Home Mendeleev and Natural Resources
Article Publicly Available

Mendeleev and Natural Resources

Published/Copyright: September 1, 2009
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

_

Mendeleev and Natural Resources

The opinions and views of Mendeleev are quoted in the books Sacred Thoughts and To the Discovery of Russia. His foresight about the origin and use of natural resources is no less meaningful than the periodic table of elements that made his name world famous. In Czarist Russia, Mendeleev’s thoughts about resource exploration were not deservedly appreciated: Oil industry leaders were thinking only of the present day and today’s issues, and not of sustainable development of the country and the communities of the future.

In the Soviet Union, Mendeleev’s work in the fields of economics and resources exploration were criticized because he considered capitalism to be progressive and appreciated it’s value.

The early life of the genius was not simple. The well-known Russian universities of Moscow and St. Petersburg refused to accept the 16-year old Mendeleev as a student. In 1855, he graduated from the Nature Department of the Physics and Mathematics Faculty of the St. Petersburg Pedagogical Institute and left to become a school master.

The first of Mendeleev’s works, published in a scientific journal dedicated to mining while he was still a student, was concerned with resource exploration (resourceology). In this work Mendeleev considered the composition of minerals: orthite (basic silicate) and pyroxene R2[Si2O6] R – Li, Na, Ca, Mg, Fe, Al. He was able to add new knowledge about the behavior of isomorphic crystals.

During the 1862–1863 academic year, when the University of St. Petersburg was closed due to student unrest and professors were free from teaching duties, Mendeleev became engaged in the compilation and editing of the Technical Encyclopaedia. This led to his enthusiasm for oil production and its enormous potential for Russia.

It is well known that Russia is considered to be the birthplace of the first industrial method of distilling oil. The first oil distillation factory was built in 1823 in the region of the town of Mozdok, by the free peasants of the brothers Dubinin. The first experiments in the distillation of oil occurred 10 years later in America. However, it was during this time that an illuminating American commodity materialized in St. Petersburg. It was first known as Photonaphtil or Photogen, and then as Kerosene. American kerosene, imported to Russia via the Atlantic Ocean became cheaper than Russian kerosene. Mendeleev became interested in this sad paradox and ascertained each overly laborious stage of the long journey of Bakinese kerosene to the capital of Russia via the Caspian Sea and Volga River in wooden barrels. He concluded that the outlay on the containers for a repeated shipment, warehouse storage, and transportation far exceeded the production cost of kerosene. Furthermore, the transportation method resulted in large amounts of wasted cargo due to contamination from other oil products.

In these conditions, Russian kerosene could not compete with American kerosene even in the internal market. Many Russian oil refining factories were functioning at a loss. In analyzing the situation, Mendeleev recommended interconnecting piping from the oil wells to the factory, and connecting pipes from the factory to the shipping dock. He suggested transferring oil products not in barrels but in specially designed tanks in the hold of the craft. Hence, the first of oil by tankers was initiated by the Astrakhan ship owners Nikolai and Dmitri Artemyevs on the freighter Alexander. After a prosperous journey from Baku to Astrakhan, the new method gained wide recognition not only in Russia but in the rest of the world, where it was known as the “Russian method.” Thanks to the development of an economically viable method of transportation, Russian kerosene became a competitor on the export market.

Mendeleev was the first to discern the enormous value of oil for the national economy; he energetically insisted that oil be efficiently refined. As early as the 1880s he foresaw the potential of refining not just kerosene from oil but many other useful substances.

Mendeleev was aware of the dangers of creating a monopoly in oil production. He was convinced that monopolization would lead to a high price for oil, to an increase in demand, and eventually to the end of development. He advocated for the presence on the oil market of many large and small industrial developers.

In the summer of 1888, Mendeleev travelled to Donbas to study coal mining industries and sources and also potential methods for reducing the extraction of indigenous coal. As a result of his trip, he wrote a long and public article entitled “Future Strength Slumbering beneath the Banks of the Don.” He was concerned not simply about his own time but about future generations. He was convinced that raw materials should be used wisely. “We could flood the world with oil, we can abundantly supply coal not just to our own industries, but to many places in Europe . . ., iron ore could be converted into any amount of cast iron, iron, and steel, and thus we could compete not only with England and Germany . . . but with the United States of America . . . Don coal, iron, and soda could supply the whole of western Europe.”

Mendeleev foresaw that the extraction of coal would always be economically nonviable and exceedingly laborious. Even today, mineworkers frequently go on strike: on the Gorbaty Bridge in Moscow, in Krivoi Rog, in Donbas, in Kuzbas, as in Scotland, Wales, and Germany. Statistics show that each 1000 tonnes of coal are being paid for by one human life. Mendeleev was deeply concerned about the moral cost from coal mining. One day the idea of carbonating coal came to him, which he revealed in 1880. The idea, unfortunately, has never been realized.

The contemporary concept of sustainable development is evident in Mendeleev’s work “Explanatory Tariff or Exploration of Industrial Development in Russia in Connection with the General Customs Tariff of 1891.” One contemporary described it as “a bible of Russian protectionism and stimulation of industrial development in Russia.” With great accuracy and attention to detail, he analyzed the raw materials of the Russian economy—from raw iron to that little known commodity ”Paraguayan tea” (Herba Matte).

Sadly, political favoritism often leads to the appreciation of commodities, and this can be observed in Russia today. As Mendeleev saw it, protectionist policies regarding such commodities as soda and iron caused an increase in production within the country, which in turn produced a reduction in the sale price.

_

Page last modified 28 April 2009.

Copyright © 2003-2009 International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry.

Questions regarding the website, please contact edit.ci@iupac.org

Published Online: 2009-09-01
Published in Print: 2009-06

© 2014 by Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Masthead
  2. From the Editor
  3. Contents
  4. Moving Ahead with the International Year of Chemistry
  5. What Is “Materials Chemistry?”
  6. Beyond the Book
  7. Scientific Method: Can It Help Promote the Public Appreciation of Science?
  8. IUPAC President Publicizes the International Year of Chemistry
  9. L’Oréal-UNESCO Awards Bestowed Upon Five Exceptional Women Scientists
  10. Javier Garcia Martinez Named a Young Global Leader
  11. Deliang Chen Takes the Helm at ICSU
  12. Postgraduate Course in Polymer Science
  13. Toward a Comprehensive Definition of Oxidation State
  14. IUPAC International Chemical Identifier–InChI Update
  15. Humic-Metal Binding Constants Database
  16. Provisional Recommendations
  17. Immunological Effects of Mercury (IUPAC Technical Report)
  18. Teaching High-Temperature Materials Chemistry at University (IUPAC Technical Report)
  19. Guidelines for Rheological Characterization of Polyamide Melts (IUPAC Technical Report)
  20. Dispersity in Polymer Science (IUPAC Recommendations 2009)
  21. Countercurrent Chromatography in Analytical Chemistry (IUPAC Technical Report)
  22. A Global Science Gateway
  23. Interactions of Soil Minerals with Organic Components and Microorganisms
  24. Biotechnology for the Sustainability of Human Society
  25. From Molecular Understanding to Innovative Applications of Humic Materials
  26. D.I. Mendeleev and the Problems of Sustainable Development
  27. Mendeleev and Natural Resources
  28. Challenges in Organic and Bioorganic Chemistry
  29. Biological Surfaces and Interfaces
  30. Heteroatom Chemistry
  31. Philosophy of Chemistry
  32. Advanced Materials
  33. Thermodynamics
  34. Crop Protection Chemistry in Latin America
  35. Mark Your Calendar
Downloaded on 8.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ci.2009.31.3.33/html
Scroll to top button