Refining the network for the Chinese analytic causative constructicon: insights from corpus analysis and psycholinguistic experimentation
-
Xiaoyu Tian
Abstract
This study explores the network of the Chinese analytic causative constructicon adopting a cross-variety perspective. Unlike prior research focusing solely on the causative marker, this study acknowledges the multi-level nature of the constructicon and examines the descriptive causative construction identified by Zhang, Lili. (2005. Cong shiyi dao zhishi [The causativisation of Chinese shi-yi constructions]. Taida Wenshi Zhexue Bao (62). 119–152), which features a syntactically specified causee slot and a semantically defined effect predicate slot, distinguishing it from general causatives. Combining corpus analysis and psycholinguistic experimentation, our research reveals a consistent preference for using lìng as the causative marker within the descriptive causative construction, observed in both Mainland and Taiwan Chinese. By analyzing the syntactic and semantic features of the descriptive causative construction and its association with the causative marker lìng, we argue that this construction is stored at a separate level. Furthermore, we propose that the Chinese analytic causative constructicon is best represented by a radial network, accommodating both hierarchical and associative relationships, rather than a purely hierarchical structure as illustrated in Pijpops, Dirk, Dirk Speelman, Freek Van De Velde & Stefan Grondelaers. (2021. Incorporating the multi-level nature of the constructicon into hypothesis testing. Cognitive Linguistics 32(3). 487–528).
Funding source: China Scholarship Council
Award Identifier / Grant number: No.202006900017
-
Data availability: All data and analysis scripts for this study are accessible via the Open Science Framework (OSF) at this OSF link.
Abbreviations
- Ce
-
causee
- Cr
-
causer
- cop
-
copula
- CM
-
causative marker
- EP
-
effected predicate
- MC
-
Mainland Chinese
- neg
-
negation
- NP
-
noun phrase
- Pred
-
effected predicate
- rel
-
relative
- Sem
-
semantic class
- Synt
-
syntactic form
- TC
-
Taiwan Chinese
- V
-
verb
References
Bresnan, Joan & Marilyn Ford. 2010. Predicting syntax: Processing dative constructions in American and Australian varieties of English. Language 86(1). 168–213. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0189.Suche in Google Scholar
Chen, Keh-Jiann, Chu-Ren Huang, Li-Ping Chang & Hui-Li Hsu. 1996. Sinica corpus: Design methodology for balanced corpora. In Proceedings of the 11th Pacific Asia conference on language, information and computation. 167–176.Suche in Google Scholar
Christensen Rune. 2024. A Tutorial on fitting cumulative link mixed models with clmm2 from the ordinal package. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ordinal/vignettes/clmm2_tutorial.pdf (accessed 28 December 2024)Suche in Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2016. Cognitive Linguistics’ seven deadly sins. Cognitive Linguistics 27(4). 479–491. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0059.Suche in Google Scholar
Deshors, Sandra C. & Stefan Th. Gries. 2020. Mandative subjunctive versus should in world Englishes: A new take on an old alternation. Corpora 15(2). 213–241. https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2020.0195.Suche in Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger. 2019. The grammar network: How linguistic structure is shaped by language use, 1st edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108671040Suche in Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger. 2023. The constructicon: Taxonomies and networks, 1st edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781009327848Suche in Google Scholar
Divjak, Dagmar, Ewa Dąbrowska & Antti Arppe. 2016. Machine meets man: Evaluating the psychological reality of corpus-based probabilistic models. Cognitive Linguistics 27(1). 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2015-0101.Suche in Google Scholar
Engel, Alexandra, Jason Grafmiller, Laura Rosseel & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi. 2022. Assessing the complexity of lectal competence: The register-specificity of the dative alternation after give. Cognitive Linguistics 33(4). 727–766. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2021-0107.Suche in Google Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle. 2010. Corpus, Cognition and Causative Constructions (Studies in Corpus Linguistics), Vol. 39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/scl.39Suche in Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure (cognitive theory of language and culture). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268511.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. 2020. On classification trees and random forests in corpus linguistics: Some words of caution and suggestions for improvement. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 16(3). 617–647. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2018-0078.Suche in Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin. 2019. Construction grammar and its application to English, 2nd edn. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9781474433624Suche in Google Scholar
Hothorn, Torsten, Kurt Hornik & Achim Zeileis. 2006. Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 15(3). 651–674. https://doi.org/10.1198/106186006X133933.Suche in Google Scholar
Kuhn, Max & Kjell Johnson. 2016. Applied predictive modeling. New York: Springer.Suche in Google Scholar
Levshina, Natalia. 2011. Doe wat je niet laten kan: A usage-based analysis of Dutch causative constructions. Leuven: KU Leuven PhD dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Levshina, Natalia, Dirk Geeraerts & Dirk Speelman. 2013. Towards a 3D-grammar: Interaction of linguistic and extralinguistic factors in the use of Dutch causative constructions. Journal of Pragmatics 52. 34–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.12.013.Suche in Google Scholar
Li, Yi. 2024. Cognitive and sociolectal constraints on the theme-recipient alternation: Evidence from Mandarin. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2023-0127.Suche in Google Scholar
Liesenfeld, Andreas, Meichun Liu & Chu-Ren Huang. 2022. Profiling the Chinese causative construction with rang (讓), shi (使) and ling (令) using frame semantic features. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 18(2). 263–306. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2020-0027.Suche in Google Scholar
Luo, Liwei & Zuomin Nan. 2014. Gudai hanyu “V+ren” goucheng “shigan” jiegou de qingdongci cengmian tanjiu [A Study on the Light Verb Level of the ‘V+ren’ Structure in Ancient Chinese]. Xiandai Yuwen [Modern Chinese](6). 77–79.Suche in Google Scholar
McEnery, Anthony & Zhonghua Xiao. 2004. The Lancaster corpus of Mandarin Chinese: A corpus for monolingual and contrastive language study. Religion 17. 3–4.Suche in Google Scholar
Pijpops, Dirk, Dirk Speelman, Freek Van De Velde & Stefan Grondelaers. 2021. Incorporating the multi-level nature of the constructicon into hypothesis testing. Cognitive Linguistics 32(3). 487–528. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2020-0039.Suche in Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2024. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/.Suche in Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2020. The dynamics of the linguistic system: Usage, conventionalization, and entrenchment, 1st edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198814771.003.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Sommerer, Lotte & Elena Smirnova (eds.). 2020. Nodes and networks in diachronic construction grammar (constructional approaches to language), Vol. 27. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.27.Suche in Google Scholar
Speelman, Dirk & Dirk Geeraerts. 2009. Causes for causatives: The case of Dutch doen and laten. In Causal categories in discourse and cognition, 173–204. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110224429.173Suche in Google Scholar
Strobl, Carolin, James Malley & Gerhard Tutz. 2009. An introduction to recursive partitioning: Rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests. Psychological Methods 14(4). 323–348. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016973.Suche in Google Scholar
Tao, Hongyin & Richard Xiao. 2007. The UCLA corpus of written Chinese. Lancaster, UK: Los Angeles, USA and UCREL.Suche in Google Scholar
Tian, Xiaoyu, Dirk Speelman & Weiwei Zhang. 2025. Unravelling the competing dynamics of Chinese causative markers shi 使, ling 令, jiao1 叫 and jiao2 教: A diachronic analysis. Language Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101701.Suche in Google Scholar
Tian, Xiaoyu, Weiwei Zhang & Dirk Speelman. 2022. Lectal variation in Chinese analytic causative constructions: What trees can and cannot tell us. In Dennis Tay & Molly Xie Pan (eds.). Data analytics in cognitive linguistics, 137–168. De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110687279-006Suche in Google Scholar
Tian, Xiaoyu, Dirk Speelman & Weiwei Zhang. 2024. Mapping temporal evolution through spatial distances: Exploring the diachronic variation in Chinese analytic causative constructions across seven centuries. Corpora 19(3). 333–361. https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2024.0317.Suche in Google Scholar
Xu, Dan. 2003. Shi ziju de yanbian, jiantan shi de yufahua [The grammaticalization of shi-construction and the evolution of shi]. In Wu (ed.), Yufahua yu Yufa Tansuo. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Xu, Dan. 2006. Typological change in chinese syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199297566.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Xu, Mengmin, Fuyin Li & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi. 2024. Modeling the locative alternation in Mandarin Chinese: A corpus-based study. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 29(2). 258–285. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.22072.xu.Suche in Google Scholar
Zhang, Lili. 2005. Cong shiyi dao zhishi [The causativisation of Chinese shi-yi constructions]. Taida Wenshi Zhexue Bao(62). 119–152.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
