Register in corpus linguistics: the role and legacy of Douglas Biber

References

Bell, Allan. 1995. Review of Sociolinguistic perspectives on register edited by Douglas Biber and Edward Finegan. Language in Society 24(2). 265–270. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404500018637.Suche in Google Scholar

Berber-Sardinha, Tony & Marcia Veirano-Pinto (eds.). 2014. Multi-dimensional analysis, 25 years on: A tribute to Douglas Biber. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.60Suche in Google Scholar

Berber-Sardinha, Tony & Marcia Veirano-Pinto (eds.). 2019. Multi-dimensional analysis: Research methods and current issues. London: Bloomsbury.10.5040/9781350023857Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas. 1984. A model of textual relations within the written and spoken modes. Los Angeles: University of Southern California dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas. 1986. Spoken and written textual dimensions in English: Resolving the contradictory findings. Language 62(2). 384–414. https://doi.org/10.2307/414678.Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511621024Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas. 1990. Methodological issues regarding corpus-based analyses of linguistic variation. Literary and Linguistic Computing 5(4). 257–269. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/5.4.257.Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas. 1992. On the complexity of discourse complexity: A multidimensional analysis. Discourse Processes 15(2). 133–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539209544806.Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas. 1993. Representativeness in corpus design. Literary and Linguistic Computing 8(4). 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/8.4.243.Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas. 1995. Dimensions of register variation: A cross-linguistic comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511519871Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas. 2003. Compressed noun phrase structures in newspaper discourse: The competing demands of popularization vs. economy. In Jean Aitchison & Diana Lewis (eds.), New media discourse, 169–181. New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas. 2004. Historical patterns for the grammatical marking of stance: A cross-register comparison. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 5(1). 107–136. https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.5.1.06bib.Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas. 2006. University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.23Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas. 2012. Register as a predictor of linguistic variation. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 8(1). 9–37. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2012-0002.Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas. 2014. Using multi-dimensional analysis to explore cross-linguistic universals of register variation. Languages in Contrast 14(1). 7–34. https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.14.1.02bib.Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas & Federica Barbieri. 2007. Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. English for Specific Purposes 26. 263–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.08.003.Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas & Susan Conrad. 2001. Quantitative corpus research – much more than bean counting. TESOL Quarterly 35(2). 331–336. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587653.Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas & Susan Conrad. 2009/2019. Register, genre, and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511814358Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas & Jesse Egbert. 2016. Register variation on the searchable web: A multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of English Linguistics 44(2). 95–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424216628955.Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas & Jesse Egbert. 2018. Register variation online. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316388228Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas & Edward Finegan. 1989a. Drift and the evolution of English style: A history of three genres. Language 65(3). 487–517. https://doi.org/10.2307/415220.Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas & Edward Finegan. 1989b. Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text 9(1). 93–124. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1989.9.1.93.Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas & Edward Finegan. 1997. Diachronic relations among speech-based and written registers in English. In Terttu Nevalainen & Leena Kahlas-Tarkka (eds.), To explain the present: Studies in the changing English language in honour of Matti Rissanen, 253–276. Helsinki: Societe Neophilologique.Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas & Bethany Gray. 2010. Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9. 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.01.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas & Mohamed Hared. 1991. Literacy in Somali: Linguistic consequences. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 12. 260–282. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190500002269.Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas & James K. Jones. 2009. Quantitative methods in corpus linguistics. In Lüdeling Anke & Merja Kytö (eds.), Corpus linguistics: An international handbook, 1286–1304. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110213881.2.1286Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas & Jerry Kurjian. 2007. Towards a taxonomy of web registers and text types: A multi-dimensional analysis. In Marianne Hundt, Nadja Nesselhauf & Carolin Biewer (eds.), Corpus linguistics and the web, 109–132. Amsterdam: Rodopi.10.1163/9789401203791_008Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas & Elena Seoane (eds.). 2021. Corpus-based approaches to register variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad & Randi Reppen. 1998. Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804489Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad & Viviana Cortes. 2004a. “Take a look at…”: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics 25(3). 371–405. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.3.371.Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad, Randi Reppen, Patricia Byrd & Marie Helt. 2002. Speaking and writing in the university: A multi-dimensional comparison. TESOL Quarterly 36(1). 9–48. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588359.Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Eniko Csomay, James Jones & Casey Keck. 2004b. A corpus linguistic investigation of vocabulary-based discourse units in university registers. In Ula Connor & Thomas Upton (eds.), Applied corpus linguistics, 53–72. Amsterdam: Rodopi.10.1163/9789004333772_005Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Mark Davies, James Jones & Nicole Tracy-Ventura. 2006. Spoken and written register variation in Spanish: A multi-dimensional analysis. Corpora 1. 7–38. https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2006.1.1.1.Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Bethany Gray & Kornwipa Poonpon. 2011. Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly 45(1). 5–35. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.244483.Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Jesse Egbert & Daniel Keller. 2020. Reconceptualizing register in a continuous situational space. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 16(3). 581–616. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2018-0086.Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Jesse Egbert, Daniel Keller & Stacey Wizner. 2021a. Towards a taxonomy of conversational discourse types: An empirical corpus-based analysis. Journal of Pragmatics 171. 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.018.Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Bethany Gray, Shelley Staples & Jesse Egbert. 2022. The register-functional approach to grammatical complexity. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781003087991Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan. 1999. The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow, England: Pearson Education.Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan. 2021b. The grammar of spoken and written English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.232Suche in Google Scholar

Conrad, Susan & Douglas Biber (eds.). 2001. Variation in English: Multi-dimensional studies. Harlow: Pearson Education.Suche in Google Scholar

Crystal, David & Derek Davy. 1969. Investigating English style. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Egbert, Jesse, Douglas Biber & Bethany Gray. 2022. Designing and evaluating language corpora: A practical framework for corpus representativeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316584880Suche in Google Scholar

Egbert, Jesse, Stacey Wizner, Daniel Keller, Douglas Biber, Tony McEnery & Paul Baker. 2021. Identifying and describing functional discourse units in the BNC spoken. Text & Talk 41(5–6). 715–737. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2020-0053.Suche in Google Scholar

Finegan, Edward & Douglas Biber. 1994. Register and social dialect variation: An integrated approach. In Biber Douglas & Edward Finegan (eds.), Sociolinguistic perspectives on register, 315–347. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195083644.003.0014Suche in Google Scholar

Finegan, Edward & Douglas Biber. 2001. Register variation and social dialect variation: The register axiom. In Penelope Eckert & John Richford (eds.), Style and sociolinguistic variation, 235–267. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511613258.015Suche in Google Scholar

Friginal, Eric. 2008. Linguistic variation in the discourse of outsourced call centers. Discourse Studies 10(6). 715–736. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445608096570.Suche in Google Scholar

Friginal, Eric. 2013. Twenty-five years of Biber’s multi-dimensional analysis: Introduction to the special issue and an interview with Douglas Biber. Corpora 8(2). 137–152. https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2013.0038.Suche in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K. 1978. Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.Suche in Google Scholar

Hymes, Dell. 1974. Foundations in sociolinguistics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Lee, David. 2001. Genres, register, text types, domains, and styles: Clarifying the concepts and navigating a path through the BNC jungle. Language, Learning and Technology 5(3). 37–72.Suche in Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis. 2001. Style and the psycholinguistics of sociolinguistics: The logical problem of language variation. In Penelope Eckert & John Richford (eds.), Style and sociolinguistic variation, 279–304. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511613258.017Suche in Google Scholar

Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Svartvik Jan. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Reid, Thomas B. W. 1956. Linguistics, structuralism and philology. Archivum Linguisticum 8. 28–37.Suche in Google Scholar

Sinclair, John. 1991. Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Tracy-Ventura, Nicole, Douglas Biber & Viviana Cortes. 2007. Lexical bundles in Spanish speech and writing. In Giovanni Parodi (ed.), Working with Spanish corpora, 217–231. London: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar