Home Medicine Challenges of LC-MS/MS ethyl glucuronide analysis in abstinence monitoring of liver transplant candidates
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Challenges of LC-MS/MS ethyl glucuronide analysis in abstinence monitoring of liver transplant candidates

  • Mitja L. Heinemann ORCID logo , Louis Elsing , Thorsten Kaiser , Michael Boettcher , Adam Herber , Daniel Seehofer , Thomas Berg and Uta Ceglarek
Published/Copyright: March 2, 2020

Abstract

Background

Urinary ethyl glucuronide (EtG) has emerged as the biomarker of choice for alcohol abstinence monitoring in forensic toxicology and is now used in the listing decision process for liver transplantations (LTs) in the German transplant program. However, EtG analysis in this patient group is challenging due to severely impaired liver function, renal failure, co-morbidities and multidrug regimens. The aim of our study was to evaluate liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)-based EtG analysis for a precise abstinence monitoring in transplant candidates.

Methods

EtG and ethyl sulfate (EtS) were analyzed by a commercial LC-MS/MS assay in 1787 spot urine samples of 807 patients (>85% from the Department of Hepatology) using a combination of quantifier and two qualifier mass transitions for each analyte. Influences of bacterial contamination, kidney and liver function were investigated.

Results

Two hundred and sixty-four urine samples had elevated (≥0.5 mg/L) EtG concentrations when only analyzing one quantifier mass transition. Eleven results (4.2%) were found to be false positive after combining three mass transitions for EtG quantification and verification with parallel analysis of EtS. Decreased kidney function was associated with a significantly higher rate of positive EtG samples. One of the false positive results was caused by bacterial metabolism.

Conclusions

Multimorbid pre-transplant patients have a high risk of individual analytical disturbances of EtG results obtained by LC-MS/MS. Therefore, EtG and EtS should always be measured by a combination of one quantifier and two qualifiers each and evaluated together.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: Louis Elsing, supported by the doctoral research study scholarship of the Medical Faculty of the University of Leipzig. All other authors have nothing to declare.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Tacke F, Kroy DC, Barreiros AP, Neumann UP. Liver transplantation in Germany. Liver Transplant 2016;22:1136–42.10.1002/lt.24461Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Wong RJ, Aguilar M, Cheung R, Perumpail RB, Harrison SA, Younossi ZM, et al. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is the second leading etiology of liver disease among adults awaiting liver transplantation in the united states. Gastroenterology 2015;148:547–55.10.1053/j.gastro.2014.11.039Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Adam R, Karam V, Delvart V, O’Grady J, Mirza D, Klempnauer J, et al. Evolution of indications and results of liver transplantation in Europe. a report from the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR). J Hepatol 2012;57:675–88.10.1016/j.jhep.2012.04.015Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: liver transplantation. J Hepatol 2016;64:433–85.10.1016/j.jhep.2015.10.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Erim Y, Böttcher M, Dahmen U, Beck O, Broelsch CE, Helander A. Urinary ethyl glucuronide testing detects alcohol consumption in alcoholic liver disease patients awaiting liver transplantation. Liver Transplant 2007;13:757–61.10.1002/lt.21163Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Staufer K, Andresen H, Vettorazzi E, Tobias N, Nashan B, Sterneck M. Urinary ethyl glucuronide as a novel screening tool in patients pre- and post-liver transplantation improves detection of alcohol consumption. Hepatology 2011;54:1640–9.10.1002/hep.24596Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Richtlinien zur Organtransplantation gem. §16 TPG (German transplantation guidelines). Dtsch Arztebl 2016;113:A–1947/B-1635/C-1623.Search in Google Scholar

8. Jatlow PI, Agro A, Wu R, Nadim H, Toll BA, Ralevski E, et al. Ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulfate assays in clinical trials, interpretation, and limitations: results of a dose ranging alcohol challenge study and 2 clinical trials. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2014;38:2056–65.10.1111/acer.12407Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

9. Helander A, Bottcher M, Fehr C, Dahmen N, Beck O. Detection times for urinary ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulfate in heavy drinkers during alcohol detoxification. Alcohol Alcohol 2008;44:55–61.10.1093/alcalc/agn084Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Helander A, Beck O. Mass spectrometric identification of ethyl sulfate as an ethanol metabolite in humans. Clin Chem 2004;50:936–7.10.1373/clinchem.2004.031252Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Becker S, Brauer R, Böttcher M, Thiery J, Ceglarek U. Evaluation of a commercial LC-MS/MS assay for the quantification of ethyl glucuronide in urine for alcohol intake monitoring. J Lab Med 2015;39:159–63.10.1515/labmed-2015-0029Search in Google Scholar

12. Stephanson N, Dahl H, Helander A, Beck O. Direct quantification of ethyl glucuronide in clinical urine samples by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Ther Drug Monit 2002;24:645–51.10.1097/00007691-200210000-00011Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Helander A, Kenan N, Beck O. Comparison of analytical approaches for liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry determination of the alcohol biomarker ethyl glucuronide in urine. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 2010;24:1737–43.10.1002/rcm.4573Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Helander A, Olsson I, Dahl H. Postcollection synthesis of ethyl glucuronide by bacteria in urine may cause false identification of alcohol consumption. Clin Chem 2007;53: 1855–7.10.1373/clinchem.2007.089482Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Høiseth G, Nordal K, Pettersen E, Mørland J. Prolonged urinary detection times of EtG and EtS in patients with decreased renal function. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2012;36:1148–51.10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01713.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Fraser AD, Zamecnik J. Impact of lowering the screening and confirmation cutoff values for urine drug testing based on dilution indicators. Ther Drug Monit 2003;25:723–7.10.1097/00007691-200312000-00011Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Helander A, Dahl H. Urinary tract infection: a risk factor for false-negative urinary ethyl glucuronide but not ethyl sulfate in the detection of recent alcohol consumption. Clin Chem 2005;51:1728–30.10.1373/clinchem.2005.051565Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Baranowski S, Serr A, Thierauf A, Weinmann W, Groβe Perdekamp M, Wurst FM, et al. In vitro study of bacterial degradation of ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulphate. Int J Legal Med 2008;122:389–93.10.1007/s00414-008-0229-3Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Musshoff F, Albermann E, Madea B. Ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulfate in urine after consumption of various beverages and foods – misleading results? Int J Legal Med 2010;124:623–30.10.1007/s00414-010-0511-zSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Høiseth G, Yttredal B, Karinen R, Gjerde H, Christophersen A. Levels of ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulfate in oral fluid, blood, and urine after use of mouthwash and ingestion of nonalcoholic wine. J Anal Toxicol 2010;34:84–8.10.1093/jat/34.2.84Search in Google Scholar PubMed


Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2019-1302).


Received: 2019-12-18
Accepted: 2020-01-31
Published Online: 2020-03-02
Published in Print: 2020-07-28

©2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Quality controls for serology: an unfinished agenda
  4. A modern and pragmatic definition of Laboratory Medicine
  5. Reviews
  6. Blood biochemical characteristics of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a systemic review and meta-analysis
  7. ISO/TS 20914:2019 – a critical commentary
  8. Mini Review
  9. Reporting of D-dimer data in COVID-19: some confusion and potential for misinformation
  10. Opinion Paper
  11. Implementation of metrological traceability in laboratory medicine: where we are and what is missing
  12. IFCC Recommendation
  13. Recommendation for performance verification of patient-based real-time quality control
  14. Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics
  15. Comparison of BCR-ABL1 quantification in peripheral blood and bone marrow using an International Scale-standardized assay for assessment of deep molecular response in chronic myeloid leukemia
  16. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  17. Risk assessment of the total testing process based on quality indicators with the Sigma metrics
  18. Determination of hemolysis cut-offs for biochemical and immunochemical analytes according to their value
  19. A computer model for professional competence assessment according to ISO 15189
  20. Traceability validation of six enzyme measurements on the Abbott Alinity c analytical system
  21. Evaluating the need for free glycerol blanking for serum triglyceride measurements at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital
  22. Challenges of LC-MS/MS ethyl glucuronide analysis in abstinence monitoring of liver transplant candidates
  23. Changes in the result of antinuclear antibody immunofluorescence assay on HEp-2 cells reflect disease activity status in systemic lupus erythematosus
  24. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  25. Long-term biological variation estimates of 13 hematological parameters in healthy Chinese subjects
  26. Age-specific reference values improve the diagnostic performance of AMH in polycystic ovary syndrome
  27. Establishment of reference intervals for immunoassay analytes of adult population in Saudi Arabia
  28. Hematology and Coagulation
  29. Total haemoglobin – a reference measuring system for improvement of standardisation
  30. Laboratory testing for activated protein C resistance: rivaroxaban induced interference and a comparative evaluation of andexanet alfa and DOAC Stop to neutralise interference
  31. Cancer Diagnostics
  32. Identification of a four-gene methylation biomarker panel in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma
  33. Performance comparison of two next-generation sequencing panels to detect actionable mutations in cell-free DNA in cancer patients
  34. Diabetes
  35. Availability and analytical quality of hemoglobin A1c point-of-care testing in general practitioners’ offices are associated with better glycemic control in type 2 diabetes
  36. Infectious Diseases
  37. Validation of a chemiluminescent assay for specific SARS-CoV-2 antibody
  38. Dynamic profile and clinical implications of hematological parameters in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019
  39. Does a change in quality control results influence the sensitivity of an anti-HCV test?
  40. Letters to the Editor
  41. Variability between testing methods for SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid detection 16 days post-discharge: a case report
  42. L-index, more than a screening tool for hypertriglyceridemia
  43. Neutralization of biotin interference: preliminary evaluation of the VeraTest Biotin™, VeraPrep Biotin™ and BioT-Filter®
  44. Counting and reporting band count is unreliable practice due to the high inter-observer variability
  45. Cigarette smoking prior to blood sampling acutely affects serum levels of the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease biomarker surfactant protein D
  46. How reliable is the detection of anti-mitochondrial antibodies on murine triple-tissue?
  47. Further advices on measuring lipoprotein(a) for reducing the residual cardiovascular risk on statin therapy
Downloaded on 6.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2019-1302/html
Scroll to top button