suche in Google Scholar

West, Donna. 2018. Deely’s extension of Peirce’s thirdness: Pregenerativity. The American Journal of Semiotics 34(1–2). 39–64. https://doi.org/10.5840/ajs201841835.Suche in Google Scholar

West, Donna. 2019a. Index as scaffold to logical and final interpretants: Compulsive urges and modal submissions. [Special issue]. Semiotica 228. 333–353. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2018-0085.Suche in Google Scholar

West, Donna. 2019b. Index as scaffold to the subjunctivity of early performatives. The American Journal of Semiotics. https://doi.org/10.5840/ajs201971551. (Online ahead of print).Suche in Google Scholar

West, Donna. 2020. Perfectivity in Peirce’s energetic interpretant. Cognitio 21(1). 152–164. https://doi.org/10.23925/2316-5278.2020v21i1p152-164.Suche in Google Scholar

West, Donna. 2021. Auditory hallucinations as internal discourse: The intersection between Peirce’s endoporeusis and double consciousness. In Geoffrey Owens & Donna West (eds.), Semiotics 2019. Charlottesville: Philosophy Documentation Center Press.10.5840/cpsem20195Suche in Google Scholar

West, Donna. In press. Habit and semiosis: Habit across the categories. In Jamin Pelkey (ed.), Bloomsbury encyclopedia of semiotics, volume I: History and semiosis. London: Bloomsbury, in press.Suche in Google Scholar

Wilson, Aaron. 2016. Peirce’s empiricism: Its roots and its originality. Lanham: Lexington Press. https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526111050.00008.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-03-13
Accepted: 2021-03-28
Published Online: 2021-07-14

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 22.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cogsem-2021-2038/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen