Home Standardization of Electrical Energy Per Order (EEO) Reporting for UV/H2O2 Reactors
Article Publicly Available

Standardization of Electrical Energy Per Order (EEO) Reporting for UV/H2O2 Reactors

Published/Copyright: December 16, 2016
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

The Electrical Energy per Order (EEO) is a useful concept for comparing the performance of ultraviolet–based (UV-based) advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) for the degradation of organic contaminants or other applications. The parameter was introduced in 2001 by Bolton, et al., [1] in a report published by the IUPAC Photochemistry Commission. It is a fundamental concept and, if properly reported, it can be used to compare technologies based on reports and papers from various years, regardless of the energy costs in a given year.

However, researchers find that the usability of the EEO values is undermined by incomplete reporting. The EEO parameter depends on a variety of factors, from the concentration and the identity of the target contaminant to the amount of hydrogen peroxide added. Therefore, the EEO parameter needs to be reported in AOP literature together with many other experimental details that affect the reactor performance for proper comparison between reactors across studies.

This project will identify the parameters that affect the EEO outcome and need to be reported along with the EEO values. The report will explain how to adjust the results of the different studies for comparison. Ways to standardize the reactor testing and results reporting will be proposed. The report will discuss the proper application of the EEO parameter for bench-, pilot-, and full-scale studies. The proposed notation will also be reiterated.

The work builds on the prior IUPAC report by Bolton et al. (2001) that introduced EEO. The goal of the report is further standardization for measuring and reporting EEO. As such, it falls within the IUPAC mission of creating a standard communication protocol for experimental outcomes so that results can be widely used and shared.

For more information and comments, contact Task Group Chair Olya Keen <>

www.iupac.org/project/2015-010-3-600

References

1. Bolton J.R., Bircher, K.G., Tumas W. and Tolman, C.A. (2001) Figures-of-merit for the technical development and application of advanced oxidation technologies for both electric- and solar-driven systems (IUPAC Technical Report), Pure Appl. Chem. 73(4):627-637; http://dx.doi.org/10.1351/pac20017304062710.1351/pac200173040627Search in Google Scholar

Online erschienen: 2016-12-16
Erschienen im Druck: 2016-12-1

©2016 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Masthead - Full issue pdf
  2. Contents
  3. Vice-President’s Column
  4. IUPAC— Holding the International Chemistry Family Together
  5. Stamps International
  6. Reaching Out for the Sun
  7. Features
  8. IChO-48—An Extraordinary Olympiad of Chemistry
  9. SAICM Science Sector and IUPAC Activities
  10. The Solar Army
  11. IUPAC Wire
  12. Chemistry International Goes Seasonal
  13. Future of the Chemical Sciences
  14. IUPAC 2017 Distinguished Women in Chemistry or Chemical EngineeringCall for Nominations
  15. 2017 IUPAC-Solvay International Award For Young Chemists
  16. IUPAC100 Logo Competition
  17. UNESCO/PhosAgro/IUPAC Green Chemistry for Life Program
  18. Hanwha Total IUPAC Young Scientist Award 2016
  19. DSM Materials Sciences Award 2016 Goes to Professor Steven P. Armes
  20. WANTED: A Home for an Orphaned Chemical Database
  21. Project Place
  22. Identifying International Chemical Identifier (InChI) Enhancements—QR Codes and Industry Applications
  23. Categorizing Chalcogen, Pnictogen, and Tetrel Bonds, and Other Interactions Involving Groups 14-16 Elements
  24. Standardization of Electrical Energy Per Order (EEO) Reporting for UV/H2O2 Reactors
  25. Isotopes Matter
  26. Materials on the Nanoscale—Uniform Description System Version 2.0
  27. Making an imPACt
  28. How to Name New Chemical Elements (IUPAC Recommendations 2016)
  29. Vocabulary of Concepts and Terms in Chemometrics (IUPAC Recommendations 2016)
  30. Glossary of Terms Used in Extraction (IUPAC Recommendations 2016)
  31. Extraction for Analytical Scale Sample Preparation (IUPAC Technical Report)
  32. Review of Footnotes and Annotations to the 1949–2013 Tables of Standard Atomic Weights and Tables of Isotopic Compositions of the Elements (IUPAC Technical Report)
  33. Guidelines for Measurement of Luminescence Spectra and Quantum Yields of Inorganic and Organometallic Compounds in Solution and Solid State (IUPAC Technical Report)
  34. Bookworm
  35. Storing Energy, with Special Reference to Renewable Energy Sources
  36. Chemistry Beyond Chlorine
  37. POLYCHAR 23—World Forum on Advanced Materials
  38. Macromolecular Complexes Part I and II
  39. Polymer-Solvent Complexes and Intercalates POLYSOLVAT-10
  40. A Draft Framework for Understanding SDG Interactions
  41. Up for Discussion
  42. Is it possible to extend the Cahn-Ingold-Prelog priority rules to supramolecular structures and coordination compounds using lone pairs?
  43. Preliminary Property Design for Ionic Solids and Liquids
  44. Conference Call
  45. New Chemistries for Phytomedicines and Crop Protection Chemicals
  46. Science: How Close to Open?
  47. Chemical Safety and Security in a Rapidly Changing World
  48. POLYCHAR 24 World Forum Advanced Materials
  49. Polymers and Organic Chemistry (POC-16)
  50. Phosphorus Chemistry
  51. Where 2B & Y
  52. Solutions for Drug-Resistant Infections
  53. Macro- and Supramolecular Architectures and Materials
  54. Colloquium Spectroscopicum Internationale
  55. Introduction to the World of Chemical Data—an OnLine College Course (OLCC) on Cheminformatics
  56. Chemical Identifier
  57. Digital Cultural Heritage
  58. 16th International Meeting on Boron Chemistry (IMEBORON16)
  59. Mark Your Calendar
  60. Index 2016
Downloaded on 28.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ci-2016-0618/html
Scroll to top button