Creativity within and outside the linguistic system

References

Adger, David. 2003. Core syntax: A minimalist approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199243709.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Adger, David. 2019. Language unlimited: The science behind our most creative power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Andersen, Henning. 1973. Abductive and deductive change. Language 49(4). 765–793. https://doi.org/10.2307/412063.Search in Google Scholar

Bergs, Alexander. 2016. Under pressure: Norms, rules, and coercion in linguistic analyses and literary readings. In Burke, Michael & Emily T. Troscianko (eds.), Cognitive literary science: Dialogues between literature and cognition, 279–302. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190496869.003.0015Search in Google Scholar

Bergs, Alexander. 2018. Learn the rules like a pro, so you can break them like an artist (Picasso): Linguistic aberrancy from a constructional perspective. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 66(3). 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1515/zaa-2018-0025.Search in Google Scholar

Bicchieri, Cristina. 2017. Norms in the wild. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190622046.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Black, Max. 1993. More about metaphor. In Ortony, Andrew (ed.), Metaphor and thought, 19–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173865.004Search in Google Scholar

Boeckx, Cedric. 2006. Linguistic minimalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199247455.013.0018Search in Google Scholar

Brodbeck, Karl-Heinz. 2006. Neue Trends in der Kreativitätsforschung. Psychologie in Österreich 4 and 5. 246–253.Search in Google Scholar

Burridge, Kate & Alexander Bergs. 2017. Understanding language change. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315463018Search in Google Scholar

Carlson, Stephanie M. & Danielle M. Beck. 2009. Symbols as tools in development of executive function. In Winsler, Adam, Charles Fernyhough, Ignacio Montero (eds.), Private speech, executive functioning, and the development of verbal self-regulation, 163–175. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511581533.014Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.21236/AD0616323Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1976. Reflections on language. London: Temple Smith.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2003. For reasons of state. London: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, Jonathan D. 2017. Cognitive control: Core constructs and current considerations. In Egner, Tobias (ed.), The Wiley handbook of cognitive control, 3–28. Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell.10.1002/9781118920497.ch1Search in Google Scholar

D'Agostino, Fred. 1984. Chomsky on creativity. Synthese 58(1). 85–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00485363.Search in Google Scholar

Fox, Kieran C. R. & Kalina Christoff. 2018. Introduction: Toward an interdisciplinary science of spontaneous thought. In Fox, Kieran C. R. & Kalina Christoff (eds.), The Oxford handbook of spontaneous thought: Mind-wandering, creativity, and dreaming, 3–10. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gentner, Dedre & Brian Bowdle. 2008. Metaphor as structure mapping. In Gibbs, Raymond W.Jr. (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought, 109−128. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511816802.008Search in Google Scholar

Gentner, Dedre. 1983. Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science 7. 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0702_3.Search in Google Scholar

Grice, Paul H. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Cole, Peter & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics: 3 Speech Acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368811_003Search in Google Scholar

Hesse, Mary B. 1970. Models and analogies in science, 2nd edn. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Thomas & Graeme Trousdale (eds.). 2013. The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Keller, Rudi. 1974. Zum Begriff der Regel. In Heringer, Hans-Jürgen (ed.), Seminar: Der Regelbegriff in der praktischen Semantik, 10–24. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Search in Google Scholar

Keller, Rudi. 1994. On language change: The invisible hand in language. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

King, Robert Desmond. 1969. Historical linguistics and generative grammar. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Search in Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul. 1968. Linguistic universals and linguistic change. In Bach, Emmon & Robert T. Harms (eds.), Universals in linguistic theory, 170–202. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.Search in Google Scholar

Koechlin, Etienne, Chrystele Ody & Frédérique Kouneiher. 2003. The architecture of cognitive control in the human prefrontal cortex. Science 302. 1181–1185. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1088545.Search in Google Scholar

Kompa, Nikola. Forthcoming. Insight by metaphor: On the epistemic role of metaphor in science. In A. Heidenreich and K. Mecke (eds.), Physics and literature: Theory – popularization – aestheticization. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110481112-002Search in Google Scholar

Kompa, Nikola. 2019. Language evolution and linguistic norms. In Roughley, Neil & Kurt Bayertz (eds.), The normative animal? on the anthropological significance of social, moral, and linguistic norms, 245–264. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190846466.003.0012Search in Google Scholar

Kompa, Nikola. 2020. On the coevolution of language and cognition: Gricean intentions meet Lewisean conventions. In Loukanova, Roussanka (ed.), Logic and algorithms in computational linguistics 2018. 177–205. Cham: Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30077-7.Search in Google Scholar

Kompa, Nikola. 2015. Metaphern. In Kompa, Nikola (ed.), Handbuch Sprachphilosophie, 341–351. Stuttgart: Metzler.10.1007/978-3-476-05362-6Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lauwers, Peter & Dominique Willems. 2011. Coercion: Definition and challenges, current approaches, and new trends. Linguistics 49(6). 1219–1235. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2011.034.Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, David. 1969. Convention. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lightfoot, David. 1999. The development of language. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Meisel, Jurgen, Martin Elsig & Esther Rinke. 2013. The child as the locus and agent of linguistic change. In Meisel, Jurgen, Martin Elsig & Esther Rinke (eds.), Language acquisition and change: A morphosyntactic perspective, 52–72. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.3366/edinburgh/9780748642250.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Miller, Earl K. & Jonathan D. Cohen. 2001. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience 24. 167–202. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167.Search in Google Scholar

Müller, Stefan. 2018. Grammatical theory. Berlin: Langsci Press.Search in Google Scholar

Newmeyer, Frederick J. 2005. Possible and probable languages: A generative perspective on linguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274338.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Pinker, Steven. 1999. Words and rules: The ingredients of language. New York: Harper Perennial.Search in Google Scholar

Plag, Ingo. 2003. Word Formation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511841323Search in Google Scholar

Pustejovsky, James & Pierrette Bouillon. 1994. On the proper role of semantic typing in coercion. Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Computation Linguistics 2. 706–771.10.3115/991250.991259Search in Google Scholar

Rescher, Nicholas. 1989. Rationality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rescorla, Michael. 2017. Convention. In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, summer 2017 edition.Search in Google Scholar

Robins, Robert Henry. 1997. A short history of linguistics, 4th edn. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Runco, Mark A. & Robert S. Albert. 2010. Creativity research: A historical view. In Kaufman, James C. & Robert J. Sternberg (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity, 3–19. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511763205.003Search in Google Scholar

Sampson, Geoffrey. 2016. Two ideas of creativity. In Hinton, Martin (ed.), Evidence, experiment, and argument in linguistics and philosophy of language, 15–26. Bern: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Sawyer, R. Keith. 2012. Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Scherliess, Volker. 2005. Die Sinfonien. In Leopold, Silke (ed.), Mozart-Handbuch, 286–293. Kassel: Bärenreiter-Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles. 2016. The language animal: The full shape of the human linguistic capacity. Cambridge: Bellknap Press.10.4159/9780674970250Search in Google Scholar

Van Gelderen, Elly. 2016. Generative framework and approaches. In Kytö, Merja & Päivi Pahta (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of English historical linguistics, 79–94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139600231.006Search in Google Scholar

Von Wright, Georg Henrik. 1963. Norm and action: A logical enquiry. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Sterling L. 1953/2003. Philosophische untersuchungen. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Search in Google Scholar

Whorf, Benjamin Lee. 1956. Language, thought, reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ziegler, Debra. 2007. A word of caution on coercion. Journal of Pragmatics 39(5). 990–1028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.014.Search in Google Scholar