Home Medicine Laboratory testing for activated protein C resistance: rivaroxaban induced interference and a comparative evaluation of andexanet alfa and DOAC Stop to neutralise interference
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Laboratory testing for activated protein C resistance: rivaroxaban induced interference and a comparative evaluation of andexanet alfa and DOAC Stop to neutralise interference

  • EMAIL logo , , , , , and
Published/Copyright: March 3, 2020

Abstract

Background

Investigation of hemostasis is problematic when patients are on anticoagulant therapy. Rivaroxaban especially causes substantial interference, extending many clot-based tests, thereby leading to false positive or negative events. In particular, rivaroxaban affects some assays for activated protein C resistance (APCR).

Methods

We assessed, in an international setting, cross laboratory (n = 31) testing using four samples to evaluate rivaroxaban induced interference in APCR testing, and whether this interference could be neutralised. The samples comprised: (A) pool of normal plasma (APCR-negative control); (B) this normal pool spiked with rivaroxaban (200 ng/mL) to create rivaroxaban-induced interference (potential ‘false’ positive APCR event sample); (C) the rivaroxaban sample subsequently treated with a commercial direct oral anticoagulant ‘DOAC-neutraliser’ (DOAC Stop), or (D) treated with andexanet alfa (200 μg/mL). Testing was performed blind to sample type.

Results

The rivaroxaban-spiked sample generated false positive APCR results for some, but unexpectedly not most APCR-tests. The sample treated with DOAC Stop evidenced a correction in the rivaroxaban-affected APCR assays, and did not otherwise adversely affect the rivaroxaban ‘unaffected’ APCR assays. The andexanet alfa-treated sample did not evidence correction of the false positive APCR, and instead unexpectedly exacerbated false positive APCR status with many tests.

Conclusions

DOAC Stop was able to neutralise any APCR interference induced by rivaroxaban. In contrast, andexanet alfa did not negate such interference, and instead unexpectedly created more false-positive APCR events.

Acknowledgements

We thank the ICPMR technical staff for performance of some preliminary laboratory testing. The RCPAQAP staff are thanked for logistical support in packing and dispatching study material, and Nalishia Munuswamy is acknowledged for help in designing the results form. We also thank all study participants. Portola Pharmaceuticals Inc (San Francisco, CA, USA) is acknowledged for suppling andexanet alfa, and Haematex (Sydney, Australia) provided DOAC Stop as used in this exercise. Neither Portola nor Haematex had any influence in reported study findings, which remain the sole responsibility of the authors. New South Wales (NSW) Health Pathology is acknowledged for providing in-kind support to permit study completion. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors, and are not necessarily those of NSW Health Pathology.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: Ross Baker declares the following: Industry led Clinical Trial Support payment to Institution: Bayer, Shire, Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, and CSL Behring, Roche, Amgen, Celgene, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Abbvie, Sanofi, MorphoSys AG, Acerta Pharma, Jansen-Cileg. Clinical Advisory boards: Roche. Conference Travel and speaker support: Shire, Roche, CSL Behring, Bayer, BMS, Novo Nordisk. Research support from: Shire, Bayer, Bristol- Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Portola, Technoclone. The remaining authors stated that they had no interests which might be perceived as posing a conflict or bias.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Lippi G, Gosselin R, Favaloro EJ. Current and emerging direct oral anticoagulants: state-of-the-art. Semin Thromb Hemost 2019;45:490–501.10.1055/s-0039-1692703Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Lip GY, Banerjee A, Boriani G, Chiang CE, Fargo R, Freedman B, et al. Antithrombotic therapy for atrial fibrillation: chest guideline and expert panel report. Chest 2018;154:1121–201.10.1016/j.chest.2018.07.040Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Favaloro EJ, McCaughan GJ, Mohammed S, Pasalic L. Anticoagulation therapy in Australia. Ann Blood 2018;3:48.10.21037/aob.2018.12.02Search in Google Scholar

4. Lippi G, Mattiuzzi C, Adcock D, Favaloro EJ. Oral anticoagulants around the world: an updated state-of the art analysis. Ann Blood 2018;3:49.10.21037/aob.2018.12.04Search in Google Scholar

5. Steinberg BA, Shrader P, Thomas L, Ansell J, Fonarow GC, Gersh BJ, et al. Off-label dosing of non-vitamin k antagonist oral anticoagulants and adverse outcomes: the ORBIT-AF II registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;68:2597–604.10.1016/j.jacc.2016.09.966Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Mohammed S, Favaloro EJ. Laboratory testing for activated protein C resistance (APCR). Methods Mol Biol 2017;1646:137–43.10.1007/978-1-4939-7196-1_10Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Van Cott EM, Khor B, Zehnder JL. Factor V Leiden. Am J Hematol 2016;91:46–9.10.1002/ajh.24222Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Favaloro EJ. Danger of false negative (exclusion) or false positive (diagnosis) for ‘congenital thrombophilia’ in the age of anticoagulants. Clin Chem Lab Med 2019;57:873–82.10.1515/cclm-2018-1041Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Favaloro EJ, Mohammed S, Curnow J, Pasalic L. Laboratory testing for lupus anticoagulant (LA) in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs): potential for false positives and false negatives. Pathology 2019;51:292–300.10.1016/j.pathol.2018.11.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Bonar R, Favaloro EJ, Mohammed S, Pasalic L, Sioufi J, Marsden K. The effect of dabigatran on haemostasis tests: a comprehensive assessment using in-vitro and ex-vivo samples. Pathology 2015;47:355–64.10.1097/PAT.0000000000000252Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Bonar R, Favaloro EJ, Mohammed S, Ahuja M, Pasalic L, Sioufi J, et al. The effect of the direct factor Xa inhibitors apixaban and rivaroxaban on haemostasis tests: a comprehensive assessment using in vitro and ex vivo samples. Pathology 2016;48:60–71.10.1016/j.pathol.2015.11.025Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Favaloro EJ, Pasalic L, Curnow J, Lippi G. Laboratory monitoring or measurement of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs): Advantages, limitations and future challenges. Curr Drug Metab 2017;18:598–608.10.2174/1389200218666170417124035Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Gosselin RC, Adcock DM, Bates SM, Douxfils J, Favaloro EJ, Gouin-Thibault I, et al. International Council for Standardization in Haematology (ICSH) recommendations for laboratory measurement of direct oral anticoagulants. Thromb Haemost 2018;118:437–450.10.1055/s-0038-1627480Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Douxfils J, Gosselin RC. Laboratory assessment of direct oral anticoagulants. Semin Thromb Hemost 2017;43:277–290.10.1055/s-0036-1597296Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Favaloro EJ, Lippi G. Interference of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in hemostasis assays: high potential for diagnostic false positives and false negatives. Blood Transfus 2017;15:491–4.Search in Google Scholar

16. Kopytek M, Ząbczyk M, Malinowski KP, Undas A, Natorska J. DOAC-Remove abolishes the effect of direct oral anticoagulants on activated protein C resistance testing in real-life venous thromboembolism patients. Clin Chem Lab Med 2020;58:430–7.10.1515/cclm-2019-0650Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Favresse J, Lardinois B, Sabor L, Devalet B, Vandepapeliere J, Braibant M, et al. Evaluation of the DOAC-Stop® procedure to overcome the effect of DOACs on several thrombophilia screening tests. TH Open 2018;2:e202–9.10.1055/s-0038-1657785Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Connolly SJ, Milling Jr TJ, Eikelboom JW, Gibson CM, Curnutte JT, Gold A, et al. ANNEXA-4 investigators. andexanet alfa for acute major bleeding associated with factor Xa inhibitors. N Engl J Med 2016;375:1131–41.10.1056/NEJMoa1607887Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

19. Siegal DM, Curnutte JT, Connolly SJ, Lu G, Conley PB, Wiens BL, et al. Andexanet alfa for the reversal of factor Xa inhibitor activity. N Engl J Med 2015;373:2413–24.10.1056/NEJMoa1510991Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Kalathottukaren MT, Creagh AL, Abbina S, Lu G, Karbarz MJ, Pandey A, et al. Comparison of reversal activity and mechanism of action of UHRA, andexanet, and PER977 on heparin and oral FXa inhibitors. Blood Adv 2018;2:2104–14.10.1182/bloodadvances.2016003616Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

21. Exner T, Michalopoulos N, Pearce J, Xavier R, Ahuja M. Simple method for removing DOACs from plasma samples. Thromb Res 2018;163:117–22.10.1016/j.thromres.2018.01.047Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Favaloro EJ, Gilmore G, Arunachalam S, Mohammed S, Baker R. Neutralising rivaroxaban induced interference in laboratory testing for lupus anticoagulant (LA): a comparative study using DOAC Stop and andexanet alfa. Thromb Res 2019;180:10–9.10.1016/j.thromres.2019.05.013Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Favaloro EJ, Mirochnik O, McDonald D. Functional activated Protein C resistance assays: correlation with factor V DNA analysis is better with RVVT- than APTT- based assays. Br J Biomed Sci 1999;56:23–33.Search in Google Scholar

24. Favaloro EJ, Orsag I, Bukuya M, McDonald D. A nine-year retrospective assessment of laboratory testing for activated protein C resistance: evolution of a novel approach to thrombophilia investigations. Pathology 2002;34:348–55.10.1080/003130202760120526Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. RCPAQAP website: https://rcpaqap.com.au/ Last accessed 16th November 2018.Search in Google Scholar

26. Maryamchik E, Rosenbaum MW, Van Cott EM. Rivaroxaban causes missed diagnosis of Protein S deficiency but not of activated protein C resistance (factor V Leiden). Arch Pathol Lab Med 2018;142:70–4.10.5858/arpa.2016-0616-OASearch in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Favaloro EJ, McDonald D. Futility of testing for factor V Leiden. Blood Transfus 2012;10:260–3.Search in Google Scholar

28. Favaloro EJ. The futility of thrombophilia testing. Clin Chem Lab Med 2014;52:499–503.10.1515/cclm-2013-0560Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Favaloro EJ. Genetic testing for thrombophilia-related genes: observations of testing patterns for factor V leiden (G1691A) and prothrombin gene "Mutation" (G20210A). Semin Thromb Hemost 2019;45:730–42.10.1055/s-0039-1694772Search in Google Scholar PubMed


Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2019-1160).


Received: 2019-11-10
Accepted: 2020-01-08
Published Online: 2020-03-03
Published in Print: 2020-07-28

©2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Quality controls for serology: an unfinished agenda
  4. A modern and pragmatic definition of Laboratory Medicine
  5. Reviews
  6. Blood biochemical characteristics of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a systemic review and meta-analysis
  7. ISO/TS 20914:2019 – a critical commentary
  8. Mini Review
  9. Reporting of D-dimer data in COVID-19: some confusion and potential for misinformation
  10. Opinion Paper
  11. Implementation of metrological traceability in laboratory medicine: where we are and what is missing
  12. IFCC Recommendation
  13. Recommendation for performance verification of patient-based real-time quality control
  14. Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics
  15. Comparison of BCR-ABL1 quantification in peripheral blood and bone marrow using an International Scale-standardized assay for assessment of deep molecular response in chronic myeloid leukemia
  16. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  17. Risk assessment of the total testing process based on quality indicators with the Sigma metrics
  18. Determination of hemolysis cut-offs for biochemical and immunochemical analytes according to their value
  19. A computer model for professional competence assessment according to ISO 15189
  20. Traceability validation of six enzyme measurements on the Abbott Alinity c analytical system
  21. Evaluating the need for free glycerol blanking for serum triglyceride measurements at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital
  22. Challenges of LC-MS/MS ethyl glucuronide analysis in abstinence monitoring of liver transplant candidates
  23. Changes in the result of antinuclear antibody immunofluorescence assay on HEp-2 cells reflect disease activity status in systemic lupus erythematosus
  24. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  25. Long-term biological variation estimates of 13 hematological parameters in healthy Chinese subjects
  26. Age-specific reference values improve the diagnostic performance of AMH in polycystic ovary syndrome
  27. Establishment of reference intervals for immunoassay analytes of adult population in Saudi Arabia
  28. Hematology and Coagulation
  29. Total haemoglobin – a reference measuring system for improvement of standardisation
  30. Laboratory testing for activated protein C resistance: rivaroxaban induced interference and a comparative evaluation of andexanet alfa and DOAC Stop to neutralise interference
  31. Cancer Diagnostics
  32. Identification of a four-gene methylation biomarker panel in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma
  33. Performance comparison of two next-generation sequencing panels to detect actionable mutations in cell-free DNA in cancer patients
  34. Diabetes
  35. Availability and analytical quality of hemoglobin A1c point-of-care testing in general practitioners’ offices are associated with better glycemic control in type 2 diabetes
  36. Infectious Diseases
  37. Validation of a chemiluminescent assay for specific SARS-CoV-2 antibody
  38. Dynamic profile and clinical implications of hematological parameters in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019
  39. Does a change in quality control results influence the sensitivity of an anti-HCV test?
  40. Letters to the Editor
  41. Variability between testing methods for SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid detection 16 days post-discharge: a case report
  42. L-index, more than a screening tool for hypertriglyceridemia
  43. Neutralization of biotin interference: preliminary evaluation of the VeraTest Biotin™, VeraPrep Biotin™ and BioT-Filter®
  44. Counting and reporting band count is unreliable practice due to the high inter-observer variability
  45. Cigarette smoking prior to blood sampling acutely affects serum levels of the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease biomarker surfactant protein D
  46. How reliable is the detection of anti-mitochondrial antibodies on murine triple-tissue?
  47. Further advices on measuring lipoprotein(a) for reducing the residual cardiovascular risk on statin therapy
Downloaded on 29.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2019-1160/html
Scroll to top button