Entrenchment effects in code-mixing: individual differences in German-English bilingual children

References

Ambridge, Ben, Libby Barak, Elizabeth Wonnacott, Colin Bannard & Giovanni Sala. 2018. Effects of Both preemption and entrenchment in the retreat from verb overgeneralization errors: Four reanalyses, an extended replication, and a meta-analytic synthesis. Collabra: Psychology 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.133.Suche in Google Scholar

Ambridge, Ben & Chloe Ambridge. 2020. The retreat from transitive-causative overgeneralization errors. In Caroline F. Rowland, Anna L. Theakston, Ben Ambridge & Katherine E. Twomey (eds.), Current perspectives on child language acquisition, 113–130. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.27.05amb.Suche in Google Scholar

Ambridge, Ben & Elena Lieven. 2011. Child language acquisition: Contrasting theoretical approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511975073Suche in Google Scholar

Ambridge, Ben & Elena Lieven. 2015. A constructivist account of child language acquisition. In Brian MacWhinney & William O’Grady (eds.), Handbook of language emergence, 478–510. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.10.1002/9781118346136.ch22Suche in Google Scholar

Arnon, Inbal & Neal Snider. 2010. More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory and Language 62(1). 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.09.005.Suche in Google Scholar

Arnon, Inbal & Morten H. Christiansen. 2017. The role of multiword building blocks in explaining L1-L2 differences. Topics in Cognitive Science 9(3). 621–636. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12271.Suche in Google Scholar

Backus, Ad. 2014. Towards a usage-based account of language change: Implications of contact linguistics for linguistic theory. In Robert Nicolaï (ed.), Questioning language contact. Limits of contact, contact at its limits, 91–118. Leiden/Boston: Brill.10.1163/9789004279056_005Suche in Google Scholar

Bannard, Colin & Danielle Matthews. 2008. Stored word sequences in language learning: The effect of familiarity on children’s repetition of four-word combinations. Psychological Science 19(3). 241–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02075.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Bates, Elizabeth, Inge Bretherton, Lynn Snyder, Marjorie Beeghly, Cecilia Shore, Sandra McNew, Vicki Carlson, Carol Williamson & Andrew Garrison, et al.. 1988. From first words to grammar: Individual differences and dissociable mechanisms. New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Bates, Elizabeth, Philip Dale & Donna Thal. 1995. Individual differences and their implications for theories of language development. In Paul Fletcher & Brian MacWhinney (eds.), Handbook of child language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.10.1111/b.9780631203124.1996.00005.xSuche in Google Scholar

Bates, Elizabeth & Judith Goodman. 1997. On the inseparability of grammar and the lexicon: Evidence from acquisition, aphasia and real-time processing. Language and Cognitive Processes 12(5–6). 507–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/016909697386628.Suche in Google Scholar

Bernardini, Petra & Suzanne Schlyter. 2004. Growing syntactic structure and code-mixing in the weaker language: The Ivy hypothesis. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7(1). 49–69. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728904001270.Suche in Google Scholar

Birdsong, David. 2016. Dominance in bilingualism: Foundation of measurement, with insights from the study of handedness. In Language dominance in bilingualism. Issues of measurement and operationalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107375345.005Suche in Google Scholar

Bornstein, Marc H. & Diane L. Putnick. 2012. Stability of language in childhood: A multiage, multidomain, multimeasure, and multisource study. Developmental Psychology 48(2). 477–491. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025889.Suche in Google Scholar

Bowerman, Melissa. 1981. The child’s expression of meaning: Expanding relationships among lexicon, syntax, and morphology. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 379: 172–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1981.tb42008.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan & Joanne Scheibman. 1999. The effect of usage on degrees of constituency: The reduction of don’t in English. Linguistics 37. 575–596.10.1515/ling.37.4.575Suche in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 2010. Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511750526Suche in Google Scholar

Cameron-Faulkner, Thea, Elena Lieven & Michael Tomasello. 2003. A construction based analysis of child directed speech. Cognitive Science 27(6). 843–873.10.1207/s15516709cog2706_2Suche in Google Scholar

Chan, Angel, Elena Lieven & Michael Tomasello. 2009. Children’s understanding of the agent-patient relations in the transitive construction: Cross-linguistic comparisons between Cantonese, German, and English, Cognitive Linguistics 20(2). 267–300. https://doi.org/10.1515/COGL.2009.015.Suche in Google Scholar

Chouinard, Michelle M & Eve V. Clark. 2003. Adult reformulations of child errors as negative evidence. Journal of Child Language 30(3). 637–670. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000903005701.Suche in Google Scholar

Crain, Stephen & Diane Lillo-Martin. 1999. An introduction to linguistic theory and language acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Suche in Google Scholar

Culicover, Peter W. & Ray Jackendoff. 2005. Simpler syntax. Oxford University Press on Demand.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199271092.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2019. Individual differences in grammatical knowledge. In Cognitive linguistics – Key topics. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110626438-012.Suche in Google Scholar

Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2014. Recycling utterances: A speaker’s guide to sentence processing. Cognitive Linguistics 25. 617–653. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0057.Suche in Google Scholar

Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2012. Different speakers, different grammars: Individual differences in native language attainment. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 2(3). 219–253. https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/10.1075/lab.2.3.01dab.10.1075/lab.2.3.01dabSuche in Google Scholar

Dąbrowska, Ewa, Caroline Rowland & Anna, Theakston. 2009. The acquisition of questions with long-distance dependencies. Cognitive Linguistics 20(3). 571–597. https://doi.org/10.1515/COGL.2009.025.Suche in Google Scholar

Dąbrowska, Ewa & James Street. 2006. Individual differences in language attainment: Comprehension of passive sentences by native and non-native English speakers. Language Sciences 28. 604–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2005.11.014.Suche in Google Scholar

Dąbrowska, Ewa & Elena Lieven. 2005. Towards a lexically specific grammar of children’s question constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 16. 437–474. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2005.16.3.437.Suche in Google Scholar

De Houwer, A. 1990. The acquisition of two languages from birth: A case study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511519789Suche in Google Scholar

Diessel, Holger. 2019. The grammar network. How linguistic structure is shaped by language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108671040Suche in Google Scholar

Dittmar, Miriam, Kirsten Abbot-Smith, Elena Lieven & Michael Tomasello. 2008. German children’s comprehension of word order and case marking in causative sentences. Child Development 79(4). 1152–1167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01181.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Ellis, Nick C., Ute Römer & Matthew Brook O’Donnel. 2016. Usage-based approaches to language acquisition and processing: Cognitive and corpus investigations of construction grammar. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.Suche in Google Scholar

Frank, Michael, Mika Braginsky, Daniel Yurovsky & Virginia Marchman. 2017. Wordbank: An open repository for developmental vocabulary data. Journal of Child Language 44(3), 677–694. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000916000209.Suche in Google Scholar

Gaskins, Dorota, Maria Frick, Elina Palola & Antje E. Quick. 2019. A usage-driven analysis of naturalistic code-switching data from three bilingual 2-3-year olds with English as one of their two languages and Polish, German, or Finnish as the other. Applied Linguistics Review. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2019-0030.Suche in Google Scholar

Genesee, Fred, Isabelle Boivin & Elena Nicoladis. 1996. Talking with strangers: a study of bilingual children’s communicative competence. Applied Psycholinguistics 17. 427–442. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400008183.Suche in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Grosjean, François. 2001. The bilingual’s language modes. In Janet L. Nicol (ed.), Explaining linguistics. One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing. Blackwell Publishing.10.4324/9781003060406-39Suche in Google Scholar

Hart, Betty & Todd R. Risley. 1995. Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD, US: Paul H Brookes Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar

Havron, Naomi & Inbal Arnon. 2021. Starting big: The effect of unit size on language learning in children and adults. Journal of Child Language. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000920000264.Suche in Google Scholar

Kemp, Nenagh, Elena Lieven & Michael Tomasello. 2005. Young children’s knowledge of the determiner and adjective categories. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 48(3). 592–609. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2005/041).Suche in Google Scholar

Kidd, Evan, Seamus Donnelly, H Morten & Christiansen. 2018. Individual differences in language acquisition and processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 22(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.11.006.Suche in Google Scholar

Kirjavainen, Minna, Anna, Theakston & Elena Lieven. 2009. Can input explain children’s me-for-I errors? Journal of Child Language 36. 1091–1114. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000909009350.Suche in Google Scholar

Koch, Nikolas. 2019. Schemata im Erstspracherwerb. Eine Traceback-Studie für das Deutsche. De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110623857Suche in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald. 2009. Cognitive (Construction) Grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 20(1). 167–176.10.1515/COGL.2009.010Suche in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. I. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Lieven, Elena, Dorothé Salomo & Michael Tomasello. 2009. Two-year-old children’s production of multiword utterances: A usage-based analysis. Cognitive Linguistics 20(3). 481–508. https://doi.org/10.1515/COGL.2009.022.Suche in Google Scholar

Lieven, Elena, Heike Behrens, Jennifer Speares & Michael Tomasello. 2003. Early syntactic creativity: A usage-based approach. Journal of Child Language 30. 333–370.10.1017/S0305000903005592Suche in Google Scholar

Lieven, Elena, Julian Pine & Gillian Baldwin. 1997. Lexically-based learning and early grammatical development. Journal of Child Language 24(1). 187–219. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000996002930.Suche in Google Scholar

MacWhinney, Brian. 2000. The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Suche in Google Scholar

Miorelli, Luca. 2017. The development of morpho-syntactic competence in Italian-speaking children: A usage-based approach. Newcastle upon Tyne: Northumbria University. http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/39990.Suche in Google Scholar

Myers-Scotton, Carol. 1997. Duelling languages: Grammatical structure in code-switching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Petitto, Laura Ann, Marina Katerelos, Bronna Levy, Kristine Gauna, Karine Tétrault & Vittoria Ferraro. 2001. Bilingual signed and spoken language acquisition from birth: Implications for mechanisms underlying bilingual language acquisition. Journal of Child Language 28(2). 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000901004718.Suche in Google Scholar

Quick, Antje Endesfelder, Elena Lieven, Malinda Carpenter & Michael Tomasello. 2018a. Identifying partially schematic units in the code-mixing of an English and German speaking child. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 8(4). 477–501.10.1075/lab.15049.quiSuche in Google Scholar

Quick, Antje Endesfelder, Ad Backus & Elena Lieven. 2018b. Partially schematic constructions as engines of development: Evidence from German-English bilingual acquisition. In Eline Zenner, Ad Backus & Esme Winter-Froemel (eds.), Cognitive contact linguistics, 279–304. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110619430-010Suche in Google Scholar

Quick, Antje Endesfelder, Stefan Hartmann, Ad Backus & Elena Lieven. 2019. Entrenchment and productivity: The role of input in the code-mixing of a German-English bilingual child. Applied Linguistics Review 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2019-0027.Suche in Google Scholar

Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2020. The dynamics of the linguistic system. Usage, conventionalization and entrenchment. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/oso/9780198814771.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Seidenberg, Mark S. 1997. Language acquisition and use: Learning and applying probabilistic constraints. Science 275(5306). 1599–1603. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.275.5306.1599.Suche in Google Scholar

Street, James & Ewa Dąbrowska. 2010. More individual differences in Language Attainment: How much do adult native speakers of English know about passives and quantifiers? Lingua 120. 2080–2094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.01.004.Suche in Google Scholar

Tomasello, Michael. 2000. First steps toward a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cognitive Linguistics 74. 209–253.10.1515/cogl.2001.012Suche in Google Scholar

Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Vogt, Paul & Elena Lieven. 2010. Verifying theories of language acquisition using computer models of language evolution. Adaptive Behavior 18(1). 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059712309350970.Suche in Google Scholar

Wray, Alison. 2002. Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511519772Suche in Google Scholar

Eline Zenner, Ad Backus & Esme Winter-Froemel (eds.). 2019. Cognitive contact linguistics. Placing usage, meaning and mind at the core of contact-induced variation and change. (Cognitive linguistics research, Vol. 62). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110619430Suche in Google Scholar