Evaluation of stability and potential interference on the α-thalassaemia early eluting peak and immunochromatographic strip test for α-thalassaemia --SEA carrier screening
-
Wing Kit Lam
, Christina Pui Ying Fan
Abstract
Objectives
α-Thalassaemia screening is crucial for identifying carriers at risk of having offspring with haemoglobin (Hb) Bart’s hydrops fetalis syndrome. This study evaluated the performance of two potential screening methods: the α-thalassaemia early eluting peak (αEEP) identified by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and an immunochromatographic strip test (ICT), focusing on stability and potential interferences.
Methods
Ninety-two peripheral blood samples were used. Thirty were for assessment of αEEP and ICT stability and interference by icterus/lipaemia, and saline washing for interference removal. Diagnostic performance of αEEP and ICT were evaluated in 40 samples with glycated Hb (P2) ≥6.0 % and 22 with Hb F≥2.0 % on HPLC, using α-globin genotyping as the gold standard.
Results
Both αEEP and ICT results remained stable for 14 days. Neither test was significantly affected by icterus or lipaemia, though 3 of 20 ICT results (15 %) showed discordance after saline washing. Elevated HbA1c and Hb F altered early eluting peak patterns but did not affect αEEP interpretation. For detecting --SEA mutation, αEEP showed 100 % sensitivity and 100 % specificity when P2≥6.0 % or Hb F≥2.0 %, while ICT a low specificity (45 %) when Hb F≥2.0 %.
Conclusions
αEEP showed reliable performance in detecting α0-thalassaemia with --SEA mutation in all conditions tested, while ICT showed low specificity when Hb F≥2.0 %. These findings support αEEP as a reliable test for routine clinical laboratory use, while cautions should be made for ICT in case of elevated Hb F levels.
-
Research ethics: The study was approved by the Hospital Authority Central Institutional Review Board (Ref: CIRB-2024-162-4) and performed according to the Declaration of Helsinki.
-
Informed consent: Not applicable.
-
Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission. Lam WK: conceptualisation, data curation, formal analysis, methodology, project administration, writing original draft, review and editing; Fan CPY, Law YFW, Wong TF: data curation, formal analysis, investigation; Too DLH, Ko LN: formal analysis, investigation; Leung AYH: methodology, supervision, review and editing; Yip SF: methodology, resources, supervision, review and editing.
-
Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.
-
Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.
-
Research funding: None declared.
-
Data availability: The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article [and/or] its supplementary materials.
References
1. Amid, A, Lal, A, Coates, TD, Fucharoen, S. Guidelines for the management of α-thalassaemia, 1st ed. Nicosia, Cyprus: Thalassaemia International Federation; 2023.Suche in Google Scholar
2. Lau, YL, Chan, LC, Chan, YY, Ha, SY, Yeung, CY, Waye, JS, et al.. Prevalence and genotypes of alpha- and beta-thalassemia carriers in Hong Kong - implications for population screening. N Engl J Med 1997;336:1298–301. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199705013361805.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
3. Bain, BJ, Daniel, Y, Henthorn, J, de la Salle, B, Hogan, A, Roy, NBA, et al.. Significant haemoglobinopathies: a guideline for screening and diagnosis: a British Society for Haematology Guideline. Br J Haematol 2023;201:1047–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.18794.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
4. Winichagoon, P, Kumpan, P, Holmes, P, Finlayson, J, Newbound, C, Kabral, A, et al.. Validation of the immunochromatographic strip for α-thalassemia screening: a multicenter study. Transl Res 2015;165:689–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trsl.2014.10.013.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
5. Lam, WK, Law, WYF, Wong, TF, Woo, VHK, Wu, AHH, Chow, EY, et al.. A specific early eluting peak in Bio-Rad Variant II cation-exchange high-performance liquid chromatography (CE-HPLC) for the screening of alpha-thalassaemia in a Chinese population. Pathology 2023;55:835–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pathol.2023.05.008.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
6. CLSI. User protocol for evaluation of qualitative test performance; approved guideline, 2nd ed. EP12-A2. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2008.Suche in Google Scholar
7. CLSI. Interference testing in clinical chemistry; approved guideline, 3rd ed. EP07. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2018.Suche in Google Scholar
8. CLSI. Supplemental tables for interference testing in clinical chemistry; approved guideline, 1st ed. EP37. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2018.Suche in Google Scholar
9. Chan, AY, So, CC, Ma, ES, Chan, LC. A laboratory strategy for genotyping haemoglobin H disease in the Chinese. J Clin Pathol 2007;60:931–4. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.2006.042242.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
10. Bunkall, C, Ghallyan, N, Elliott, C, Van de Water, N, Chan, G. Evaluation of an immunochromatographic strip test for alpha-thalassaemia screening. Int J Lab Hematol 2018;40:691–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.12905.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
11. Pantiya, P, Chairatanapiwong, S, Dankai, D, Nualkeaw, S, Jaiping, K, Singboottra, P, et al.. False-positive result of immunochromatographic (IC) strip test for the diagnosis of α-thalassemia in samples with autoantibodies. Clin Chem Lab Med 2020;58:e44–6. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2019-0827.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
12. Tayapiwatana, C, Kuntaruk, S, Tatu, T, Chiampanichayakul, S, Munkongdee, T, Winichagoon, P, et al.. Simple method for screening of alpha-thalassaemia 1 carriers. Int J Hematol 2009;89:559–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-009-0331-4.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
13. Chan, G, Wong, J, Sami, V. Hb Bart’s immunochromatographic test result and Hb F level in normal cord blood and in selected haemoglobinopathy cases. Int J Lab Hematol 2024;46:408–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.14223.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
Supplementary Material
This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2025-0754).
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston