Prototype-driven alternations: The case of German weak nouns

References

Baayen, R. Harald, Anna Endresen, Laura A. Janda, Anastasia Makarova & Tore Nesset. 2013. Making choices in Russian: Pros and cons of statistical methods for rival forms. Russian Linguistics 37. 253–291.10.1007/s11185-013-9118-6Suche in Google Scholar

Baroni, Marco, Silvia Bernardini, Adriano Ferraresi & Eros Zanchetta. 2009. The WaCky Wide Web: A collection of very large linguistically processed web-crawled corpora. Language Resources and Evaluation 43(3). 209–226.10.1007/s10579-009-9081-4Suche in Google Scholar

Barsalou, Lawrence W. 1990. On the indistinguishability of exemplar memory and abstraction in category representation. In Thomas K. Srull & Robert S. Wyer (eds.), Advances in social cognition, Volume III: Content and process specificity in the effects of prior experiences, 61–88. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Suche in Google Scholar

Barth, Danielle & Vsevolod Kapatsinski. 2014, ahead of print. A multimodel inference approach to categorical variant choice: Construction, priming and frequency effects on the choice between full and contracted forms of “am”, “are” and “is”. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. DOI 10.1515/cllt–2014–0022.DOI 10.1515/cllt–2014–0022Suche in Google Scholar

Bates, Douglas, Martin Maechler, Ben Bolker, Steve Walker. 2015. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1). 1–48.10.18637/jss.v067.i01Suche in Google Scholar

Biemann, Chris, Felix Bildhauer, Stefan Evert, Dirk Goldhahn, Uwe Quasthoff, Roland Schäfer, Johannes Simon, Leonard Swiezinski & Torsten Zesch. 2013. Scalable construction of high-quality web corpora. Journal for Language Technology and Computational Linguistics 28(2). 23–60.10.21248/jlcl.28.2013.175Suche in Google Scholar

Bittner, Dagmar. 2003. Von starken Feminina und schwachen Maskulina: Die neuhochdeutsche Substantivflexion – Eine Systemanalyse im Rahmen der natürlichen Morphologie. Berlin: ZAS.10.21248/zaspil.31.2003.181Suche in Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan, Anna Cueni, Tatiana Nikitina & R. Harald Baayen. 2007. Predicting the dative alternation. In Gerlof Bouma, Irene Kraemer & Joost Zwarts (eds.), Cognitive foundations of interpretation, 69–94. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Science.Suche in Google Scholar

Burnham, Kenneth P. & David R. Anderson. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical Information-Theoretic approach, 2nd edn. New York: Springer.Suche in Google Scholar

Busemeyer, Jerome R., In Jae Myung & Mark A. McDaniel. 1993. Cue competition effects: Empirical tests of adaptive network learning models. Psychological Science 4(3). 190–195.10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00486.xSuche in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. 1985. Morphology. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.9Suche in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. & Paul Hopper. 2001. Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.45Suche in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. & Carol Lynn Moder. 1983. Morphological classes as natural categories. Language 59. 251–70.10.2307/413574Suche in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. & Sandra Thompson. 2000. Three frequency effects in syntax. Berkeley Linguistic Society 23. 378–388.10.3765/bls.v23i1.1293Suche in Google Scholar

Campell, Donald T. & Donald W. Fiske. 1959. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin 56. 81–105.10.1037/h0046016Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Cronbach, Lee J. & Paul E. Meehl. 1955. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin 52. 281–302.10.1037/h0040957Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2008. The effects of frequency and neighbourhood density on adult speakers’ productivity with Polish case inflections: An empirical test of usage-based approaches to morphology. Journal of Memory and Language 58. 931–951.10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.005Suche in Google Scholar

Daelemans, Walter & Antal van den Bosch. 2005. Memory-based language processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486579Suche in Google Scholar

Divjak, Dagmar & Antti Arppe. 2013. Extracting prototypes from exemplars: What can corpus data tell us about concept representation? Cognitive Linguistics 24(2). 221–274.10.1515/cog-2013-0008Suche in Google Scholar

Divjak, Dagmar & Catherine L. Caldwell-Harris. 2015. Frequency and entrenchment. In Ewa Dąbrowska & Dagmar Divjak (eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics, 53–75. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110292022-004Suche in Google Scholar

Dobrić, Nikola. 2015. Three-factor prototypicality evaluation and the verb “look”. Language Sciences 50. 1–11.10.1016/j.langsci.2014.12.005Suche in Google Scholar

Eisenberg, Peter. 2012. Das Fremdwort im Deutschen, 2nd edn. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110288421Suche in Google Scholar

Eisenberg, Peter. 2013. Grundriss der deutschen Grammatik: Das Wort, 4th edn. edited by Nanna Fuhrhop. Stuttgart: Metzler.10.1007/978-3-476-00757-5Suche in Google Scholar

Ernestus, Mirjam & R. Harald Baayen. 2004. Analogical effects in regular past tense production in Dutch. Linguistics 42(5). 873–903.10.1515/ling.2004.031Suche in Google Scholar

Evert, Stefan & Andrew Hardie. 2011. Twenty-first century Corpus Workbench: Updating a query architecture for the new millennium. Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics 2011 Conference. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.Suche in Google Scholar

Fahrmeir, Ludwig, Thomas Kneib, Stefan Lang & Brian Marx. 2013. Regression – models, methods, and application. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-34333-9Suche in Google Scholar

Fox, John & Georges Monette. 1992. Generalized collinearity diagnostics. Journal of the American Statistics Association 87. 178–183.10.1080/01621459.1992.10475190Suche in Google Scholar

Gelman, Andrew & Jennifer Hill. 2006. Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511790942Suche in Google Scholar

Gilquin, Gaëtanelle. 2006. The place of prototypicality in corpus linguistics: Causation in the hot seat. In Stefan Th. Gries & Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds.), Corpus-based approaches to syntax and lexis, 159–191. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele. 2006. Constructions at work. The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268511.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Glyn, Dylan & Kerstin Fischer (eds.). 2010. Quantitative methods in cognitive semantics: Corpus-driven approaches. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110226423Suche in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th. 2003. Towards a corpus-based identification of prototypical instances of constructions. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 1. 1–27.10.1075/arcl.1.02griSuche in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th. 2010. Corpus linguistics and theoretical linguistics – A love-hate relationship? Not Necessarily. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 15(3). 327–343.10.1075/ijcl.15.3.02griSuche in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th. 2014. Corpus and quantitative methods. In Jeanette Littlemore & John R. Taylor (eds.), The Bloomsbury companion to cognitive linguistics, 279–300. London & New York: Bloomsbury.Suche in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th. 2015. The most underused statistical method in corpus linguistics: Multi-level (and mixed-effects) models. Corpora 10(1). 95–126.10.3366/cor.2015.0068Suche in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th. & Dagmar S. Divjak. 2010. Quantitative approaches in usage-based cognitive semantics. In Dylan Glyn & Kerstin Fischer (eds.), Quantitative methods in cognitive semantics: Corpus-driven approaches, 331–354. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110226423.331Suche in Google Scholar

Hay, Jennifer B. & R. Harald Baayen. 2005. Shifting paradigms: Gradient structure in morphology. Trends in Cognitive Linguistics 9(7). 342–348.10.1016/j.tics.2005.04.002Suche in Google Scholar

Hintzman, Douglas, L. 1986. Schema abstraction in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review 93(4). 411–428.10.1037/0033-295X.93.4.411Suche in Google Scholar

Joeres, Rolf. 1996. “Der Friede” oder “der Frieden”: ein Normproblem der Substantivflexion. Sprachwissenschaft 21. 301–336.Suche in Google Scholar

Kapatsinski, Vsevolod. 2014. What is grammar like? A usage-based constructionist perspective. Linguistic Issues in Language Technology 11. 1–41.10.33011/lilt.v11i.1361Suche in Google Scholar

Klein, Wolf Peter. 2009. Auf der Kippe? Zweifelsfälle als Herausforderung(en) für Sprachwissenschaft und Sprachnormierung. In Marek Konopka & Bruno Strecker (eds.), Deutsche Grammatik – Regeln, Normen, Sprachgebrauch, 141–165. Berlin: de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Köpcke, Klaus-Michael. 1995. Die Klassifikation der schwachen Maskulina in der deutschen Gegenwartssprache – ein Beispiel für die Leistungsfähigkeit der Prototypentheorie. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 14(2). 159–180.10.1515/zfsw.1995.14.2.159Suche in Google Scholar

Köpcke, Klaus-Michael. 2000. Chaos und Ordnung – zur semantischen Remotivierung einer Deklinationsklasse im Übergang vom Mhd. zum Nhd. In Andreas Bittner, Dagmar Bittner & Klaus-Michael Köpcke (eds.), Angemessene Strukturen: Systemorganisation in Phonologie, Morphologie und Syntax, 107–122. Hildesheim, Zürich & New York: Olms.Suche in Google Scholar

Kruschke, John K. & Mark K. Johansen. 1999. A model of probabilistic category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 25(5). 1083–1119.10.1037/0278-7393.25.5.1083Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Kuperman, Victor & Joan Bresnan. 2012. The effects of construction probability on word durations during spontaneous incremental sentence production. Journal of Memory and Language 66. 588–611.10.1016/j.jml.2012.04.003Suche in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald. 2010. How not to disagree: The emergence of structure from usage. In Kasper Boye & Elisabeth Engberg-Pedersen (eds.), Language usage and language structure, 107–143. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Maxwell, Scott E. & Harold D. Delaney. 2004. Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison perspective. Mahwah, NJ & London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.10.4324/9781410609243Suche in Google Scholar

Medin, Douglas L. & Marguerite M. Schaffer. 1978. Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review 85(3). 207–238.10.1037/0033-295X.85.3.207Suche in Google Scholar

Murphy, Gregory. 2002. The big book of concepts. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/1602.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Nesset, Tore & Laura A. Janda. 2010. Paradigm structure: Evidence from Russian suffix shift. Cognitive Linguistics 21(4). 699–725.10.1515/cogl.2010.022Suche in Google Scholar

Newmeyer, Frederick J. 2003. Grammar is grammar and usage is usage. Language 79. 682–707.10.1353/lan.2003.0260Suche in Google Scholar

R Core Team. 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Suche in Google Scholar

Ramscar, Michael, Melody Dye & Malte Hübner. 2013. When the fly flied and when the fly flew: How semantics affect the processing of inflected verbs. Language and Cognitive Processes 28(4). 468–497.10.1080/01690965.2011.649041Suche in Google Scholar

Rosch, Eleanor. 1973. Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 4. 328–350.10.1016/0010-0285(73)90017-0Suche in Google Scholar

Rosch, Eleanor. 1978. Principles of categorization. In Eleanor Rosch & Barbara B. Lloyd (eds.), Cognition and categorization, 27–48. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Suche in Google Scholar

Rosch, Eleanor, Carolyn B. Mervis, Wayne D. Gray, David M. Johnson & Penny Boyes-Braem. 1976. Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 8. 382–439.10.1016/0010-0285(76)90013-XSuche in Google Scholar

Rousseeuw, Peter J., Ida Ruts & John W. Tukey. 1999. The bagplot: A bivariate Boxplot. The American Statistician 53(4). 382–387.10.1080/00031305.1999.10474494Suche in Google Scholar

Schäfer, Roland. 2015. Einführung in die grammatische Beschreibung des Deutschen. Berlin: Language Science Press.10.26530/OAPEN_533872Suche in Google Scholar

Schäfer, Roland & Ulrike Sayatz. 2014. Die Kurzformen des Indefinitartikels im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 33(2). 215–250.10.1515/zfs-2014-0008Suche in Google Scholar

Schäfer, Roland & Felix Bildhauer. 2012. Building large corpora from the web using a new effcient tool chain. In Nicoletta Calzolari, Khalid Choukri, Thierry Declerck, Mehmet Uğur Doğan, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Jan Odijk & Stelios Piperidis (eds.), Proceedings of the eighth International conference on language resources and evaluation, 486–493. Istanbul: ELRA.Suche in Google Scholar

Schäfer, Roland & Felix Bildhauer. 2013. Web corpus construction. San Francisco: Morgan & Claypool.10.2200/S00508ED1V01Y201305HLT022Suche in Google Scholar

Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2010a. Entrenchment, salience, and basic levels. In Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics, 117–134. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2010b. Does frequency in text really instantiate entrenchment in the cognitive system? In Dylan Glyn & Kerstin Fischer (eds.), Quantitative methods in cognitive semantics: Corpus-driven approaches, 101–133. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110226423.101Suche in Google Scholar

Skousen, Royal. 1989. Analogical modeling of language. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-009-1906-8Suche in Google Scholar

Storms, Gert, Paul De Boeck & Wim Ruts. 2000. Prototype and exemplar-based information in natural language categories. Journal of Memory and Language 42. 51–73.10.1006/jmla.1999.2669Suche in Google Scholar

Sutcliffe, John P. 1993. Concepts, class, and category in the tradition of aristotle. In Iven Van Mechelen, James A. Hampton, Ryszard S. Michalski, & Peter Theuns (eds.), Categories and concepts: Theoretical views and inductive data analysis, 35–65. London: Academic Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Tabak, Wieke, Robert Schreuder & R. Harald Baayen. 2010. Producing inflected verbs: A picture naming study. The Mental Lexicon 5(1). 22–46.10.1075/ml.5.1.02tabSuche in Google Scholar

Taylor, John R. 2003a. Linguistic categorization, 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Taylor, John R. 2003b. Near-synonyms as co-extensive categories. Language Sciences 25. 637–655.10.1016/S0388-0001(03)00031-7Suche in Google Scholar

Taylor, John R. 2006. Polysemy and the lexicon. In Gitte Kristiansen, Michel Achard, René Dirven & Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives, 51–80. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Taylor, John R. 2008. Prototypes in cognitive linguistics. In Peter Robinson & Nick C. Ellis (eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition, 39–65. New York & London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Taylor, John R. 2015. Prototype effects in grammar. In Ewa Dąbrowska & Dagmar Divjak (eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics, 562–579. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110292022-028Suche in Google Scholar

Tuggy, David. 2007. Schematicity. In Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics, 82–116. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Thieroff, Rolf. 2003. Die Bedienung des Automatens durch den Mensch. Deklination der schwachen Maskulina als Zweifelsfall. Linguistik Online 16(4). 105–117.10.13092/lo.16.798Suche in Google Scholar

Uehara, Satoshi. 2003. A diachronic perspective on prototypicality: The case of nominal adjectives in Japanese. In Hubert Cuyckens, René Dirven & Taylor, John (eds.), Cognitive approaches to lexical semantics, 363–391. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110219074.363Suche in Google Scholar

Van Goethem, Kristel & Philippe Hiligsmann. 2014. When two paths converge: Debonding and clipping of Dutch “reuze”. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 26(1). 31–64.10.1017/S1470542713000172Suche in Google Scholar

Winters, Margaret E. 1990. Toward a theory of syntactic prototypes. In Savas L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), Meanings and prototypes. Studies in linguistic categorization, 285–306. London & New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Wurzel, Wolfgang U. 1985. Deutsch “der Funke” zu “der Funken”: ein Fall für die natürliche Morphologie. Linguistische Studien des Zentralinstituts für Sprachwissenschaft der Akademie der Wissenschaften der DDR A(127). 129–145.Suche in Google Scholar

Zeldes, Amir. 2012. Productivity in argument selection. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110303919Suche in Google Scholar

Zuur, Alain F., Elena N. Ieno, Neil Walker, Anatoly A. Saveliev & Graham M. Smith. 2009. Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-87458-6Suche in Google Scholar