Startseite Linguistik & Semiotik A multifactorial aspectual analysis of verb concatenation with imperfective markers zhe in Mandarin
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

A multifactorial aspectual analysis of verb concatenation with imperfective markers zhe in Mandarin

  • ORCID logo EMAIL logo und ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 8. Mai 2023

Abstract

As a cognitive ability to construe events in alternate ways, aspectuality has aroused many researchers’ academic attention; however, the concatenation of aspect markers in a clause is understudied in previous studies. The present paper follows a bidimensional approach of aspect to conduct a corpus-based aspectual analysis of verb concatenation with imperfective markers zhe (henceforth VCIMs zhe) in Mandarin. Specifically, to construe the cognitive inference mechanism of aspect, a multifactorial analysis of VCIMs zhe by the statistical techniques of multiple correspondence analysis, conditional inference trees and conditional random forests is carried out to explore the prototypical temporal features of verbs in two slots, predict the aspectual meanings of two imperfective markers zhe, and also discuss the conditional importance of factors such as durativity, dynamicity, telicity, boundedness, and slot in identifying the situation types of two verbs or verb phrases in VCIMs zhe. Methodologically, a usage-based multifactorial analysis of VCIMs zhe complements previous introspective studies on aspect marking. Theoretically, a corpus-based aspectual account of VCIMs zhe, one type of complex viewpoint aspects, expands traditional studies on Chinese aspect system, supplies evidence for aspect typology cross-linguistically, and provides reference for second language acquisition of usage patterns of zhe by non-native speakers.


Corresponding authors: Junjie Jin, School of Foreign Languages, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China, E-mail: ; and Fuyin Thomas Li, School of Foreign Languages, Beihang University, Beijing, China; and Linguistics Research Center, School of Foreign Languages, Beihang University, No. 37 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Room 702, Ruxin Building, Beijing, 100191, China, E-mail:

Funding source: The National Social Science Foundation Project of China “A Diachronic Typological Study on the Chinese Resultatives of Macro-event”

Award Identifier / Grant number: 21BY045

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely thank three anonymous reviewers and the editors for their insightful comments and suggestions for improvement. As ever, all errors in the writing belong to the authors.

  1. Research funding: This study was funded by the National Social Science Foundation Project of China “A Diachronic Typological Study on the Chinese Resultatives of Macro-event” (Award Number: 21BY045, PI: Fuyin Li)

  2. Data availability statements: All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article and its supplementary information files.

References

Baayen, Harald, Endresen Anna, Laura Janda, Makarova Anastasia & Nesset Tore. 2013. Making choices in Russian: Pros and cons of statistical methods for rival forms. Russian Linguistics 37(3). 253–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11185-013-9118-6.Suche in Google Scholar

Bi, Yanjuan. 2011. Zhe de yiyi xitong yanjiu [The research on the meaning system of zhe]. Shanghai: East China Normal University MA thesis.Suche in Google Scholar

Cienki, Alan & Olga Iriskhanova. 2018. Aspectuality across languages: Event construal in speech and gesture. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/hcp.62Suche in Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2012. Verbs: Aspect and causal structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199248582.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Dai, Yaojing. 1991. Xiandai hanyu biaoshi chixuti de zhe de yuyi fenxi [A semantic analysis of the durative marker zhe in modern Chinese]. Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu [Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies] (2). 92–105.Suche in Google Scholar

Dai, Yaojing. 1997. Xiandai hanyu shiti xitong yanjiu [Research on tense and aspect system in modern Chinese]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Education Publishing House.Suche in Google Scholar

De Swart, Henritte. 1998. Aspect shift and coercion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16. 347–385. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005916004600.10.1023/A:1005916004600Suche in Google Scholar

Firth, John R. 1957. Papers in linguistics 1934–51. London: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy. 2001. Syntax: An introduction (Vol. I). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Suche in Google Scholar

Glynn, Dylan. 2010. Correspondence analysis: Exploring data and identifying patterns. In Dylan Glynn & Kerstin Fischer (eds.), Corpus methods for semantics: Quantitative methods in polysemy and synonymy, 443–485. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/hcp.43.17glySuche in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th. 2020. On classification trees and random forests in corpus linguistics: Some words of caution and suggestions for improvement. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 16(3). 617–647. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2018-0078.Suche in Google Scholar

Husson, François & Julie Josse. 2014. Multiple correspondence analysis. In Jörg Blasius & Michael Greenacre (eds.), Visualization and verbalization of data, 165–183. Boca Raton & London & New York: CRC Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray S. 1991. Parts and boundaries. Cognition 41. 9–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(91)90031-x.Suche in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Nouns and verbs. Language 63(1). 53–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/415384.Suche in Google Scholar

Levshina, Natalia. 2015. How to do linguistics with R: Data exploration and statistical analysis. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/z.195Suche in Google Scholar

Levshina, Natalia. 2020. Conditional inference trees and random forests. In Magali Paquot & Stefan Th Gries (eds.), A practical handbook of corpus linguistics, 611–643. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG.10.1007/978-3-030-46216-1_25Suche in Google Scholar

Li, Tiegen. 1998. Liandongshi zhong le, zhe, guo de danyong he lianyong [Single use and combined use of le, zhe, guo in serial verb structures]. Hanyu Xuexi [Chinese Language Learning] (2). 14–18.Suche in Google Scholar

Li, Yanhua. 2008. “V1 zhe V2 zhe” de xingshi, guanxi yu gongneng [The form, relationship and function of V1 zhe V2 zhe]. Guilin: Guangxi Normal University MA thesis.Suche in Google Scholar

Li, Charles & Sandra Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Los Angeles: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520352858Suche in Google Scholar

Liang, Yinfeng. 2010. Lun hanyu chixuti biaoji zhe he jinxingti biaoji zhe de yufahua lujing [The pathways of grammaticalization of the marker zhe in durative aspect and progressive aspect]. Yuyan Yanjiu Jikan [Bulletin of Linguistic Studies] 7. 188–206.Suche in Google Scholar

Liu, Ningsheng. 1985. Lun zhe jiqi xiangguan de liangge dongtai fanchou [On zhe and its two related dynamic categories]. Yuyan Yanjiu [Language Studies] (2). 117–128.Suche in Google Scholar

Lu, Jianming. 1999. Zhe zi buyi [A supplementary discussion on zhe]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language] (5). 331–336.Suche in Google Scholar

Ma, Qingzhu. 1992. Hanyu dongci he dongcixing jiegou [Chinese verbs and verbal structure]. Beijing: Beijing Language Institute Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Michaelis, Laura A. 2004. Type shifting in Construction Grammar: An integrated approach to aspectual coercion. Cognitive Linguistics 15(1). 1–67.10.1515/cogl.2004.001Suche in Google Scholar

Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1972. A grammar of contemporary English. New York & London: Seminar Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. New York & London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Rothstein, Susan. 2004. Structuring events: A study in the semantics of lexical aspect. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470759127Suche in Google Scholar

Shen, Jiaxuan. 1995. “Youjie” yu “wujie” [Bounded and unbounded]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language] (5). 367–380.Suche in Google Scholar

Shi, Yuzhi & Ne Li. 2001. Hanyu yufahua de licheng—Xingtai jufa fazhan de dongyin he jizhi [A history of grammaticalization in Chinese: Motivations and mechanisms of evolution of Chinese morph-syntax]. Beijing: Peking University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Smith, Carlota S. 1983. A theory of aspectual choice. Language 59(3). 479–501. https://doi.org/10.2307/413899.Suche in Google Scholar

Smith, Carlota S. 1991. The parameter of aspect. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Suche in Google Scholar

Strobl, Carolin, Boulesteix Anne-Laure, Kneib Thomas, Augustin Thomas & Zeileis Achim. 2008. Conditional variable importance for random forests. BMC Bioinformatics 307(9). 1–11.10.1186/1471-2105-9-307Suche in Google Scholar

Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, Grafmiller Jason, Heller Benedikt & Röthlisberger Melanie. 2016. Around the world in three alternations: Modeling syntactic variation in varieties of English. English World-Wide 37(2). 109–137. https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.37.2.01szm.Suche in Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali & Harald Baayen. 2012. Models, forests, and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation and Change 24(2). 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954394512000129.Suche in Google Scholar

Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics (Vol. I): Concept structuring system. Cambridge: the MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6847.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Tenny, Carol L. 1994. Aspectual roles and the syntax-semantics interface. Dordrecht & Boston & London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-011-1150-8Suche in Google Scholar

Vendler, Zeno. 1957. Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review 66(2). 143–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2182371.Suche in Google Scholar

Verkuyl, Henk J. 1989. Aspectual classes and aspectual composition. Linguistics and Philosophy 12(1). 39–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00627398.Suche in Google Scholar

Verkuyl, Henk J. 1993. A theory of aspectuality: The interaction between temporal and atemporal structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511597848Suche in Google Scholar

Verkuyl, Henk J. 2005. Aspectual composition: Surveying the ingredients. In Henk Verkuyl, Henriette de Swart & Angeliek van Hout (eds.), Perspectives on aspect, 19–39. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/1-4020-3232-3_2Suche in Google Scholar

Wang, Tangyan. 2009. Xiandai hanyu zhuci zhe de duojiaodu yanjiu [The multi-perspectival research on zhe in modern Chinese]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University MA thesis.Suche in Google Scholar

Xiao, Zhonghua & Anthony McEnery. 2004a. A corpus-based two-level model of situation aspect. Journal of Linguistics 40. 325–363. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226704002543.Suche in Google Scholar

Xiao, Richard & Tony McEnery. 2004b. Aspect in Mandarin Chinese: A corpus-based study. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/slcs.73Suche in Google Scholar

Xun, Endong, Gaoqi Rao, Xiaoyue Xiao & Jiaojiao Zang. 2016. Dashuju beijing xia BCC yuliaoku de yanzhi [The construction of the BCC corpus in the age of big data]. Yuliaoku Yuyanxue [Corpus Linguistics] 3(1). 93–109.Suche in Google Scholar

Yang, Suying. 1995. The aspectual system of Chinese. Victoria: University of Victoria dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhao, Lihua. 2000. Dongci dai zhe duodongju de kaocha [An investigation of sentences with multiple verbs taking zhe]. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University MA thesis.Suche in Google Scholar

Zuo, Simin. 1999. Xiandai hanyu zhong ti de yanjiu—Jianji ti yanjiu de leixingxue yiyi [Research on aspect in modern Chinese and its typological significance]. Yuwen Yanjiu [Linguistic Research] (1). 9–20.Suche in Google Scholar


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2022-0080).


Received: 2022-09-20
Accepted: 2023-04-05
Published Online: 2023-05-08
Published in Print: 2024-02-26

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 29.3.2026 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cllt-2022-0080/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen