Discourse functions of always progressives: Beyond complaining

References

Alves, Hans, Alex Koch & Christian Unkelbach. 2017. Why good is more alike than bad: Processing implications. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 21(2). 69–79.10.1016/j.tics.2016.12.006Suche in Google Scholar

Always, adv. [Def. 1.]. 2015. Oxford English Dictionary Online. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/5941 Accessed 31 March 2015.Suche in Google Scholar

Anderson, Kristin J. & Campbell Leaper. 1998. Emotion talk between same- and mixed-gender friends: Form and function. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 17(4). 419–448.10.1177/0261927X980174001Suche in Google Scholar

Baumeister, Roy F., Ellen Bratslavsky, Catrin Finkenauer & Kathleen D. Vohs. 2001. Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology 5(4). 323–370.10.1037/e413792005-154Suche in Google Scholar

Bebbington, Keely, T. Colin MacLeod, Mark Ellison & Nicolas Fay. 2016. The sky is falling: Evidence of a negativity bias in the social transmission of information. Evolution and Human Behavior 38(1). 92–101.10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.07.004Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan. 1999. The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow, England: Pearson Education.Suche in Google Scholar

Boucher, Jerry & Charles E. Osgood. 1969. The Pollyanna Hypothesis. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 8(1). 1–8.10.1016/S0022-5371(69)80002-2Suche in Google Scholar

Carter, Ronald & McCarthy. Michael. 2006. Cambridge grammar of English. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Celce-Murcia, Marianne & Diane Larsen-Freeman. 1999. The grammar book: An ESL/EFL teacher’s course, 2nd edn. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.Suche in Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace L. & Jane Danielewicz. 1987. Properties of spoken and written language. In Rosalind Horowitz & S. Jay Samuels (eds.), Comprehending oral and written language, 83–113. New York, NY: Academic Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Claridge, Claudia. 2011. Hyperbole in English: A corpus-based study of exaggeration. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511779480Suche in Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Davies, Mark. 2008–. The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990–Present. Available online at http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/.Suche in Google Scholar

Edmondson, Willis & Juliane House. 1981. Let’s talk and talk about it: A pedagogic interactional grammar of English. Munich, Germany: Urban & Schwarzenberg.Suche in Google Scholar

Ellis, Nick C. & Eric Frey. 2009. The psycholinguistic reality of collocation and semantic prosody (2): Affective priming. In Edith A. Roberta Corrigan, Hamid Ouali Moravcsik & Kathleen Wheatley (eds.), Formulaic language, Vol. II: Acquisition, loss, psychological reality, and functional explanations (Typological Studies in Language 83), 473–497. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.83.13ellSuche in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan T. 2004. HCFA script for R (Version 3.2). Santa Barbara, California: University of California, Santa Barbara. http://www.linguistics.ucsb.edu/faculty/stgries/research/sflwr/sflwr.html Accessed May 10, 2017.Suche in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan T. 2009. Statistics for linguistics with R: A practical introduction. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110216042Suche in Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. 1985. An introduction to functional grammar. London, England: Arnold.Suche in Google Scholar

Hauser, David J. & Norbert Schwarz. 2016. Semantic prosody and judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 145(7). 882–896.10.1037/xge0000178Suche in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Thomas. 2011. Preposition placement in English: A usage-based approach. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511933868Suche in Google Scholar

Jesperson, Otto. 1931. A Modern English grammar on historical principles. Part IV: Syntax (Time and Tense 3). Heidelberg, Germany: Carl Winters University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Jing-Schmidt, Zhuo. 2007. Negativity bias in language: A cognitive-affective model of emotive intensifiers. Cognitive Linguistics 18(3). 417–443.10.1515/COG.2007.023Suche in Google Scholar

Killie, Kristin. 2004. Subjectivity and the English progressive. English Language and Linguistics 8(1). 25–46.10.1017/S1360674304001236Suche in Google Scholar

Kranich, Svenja. 2007. Subjectification and the English progressive: The history of ALWAYS+progressive constructions. York Papers in Linguistics 2(8). 120–137.Suche in Google Scholar

Kranich, Svenja. 2010. The progressive in Modern English: A corpus-based study of grammaticalization and related changes. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Rodopi.10.1163/9789042031449Suche in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1990. The invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schemas? Cognitive Linguistics 1(1). 39–74.10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.39Suche in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1988. An overview of cognitive grammar. In Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (ed.), Topics in cognitive linguistics (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 50), 3–48. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.50.03lanSuche in Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey. 2004. Meaning and the English verb, 3rd edn. Harlow, England: Pearson Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Legitt, John S. & Raymond W. Gibbs. 2000. Emotional reactions to verbal irony. Discourse Processes 29(1). 1–24.10.1207/S15326950dp2901_1Suche in Google Scholar

Lindley, Jori. 2016. Literal versus exaggerated always and never: A cross-genre corpus study. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 21(2). 219–249.10.1075/ijcl.21.2.04linSuche in Google Scholar

Ljung, Magnus. 1980. Reflections on the English progressive. Gothenburg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Suche in Google Scholar

Louw, Bill. 1993. Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer? The diagnostic potential of semantic prosodies. In Mona Baker, Gill Francis & Elena Tognini-Bonelli (eds.), Text and technology: In honour of John Sinclair, 157–176. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.64.11louSuche in Google Scholar

Louw, Bill. 2000. Contextual prosodic theory: Bringing semantic prosodies to life. In Chris Heffer, Helen Sauntson & Gwyneth Fox (eds.), Words in context: A tribute to John Sinclair on his retirement, 48–94. Birmingham, England: University of Birmingham.Suche in Google Scholar

Matlin, Margaret W. & David J. Stang. 1978. The Pollyanna Principle: Selectivity in language, memory, and thought. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.Suche in Google Scholar

Mindt, Dieter. 2000. An empirical grammar of the English verb system. Berlin, Germany: Cornelsen.Suche in Google Scholar

Onions, C. T. 1904. An advanced English syntax. London, England: Sonnenschein.Suche in Google Scholar

Palmer, Frank R. 1988. The English Verb, 2nd edn London, England: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Peeters, Guido & Janusz Czapinski. 1990. Positive-negative asymmetry in evaluations: The distinction between affective and informational negativity effects. European Review of Social Psychology 1. 33–60.10.1080/14792779108401856Suche in Google Scholar

Pratto, Felicia & Oliver P. John. 1991. Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of negative social information. Personality & Social Psychology 61(3). 380–391.10.4324/9780203496398-15Suche in Google Scholar

Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London, England: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Römer, Ute. 2005. Progressive, patterns, pedagogy: A corpus-driven approach to English progressive forms, functions, contexts and didactics. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.18Suche in Google Scholar

Rozin, Paul & Edward B. Royzman. 2001. Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review 5(4). 296–320.10.1207/S15327957PSPR0504_2Suche in Google Scholar

Rydén, Mats. 1997. On the panchronic core meaning of the English progressive. In Terttu Nevalainen & Leena Kahlas-Tarkka (eds.), To explain the present: Studies in the changing English language in honour of Matti Rissanen, 419–429. Helsinki, Finland: Société Néophilologique.Suche in Google Scholar

Shimanoff, Susan B. 1985. Expressing emotions in words: Verbal patterns of interaction. Journal of Communication 35. 16–31.10.1111/j.1460-2466.1985.tb02445.xSuche in Google Scholar

Simpson, Rita, Sarah Briggs, Janine Ovens & John Swales. 2002. The Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English. Ann Arbor, MI: The Regents of the University of Michigan.Suche in Google Scholar

Sinclair, John McHardy. 1970 [1966]. Taking a poem to pieces. In Donald C. Freeman (ed.), Linguistics and Literary Style, 129–142. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Suche in Google Scholar

Sinclair, John McHardy. 1987. Looking up. London, England: Collins.Suche in Google Scholar

Sinclair, John McHardy (ed.). 1990. Collins COBUILD English grammar. London, England: Collins.Suche in Google Scholar

Sinclair, John McHardy. 1991. Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Smith, N. Kyle, John T. Cacioppo, Jeff T. Larsen & Tanya L. Chartrand. 2003. May I have your attention, please: Electrocortical responses to positive and negative stimuli. The Cognitive Neuroscience of Social Behavior 41(2). 171–183.10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00147-1Suche in Google Scholar

Smitterberg, Erik. 2005. The progressive in 19th–Century English: A process of integration. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Rodopi.10.1163/9789004333086Suche in Google Scholar

Tannen, Deborah. 1982. Oral and literate strategies in spoken and written narratives. Language 58(1). 1–21.10.2307/413530Suche in Google Scholar

Taylor, Shelley E. 1991. Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin 110(1). 67–85.10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.67Suche in Google Scholar

Tversky, Amos & Daniel Kahneman. 1991. Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106(4). 1039–1061.10.1017/CBO9780511803475.008Suche in Google Scholar

Von Eye, Alexander. 2001. Configural Frequency Analysis – “Version 2000”: A program for 32 bit Windows operating systems. Methods of Psychological Research Online 6(2). 129–139.Suche in Google Scholar

Williams, Christopher. 2002. Non-progressive and progressive aspect in English. Fasano, Italy: Schena.Suche in Google Scholar

Wright, Susan. 1994. The mystery of the modal progressive. In Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), Studies in Early Modern English, 467–485. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar