Startseite Impact of delta check time intervals on error detection capability
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Impact of delta check time intervals on error detection capability

  • Rui Zhen Tan , Corey Markus ORCID logo und Tze Ping Loh EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 16. November 2019
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Background

The delta check time interval limit is the maximum time window within which two sequential results of a patient will be evaluated by the delta check rule. The impact of time interval on delta check performance is not well studied.

Methods

De-identified historical laboratory data were extracted from the laboratory information system and divided into children (≤18 years) and adults (>21 years). The relative and absolute differences of the original pair of results from each patient were compared against the delta check limits associated with 90% specificity. The data were then randomly reshuffled to simulate a switched (misidentified) sample scenario. The data were divided into 1-day, 3-day, 7-day, 14-day, 1-month, 3-month, 6-month and 1-year time interval bins. The true positive- and false-positive rates at different intervals were examined.

Results

Overall, 24 biochemical and 20 haematological tests were analysed. For nearly all the analytes, there was no statistical evidence of any difference in the true- or false-positive rates of the delta check rules at different time intervals when compared to the overall data. The only exceptions to this were mean corpuscular volume (using both relative- and absolute-difference delta check) and mean corpuscular haemoglobin (only absolute-difference delta check) in the children population, where the false-positive rates became significantly lower at 1-year interval.

Conclusions

This study showed that there is no optimal delta check time interval. This fills an important evidence gap for future guidance development.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Schifman RB, Talbert M, Souers RJ. Delta check practices and outcomes: a Q-probes study involving 49 health care facilities and 6541 delta check alerts. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2017;141:813–23.10.5858/arpa.2016-0161-CPSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Straseski JA, Strathmann FG. Patient data algorithms. Clin Lab Med 2013;33:147–60.10.1016/j.cll.2012.11.009Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Ko DH, Park HI, Hyun J, Kim HS, Park MJ, Shin DH. Utility of reference change values for delta check limits. Am J Clin Pathol 2017;148:323–9.10.1093/ajcp/aqx083Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Yamashita T, Ichihara K, Miyamoto A. A novel weighted cumulative delta-check method for highly sensitive detection of specimen mix-up in the clinical laboratory. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013;51:781–9.10.1515/cclm-2012-0752Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Rosenbaum MW, Baron JM. Using machine learning-based multianalyte delta checks to detect wrong blood in tube errors. Am J Clin Pathol 2018;150:555–66.10.1093/ajcp/aqy085Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

6. CLSI. CLSI guideline EP33. Use of delta checks in the medical laboratory, 1st ed. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2016.Suche in Google Scholar

7. Ricós C, Alvarez V, Cava F, García-Lario JV, Hernández A, Jiménez CV, et al. Current databases on biological variation: pros, cons and progress. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1999;59:491–500.10.1080/00365519950185229Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Loh TP, Antoniou G, Baghurst P, Metz MP. Development of paediatric biochemistry centile charts as a complement to laboratory reference intervals. Pathology 2014;46:336–43.10.1097/PAT.0000000000000118Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Loh TP, Metz MP. Indirect estimation of pediatric between-individual biological variation data for 22 common serum biochemistries. Am J Clin Pathol 2015;143:683–93.10.1309/AJCPB7Q3AHYLJTPKSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Loh TP, Ranieri E, Metz MP. Derivation of pediatric within-individual biological variation by indirect sampling method: an LMS approach. Am J Clin Pathol 2014;142:657–63.10.1309/AJCPHZLQAEYH94HISuche in Google Scholar PubMed


Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2019-1004).


Received: 2019-09-27
Accepted: 2019-10-15
Published Online: 2019-11-16
Published in Print: 2020-02-25

©2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Progress in understanding the use of human chorionic gonadotropin as a tumor marker
  4. Reviews
  5. Biomarkers for prostate cancer: prostate-specific antigen and beyond
  6. Gut microbiome investigation in celiac disease: from methods to its pathogenetic role
  7. Opinion Papers
  8. Understanding and managing interferences in clinical laboratory assays: the role of laboratory professionals
  9. A step forward in identifying the right human chorionic gonadotropin assay for testicular cancer
  10. EFLM Opinion Paper
  11. Validation and verification of examination procedures in medical laboratories: opinion of the EFLM Working Group Accreditation and ISO/CEN standards (WG-A/ISO) on dealing with ISO 15189:2012 demands for method verification and validation
  12. Guidelines and Recommendations
  13. An updated protocol based on CLSI document C37 for preparation of off-the-clot serum from individual units for use alone or to prepare commutable pooled serum reference materials
  14. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  15. Highly accurate and explainable detection of specimen mix-up using a machine learning model
  16. Impact of delta check time intervals on error detection capability
  17. Effect of long-term frozen storage and thawing of stool samples on faecal haemoglobin concentration and diagnostic performance of faecal immunochemical tests
  18. A more accurate prediction to rule in and rule out pre-eclampsia using the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio and NT-proBNP as biomarkers
  19. Macro vitamin B12: an underestimated threat
  20. Evaluation of the primary biliary cholangitis-related serologic profile in a large cohort of Belgian systemic sclerosis patients
  21. High frequency of anti-parietal cell antibody (APCA) and intrinsic factor blocking antibody (IFBA) in individuals with severe vitamin B12 deficiency – an observational study in primary care patients
  22. DOAC-Remove abolishes the effect of direct oral anticoagulants on activated protein C resistance testing in real-life venous thromboembolism patients
  23. Cancer Diagnostics
  24. How comparable are total human chorionic gonadotropin (hCGt) tumour markers assays?
  25. Diabetes
  26. Measurement accuracy of two professional-use systems for point-of-care testing of blood glucose
  27. Letters to the Editor
  28. Human chorionic gonadotropin in oncology: a matter of tight (bio)marking
  29. More robust analytical evidence should support the selection of human chorionic gonadotropin assays for oncology application
  30. Letter in reply to the letter to the editor of Ferraro S and Panteghini M with the title “More robust analytical evidence should support the selection for human chorionic gonadotropin assays for oncology application”
  31. Definition of analytical quality specifications for serum total folate measurements using a simulation outcome-based model
  32. Alarmed by misleading interference in free T3 and free T4 assays: a new case of anti-streptavidin antibodies
  33. A root cause analysis of ‘falsely elevated’ oxygen saturation: investigation of pneumatic tube transport and differences between estimated and measured saturation in a critical patient population
  34. The chaos of serologic markers in interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features can be corrected by the laboratory physician
  35. Vitamin A and E gender and age stratification in adults
  36. Detection of monoclonal B-lymphocytosis: interest of cellular population data and CytoDiff™ analysis
  37. Urinary reference intervals for gadolinium in individuals without recent exposure to gadolinium-based contrast agents
  38. Molecular diagnosis of toxoplasmosis: evaluation of automated DNA extraction using eMAG® (bioMérieux) on buffy coat, cerebrospinal and bronchoalveolar lavage fluids
  39. Retraction
  40. Retraction of: The Effect of a Gender Difference in the Apolipoprotein E Gene DNA Polymorphism on Serum Lipid Levels in a Serbian Healthy Population
Heruntergeladen am 8.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2019-1004/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen