The English gerund revisited

References

Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Boye, Kasper. 2012. Epistemic meaning: A crosslinguistic and functional-cognitive study. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110219036Suche in Google Scholar

Brems, Lieselotte, Kristin Davidse. 2010. Complex subordinators derived from noun complement clauses: Grammaticalization and paradigmaticity. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia. International Journal of Linguistics 42(1). 101–116.10.1080/03740463.2010.486920Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds.), Reading in English transformational grammar, 184–221. Waltham: Ginn.Suche in Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1976. The syntax of action nominals: A cross-language study. Lingua 40. 177–201.10.1016/0024-3841(76)90093-0Suche in Google Scholar

Cristofaro, Sonia. 2003. Subordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Davidse, Kristin. 2015. Complex NPs with third-order entity clauses: Towards a grammatical description and semantic typology. In Alex Ho-Cheong Leung & William van der Wurff (eds.), The noun phrase in English: Past and present. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Suche in Google Scholar

Davies, Mark. 2004. BYU-BNC. (Based on the British National Corpus from Oxford University Press). http://corpus.byu.edu/bnc/.Suche in Google Scholar

Davies, Mark. 2008. The corpus of contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990-present. http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/.Suche in Google Scholar

De Smet, Hendrik. 2007. Nominal gerunds in 16th-century English. The function of the definite article. Folia Linguistica Historica 28(1). 77–113.10.1515/flih.2007.77Suche in Google Scholar

De Smet, Hendrik. 2008. Functional motivations in the development of nominal and verbal gerunds in Middle and Early Modern English. English Language and Linguistics 12(1). 55–102.10.1017/S136067430700250XSuche in Google Scholar

De Smet, Hendrik. 2010. English -ing-clauses and their problems: The structure of grammatical categories. Linguistics 48(6). 1153–1193.10.1515/ling.2010.038Suche in Google Scholar

De Smet, Hendrik. 2013. Spreading patterns: Diffusional change in the English system of complementation. Oxford studies in the history of English. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199812752.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Declerck, Renaat. 1991. A comprehensive descriptive grammar of English. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Suche in Google Scholar

Dik, Simon & Kees Hengeveld. 1991. The hierarchical structure of the clause and the typology of perception-verb complements. Linguistics 29. 231–259.10.1515/ling.1991.29.2.231Suche in Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 2005. A semantic approach to English grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 2006. Complementation: A cross-linguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Donner, Morton. 1986. The gerund in middle English. English Studies 67. 390–400.10.1080/00138388608598465Suche in Google Scholar

Egan, Thomas. 2008. Non-finite complementation. A usage-based study of infinitive and -ing clauses in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi.10.1163/9789401205542Suche in Google Scholar

Fanego, Teresa. 1996. The gerund in early modern English. Evidence from the Helsinki Corpus. Folia Linguistica Historica 17. 97–152.10.1515/flih.1996.17.1-2.97Suche in Google Scholar

Fanego, Teresa. 2004. On reanalysis and actualization in syntactic change: The rise and development of English verbal gerunds. Diachronica 21. 5–55.10.1075/dia.21.1.03fanSuche in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles. 1985. Mental spaces. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Fonteyn, Lauren. 2016a. Categoriality in language change: The case of the English gerund. Leuven: University of Leuven dissertation.10.1093/oso/9780190917579.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Fonteyn, Lauren. 2016b. From nominal to verbal gerunds: A referential typology. Functions of Language 23(1). 82–106.10.1075/fol.23.1.04fonSuche in Google Scholar

Fonteyn, Lauren, Hendrik De Smet & Liesbet Heyvaert. 2015a. What it means to verbalize: The changing discourse functions of the English gerund. Journal of English Linguistics 43(1). 36–60.10.1177/0075424214564365Suche in Google Scholar

Fonteyn, Lauren & Liesbet Heyvaert. To appear. Category change in the English gerund: Tangled web or fine-tuned constructional network? In Kristel Van Goethem, Muriel Norde, Evie Coussé & Gudrun Vanderbauwhede (eds.), Category change from a constructional perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Suche in Google Scholar

Fonteyn, Lauren, Liesbet Heyvaert & Charlotte Maekelberghe. 2015b. How do gerunds conceptualize events? A diachronic study. Cognitive Linguistics 26(4). 583–612.10.1515/cog-2015-0061Suche in Google Scholar

Fraser, Bruce. 1970. Some remarks on the action nominalization in English. In Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds.), Reading in English transformational grammar, 89–98. Waltham: Ginn.Suche in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th. & Anatol Stefanowitsch. 2004. Extending collostructional analysis. A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9(1). 97–129.10.1075/ijcl.9.1.06griSuche in Google Scholar

Heyvaert, Liesbet. 2003. A cognitive-functional approach to nominalization in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110903706Suche in Google Scholar

Heyvaert, Liesbet. 2008. On the constructional semantics of gerundive nominalizations. Folia Linguistica 42(1). 9–82.10.1515/FLIN.2008.39Suche in Google Scholar

Huddleston, Rodney D. & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316423530Suche in Google Scholar

Jack, George. 1988. The origins of the English gerund. Nowele 12. 15–75.10.1075/nowele.12.02jacSuche in Google Scholar

Keizer, Evelien. 2007. The English noun phrase: The nature of linguistic categorization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511627699Suche in Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul & Carol Kiparsky. 1970. Fact. In Manfred Bierwisch & Karl E. Heidolph (eds.), Progress in linguistics, 143–73. The Hague: Mouton.Suche in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar 2: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2002. Remarks on the English grounding systems. In Frank Brisard (ed.), Grounding: The epistemic footing of deixis and reference, 29–40. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110899801.29Suche in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2009. Investigations in cognitive grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110214369Suche in Google Scholar

Lees, Robert. 1966. The grammar of English nominalizations. Indiana: Bloomington.Suche in Google Scholar

Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics, Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Mackenzie, Lachlan. 1996. English nominalizations in the layered model of the sentence. In Betty Devriendt, Louis Goossens & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), Complex structures: A functionalist perspective, 325–355. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Mackenzie, Lachlan. 2004. Entity Concepts. In Geert Booij, Christian Lehmann, Joachim Mugdan & Stavros Skopeteas (eds.), Morphologie/Morphology. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung/An International handbook on Inflection and Word Formation, 973–982. Berlin: De Gruyter10.1515/9783110172782.2.13.973Suche in Google Scholar

Maekelberghe, Charlotte. Forthcoming. Present-day English gerunds: A multilayered referential model. Folia Linguistica.Suche in Google Scholar

Newmeyer, Frederick J. 1970. The derivation of the English action nominalization. Chicago Linguistic Society 6. 408–419.Suche in Google Scholar

Noonan, Michael. 1985. Complementation. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description: Complex constructions, Vol. 2, 42–140. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Rohdenburg, Günter. 2003. Cognitive complexity and horror aequi as factors determining the use of interrogative clause linkers in English. In Rohdenburg, Günter & Mondorf, Britta (eds.), Determinants of Grammatical variation in English, 205–250. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110900019.205Suche in Google Scholar

Ross, John R. 1973. Nouniness. In Osamu Fujimura (ed.), Three dimensions of linguistic research, 137–257. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Schachter, Paul. 1976. A nontransformational account of gerundive nominals in English. Linguistic Inquiry 7(2). 205–241.Suche in Google Scholar

Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2000. English Abstract nouns as conceptual shells. From corpus to cognition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110808704Suche in Google Scholar

Tajima, Matsuji. 1985. The syntactic development of the gerund in Middle English. Tokyo: Nan’un-do.Suche in Google Scholar

Thompson, Sandra. 1973. On subjectless gerunds in English. Foundations of Language 9(3). 374–383.Suche in Google Scholar

van der Wurff, William. 1993. Gerunds and their objects in the Modern English period. In Jaap van Marle (ed.), Historical linguistics 1991, 363–375. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.107.24wurSuche in Google Scholar

van der Wurff, William. 1997. Deriving object-verb order in Late Middle English. Journal of Linguistics 33. 485–509.10.1017/S0022226797006531Suche in Google Scholar

Vendler, Zeno. 1968. Adjectives and nominalizations. Papers on formal linguistics no. 5. The Hague: Mouton.Suche in Google Scholar

Vosberg, Uwe. 2003. The role of extractions and horror aequi in the evolution of -ing complements in Modern English. In Rohdenburg, Günter & Mondorf, Britta (eds.), Determinants of grammatical variation in English, 305–328. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110900019.305Suche in Google Scholar