Home How comparable are total human chorionic gonadotropin (hCGt) tumour markers assays?
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

How comparable are total human chorionic gonadotropin (hCGt) tumour markers assays?

  • Carel J. Pretorius ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Stephen du Toit , Urs Wilgen , Sandra Klingberg , Mark Jones , Jacobus P.J. Ungerer and Jillian R. Tate
Published/Copyright: July 24, 2019

Abstract

Background

Total human chorionic gonadotropin (hCGt) tumour marker testing is regarded as an “off label” application for most commercial methods. We compared four assays in patients with a hCGt tumour marker request. We hypothesised that regression slopes would be altered and that outliers would be more common with tumour marker than with pregnancy samples if the detection of malignancy associated hCG molecular forms differed amongst assays. Further such systematic differences would be obvious and large enough to change clinical management decisions.

Results

We measured hCGt in 390 samples from 137 females and 253 males with a tumour marker request and 208 pregnancy controls with the following methods: Access Total βhCG, Architect Total-βhCG, Cobas hCG + β and Immulite HCG. The between method regressions determined on tumour marker and pregnancy samples were not significantly different. The outlier rates were similar for male and female tumour marker and the pregnancy groups: 1.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0%–3.1%), 2.2% (95% CI 0%–4.7%) and 2.9% (95% CI 0.6%–5.2%). The outliers were randomly distributed amongst the methods and we were confident that they would not adversely influence clinical decisions.

Conclusions

The hCGt results were clinically equivalent with no systematic difference amongst the four assays.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organisation(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Stenman U, Alfthan H, Hotakainen K. Human chorionic gonadotropin in cancer. Clin Biochem 2004;37:549–61.10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2004.05.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Gronowski AM. Lumpers and splitters: the debate continues. Clin Chem 2018;64:1670.10.1373/clinchem.2018.294710Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Ferraro S, Trevisiol C, Gion M, Panteghini M. Human chorionic gonadotropin assays for testicular tumors: closing the gap between clinical and laboratory practice. Clin Chem 2018;64:270–8.10.1373/clinchem.2017.275263Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Cao Z, Rej R. Are laboratories reporting serum quantitative hCG results correctly? Clin Chem 2008;54:761–4.10.1373/clinchem.2007.098822Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Rinker AD, Tietz NW. β-hCG vs intact hCG assays in the detection of trophoblastic disease. Clin Chem 1989;35: 1799–800.10.1093/clinchem/35.8.1799Search in Google Scholar

6. Lempaiainen A, Hotakainen K, Blomqvist C, Alfthan H, Stenman U. Hyperglycosylated human chorionic gonadotropin in serum of testicular cancer patients. Clin Chem 2012;58:1123–9.10.1373/clinchem.2012.183723Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Cole LA, Du Toit S, Higgins TN. Total hCG tests. Clin Chim Acta 2011;412:2216–22.10.1016/j.cca.2011.08.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Whittington J, Fantz CR, Gronowski AM, McCudden C, Mullins R, Sokoll L, et al. The analytical specificity of human chorionic gonadotropin assays determined using WHO international reference reagents. Clin Chim Acta 2010;411:81–5.10.1016/j.cca.2009.10.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Greene DN, Petrie MS, Pyle AL, Kamer SM, Grenache DG. Performance characteristics of the Beckman Coulter total βHCG (5th IS) assay. Clin Chim Acta 2015;439:61–7.10.1016/j.cca.2014.09.029Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Ungerer JP, Pretorius CJ, Dimeski G, O’Rourke PK, Tyack SA. Falsely elevated troponin I results due to outliers indicate a lack of analytical robustness. Ann Clin Biochem 2010;47:242–7.10.1258/acb.2010.010012Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Altman DG, Machin D, Bryant TN, Gardner MJ. Statistics with confidence, 2nd ed. Chapter 6: proportions and their differences. UK: BMJ Books, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

12. Ungerer JP, Marquart L, O’Rourke PK, Wilgen U, Pretorius CJ. Concordance, variance, and outliers in 4 contemporary cardiac troponin assays: implications for harmonization. Clin Chem 2012;58:274–83.10.1373/clinchem.2011.175059Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2019-05-02
Accepted: 2019-06-27
Published Online: 2019-07-24
Published in Print: 2020-02-25

©2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Progress in understanding the use of human chorionic gonadotropin as a tumor marker
  4. Reviews
  5. Biomarkers for prostate cancer: prostate-specific antigen and beyond
  6. Gut microbiome investigation in celiac disease: from methods to its pathogenetic role
  7. Opinion Papers
  8. Understanding and managing interferences in clinical laboratory assays: the role of laboratory professionals
  9. A step forward in identifying the right human chorionic gonadotropin assay for testicular cancer
  10. EFLM Opinion Paper
  11. Validation and verification of examination procedures in medical laboratories: opinion of the EFLM Working Group Accreditation and ISO/CEN standards (WG-A/ISO) on dealing with ISO 15189:2012 demands for method verification and validation
  12. Guidelines and Recommendations
  13. An updated protocol based on CLSI document C37 for preparation of off-the-clot serum from individual units for use alone or to prepare commutable pooled serum reference materials
  14. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  15. Highly accurate and explainable detection of specimen mix-up using a machine learning model
  16. Impact of delta check time intervals on error detection capability
  17. Effect of long-term frozen storage and thawing of stool samples on faecal haemoglobin concentration and diagnostic performance of faecal immunochemical tests
  18. A more accurate prediction to rule in and rule out pre-eclampsia using the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio and NT-proBNP as biomarkers
  19. Macro vitamin B12: an underestimated threat
  20. Evaluation of the primary biliary cholangitis-related serologic profile in a large cohort of Belgian systemic sclerosis patients
  21. High frequency of anti-parietal cell antibody (APCA) and intrinsic factor blocking antibody (IFBA) in individuals with severe vitamin B12 deficiency – an observational study in primary care patients
  22. DOAC-Remove abolishes the effect of direct oral anticoagulants on activated protein C resistance testing in real-life venous thromboembolism patients
  23. Cancer Diagnostics
  24. How comparable are total human chorionic gonadotropin (hCGt) tumour markers assays?
  25. Diabetes
  26. Measurement accuracy of two professional-use systems for point-of-care testing of blood glucose
  27. Letters to the Editor
  28. Human chorionic gonadotropin in oncology: a matter of tight (bio)marking
  29. More robust analytical evidence should support the selection of human chorionic gonadotropin assays for oncology application
  30. Letter in reply to the letter to the editor of Ferraro S and Panteghini M with the title “More robust analytical evidence should support the selection for human chorionic gonadotropin assays for oncology application”
  31. Definition of analytical quality specifications for serum total folate measurements using a simulation outcome-based model
  32. Alarmed by misleading interference in free T3 and free T4 assays: a new case of anti-streptavidin antibodies
  33. A root cause analysis of ‘falsely elevated’ oxygen saturation: investigation of pneumatic tube transport and differences between estimated and measured saturation in a critical patient population
  34. The chaos of serologic markers in interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features can be corrected by the laboratory physician
  35. Vitamin A and E gender and age stratification in adults
  36. Detection of monoclonal B-lymphocytosis: interest of cellular population data and CytoDiff™ analysis
  37. Urinary reference intervals for gadolinium in individuals without recent exposure to gadolinium-based contrast agents
  38. Molecular diagnosis of toxoplasmosis: evaluation of automated DNA extraction using eMAG® (bioMérieux) on buffy coat, cerebrospinal and bronchoalveolar lavage fluids
  39. Retraction
  40. Retraction of: The Effect of a Gender Difference in the Apolipoprotein E Gene DNA Polymorphism on Serum Lipid Levels in a Serbian Healthy Population
Downloaded on 9.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2019-0457/html
Scroll to top button