Startseite Comparative study of i-SENS glucometers in neonates using capillary blood samples
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Comparative study of i-SENS glucometers in neonates using capillary blood samples

  • Ha Nui Kim und Soo-Young Yoon EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 22. Januar 2021
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Objectives

The accuracy of point-of-care blood glucometers in the detection and evaluation of neonatal hypoglycemia is a concern. This study compared the performance of three i-SENS glucometers with that of the YSI 2300 STAT Plus Analyzer, which was used as a reference.

Methods

The leftover neonatal capillary blood samples of 319 patients were used in this study. The evaluation process and accuracy performance criteria were based on the International Organization for Standardization 15197:2013 guidelines. The evaluation involved three i-SENS glucometers (BAROzen H Expert plus, CareSens PRO, and CareSens H Beat) and the ACCU-CHEK® Inform II glucometer.

Results

The accuracy evaluation yielded acceptable results as follows: a) 100 and 100% for BAROzen H Expert plus; 99.8 and 100% for CareSens PRO; 98.7%, and 97.2% for CareSens H Beat glucometers were within the range of ±0.8 mmol/L (15 mg/dL) and ±15% of the average reference values at glucose concentrations <5.55 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) and ≥5.55 mmol/L (100 mg/dL), respectively, and b) all estimated glucose values (100%) were within the zones A and B of Consensus Error Grid for all three i-SENS glucometers. There was good correlation between the glucose values estimated by the glucometers and the reference values (R>0.990).

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that i-SENS glucometers exhibit acceptable performance and can be used as effective point-of-care devices in neonates.


Corresponding author: Soo-Young Yoon, MD, PhD, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, 148, Gurodong-ro, Guro-gu, Seoul 08308, Republic of Korea, Phone: +82 2 2626 3246, Fax: +82 2 2626 1465, E-mail:

Funding source: Korean Health Technology R&D Project

Funding source: Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea

Award Identifier / Grant number: H15C1512

Funding source: i-SENS, Inc.

Funding source: Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea

Award Identifier / Grant number: HR20C0021

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.co.kr) for the English language editing and also i-SENS, Inc., for providing reagents with technical support.

  1. Research funding: This study was supported by a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant number: HR20C0021) and the Korean Health Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (H15C1512) and i-SENS, Inc.

  2. Author contributions: HK and SY reviewed the literature and conceived the study. SY was involved in protocol development, obtaining ethical approval, patient recruitment and data analysis. HK wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript and approved the final version of the manuscript.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  5. Ethical approval: The research related to human use has been complied with all the relevant national regulations, institutional policies and in accordance the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration, and has been approved by Institutional Review Board of Korea University Guro Hospital (IRB No: 2019GR0016).

References

1. Roth-Kleiner, M, Stadelmann Diaw, C, Urfer, J, Ruffieux, C, Werner, D. Evaluation of different POCT devices for glucose measurement in a clinical neonatal setting. Eur J Pediatr 2010;169:1387–95.10.1007/s00431-010-1243-2Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Lucas, A, Morley, R, Cole, TJ. Adverse neurodevelopmental outcome of moderate neonatal hypoglycaemia. BMJ 1988;297:1304–8.10.1136/bmj.297.6659.1304Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Nuntnarumit, P, Chittamma, A, Pongmee, P, Tangnoo, A, Goonthon, S. Clinical performance of the new glucometer in the nursery and neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatr Int 2011;53:218–23.10.1111/j.1442-200X.2010.03214.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Movalia, MK, Ogino, MT. Point of care glucose testing in neonatal hypoglycemia. Point Care 2006;5:95–9.10.1097/01.poc.0000232027.69785.f5Suche in Google Scholar

5. Ho, H, Yeung, W, Young, B. Evaluation of “point of care” devices in the measurement of low blood glucose in neonatal practice. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2004;89:F356–9.10.1136/adc.2003.033548Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Freckmann, G, Jendrike, N, Baumstark, A, Pleus, S, Liebing, C, Haug, C. User performance evaluation of four blood glucose monitoring systems applying ISO 15197:2013 accuracy criteria and calculation of insulin dosing errors. Diabetes Ther 2018;9:683–97.10.1007/s13300-018-0392-6Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Solnica, B, Naskalski, J, Gernand, W, Sieradzki, J. Evaluation of glucose meters performance in detection hypoglycemia. Point Care 2008;7:144.10.1097/01.POC.0000335850.55143.5dSuche in Google Scholar

8. Ekhlaspour, L, Mondesir, D, Lautsch, N, Balliro, C, Hillard, M, Magyar, K, et al.. Comparative accuracy of 17 point-of-care glucose meters. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2017;11:558–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296816672237.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

9. Klonoff, DC. The need for separate performance goals for glucose sensors in the hypoglycemic, normoglycemic, and hyperglycemic ranges. Diabetes Care 2004;27:834–6.10.2337/diacare.27.3.834Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Freckmann, G, Schmid, C, Baumstark, A, Rutschmann, M, Haug, C, Heinemann, L. Analytical performance requirements for systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose with focus on system accuracy: relevant differences among ISO 15197:2003, ISO 15197:2013, and current FDA recommendations. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2015;9:885–94.10.1177/1932296815580160Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Rodin, D, Kirby, M, Sedogin, N, Shapiro, Y, Pinhasov, A, Kreinin, A. Comparative accuracy of optical sensor-based wearable system for non-invasive measurement of blood glucose concentration. Clin Biochem 2019;65:15–20.10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.12.014Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Ginsberg, BH. Factors affecting blood glucose monitoring: sources of errors in measurement. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2009;3:903–13.10.1177/193229680900300438Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Stene, D, Song, L. Investigation of maltose interference on the Roche ACCU-CHEK Inform II blood glucose meter. Point Care 2016;15:26–9.10.1097/POC.0000000000000083Suche in Google Scholar

14. Chakraborty, PP, Patra, S, Bhattacharjee, R, Chowdhury, S. Erroneously elevated glucose values due to maltose interference in mutant glucose dehydrogenase pyrroloquinolinequinone (mutant GDH-PQQ) based glucometer. BMJ Case Rep 2017;2017:bcr-2017-219928. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2017-219928.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Klonoff, DC, Parkes, JL, Kovatchev, BP, Kerr, D, Bevier, WC, Brazg, RL, et al.. Investigation of the accuracy of 18 marketed blood glucose monitors. Diabetes Care 2018;41:1681–8.10.2337/dc17-1960Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Thompson-Branch, A, Havranek, T. Neonatal hypoglycemia. Pediatr Rev 2017;38:147–57.10.1542/pir.2016-0063Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Guemes, M, Rahman, SA, Hussain, K. What is a normal blood glucose? Arch Dis Child 2016;101:569–74.10.1136/archdischild-2015-308336Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Rafai, N, Horvath, AR, Wittwer, CT. Tietz textbook of clinical chemistry and molecular diagnostics. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2018.Suche in Google Scholar

19. Morales, J, Schneider, D. Hypoglycemia. Am J Med 2014;127:S17–24.10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.07.004Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Alsaleem, M, Saadeh, L, Kamat, D. Neonatal hypoglycemia: a review. Clin Pediatr 2019;58:1381–6.10.1177/0009922819875540Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Stanley, CA, Rozance, PJ, Thornton, PS, De Leon, DD, Harris, D, Haymond, MW, et al.. Re-evaluating “transitional neonatal hypoglycemia”: mechanism and implications for management. J Pediatr-Us 2015;166:1520–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.02.045.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

22. Kumar, R, Madan, A, Benitz, WE, Widness, JA. Reduction in red blood cell transfusions using a bedside analyzer in extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatr Res 2004;55:21–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211201.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Sacks, DB, Arnold, M, Bakris, GL, Bruns, DE, Horvath, AR, Kirkman, MS, et al.. Executive summary: guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus. Clin Chem 2011;57:793–8.10.1373/clinchem.2011.163634Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Cho, J, Ahn, S, Yim, J, Cheon, Y, Jeong, SH, Lee, SG, et al.. Influence of vitamin C and maltose on the accuracy of three models of glucose meters. Ann Lab Med 2016;36:271–4.10.3343/alm.2016.36.3.271Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

25. Dogan, K, Kayalp, D, Ceylan, G, Azak, A, Senes, M, Duranay, M, et al.. Falsely elevated glucose concentrations in peritoneal dialysis patients using icodextrin. J Clin Lab Anal 2016;30:506–9.10.1002/jcla.21887Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

26. Ramel, SE, Long, JD, Gray, H, Durrwachter-Erno, K, Demerath, EW, Rao, R. Neonatal hyperglycemia and diminished long-term growth in very low birth weight preterm infants. J Perinatol 2013;33:882–6.10.1038/jp.2013.77Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Simsek, DG, Ecevit, A, Hatipoglu, N, Coban, A, Arisoy, AE, Bas, F, et al.. Neonatal hyperglycemia, which threshold value, diagnostic approach and treatment? Turkish Neonatal and Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes Societies consensus report. Turk Pediatr Arsivi 2018;53:S234–8.10.5152/TurkPediatriArs.2018.01821Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2020-09-09
Accepted: 2021-01-07
Published Online: 2021-01-22
Published in Print: 2021-05-26

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. COVID-19: which lessons have we learned?
  4. Review
  5. Global FT4 immunoassay standardization: an expert opinion review
  6. Mini Review
  7. Mechanism of bilirubin elimination in urine: insights and prospects for neonatal jaundice
  8. Opinion Paper
  9. Laboratory medicine in the COVID-19 era: six lessons for the future
  10. EFLM Paper
  11. How to meet ISO15189:2012 pre-analytical requirements in clinical laboratories? A consensus document by the EFLM WG-PRE
  12. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  13. External quality assessment of M-protein diagnostics: a realistic impression of the accuracy and precision of M-protein quantification
  14. Error simulation modeling to assess the effects of bias and precision on bilirubin measurements used to screen for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia
  15. NT-proBNP levels in preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction as well as in the prediction on an imminent delivery
  16. Serum N-glycan fingerprint nomogram predicts liver fibrosis: a multicenter study
  17. Hematology and Coagulation
  18. Performance of digital morphology analyzer Vision Pro on white blood cell differentials
  19. Cardiovascular Diseases
  20. Prognostic implication of elevated cardiac troponin I in patients visiting emergency department without diagnosis of coronary artery disease
  21. Relationships between renal function variations and relative changes in cardiac troponin T concentrations based on quantile generalized additive models (qgam)
  22. Diabetes
  23. Association of hemoglobin H (HbH) disease with hemoglobin A1c and glycated albumin in diabetic and non-diabetic patients
  24. Comparative study of i-SENS glucometers in neonates using capillary blood samples
  25. Infectious Diseases
  26. Evaluation of four commercial, fully automated SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests suggests a revision of the Siemens SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay
  27. Vitamin-D levels and intensive care unit outcomes of a cohort of critically ill COVID-19 patients
  28. Does mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM) improve the sequential organ failure assessment-score (SOFA score) for mortality-prediction in patients with acute infections? Results of a prospective observational study
  29. Letters to the Editors
  30. Global FT4 immunoassay standardization. Response to: Kratzsch J et al. Global FT4 immunoassay standardization: an expert opinion review
  31. Free-thyroxine standardization: waiting for Godot while well serving our patients today
  32. Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in health care personnel of two acute care hospitals in Linz, Austria
  33. Pediatric evaluation of clinical specificity and sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM serology assays
  34. Prevention and control of COVID-19 in the penitentiary of Florence
  35. Pooling for SARS-CoV-2-testing: comparison of three commercially available RT-qPCR kits in an experimental approach
  36. Very high SARS-CoV-2 load at the emergency department presentation strongly predicts the risk of admission to the intensive care unit and death
  37. Next-generation sequencing and RT-PCR to identify a 32-day SARS-CoV-2 carrier
  38. 25-Hydroxyvitamin D concentrations in COVID-19 patients hospitalized in intensive care unit during the first wave and the second wave of the pandemic
  39. Laboratory findings in a child with SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) multisystem inflammatory syndrome
  40. Discrepant cardiac troponin results in a young woman
  41. Response to: towards the rational utilization of SARS-CoV-2 serological tests in clinical practice
  42. Congress Abstract
  43. 12th National Scientific Congress SPML,29–31 October 2020, Online, Portugal
Heruntergeladen am 3.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2020-1367/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen