Abstract
Within cognitive linguistics, the notion of domain is central. In the literature, the notion of domain has been interpreted in an all-encompassing way, which has led to conceptual confusion. The article proposes to distinguish between a more psychologically oriented description of domains based on dimensional structures, on the one hand; and meronomic relations, on the other. It is shown how Langacker's notion of a configurational domain can be analyzed as higher-level dimensional structures. An added benefit of the distinction between dimensional domains and meronomic relations is that it generates a natural account of the difference between metaphors and metonymies.
©[2013] by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Masthead
- Temporal frames of reference
- What is a domain? Dimensional structures versus meronomic relations
- The attention-grammar interface: Eye-gaze cues structural choice in children and adults
- Understanding the Self: How spatial parameters influence the distribution of anaphora within prepositional phrases
- Collostructional analysis and other ways of measuring lexicogrammatical attraction: Theoretical premises, practical problems and cognitive underpinnings
- Book Review
- Book Review
- Book Review
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Masthead
- Temporal frames of reference
- What is a domain? Dimensional structures versus meronomic relations
- The attention-grammar interface: Eye-gaze cues structural choice in children and adults
- Understanding the Self: How spatial parameters influence the distribution of anaphora within prepositional phrases
- Collostructional analysis and other ways of measuring lexicogrammatical attraction: Theoretical premises, practical problems and cognitive underpinnings
- Book Review
- Book Review
- Book Review