Molecular machines – a new dimension of biological sciences

References

1. Astumian, R.D. and Derenyi, I. Fluctuation driven transport and models of molecular motors and pumps. Eur. Biophys. J. 27 (1998) 474-489.Search in Google Scholar

2. Kinosita, K. F-1-ATPase: A Prototypical rotary molecular motor. Viral Molecular Machines 726 (2012) 5-16.Search in Google Scholar

3. Acerenza, L. and Grana, M. On the origins of a crowded cytoplasm. J. Mol. Evol. 63 (2006) 583-590.10.1007/s00239-006-0018-xSearch in Google Scholar

4. Dobson, C.M. Chemical space and biology. Nature 432 (2004) 824-828.Search in Google Scholar

5. Ellis, R.J. Macromolecular crowding: obvious but underappreciated. Trends Biochem. Sci. 26 (2001) 597-604.10.1016/S0968-0004(01)01938-7Search in Google Scholar

6. Haugh, J.M. Live-cell fluorescence microscopy with molecular biosensors: what are we really measuring? Biophys. J. 102 (2012) 2003-2011.Search in Google Scholar

7. Leopoldo, M., Lacivita, E., Berardi, F. and Perrone, R. Developments in fluorescence probes for receptor research. Drug Disc. Today 14 (2009) 706-712.Search in Google Scholar

8. Caplan, J., Niethammer, M., Taylor, R.M. and Czymmek, K.J. The power of correlative microscopy: multi-modal, multi-scale, multi-dimensional. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 21 (2011) 686-693.Search in Google Scholar

9. Cleri, F. Microscopic mechanics of biomolecules in living cells. Sci. Model. Simul. 15 (2008) 339-362.Search in Google Scholar

10. Kole, T.P., Tseng, Y., Jiang, I., Katz, J.L. and Wirtz, D. Intracellular mechanics of migrating fibroblasts. Mol. Biol. Cell 16 (2005) 328-338.Search in Google Scholar

11. van Zanten, T.S., Cambi, A. and Garcia-Parajo, M.F. A nanometer scale optical view on the compartmentalization of cell membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1798 (2010) 777-787.Search in Google Scholar

12. Huber, F., Schnauss, J., Ronicke, S., Rauch, P., Muller, K., Futterer, C. and Kas, J. Emergent complexity of the cytoskeleton: from single filaments to tissue. Adv. Phys. 62 (2013) 1-112.Search in Google Scholar

13. Brangwynne, C.P., Brangwynne, C.P., Koenderink, G.H., MacKintosh, F.C. and Weitz, D.A. Cytoplasmic diffusion: molecular motors mix it up. J. Cell Biol. 183 (2008) 583-587.Search in Google Scholar

14. Li, G.W. and Xie, X.S. Central dogma at the single-molecule level in living cells. Nature 475 (2011) 308-315.Search in Google Scholar

15. Nelson, W.J. and Yeaman, C. Protein trafficking in the exocytic pathway of polarized epithelial cells. Trends Cell Biol. 11 (2001) 483-486.Search in Google Scholar

16. Park, C.H. and Blackstone, C. Further assembly required: construction and dynamics of the endoplasmic reticulum network. EMBO Rep. 11 (2010) 515-521.Search in Google Scholar

17. Pritchard, R.H., Huang, Y.Y.S. and Terentjev, E.M. Mechanics of biological networks: from the cell cytoskeleton to connective tissue. Soft Matter. 10 (2014) 1864-1884.Search in Google Scholar

18. Andreev, V.P. Cytoplasmic electric fields and electroosmosis: Possible solution for the paradoxes of the intracellular transport of biomolecules. Plos One 8 (2013) 1-14.Search in Google Scholar

19. Spitzer, J.J. and Poolman, B. Electrochemical structure of the crowded cytoplasm. Trends Biochem. Sci. 30 (2005) 536-541.10.1016/j.tibs.2005.08.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Bukoreshtliev, N.V., Haase, K. and Pelling, A.E. Mechanical cues in cellular signalling and communication. Cell Tissue Res. 352 (2013) 77-94.Search in Google Scholar

21. Boal, D. Mechanics of the cell. 2012, New York: Cambridge Univer. Press.10.1017/CBO9781139022217Search in Google Scholar

22. Chandler, D. Interfaces and the driving force of hydrophobic assembly. Nature 437 (2005) 640-647.Search in Google Scholar

23. Chen, I.A. and Walde, P. From self-assembled vesicles to protocells. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2 (2010) 1-13.Search in Google Scholar

24. Dallon, J.C. Multiscale modeling of cellular systems in biology. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 15 (2010) 24-31.10.1016/j.cocis.2009.05.007Search in Google Scholar

25. Ball, P. Water as an active constituent in cell biology. Chem. Rev. 108 (2007) 74-108.Search in Google Scholar

26. Kuriakin, A. Self-organization versus Watchmaker: stochastic dynamics of cellular orgnization. Biol. Chem. 386 (2005) 247-254.Search in Google Scholar

27. Qin, Z., Dimas, L., Adler, D., Bratzel, G. and Buehler, M.J. Biological materials by design. J. Phys-Condens. Mat. 26 (2014) 1-13.Search in Google Scholar

28. De Las Rivas, J. and Fontanillo, C. Protein-protein interaction networks: unraveling the wiring of molecular machines within the cell. Brief. Funct. Genomics 11 (2012) 489-496.10.1093/bfgp/els036Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Chen, T.J., Wu, C.C. and Su, F.C. Mechanical models of the cellular cytoskeletal network for the analysis of intracellular mechanical properties and force distributions: A review. Med. Eng. Phys. 34 (2012) 1375-1386.10.1016/j.medengphy.2012.08.007Search in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Fuesler, J.A. and Li, H.J. Dynamic instability - A common denominator in prokaryotic and eukaryotic DNA segregation and cell division. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 17 (2012) 542-548.Search in Google Scholar

31. Ando, T. and Skolnick, J. Crowding and hydrodynamic interactions likely dominate in vivo macromolecular motion. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 107 (2010) 18457-18462.Search in Google Scholar

32. McGuffee, S.R. and Elcock, A.H. Diffusion, crowding & protein stability in a dynamic molecular model of the bacterial cytoplasm. Plos Comput. Biol. 6 (2010) 1-18.Search in Google Scholar

33. Huang, H., Kamm, R.D. and Lee, R.T. Cell mechanics and mechanotransduction: pathways, probes, and physiology. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 287 (2004) C1-C11.10.1152/ajpcell.00559.2003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

34. Ingber, D.E., Wang, N. and Stamenovic, D. Tensegrity, cellular biophysics, and the mechanics of living systems. Rep. Prog. Phys. 77 (2014) 1-21.Search in Google Scholar

35. Bhardwaj, A., Olia, A.S. and Cingolani, G. Architecture of viral genomedelivery molecular machines. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 25 (2014) 1-8.10.1016/j.sbi.2013.10.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

36. Elston, T., Wang, H. and Oster, G. Energy transduction in ATP synthase. Nature 391 (1998) 510-513.Search in Google Scholar

37. Erhardt, M., Namba, K. and Hughes, K.T. Bacterial nanomachines: the flagellum and type III injectosome. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2 (2010) 1-22. Search in Google Scholar

38. Shao, Y. and Fu, J.P. Integrated micro/nanoengineered functional biomaterials for cell mechanics and mechanobiology: A materials perspective. Adv. Mater. 26 (2014) 1494-1533.Search in Google Scholar

39. Dill, K.A. and Bromberg, S. Molecular driving forces: statistical, thermodynamics in biology, chemistry, physics, and nanoscience, 2nd edition, Garland Science, 2010.10.4324/9780203809075Search in Google Scholar

40. Israelachvili, J.N. Intermolecular and surface forces. 3rd edition, Elsevier Inc., Amsterdam, 2011.10.1016/B978-0-12-391927-4.10001-5Search in Google Scholar

41. Di Ventura, B., Lemerle, C., Michalodimitrakis, K. and Serrano, L. From in vivo to in silico biology and back. Nature 443 (2006) 527-533.Search in Google Scholar

42. Wang, H. and Oster, G. Ratchets, power strokes, and molecular motors. Appl. Phys. A 75 (2002) 315-323.10.1007/s003390201340Search in Google Scholar

43. Barin, G., Forgan, R.S. and Stoddart, J.F. Mechanostereochemistry and the mechanical bond. P. Roy. Soc. A-Math. Phy. 468 (2012) 2849-2880.Search in Google Scholar

44. Abraham, V.C., Krishnamurthi, V., Taylor, D.L. and Lanni, F. The actinbased nanomachine at the leading edge of migrating cells. Biophys. J. 77 (1999) 1721-1732.Search in Google Scholar

45. Bier, M. Brownian ratchets in physics and biology. Contemp. Phys. 38 (1997) 371-379.10.1080/001075197182180Search in Google Scholar

46. Zhang, X.J., Qian, H. and Qian, M. Stochastic theory of nonequilibrium steady states and its applications. Phys. Rep. 510 (2012) 1-86.Search in Google Scholar

47. Chowdhury, D. Modeling stochastic kinetics of molecular machines at multiple levels: From molecules to modules. Biophys. J. 104 (2013) 2331-2341.Search in Google Scholar

48. Acin-Perez, R. and Enriquez, J.A. The function of the respiratory supercomplexes: The plasticity model. BBA-Bioenergetics 1837 (2014) 444-450.10.1016/j.bbabio.2013.12.009Search in Google Scholar

49. Chaban, Y., Boekema, E.J. and Dudkina, N.V. Structures of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation supercomplexes and mechanisms for their stabilisation. BBA-Bioenergetics 1837 (2014) 418-426.Search in Google Scholar

50. Kim, E., Leverage, W.T., Liu, Y., White, I.M., Bentley, W.E. and Payne, G. F. Redox-capacitor to connect electrochemistry to redox-biology. Analyst 139 (2014) 32-43.Search in Google Scholar

51. Palikaras, K. and Tavernarakis, N. Mitochondrial homeostasis: The interplay between mitophagy and mitochondrial biogenesis. Exp. Gerontol. 56 (2014) 182-188.Search in Google Scholar

52. Vartak, R.S., Semwal, M.K. and Bai, Y.D. An update on complex I assembly: the assembly of players. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 46 (2014) 323-328.10.1007/s10863-014-9564-xSearch in Google Scholar

53. Xing, J.H., Liao, J.C. and Oster, G. Making ATP. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 (2005) 16539-16546.10.1073/pnas.0507207102Search in Google Scholar

54. Oster, G. and Wang, H. Reverse engineering a protein: the mechanochemistry of ATP synthase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1458 (2000) 482-510. 10.1016/S0005-2728(00)00096-7Search in Google Scholar

55. Oster, G., Wang, H. and Grabe, M. How F0-ATPase generates rotary torque. Philos. T. Roy. Soc. B. 355 (2000) 523-528.10.1098/rstb.2000.0593Search in Google Scholar

56. Oster, G. and Wang, H. Why is the mechanical efficiency of F1-ATPase so high? J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 32 (2000) 459-469.Search in Google Scholar

57. Oster, G. and Wang, H. Rotary protein motors. Trends Cell Biol. 13 (2003) 114-121.10.1016/S0962-8924(03)00004-7Search in Google Scholar

58. Antes, I., Chandler, D., Wang, H.Y. and Oster, G. The unbinding of ATP from F1-ATPase. Biophys. J. 85 (2003) 695-706.Search in Google Scholar

59. Sun, S.X., Wang, H. and Oster, G. Asymmetry in the F1-ATPase and its implications for the rotational cycle. Biophys. J. 86 (2004) 1373-1384.Search in Google Scholar

60. Sun, S., Chandler, D., Dinner, A.R. and Oster, G. Elastic energy storage in b-sheets with application to F1-ATPase. Eur. Biophys. J. 32 (2003) 676-683.Search in Google Scholar

61. Oster, G. and Wang, H. ATP synthase: two motors, two fuels. Structure 7 (1999) R67-R72.10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80046-XSearch in Google Scholar

62. Iino, R. and Noji, H. Operation mechanism of FoF1-adenosine triphosphate synthase revealed by its structure and dynamics. Iubmb Life 65 (2013) 238-246.Search in Google Scholar

63. Futai, M., Nakanishi-Matsui, M., Okamoto, H., Sekiya, M. and Nakamoto, R.K. Rotational catalysis in proton pumping ATPases: From E. coli F-ATPase to mammalian V-ATPase. BBA-Bioenergetics 1817 (2012) 1711-1721.Search in Google Scholar

64. Xing, J.H., Wang, H.Y., von Ballmoos, C., Dimroth, P. and Oster, G. Torque generation by teh F0 motor of the sodium ATPase. Biophys. J. 87 (2004) 2148-2183.Search in Google Scholar

65. Marshansky, V., Rubinstein, J.L. and Gruber, G. Eukaryotic V-ATPase: Novel structural findings and functional insights. BBA-Bioenergetics 1837 (2014) 857-879.Search in Google Scholar

66. Deckers-Hebestreit, G., Greie, J.C., Stalz, W.D. and Altendorf, K. The ATP synthase of Escherichia coli: structure and function of F-0 subunits. BBABioenergetics 1458 (2000) 364-373.Search in Google Scholar

67. Dimroth, P., von Ballmoos, C. and Meier, T. Catalytic and mechanical cycles in F-ATP synthases - Fourth in the cycles review series. EMBO Rep. 7 (2006) 276-282.Search in Google Scholar

68. Engelbrecht, S. and Junge, W. ATP synthase: A tentative structural model. FEBS Lett. 414 (1997) 485-491.10.1016/S0014-5793(97)00997-6Search in Google Scholar

69. Oster, G. and Wang, H.Y. Rotary protein motors. Trends Cell Biol. 13 (2003) 114-121.10.1016/S0962-8924(03)00004-7Search in Google Scholar

70. Chan, V., Asada, H.H. and Bashir, R. Utilization and control of bioactuators across multiple length scales. Lab. Chip. 14 (2014) 653-670.Search in Google Scholar

71. Miller, C.J. and Davidson, L.A. The interplay between cell signalling and mechanics in developmental processes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14 (2013) 733-744.Search in Google Scholar

72. Mohammadi, H. and McCulloch, C.A. Impact of elastic and inelastic substrate behaviors on mechanosensation. Soft Matter. 10 (2014) 408-420.Search in Google Scholar

73. Bouchoux, A., Schorr, D., Daffe, A., Cambert, M., Gesan-Guiziou, G. and Mariette, F. Molecular mobility in dense protein systems: An investigation through H-1 NMR relaxometry and diffusometry. J. Phys. Chem. B. 116 (2012) 11744-11753.Search in Google Scholar

74. Dauty, E. and Verkman, A.S. Molecular crowding reduces to a similar extent the diffusion of small solutes and macromolecules: measurement by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. J. Mol. Recognit. 17 (2004) 441-447.Search in Google Scholar

75. Dubois, J.M. and Rouzaire-Dubois, B. Roles of cell volume in molecular and cellular biology. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 108 (2012) 93-97.10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2011.12.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

76. Hofling, F. and Franosch, T. Anomalous transport in the crowded world of biological cells. Rep. Prog. Phys. 76 (2013) 1-55.Search in Google Scholar

77. Kolomeisky, A.B., Motor proteins and molecular motors: how to operate machines at the nanoscale. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 25 (2013) 1-13. DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/25/46/463101.10.1088/0953-8984/25/46/463101Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

78. Friedl, P., Wolf, K. and Lammerding, J. Nuclear machanics during cell migration. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 23 (2011) 55-64.10.1016/j.ceb.2010.10.015Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

79. Mashaghi, S., Jadidi, T., Koenderink, G. and Mashaghi, A. Lipid nanotechnology. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 14 (2013) 4242-4282.Search in Google Scholar

80. Veranic, P., Lokar, M., Schutz, G.J., Weghuber, J., Wieser, S., Haegerstrand, H., Kralj-Iglic, V. and Iglic, A. Different types of cell-to-cell connections mediated by nanotubular structures. Biophys. J. 95 (2008) 4416-4425.Search in Google Scholar

81. Kauffman, S., Investigations. Oxford University Press, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

82. Kauffman, S., Logan, R.K., Este, R., Goebel, R., Hobill, D. and Shmulevich, I. Propagating organization: an enquiry. Biol. Philos. 23 (2008) 27-45. DOI: 10.1007/s10539-007-9066-x.10.1007/s10539-007-9066-xSearch in Google Scholar

83. Shibata, Y., Hu, J.J., Kozlov, M.M. and Rapoport, T.A. Mechanisms shaping the membranes of cellular organelles. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 25 (2009) 329-354.10.1146/annurev.cellbio.042308.113324Search in Google Scholar PubMed

84. Versaevel, M., Riaz, M., Grevesse, T. and Gabriele, S. Cell confinement: putting the squeeze on the nucleus. Soft Matter. 9 (2013) 6665-6676.10.1039/c3sm00147dSearch in Google Scholar

85. Rodriguez, M.L., McGarry, P.J. and Sniadecki, N.J. Review on cell mechanics: experimental and modeling approaches. App. Mech. Rev. 65 (2013) 1-42.Search in Google Scholar

86. Shao, Y. and Fu, J. Ontegrated micro/nanoengineering functional biomaterials for cell mechanics and mechanobiology: a material perspective. Adv. Mater. 26 (2014) 1494-1533. Search in Google Scholar