Skip to main content
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Giving learners a multicultural voice: An English speaking university context

  • Anna Nunan is a Lecturer in TESOL at the Applied Language Centre, University College Dublin and Module Coordinator for a large scale university-wide language programme. Recently she has focused on the development of innovative models of language teaching, CEFR applications and language teacher education in HE.

    EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: October 7, 2017

Abstract

Difficulties establishing support for English speakers taking second language electives in postsecondary education in Ireland led to research on how language classes could be more accessible, multicultural, plurilingual and relevant for students in a university language centre. It is important to try and discover why students choose a foreign language module in an English speaking context, how prior experiences of language learning are processed by these students and how student suggestions for future semester offerings may be relevant to changing paradigms in language learning. 2,600 student evaluations over 3 semesters were analysed in relation to student motivation in taking a foreign language elective. 25 students were interviewed on their motivation in language learning, prior experience of language learning and suggestions for future language modules. Motivation in language learning is a complex process (Dörnyei 2003, Attitudes, orientations, and motivations in language learning: Advances in theory, research, and applications. Language learning 53(S1). 3–32) yet encouraging numbers in an Institution-Wide Language Programme prompted the question of why students choose a language elective from a wide range of options and pursue the language enthusiastically providing positive feedback despite minimal support from their academic discipline. The results reveal an interest in plurilingualism and multiculturalism that is not being addressed by secondary school education and an experience of prior language learning that falls significantly short of the benefits of multicultural and plurilingual approaches to language teaching. Integrated didactic approaches to languages studied and culturally oriented materials have the potential to redefine the student experience of language learning, reinforce plurilingual curriculum design (Piccardo 2013, Plurilingualism and curriculum design: Toward a synergic vision. TESOL Quarterly 47(3). 600–614) and enhance intercultural growth.

About the author

Anna Nunan

Anna Nunan is a Lecturer in TESOL at the Applied Language Centre, University College Dublin and Module Coordinator for a large scale university-wide language programme. Recently she has focused on the development of innovative models of language teaching, CEFR applications and language teacher education in HE.

References

Boekmann, Klaus Börge, Eija Aalto, Andreas Abel, Tatjana Atanasoska & Terry Lamb. 2011. Promoting plurilingualism: Majority language in multilingual settings. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Braine, George (ed.). 2014. Teaching English to the world: History, curriculum, and practice. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, James Dean. 2014. Mixed methods research for TESOL. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9780748698059Search in Google Scholar

Busse, Vera & Catherine Walter. 2013. Foreign language learning motivation in higher education: A longitudinal study of motivational changes and their causes. The Modern Language Journal 97(2). 435–456.10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12004.xSearch in Google Scholar

Butler, Elizabeth. 2014. A framework for consultation on a foreign languages in education strategy for Ireland. http://www.education.ie/en/Schools-Colleges/Information/Curriculum-and-Syllabus/Foreign-Languages-Strategy/Framework-Consultation-Foreign-Languages-in-Education-Strategy.pdf (accessed 10 August 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Candelier, Michel, Petra Daryai-Hansen & Anna Schröder-Sura. 2012. The framework of reference for pluralistic approaches to languages and cultures–a complement to the CEFR to develop plurilingual and intercultural competences. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 6(3). 243–257.10.1080/17501229.2012.725252Search in Google Scholar

Carson, Lorna. 2013. The LUCIDE network: Languages in Urban communities–integration and diversity for Europe. European Journal of Applied Linguistics 1(2). 305–312.10.1515/eujal-2013-0015Search in Google Scholar

Cenoz, Jasone. 2013. The influence of bilingualism on third language acquisition: Focus on multilingualism. Language Teaching 46(01). 71–86.10.1017/S0261444811000218Search in Google Scholar

Crystal, David. 2013. The language revolution. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Csizér, Kata & Zoltán Dörnyei. 2005. The internal structure of language learning motivation and its relationship with language choice and learning effort. The Modern Language Journal 89(1). 19–36.10.1111/j.0026-7902.2005.00263.xSearch in Google Scholar

Dörnyei, Zoltán. 2003. Attitudes, orientations, and motivations in language learning: Advances in theory, research, and applications. Language learning 53(S1). 3–32.10.1111/1467-9922.53222Search in Google Scholar

Dörnyei, Zoltán. 2009. The psychology of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

García, Ofelia, Zeena Zakharia & Bahar Otcu (eds.). 2012. Bilingual community education and multilingualism: Beyond heritage languages in a global city, Vol. 89. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781847698018Search in Google Scholar

Gardner, Robert C. 2007. Motivation and second language acquisition. Porta Linguarum 8, June. 9–20. http://digibug.ugr.es/bitstream/10481/31616/1/Gardner.pdf (accessed 10 August 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Gillespie, Paul. 2015 Why we’re so bad at picking up other languages. http://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/paul-gillespie-plurilingualism-why-we-re-so-bad-at-picking-up-more-languages-1.2420296 (accessed 10 August 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Graham, Suzanne J. 2004. Giving up on modern foreign languages? Students’ perceptions of learning French. The Modern Language Journal 88(2). 171–191.10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.00224.xSearch in Google Scholar

Horwitz, Elaine K. 1999. Cultural and situational influences on foreign language learners’ beliefs about language learning: A review of BALLI studies. System 27(4). 557–576.10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00050-0Search in Google Scholar

King, Lid & Lorna Carson (eds.). 2015. The multilingual city: Vitality, conflict and change. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781783094783Search in Google Scholar

Lantolf, James. P. 2011. The sociocultural approach to second language acquisition. In D. Dwight Atkinson (ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition, 24–47. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Lanvers, Ursula & James A. Coleman. 2013. The UK language learning crisis in the public media: A critical analysis. The Language Learning Journal 45(1). 3–25.10.1080/09571736.2013.830639Search in Google Scholar

Little, David. 2006. The common European framework of reference for languages Content, purpose, origin, reception and impact. Language Teaching 39(3). 167–190.10.1017/S0261444806003557Search in Google Scholar

Macaro, Ernesto. 2008. The decline in language learning in England: Getting the facts right and getting real. Language Learning Journal 36(1). 101–108.10.1080/09571730801988595Search in Google Scholar

Norton, Bonny. 2013. Identity and language learning: Extending the conversation. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781783090563Search in Google Scholar

O’Brien, Tim. 2014. Science Foundation encourages ‘STEM’ subjects. http://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/science-foundation-encourages-stem-subjects-1.1765961 (accessed 10 August 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Pauwels, Anne. 2014. The teaching of languages at university in the context of super-diversity. International Journal of Multilingualism 11(3). 307–319.10.1080/14790718.2014.921177Search in Google Scholar

Pennycook, Alastair. 2014. The cultural politics of English as an international language. London: Routledge,10.4324/9781315843605Search in Google Scholar

Piccardo, Enrica. 2013. Plurilingualism and curriculum design: Toward a synergic vision. TESOL Quarterly 47(3). 600–614.10.1002/tesq.110Search in Google Scholar

Richards, Jack C. & Theodore S. Rodgers. 2014. Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781009024532Search in Google Scholar

Sanz, Cristina. 2000. Bilingual education enhances third language acquisition: Evidence from Catalonia. Applied psycholinguistics 21(01). 23–44.10.1017/S0142716400001028Search in Google Scholar

Zhu, Hua. 2013. Exploring intercultural communication. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203798539Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-10-7
Published in Print: 2017-10-26

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 16.4.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cercles-2017-0018/html
Scroll to top button