Iconicity and systematicity in phonaesthemes: A cross-linguistic study

References

Abelin, Åsa. 1999. Studies in sound symbolism [Gothenburg Monographs in Linguistics 17]. Gothenburg, Sweden: University of Gothenburg.Suche in Google Scholar

Abelin, Åsa. 2012. Relative frequency and semantic relations as organizing principles for the psychological reality of phonaesthemes. In Gabriella Rundblad, Aga Tytus, Olivia Knapton & Chris Tang (eds.), Selected articles from UK-CLA meetings, vol. 1, 128–145. London: The UK Cognitive Linguistics Association. http://uk-cla.org.uk/proceedings/volume_1/21-11.Suche in Google Scholar

Abelin, Åsa. 2015. Phonaesthemes and sound symbolism in Swedish brand names. Ampersand 2. 19–29.10.1016/j.amper.2014.12.001Suche in Google Scholar

Abramova, Ekaterina, Raquel Fernández & Frederico Sangati. 2013. Automatic labeling of phonaesthemic senses. In M. Knauff, M. Pauen & N. Sebanz (eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 1696–1701. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Suche in Google Scholar

Argoud, Line. 2010. Réalité des idéophonaes anglais (phonaesthèmes): Propositions dans le cadre d’une approche de linguistique cognitive. E-rea, Revue électronique d’études sur le monde anglophone, 8.1. http://erea.revues.org/1294.10.4000/erea.1294Suche in Google Scholar

Bauer, Laurie. 2015. English phonotactics. English Language and Linguistics 19(3). 437–475.10.1017/S1360674315000179Suche in Google Scholar

Bergen, Benjamin. 2004. The psychological reality of phonaesthemes. Language 80(2). 290–311.10.1353/lan.2004.0056Suche in Google Scholar

Blasi, Damián E., Søren Wichmann, Harald Hammarström, Peter F. Stadler & Morten H. Christiansen. 2016. Sound-meaning association biases evidenced across thousands of languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113(39). 10818–10823.10.1073/pnas.1605782113Suche in Google Scholar

Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Holt.Suche in Google Scholar

Blust, Robert. 1988. Austronesian root theory: An essay on the limits of morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.19Suche in Google Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight L. 1980. Language, the loaded weapon: The use and abuse of language today. New York: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Bolinger, Dwiht L. 1950. Rime, assonance, and morpheme analysis. Word 6(2). 117–136.10.1080/00437956.1950.11659374Suche in Google Scholar

Bottineau, Didier. 2008. The submorphemic conjecture in English: Towards a distributed model of the cognitive dynamics of submorphemes. Lexis 2. 19–42.10.4000/lexis.688Suche in Google Scholar

Brunelle, Marc & Lê Thi Xuyên. 2013. Why is sound symbolism so common in Vietnamese? In Jeffrey P. Williams (ed.), The aesthetics of grammar: Sound and meaning in the languages of mainland Southeast Asia, 83–98. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139030489.006Suche in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. 2001. Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511612886Suche in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. 2010. Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511750526Suche in Google Scholar

Childs, George T. 2003. An introduction to African languages. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.121Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1981. On the representation of form and function. The Linguistic Review 1(1). 3–40.10.1515/tlir.1981.1.1.3Suche in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2003. Typology and universals, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Davis, Sally M. & Michael H. Kelly. 1997. Knowledge of the English noun-verb stress difference by native and nonnative speakers. Journal of Memory and Language 36(3). 445–460.10.1006/jmla.1996.2503Suche in Google Scholar

Dell, François. 1995. Consonant clusters and phonological syllables in French. Lingua 95. 5–26.10.1016/0024-3841(95)90099-3Suche in Google Scholar

Diffloth, Gérard. 1994. i: big, a: small. In Leanne Hinton, Johanna Nichols & John J. Ohala (eds.), Sound symbolism, 107–114. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511751806.008Suche in Google Scholar

Dingemanse, Mark, Damián E. Blasi, Gary Lupyan, Morten H. Christiansen & Padraic Monaghan. 2015. Arbitrariness, iconicity, and systematicity in language. Trends in Cognitive Science 19(10). 603–615.10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.013Suche in Google Scholar

Drellishak, Scott. 2006. Statistical techniques for detecting and validating phonaesthemes. In LSA (ed.), 81st Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America (LSA). Meeting Handbook, 116. Anaheim, CA: Linguistic Society of America. http://www.linguisticsociety.org/sites/default/files/2007_MeetingHandbook.pdf. Full text available at http://depts.washington.edu/uwcl/matrix/sfd/Drellishak%20-%20Phonaesthemes.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar

Firth, John. 1930. Speech. London: Oxford University Press. (reprinted in The Tongues of Men & Speech, 1964, pp. 180–194). London: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Fischer, Andreas. 1999. What, if anything, is phonological iconicity? In Max Nänny & Olga Fischer (eds.), Iconicity in language and literature, vol. 1, 123–133. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/ill.1.12fisSuche in Google Scholar

Fordyce, James F. 1988. Studies in sound symbolism with special reference to English. Ph.D. dissertation. Los Angeles: University of California.Suche in Google Scholar

Fougeron, Cécile & Caroline L. Smith. 1999. French. In IPA (ed.), Handbook of the international phonetic association, 78–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Francesconi, Armando. 2011. La traducción de los componentes fonosimbólicos del lenguaje. Espéculo, Revista Electrónica Cuatrimestral de Estudios Literarios 48. https://pendientedemigracion.ucm.es/info/especulo/numero48/fonosimb.html.Suche in Google Scholar

Friedman, Victor A. 1993. Macedonian. In Bernard Comrie & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), The Slavonic languages, 249–305. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Groen, B. M. 1977. Structural description of the Macedonian dialect of Dihovo. Lisse: The Peter de Ridder Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Haiman, John. 1985. Iconicity in syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.6Suche in Google Scholar

Hamano, Shoko. 1998. The sound-symbolic system of Japanese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Hinton, Leanne, Nichols Johanna & John J. Ohala. 1994. Introduction: Sound-symbolic processes. In Leanne Hinton, Nichols Johanna & John J. Ohala (eds.), Sound symbolism, 1–14. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511751806.001Suche in Google Scholar

Hock, Hans Heinrich & Brian Joseph. 1996. language history, language change, and language relationship: An introduction to historical and comparative linguistics. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Hockett, Charles F. 1960. The origin of speech. Scientific American 203(3). 88–96.10.1038/scientificamerican0960-88Suche in Google Scholar

Honikman, Beatrice. 1964. Articulatory settings. In David Abercrombie (ed.), In honour of Daniel Jones: Papers contributed on the occasion of his eightieth birthday, 12 September 1961, 73–84. London: Longmans.Suche in Google Scholar

Householder, Fred W. 1946. On the problem of sound and meaning: An English phonaestheme. Word 2. 83–84. (As part of Herzog, George (1946). Summary of papers and discussion in the Linguistic Circle of New York. Word, 2(1). 81–85.).10.1080/00437956.1946.11659279Suche in Google Scholar

Hualde, José I. 2005. The sounds of Spanish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Hunter-Smith, Sarah. 2007. Understanding without Babblefish: Reviewing the Evidence for Universal Sound Symbolism in Natural Languages. Swarthmore, PA: Senior thesis Swarthmore College. https://www.swarthmore.edu/sites/default/files/assets/documents/linguistics/2007_hunter-smith_sarah.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar

Hutchins, Sharon S. 1998. The psychological reality, variability, and compositionality of English phonaesthemes. Atlanta, GA: Emory University dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman & Linda R. Waugh. 2002. The sound shape of language, 3rd edn. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110889451Suche in Google Scholar

Jespersen, Otto. 1922. Language: Its nature, development and origin. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.Suche in Google Scholar

Kelly, Michael H. 1988. Phonological biases in grammatical category shifts. Journal of Memory and Language 27(4). 343–358.10.1016/0749-596X(88)90060-5Suche in Google Scholar

Kilani-Schoch, Marianne & U. Dressler Wolfgang. 2005. Morphologie naturelle et flexion du verbe français. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar

Kilgarriff, Adam, Vít Baisa, Jan Bušta, Miloš Jakubíček, Vojtěch Kovář, Jan Michelfeit, Pavel Rychlý & Vít Suchomel. 2014. The sketch engine: Ten years on. Lexicography 1(1). 7–36.10.1007/s40607-014-0009-9Suche in Google Scholar

Kim, K. O. 1977. Sound symbolism in Korean. Journal of Linguistics 13(1). 67–75.10.1017/S0022226700005211Suche in Google Scholar

Köhler, Wolfgang. 1947 [1929]. Gestalt psychology, (2^nd edition in 1947). New York, NY: Horace Liveright.Suche in Google Scholar

Kok, Kasper I. & Alan Cienki. 2016. Cognitive grammar and gesture: Points of convergence, advances and challenges. Cognitive Linguistics 27(1). 67–100.10.1515/cog-2015-0087Suche in Google Scholar

Kwon, Nahyun. 2016. Empirically observed iconicity levels of English phonaesthemes. Public Journal of Semiotics 7(2). 73–93.10.37693/pjos.2016.7.16470Suche in Google Scholar

Kwon, Nahyun & Erich R. Round. 2015. Phonaesthemes in morphological theory. Morphology 25(1). 1–27.10.1007/s11525-014-9250-zSuche in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Lockwood, Gwilym & Mark Dingemanse. 2015. Iconicity in the lab: A review of behavioral, developmental, and neuroimaging research into sound-symbolism. Frontiers in Psychology 6(Article). 1246. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01246.Suche in Google Scholar

Luce Paul, A. & David B. Pisoni. 1998. Recognizing spoken words: The Neighborhood activation model. Ear & Hearing 19(1). 1–36.10.1097/00003446-199802000-00001Suche in Google Scholar

Lupyan, Gary & Bodo Winter. 2018. Language is more abstract than you think, or, why aren’t languages more iconic? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 373. PMID 29915005 doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0137.Suche in Google Scholar

Magnus, Margaret. 2000. What’s in a word? Evidence for phonosemantics. Trondheim, Norway: University of Trondheim.Suche in Google Scholar

Marchand, Hans. 1969. The categories and types of present-day English word-formation: A synchronic-diachronic approach. Munich: Beck.Suche in Google Scholar

Markel, Norman N. & Eric P. Hamp. 1960–1961. Connotative meanings of certain phoneme sequences. Studies in Linguistics 15(3–4). 47–61.Suche in Google Scholar

Martin, Andrew. 2007. The evolving lexicon. Ph.D. dissertation UCLA. https://linguistics.ucla.edu/general/dissertations/Martin_dissertationUCLA2007.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar

Martínez-Celdrán, Eugenio, Ana M. Fernández-Planas & Josefina Carrera-Sabaté. 2003. Castilian Spanish. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 33(2). 255–259.10.1017/S0025100303001373Suche in Google Scholar

McCune, Keith. 1983. The internal structure of Indonesian roots. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Monaghan, Padraic, Richard C. Shillcock, Morten H. Christiansen & Simon Kirby. 2014. How arbitrary is language? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, Biological Sciences 369(1651). Paper ID 20130299.10.1098/rstb.2013.0299Suche in Google Scholar

Newmeyer, Frederick J. 1992. Iconicity and generative grammar. Language 68(4). 756–796.10.1353/lan.1992.0047Suche in Google Scholar

Nölle, Jonas, Marlene Staib, Riccardo Fusaroli & Kristian Tylén. 2018. The emergence of systematicity: How environmental and communicative factors shape a novel communication system. Cognition 181. 93–104.10.1016/j.cognition.2018.08.014Suche in Google Scholar

Ohala, John J. 1994. The frequency code underlies the sound symbolic use of voice pitch. In Leanne Hinton, Johanna Nichols & John J. Ohala (eds.), Sound symbolism, 325–347. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511751806.022Suche in Google Scholar

Oswalt, R. L. 1994. Inanimate imitatives in English. In Leanne Hinton, Johanna Nichols & John J. Ohala (eds.), Sound symbolism, 293–306. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511751806.020Suche in Google Scholar

Otis, Katya & Eyal Sagi. 2008. Phonaesthemes: A corpora-based analysis. In Bradley C. Love, Ken McRae & Vladimir M. Sloutsky (eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 65–70. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Suche in Google Scholar

Ozturk, Ozge, Madelaine Krehm & Athena Vouloumanos. 2013. Sound symbolism in infancy: Evidence for sound–shape cross-modal correspondences in 4-month-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 114(2). 173–186.10.1016/j.jecp.2012.05.004Suche in Google Scholar

Padraic, Monaghan, Karen Mattock & Peter Walker. 2012. The role of sound symbolism in language learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 38(5). 1152–1164.10.1037/a0027747Suche in Google Scholar

Parault, Susan J. & Paula J. Schwanenflugel. 2006. Sound-symbolism: A piece in the puzzle of word learning. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 35(4). 329–351.10.1007/s10936-006-9018-7Suche in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1955. Logic as semiotic: The theory of signs. In J. Buchler (ed.), Philosophical writings of Peirce, 98–119. New York: Dover.Suche in Google Scholar

Perlman, Marcus, Rick Dale & Gary Lupyan. 2015. Iconicity can ground the creation of vocal symbols. Royal Society Open Science 2. 150152. doi: 10.1098/rsos.150152.Suche in Google Scholar

Perniss, Pamela, Robin L. Thompson & Gabriella Vigliocco. 2010. Iconicity as a general property of language: Evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology 1(227). doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00227.Suche in Google Scholar

Perniss, Pamela & Gabriella Vigliocco. 2014. The bridge of iconicity: From a world of experience to the experience of language. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, Biological Sciences 369(1651). 20130300.10.1098/rstb.2013.0300Suche in Google Scholar

Perrone-Bertolotti, Marcela, Jan Kujala, Juan R. Vidal, Carlos M. Hamame, Tomas Ossandon, Olivier Bertrand, Lorella Minotti, Philippe Kahane, Karim Jerbi & Jean-Philippe Lachaux. 2012. How silent is silent reading? Intracerebral evidence for top-down activation of temporal voice areas during reading. Journal of Neuroscience 32(49). 17554–17562.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2982-12.2012Suche in Google Scholar

R Core Team. 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. URL http://www.R-project.org/.Suche in Google Scholar

Ramachandran, Vilayanur S. & Edward M. Hubbard. 2001. Synaesthesia – A window into perception, thought and language. Journal of Consciousness Studies 8(12). 3–34.Suche in Google Scholar

Reay, Irene Elizabeth. 2009. Sound symbolism. In Keith Allan (ed.), Concise encyclopedia of semantics, 893–901. Oxford: Elsevier.Suche in Google Scholar

Reilly, Jamie & Jacob Kean. 2007. Formal distinctiveness of high- and low-imageability nouns: Analyses and theoretical implications. Cognitive Science 31(1). 157–168.10.1080/03640210709336988Suche in Google Scholar

Rhodes, Richard. 1994. Aural images. In Leanne Hinton, Johanna Nichols & John J. Ohala (eds.), Sound symbolism, 276–292. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511751806.019Suche in Google Scholar

Roach, Peter. 2004. British English: Received pronunciation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 34(2). 239–245.10.1017/S0025100304001768Suche in Google Scholar

Sapir, Edward. 1929. A study in phonetic symbolism. Journal of Experimental Psychology 12. 225–239.10.1037/h0070931Suche in Google Scholar

Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1916. Cours de Linguistique Génerale. Lausanne & Paris: Payot.Suche in Google Scholar

Schmidtke, David S., Markus Conrad & Arthur M. Jacobs 2014. Phonological iconicity. Frontiers in Psychology 5(80). doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00080Suche in Google Scholar

Shisler, Benjamin K. 1997. Dictionary of English phonaesthemes. Available online at http://www.reocities.com/SoHo/Studios/9783/phond1.html/.Suche in Google Scholar

Silverstein, M. 1994. Relative motivation in denotational and indexical sound symbolism of Wasco-Wishram Chinookan. In Leanne Hinton, Johanna Nichols & John J. Ohala (eds.), Sound symbolism, 40–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511751806.004Suche in Google Scholar

Smith, Chris. 2014. The phonaestetics of blends: A lexicographic study of cognitive blends in the OED. ExELL – Explorations in English Language and Linguistics 2(1). 12–45.10.1515/exell-2016-0002Suche in Google Scholar

Stefanowitsch, Anatol 2002. Sound symbolism in a usage-driven model. Houston, TX: Unpublished manuscript, Rice University. http://www.stefanowitsch.de/anatol/fu-berlin/p/ms-stefanowitsch2002-ssudm.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar

Swadesh, Morris. 1971. The origin and diversification of language. Chicago: Aldine and Co.Suche in Google Scholar

Vaissière, Jacqueline. 1992. Rhythm, accentuation and final lengthening in French. In J. Sundberg, L. Nord & R. Carlson (eds.), Music, language, speech and brain, 108–120. Stockholm: Wenner-Gren.10.1007/978-1-349-12670-5_10Suche in Google Scholar

van Langendonck, Willi. 2007. Iconicity. In Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics, 394–418. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Vitevitch, Michael S. & Paul A. Luce. 2016. Phonological neighborhood effects in spoken word perception and production. Annual Review of Linguistics 2. 75–94.10.1146/annurev-linguistics-030514-124832Suche in Google Scholar

Wichmann, Søren, Eric W. Holman & Cecil H. Brown. 2010. Sound symbolism in basic vocabulary. Entropy 12. 844–858.10.3390/e12040844Suche in Google Scholar

Wilcox, Sherman. 2004. Cognitive iconicity: Conceptual spaces, meaning, and gesture in signed languages. Cognitive Linguistics 15(2). 119–147.10.1515/cogl.2004.005Suche in Google Scholar

Willett, Michael. 2015. A study of the productivity of twelve English onset phonaesthemes. Ph.D. Thesis. Cardiff University.Suche in Google Scholar

Ziegler, Johannes C. & Arthur M. Jacobs. 1995. Phonological information provides early sources of constraint in the processing of letter strings. Journal of Memory and Language 34(5). 567–593.10.1006/jmla.1995.1026Suche in Google Scholar

Zingler, Tim. 2017. Evidence against the morpheme: The history of English phonaesthemes. Language Sciences 62. 76–90.10.1016/j.langsci.2017.03.005Suche in Google Scholar