The theme-recipient alternation in Chinese: tracking syntactic variation across seven centuries

References

Anttila, Arto, Matthew Adams & Michael Speriosu. 2010. The role of prosody in the English dative alternation. Language & Cognitive Processes 25(7–9). 946–981. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960903525481.Suche in Google Scholar

Baayen, R. Harald. 2008. Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511801686Suche in Google Scholar

Barðdal, Jóhanna, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer & Spike Gildea (eds.). 2015. Diachronic construction grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/cal.18Suche in Google Scholar

Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Benjamin M. Bolker & Steven C. Walker. 2015. Fitting linear mixed effect models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1). 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.Suche in Google Scholar

Behaghel, Otto. 1909/10. Beziehungen zwischen Umfang und Reihenfolge von Satzgliedern. Indogermanische Forschungen 25. 110–142.Suche in Google Scholar

Bernaisch, Tobias, Th. Gries Stefan & Joybrato Mukherjee. 2014. The dative alternation in South Asian English(es): Modelling predictors and predicting prototypes. English World-wide 35(1). 7–31. https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.35.1.02ber.Suche in Google Scholar

Blake, Renée. 1997. Resolving the don’t count cases in the quantitative analysis of the copula in African American Vernacular English. Language Variation and Change 9(1). 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954394500001794.Suche in Google Scholar

Branigan, Holly P., Martin J. Pickering & Mikihiro Tanaka. 2008. Contributions of animacy to grammatical function assignment and word order during production. Lingua 118(2). 172–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.02.003.Suche in Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan. 2007. Is syntactic knowledge probabilistic? Experiments with the English dative alternation. In Sam Featherston & Wolfgang Sternfeld (eds.), Roots: Linguistics in search of its evidential base, 77–96. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110198621.75Suche in Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan & Jennifer Hay. 2008. Gradient grammar: An effect of animacy on the syntax of give in New Zealand and American English. Lingua 118(2). 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.02.007.Suche in Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan & Marilyn Ford. 2010. Predicting syntax: Processing dative constructions in American and Australian varieties of English. Language 86(1). 168–213. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0189.Suche in Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan & Tatiana Nikitina. 2009. The gradience of the dative alternation. In Linda Uyechi & Lian Hee Wee (eds.), Reality exploration and discovery: Pattern interaction in language and life, 161–184. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Suche in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 2006. From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language 82(4). 711–733.https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0186.Suche in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan & Paul Hopper (eds.). 2001. Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/tsl.45Suche in Google Scholar

Carletta, Jean. 1996. Assessing agreement on classification tasks: The kappa statistic. Computational Linguistics 22(2). 249–254.Suche in Google Scholar

Chao, Rui. 2013. 汉语“给”的语义演变 [On the semantic change of gei]. Fangyan (3). 248–257. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpm.2013.32023.Suche in Google Scholar

Chao, Yuan-Ren. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Chen, Ping. 1987. 释汉语中与名词性成分相关的四组概念 [Explaining four sets of concepts related to Chinese nominal categories]. Zhongguo Yuwen 2. 81–92.Suche in Google Scholar

Chen, Ping. 2004. Identifiability and definiteness in Chinese. Linguistics 42(6). 1129–1184. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2004.42.6.1129.Suche in Google Scholar

De Smet, Hendrik. 2020. What predicts productivity? Theory meets individuals. Cognitive Linguistics 31(2). 251–278. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2019-0026.Suche in Google Scholar

Ehret, Katharina, Christoph Wolk & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi. 2014. Quirky quadratures: On rhythm and weight as constraints on genitive variation in an unconventional data set. English Language and Linguistics 18(2). 263–303. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1360674314000033.Suche in Google Scholar

Fang, Yu & Haitao Liu. 2021. Predicting syntactic choice in Mandarin Chinese: A corpus-based analysis of ba sentences and SVO sentences. Cognitive Linguistics 32(2). 219–250. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2020-0005.Suche in Google Scholar

Gamer, Matthias, Jim Lemon, Ian Fellows & Puspendra Singh. 2019. irr: Various coefficients of interrater reliability and agreement (R package version 0.84.1). Available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=irr.Suche in Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy. 1978. Definiteness and referentiality. In Joseph H. Greenberg, Charles A. Ferguson & Edith A. Moravcsik (eds.), Universals of human language, vol. 4, 291–330. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Gorelova, Liliya M. 2002. Manchu grammar. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789047401148Suche in Google Scholar

Guan, Xiechu. 1953. 殷墟甲骨刻辞的语法研究 [Studies of the grammar of the oracle bone inscriptions excavated from Yinxu]. Shanghai: China Academy of Science Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar

Hashimoto, Mantaro. 1977. The double object construction in Chinese. Monumenta Serica 33(1). 268–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/02549948.1977.11745049.Suche in Google Scholar

Hawkins, John A. 1994. A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511554285Suche in Google Scholar

He, Xiaowei. 2008. 双及物结构句式选择的制约因素研究 [A study on the factors influencing the selection of the ditransitive constructions]. Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu. 3. 29–36.Suche in Google Scholar

Her, One-Soon. 2006. Justifying part-of-speech assignments for Mandarin gei. Lingua 116(8). 1274–1302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2005.06.003.Suche in Google Scholar

Hinrichs, Lars & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi. 2007. Recent changes in the function and frequency of Standard English genitive constructions: A multivariate analysis of tagged corpora. English Language and Linguistics 11(3). 437–474. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1360674307002341.Suche in Google Scholar

Hong, Bo. 2004. “给”字的语法化 [The grammaticalization of gei]. Nankai Yuyan Xuekan (2). 138–145.Suche in Google Scholar

Israel, Michael. 1996. The way constructions grow. In Adele Goldberg (ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse and language, 217–230. Stanford: CSLI.Suche in Google Scholar

Jing-Schmidt, Zhuo & Xinjia Peng. 2016. The emergence of disjunction: A history of constructionalization in Chinese. Cognitive Linguistics 27(1). 101–136. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2015-0073.Suche in Google Scholar

Labov, Willaim. 1972. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1982. Building on empirical foundations. In Winfred Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds.), Perspectives on historical linguistics, 17–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Suche in Google Scholar

Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620607Suche in Google Scholar

Levshina, Natalia. 2015. How to do linguistics with R: Data exploration and statistical analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/z.195Suche in Google Scholar

Li, Charles & Sandra Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520352858Suche in Google Scholar

Li, Xuping & Walter Bisang. 2012. Classifiers in Sinitic languages: From individuation to definiteness-marking. Lingua 122(4). 335–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2011.12.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Liu, Danqing. 2001. 汉语给予类双及物结构的类型学考察 [A typological study of giving-type ditransitive patterns in Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen (5). 387–398.Suche in Google Scholar

Liu, Feng-Hsi. 2006. Dative constructions in Chinese. Language and Linguistics 7(4). 863–904.Suche in Google Scholar

Lu, Guang. 2006. 《醒世姻缘传》的“给”与“己” [A diachronic study of two characters gei and ji based on A Story of Marriage for Enlightenment]. Yuyan Yanjiu. 37–39.Suche in Google Scholar

Lü, Shuxiang. 1985. 近代汉语读本 [Monograph on early Mandarin]. Shanghai: Shanghai Education Press.Suche in Google Scholar

MacDonald, Maryellen C. 2013. How language production shapes language form and comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology 4. 226. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00226.Suche in Google Scholar

Mair, Victor H. (ed.). 2001. The Columbia history of Chinese literature. New York: Columbia University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Nienhauser, William H. 1986. The Indiana companion to traditional Chinese literature. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Norman, Jerry. 1974. A sketch of Sibe morphology. Central Asiatic Journal 18(3). 159–174.Suche in Google Scholar

Orwin, Robert. 1994. Evaluating coding decisions. In Harris Cooper, Larry V. Hedges & Jeffrey C. Valentine (eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis, 139–162. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Suche in Google Scholar

Peng, Chun-Yi. 2020. The placement of co-verb gěi in spoken Mandarin varieties: A study on regional influences. Chinese Language and Discourse 11(2). 335–354. https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.18006.pen.Suche in Google Scholar

Petré, Peter & Lynn Anthonissen. 2020. Individuality in complex systems: A constructionist approach. Cognitive Linguistics 31(2). 185–212.10.1515/cog-2019-0033Suche in Google Scholar

Peyraube, Alain. 1985. Syntaxe diachronique du chinois: Évolution des constructions datives du XlVe siècle av. J.-C. au XVIIIe siècle. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 14(2). 289–294. https://doi.org/10.3406/clao.1985.1176.Suche in Google Scholar

Pinheiro, José C. & Douglas M. Bates. 2000. Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4419-0318-1Suche in Google Scholar

R Core Team. 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/.Suche in Google Scholar

Rosenbach, Anette. 2006. Descriptive genitives in English: A case study on constructional gradience. English Language and Linguistics 10(1). 77–118.https://doi.org/10.1017/s1360674306001894.Suche in Google Scholar

Röthlisberger, Melanie, Jason Grafmiller & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi. 2017. Cognitive indigenization effects in the English dative alternation. Cognitive Linguistics 28(4). 673–710.10.1515/cog-2016-0051Suche in Google Scholar

Ryan, Kevin M. 2013. Onset weight, word weight, and the perceptual interval. Paper presented at the Phonology 2013 meeting. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.Suche in Google Scholar

Sankoff, David. 1988. Sociolinguistics and syntactic variation. In Fredrick J. Newmeyer (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge survey, 140–161. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620577.009Suche in Google Scholar

Sankoff, David & William Labov. 1979. On the uses of variable rules. Language in Society 8(2–3). 189–222. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404500007430.Suche in Google Scholar

Shen, Zhongwei. 2015. Early Mandarin seen from Ancient Altaic scripts: The rise of a new phonological standard. In Willam S.-Y. Wang & Chaofen Sun (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Chinese linguistics, 91–103. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Shi, Yuzhi. 2002. 汉语发展史上的双音化趋势和双音化驱使的动补结构的诞生 [The motivation of the disyllabification for the emergence of the resultative construction----The effect of phonological change on the evolution of Chinese grammar]. Yuyan Yanjiu 1. 1–14.Suche in Google Scholar

Shih, Stephanie & Jason Grafmiller. 2011. Weighing in on end weight. Paper presented at the Linguistic Society of America 85th Annual Meeting. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 6–9 January.Suche in Google Scholar

Speelman, Dirk, Kris Heylen & Dirk Geeraerts. 2018. Introduction. In Dirk Speelman, Kris Heylen & Dirk Geeraerts (eds.), Mixed-effects regression models in Linguistics, 1–10. Cham: Springer International Publishing AG.10.1007/978-3-319-69830-4_1Suche in Google Scholar

Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2016. About text frequencies in historical linguistics: Disentangling environmental and grammatical change. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 12(1). 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2015-0068.Suche in Google Scholar

Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, Anette Rosenbach, Joan Bresnan & Christoph Wolk. 2014. Culturally conditioned language change? A multi-variate analysis of genitive constructions in ARCHER. In Marianne Hundt (ed.), Late modern English syntax, 133–152. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139507226.011Suche in Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali. 2001. Comparative sociolinguistics. In Jack Chambers, Peter Trudgill & Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds.), Handbook of language variation and change, 729–763. Malden: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470756591.ch28Suche in Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali. 2012. Variationist sociolinguistics: Change, observation, interpretation. Malden & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar

Theijssen, Daphne, Louis Ten Bosch, Lou Boves, Bert Cranen & Hans van Halteren. 2013. Choosing alternatives: Using Bayesian Networks and memory based learning to study the dative alternation. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 9(2). 227–262. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2013-0007.Suche in Google Scholar

van Bergen, Geertje & Peter de Swart. 2010. Scrambling in spoken Dutch: Definiteness versus weight as determinants of word order variation. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 6(2). 267–295. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt.2010.010.Suche in Google Scholar

Wang, Li. 1957. 汉语史稿 [A manuscript of the history of the Chinese language]. Beijing: Science Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar

Wang, Li (ed.). 1999 [1964]. 古代汉语 [Archaic Chinese], 2nd edn. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company.Suche in Google Scholar

Wang, Xin. 2016. 汉语双宾语构式的历时演化——从历时构式语法角度研究 [The evolution of Chinese double object construction: A perspective of diachronic construction grammar]. Singapore: National University of Singapore PhD Dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Wasow, Thomas & Jennifer Arnold. 2003. Post-verbal constituent ordering in English. In Günter Rohdenburg & Britta Mondorf (eds.), Determinants of grammatical variation in English, 119–154. Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110900019.119Suche in Google Scholar

Wolk, Christoph, Joan Bresnan, Anette Rosenbach & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi. 2013. Dative and genitive variability in Late Modern English: Exploring cross-constructional variation and change. Diachronica 30(3). 382–419. https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.30.3.04wol.Suche in Google Scholar

Wu, Jing & Yuzhi Shi. 2009. 制约语法结构选择的因素——以表达物体传递的结构为例 [Motivations in the choice of constructions: A case study of object transfer sentences]. Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu 6. 17–24.Suche in Google Scholar

Yao, Yao & Feng-Hsi Liu. 2010. A working report on statistically modeling dative variation in Mandarin Chinese. In Chu-Ren Huang & Dan Jurafsky (eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on computational linguistics, Beijing, August 2010, 1236–1244. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Zaenen, Annie, Jean Carlette, Gregory Garretson, Joan Bresnan, Andrew Koontz-Garboden, Tatiana Nikitina, M. Catherine O’Connor & Tom Wasow. 2004. Animacy encoding in English: Why and how. In Donna Byron & Bonnie Webber (eds.), Proceedings of the 2004 ACL Workshop on Discourse Annotation, Barcelona, July 2004, 118–125. East Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.10.3115/1608938.1608954Suche in Google Scholar

Zhan, Fangqiong & Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2020. A study of the development of the Chinese correlative comparative construction from the perspective of constructionalization. Diachronica 37(1). 83–126. https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.18025.zha.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhan, Weidong, Rui Guo, Baobao Chang, Yirong Chen & Long Chen. 2019. 北京大学 CCL语料库的研制 [The building of the CCL corpus: Its design and implementation]. Yuliaoku Yuyanxue 6(1). 71–86.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhang, Wen. 2014. 汉语双宾句构成历史演变特点探析 [A diachronic study of Chinese double object construction]. Gu Hanyu Yanjiu 4. 58–68+96.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhang, Wen. 2015. 影响汉语给予类双及物构式句式选择的制约因素 [The factors determining the alternation of ditransitive construction]. Yuyan Jiaoxue Yu Yanjiu 2. 54–65.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhang, Weiwei, Dirk Geeraerts & Dirk Speelman. 2015. Visualizing onomasiological change: Diachronic variation in metonymic patterns for WOMAN in Chinese. Cognitive Linguistics 26(2). 289–330.10.1515/cog-2014-0093Suche in Google Scholar

Zhang, Dong & Jiajin Xu. 2019. 英汉与格交替现象的多因素研究 [A multifactorial study of dative alternation in English and Chinese]. Wai Guo Yu 2. 24–33.10.32629/eep.v2i6.326Suche in Google Scholar

Zhang, Lirui & Shuangyun Yao. 2019. 双宾结构的历时嬗变及形成动因 [Diachronic evolvement and formation inducement of the double object constructions in Chinese]. Yuyan Yanjiu. 34–39.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhu, Dexi. 1979. 与动词“给”相关的句法问题 [Syntactic issues related to the verb gei]. Fangyan 2. 81–87.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhu, Dexi. 1982. 语法讲义 [Lectures on grammar]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Zuur, Alain F., Elena N. Leno, Neil J. Walker, Anatoly A. Saveliev & Graham M. Smith. 2009. Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-87458-6Suche in Google Scholar