Home Medicine UK diagnostics in the era of ‘permacrisis’: is it fit for purpose and able to respond to the challenges ahead?
Article Open Access

UK diagnostics in the era of ‘permacrisis’: is it fit for purpose and able to respond to the challenges ahead?

  • Dimitris K. Grammatopoulos ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Weizi Li , Lawrence S. Young and Neil R. Anderson
Published/Copyright: May 16, 2023

To the Editor,

The vital contribution of clinical diagnostics during the COVID-19 pandemic globally [1] and in the UK, has emphasised its crucial role in delivering the ambition of the NHS long term plan [2] and in helping post-pandemic recovery. Leveraging cross-sector strengths to build a fit-for-purpose, world-leading diagnostics enterprise has been highlighted in several recent reports [3], [4], [5]. While offering some exciting opportunities for development and expansion, this renewed interest in diagnostics places considerable burden on a sector that, for far too long, has remained outside of funding priority areas. Most importantly, as UK diagnostics attempt to decode lessons of the pandemic and redesign its strategy, new challenges are emerging in the form of scientific, operational and strategic deficits as well as capacity issues due to the COVID-19 related back-log.

Diagnostics is involved in all facets of modern healthcare. There is an expectation that rapid advances in -omics technologies, data sciences and AI-driven multi-parameter analysis will generate improved tools and disease-specific biomarkers to facilitate more practical approaches to precision medicine thereby enhancing operational efficiencies to manage the growing demand for NHS services. A system already stretched by long-standing health challenges that compromise the health of an increasingly ageing population would benefit from such approaches.

Despite significant progress post-pandemic, considerable barriers remain that require urgent action. Some of these challenges relate to the mindset of professionals involved in the delivery of diagnostics services, crystallised over years of having to focus on cost and efficiency savings and an understandable mentality to ‘just deliver the core service’ [6]. This mindset is reinforced by an activity-based funding system, that fails to incentivise innovation. Thus, the drive to explore disruptive innovation and position state-of-the-art diagnostics in close proximity to clinical and technological advances is stalled by slow decision-making processes and operational concerns. The pathology consolidation process established the foundations for spare workforce capacity to address such important considerations [7, 8]. Diagnostic services need to start exploiting such opportunities.

A successful future diagnostics strategy requires a combined approach involving active and flexible partnerships between NHS, academia and industry, and also between the diagnostics professionals and clinical teams. Connecting the currently fragmented landscape could be addressed by the development of flexible ‘accelerator centres’ of innovation drawing expertise from successful initiatives such as MICs and AHSNs [9]. These would need sufficient influence to catalyse change and innovation adoption in the NHS focussing on reducing healthcare inequalities [10]. In parallel, these ‘centres’ would be able to capitalise on emerging opportunities in new diagnostic technologies while also working with the higher education sector to provide appropriate training and up-skilling thereby creating a sustainable workforce.

Regulation reform is another area where a synchronised approach across stakeholders could catalyse rapid adoption and implementation of new technologies. A strong evidence-based regulatory framework is crucial to protect the public from ‘disrupting’ but misleading concepts and ensuring use of the right tools for the right patients at the right time. However, there are concerns that existing regulatory arrangements are too slow, unable to meet the demand and pace of innovation. This is currently depriving patients from access to technologies that can have substantial health benefits.

Post-pandemic, the UK Diagnostics stakeholders are trying to redefine their value proposition to address new health challenges of an ageing population and to exploit the unique characteristics of the NHS [11]. Workforce capacity and skills, development of fit-for-purpose regulation and pathways for innovation adoption are key determinants for optimal diagnostics services in a resource-limited healthcare landscape. The ever-changing environment of ‘permacrisis’ is our new normal with unknown consequences on mental and physical health [12]. The emergence of these new health challenges demands development of a diagnostics infrastructure that can support patients living continuously in a state where one challenge is followed continuously by the next, such as emerging infectious diseases, climate change, economic uncertainty and even war.


Corresponding author: Dimitris K. Grammatopoulos, Warwick Medical School and Health Global Research Priorities (GRP), University of Warwick, Coventry, UK; and Institute of Precision Diagnostics and Translational Medicine, Pathology, UHCW NHS Trust, Coventry, UK, E-mail:

Funding source: EPSEC

Award Identifier / Grant number: Future Blood Testing for Inclusive Monitoring and Personalised Analytics Network + (EP/W000652/1)

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: All authors made substantial contributions both conceptually and in the wirtting up of the manuscript. The author have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Competing interest statement: The author(s) state(s) no conflict of interest.

  5. Research funding: This work is funded by EPSEC Future Blood Testing for Inclusive Monitoring and Personalised Analytics Network+ (EP/W000652/1).

References

1. Hannay, E, Pai, M. Breaking the cycle of neglect: building on momentum from COVID-19 to drive access to diagnostic testing. eClinicalMedicine 2023;57:101867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101867.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

2. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/science-in-healthcare-delivering-the-nhs-long-term-plan.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

3. Available from: https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/uk/Documents/life-sciences-health-care/deloitte-uk-future-diagnostics-main-report-2022.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

4. Available from: https://dianews.roche.com/rs/106-RRW-330/images/The%20Future%20of%20Diagnostics%20Delivery%20in%20the%20UK%20report.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

5. Available from: https://acmedsci.ac.uk/file-download/89102189.Search in Google Scholar

6. Plebani, M. Clinical laboratories: production industry or medical services? Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:995–1004. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2014-1007.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/pathology-networks/.Search in Google Scholar

8. Satta, G, Edmonstone, J. Consolidation of pathology services in England: have savings been achieved? BMC Health Serv Res 2018;18:862. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3683-8.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

9. Available from: https://ahsn-nenc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Economic_Growth_digital_brochure_v10.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

10. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/about/equality/equality-hub/national-healthcare-inequalities-improvement-programme/core20plus5/.Search in Google Scholar

11. Grammatopoulos, DK, Young, L, Anderson, NR. Transforming the UK’s diagnostics agenda after COVID-19. Lancet 2022;399:P1606. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00169-6.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Available from: https://www.who.int/europe/news/item/27-09-2022-statement-the-european-region-is-in-a-permacrisis-that-stretches-well-beyond-the-pandemic-climate-change-and-war.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-05-05
Accepted: 2023-05-08
Published Online: 2023-05-16
Published in Print: 2023-10-26

© 2023 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. The development of reference measurement procedures to establish metrological traceability
  4. Opinion Paper
  5. Establishing metrological traceability for small molecule measurands in laboratory medicine
  6. Articles
  7. An isotope dilution-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (ID-LC-MS/MS)-based candidate reference measurement procedure (RMP) for the quantification of aldosterone in human serum and plasma
  8. An isotope dilution-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (ID-LC-MS/MS)-based candidate reference measurement procedure (RMP) for the quantification of methotrexate in human serum and plasma
  9. An isotope dilution-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (ID-LC-MS/MS)-based candidate reference measurement procedure (RMP) for the quantification of lamotrigine in human serum and plasma
  10. An isotope dilution-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (ID-LC-MS/MS)-based candidate reference measurement procedure for the quantification of topiramate in human serum and plasma
  11. An isotope dilution-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (ID-LC-MS/MS)-based candidate reference measurement procedure (RMP) for the quantification of gabapentin in human serum and plasma
  12. An isotope dilution-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (ID-LC-MS/MS)-based candidate reference measurement procedure for the quantification of levetiracetam in human serum and plasma
  13. Review
  14. Recent advances of drugs monitoring in oral fluid and comparison with blood
  15. Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics
  16. One fits all: a highly sensitive combined ddPCR/pyrosequencing system for the quantification of microchimerism after hematopoietic and solid organ transplantation
  17. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  18. Design of an algorithm for the detection of intravenous fluid contamination in clinical laboratory samples
  19. Sex-specific disparities of serum pepsinogen I in relation to body mass index
  20. Rapid and efficient LC-MS/MS diagnosis of inherited metabolic disorders: a semi-automated workflow for analysis of organic acids, acylglycines, and acylcarnitines in urine
  21. Persistently elevated serum concentrations of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)
  22. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  23. Pediatric reference interval verification for 16 biochemical markers on the Alinity ci system in the CALIPER cohort of healthy children and adolescents
  24. Serum GFAP – pediatric reference interval in a cohort of Danish children
  25. Cardiovascular Diseases
  26. Higher troponin T serum concentrations in hospital patients without diagnosed cardiac diseases compared to a population-based cohort
  27. Infectious Diseases
  28. Neopterin and kynurenine in serum and urine as prognostic biomarkers in hospitalized patients with delta and omicron variant SARS-CoV-2 infection
  29. Letters to the Editor
  30. Limitations in using the EFLM WG-A/ISO approach for assessment of reagent lot variability
  31. In reply to: Limitations in using the EFLM WG-A/ISO approach for assessment of reagent lot variability
  32. ChatGPT, critical thing and ethical practice
  33. AI, diabetes and getting lost in translation: a multilingual evaluation of Bing with ChatGPT focused in HbA1c
  34. UK diagnostics in the era of ‘permacrisis’: is it fit for purpose and able to respond to the challenges ahead?
  35. The underestimated potential of vibrational spectroscopy in clinical laboratory medicine: a translational gap to close
  36. A universal reference interval for serum immunoglobulins free light chains may be outdated
  37. The likelihood ratios of FIB-4-values for diagnosing advanced liver fibrosis in patients with NAFLD
Downloaded on 28.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2023-0450/html
Scroll to top button