Home Mass spectrometry based analytical quality assessment of serum and plasma specimens with patterns of endo- and exogenous peptides
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Mass spectrometry based analytical quality assessment of serum and plasma specimens with patterns of endo- and exogenous peptides

  • Peter Findeisen EMAIL logo , Shruthi Hemanna , Romi Singh Maharjan , Sonani Mindt , Victor Costina , Ralf Hofheinz and Michael Neumaier
Published/Copyright: December 4, 2018

Abstract

Background

Inappropriate preanalytical sample handling is a major threat for any biomarker discovery approach. Blood specimens have a genuine proteolytic activity that leads to a time dependent decay of peptidic quality control markers (QCMs). The aim of this study was to identify QCMs for direct assessment of sample quality (DASQ) of serum and plasma specimens.

Methods

Serum and plasma specimens of healthy volunteers and tumor patients were spiked with two synthetic reporter peptides (exogenous QCMs) and aged under controlled conditions for up to 24 h. The proteolytic fragments of endogenous and exogenous QCMs were monitored for each time point by mass spectrometry (MS). The decay pattern of peptides was used for supervised classification of samples according to their respective preanalytical quality.

Results

The classification accuracy for fresh specimens (1 h) was 96% and 99% for serum and plasma specimens, respectively, when endo- and exogenous QCMs were used for the calculations. However, classification of older specimens was more difficult and overall classification accuracy decreased to 79%.

Conclusions

MALDI-TOF MS is a simple and robust method that can be used for DASQ of serum and plasma specimens in a high throughput manner. We propose DASQ as a fast and simple step that can be included in multicentric large-scale projects to ensure the homogeneity of sample quality.


Corresponding author: Prof. Dr. Peter Findeisen, Institute for Clinical Chemistry, Mannheim Medical Faculty of Heidelberg University, University Hospital Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany, Phone: +49 621 383 2222, Fax: +49 621 383 3432

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: This work was supported by the grant 01EK1505A from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Anderson NL. The clinical plasma proteome: a survey of clinical assays for proteins in plasma and serum. Clin Chem 2010;56:177–85.10.1373/clinchem.2009.126706Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Gaye A, Peakman T, Tobin MD, Burton PR. Understanding the impact of pre-analytic variation in haematological and clinical chemistry analytes on the power of association studies. Int J Epidemiol 2014;43:1633–44.10.1093/ije/dyu127Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Yi J, Warunek D, Craft D. Degradation and stabilization of peptide hormones in human blood specimens. PLoS One 2015;10:e0134427.10.1371/journal.pone.0134427Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Yi J, Liu Z, Craft D, O’Mullan P, Ju G, Gelfand CA. Intrinsic peptidase activity causes a sequential multi-step reaction (SMSR) in digestion of human plasma peptides. J Proteome Res 2008;7:5112–8.10.1021/pr800396cSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

5. McShane LM, Hayes DF. Publication of tumor marker research results: the necessity for complete and transparent reporting. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:4223–32.10.1200/JCO.2012.42.6858Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Banks RE. Preanalytical influences in clinical proteomic studies: raising awareness of fundamental issues in sample banking. Clin Chem 2008;54:6–7.10.1373/clinchem.2007.097667Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Rifai N, Gillette M, Carr S. Protein biomarker discovery and validation: the long and uncertain path to clinical utility. Nat Biotech 2006;24:971–83.10.1038/nbt1235Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Ransohoff D. Bias as a threat to the validity of cancer molecular-marker research. Nat Rev Cancer 2005;5:142–9.10.1038/nrc1550Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Lehmann S, Guadagni F, Moore H, Ashton G, Barnes M, Benson E, et al. Standard preanalytical coding for biospecimens: review and implementation of the sample PREanalytical code (SPREC). Biopreserv Biobank 2012;10:366–74.10.1089/bio.2012.0012Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Moore HM, Kelly A, McShane LM, Vaught J. Biospecimen reporting for improved study quality (BRISQ). Transfusion 2013;53:e1.10.1111/trf.12281Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. McShane LM, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W, Taube SE, Gion M, Clark GM, et al. Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:9067–72.10.1200/JCO.2004.01.0454Search in Google Scholar

12. Riondino S, Ferroni P, Spila A, Alessandroni J, D’Alessandro R, Formica V, et al. Ensuring sample quality for biomarker discovery studies – use of ICT tools to trace biosample life-cycle. Cancer Genomics Proteomics 2015;12:291–9.Search in Google Scholar

13. Greco V, Pieragostino D, Piras C, Aebersold R, Wiltfang J, Caltagirone C, et al. Direct analytical sample quality assessment for biomarker investigation: qualifying cerebrospinal fluid samples. Proteomics 2014;14:1954–62.10.1002/pmic.201300565Search in Google Scholar

14. Betsou F, Gunter E, Clements J, DeSouza Y, Goddard KA, Guadagni F, et al. Identification of evidence-based biospecimen quality-control tools: a report of the International Society for Biological and Environmental Repositories (ISBER) Biospecimen Science Working Group. J Mol Diagn 2013;15:3–16.10.1016/j.jmoldx.2012.06.008Search in Google Scholar

15. Lengelle J, Panopoulos E, Betsou F. Soluble CD40 ligand as a biomarker for storage-related preanalytic variations of human serum. Cytokine 2008;44:275–82.10.1016/j.cyto.2008.08.010Search in Google Scholar

16. Geddes T, Ahmed S, Pruetz B, Larson D, Thibodeau B, Akervall J, et al. SPIN: development of sample-specific protein integrity numbers as an index of biospecimen quality. Biopreserv Biobank 2013;11:25–32.10.1089/bio.2012.0039Search in Google Scholar

17. Romano P, Beitia San Vicente M, Profumo A. A mass spectrometry based method and a software tool to assess degradation status of serum samples to be used in proteomics for biomarker discovery. J Proteomics 2018;173:99–106.10.1016/j.jprot.2017.12.004Search in Google Scholar

18. Findeisen P, Thumfart JO, Costina V, Hofheinz R, Neumaier M. MS-based monitoring of proteolytic decay of synthetic reporter peptides for quality control of plasma and serum specimens. Am J Clin Pathol 2013;140:314–23.10.1309/AJCPOS9Z5KVZSFSCSearch in Google Scholar

19. Thumfart J, Abidi N, Mindt S, Costina V, Hofheinz R, Klawonn F, et al. LC/MS based monitoring of endogenous decay markers for quality assessment of serum specimens. J Proteomics Bioinform 2015;8:91–7.Search in Google Scholar

20. Frank E, Hall M, Trigg L, Holmes G, Witten IH. Data mining in bioinformatics using Weka. Bioinformatics 2004;20:2479–81.10.1093/bioinformatics/bth261Search in Google Scholar

21. McDonald JH. Handbook of Biological Statistics. Baltimore, Maryland, 2014:305.Search in Google Scholar

22. Landwehr N, Hall M, Frank E. Machine Learning. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Science + Business Media, Inc., 2005.Search in Google Scholar

23. Matthews BW. Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme. Biochim Biophys Acta 1975;405:442–51.10.1016/0005-2795(75)90109-9Search in Google Scholar

24. Dick LW Jr, Kim C, Qiu D, Cheng KC. Determination of the origin of the N-terminal pyro-glutamate variation in monoclonal antibodies using model peptides. Biotechnol Bioeng 2007;97:544–53.10.1002/bit.21260Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Sciacovelli L, Lippi G, Sumarac Z, West J, Garcia Del Pino Castro I, Furtado Vieira K, et al. Quality indicators in laboratory medicine: the status of the progress of IFCC Working Group “Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety” project. Clin Chem Lab Med 2017;55:348–57.10.1515/cclm-2016-0929Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Lippi G, Baird GS, Banfi G, Bolenius K, Cadamuro J, Church S, et al. Improving quality in the preanalytical phase through innovation, on behalf of the European Federation for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group for Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE). Clin Chem Lab Med 2017;55:489–500.10.1515/cclm-2017-0107Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Salvagno GL, Danese E, Lippi G. Preanalytical variables for liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) analysis of human blood specimens. Clin Biochem 2017;50:582–6.10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.04.012Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Baker M. Biorepositories: Building better biobanks. Nature 2012;486:141–6.10.1038/486141aSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Anton G, Wilson R, Yu ZH, Prehn C, Zukunft S, Adamski J, et al. Pre-analytical sample quality: metabolite ratios as an intrinsic marker for prolonged room temperature exposure of serum samples. PLoS One 2015;10:e0121495.10.1371/journal.pone.0121495Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

30. Trezzi JP, Bulla A, Bellora C, Rose M, Lescuyer P, Kiehntopf M, et al. LacaScore: a novel plasma sample quality control tool based on ascorbic acid and lactic acid levels. Metabolomics 2016;12:96.10.1007/s11306-016-1038-1Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

31. Liu X, Hoene M, Yin P, Fritsche L, Plomgaard P, Hansen JS, et al. Quality control of serum and plasma by quantification of (4E,14Z)-sphingadienine-C18-1-phosphate uncovers common preanalytical errors during handling of whole blood. Clin Chem 2018;64:810–9.10.1373/clinchem.2017.277905Search in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Yepes D, Costina V, Pilz LR, Hofheinz R, Neumaier M, Findeisen P. Multiplex profiling of tumor-associated proteolytic activity in serum of colorectal cancer patients. Proteomics Clin Appl 2014;8:308–16.10.1002/prca.201300103Search in Google Scholar PubMed

33. Wildes D, Wells JA. Sampling the N-terminal proteome of human blood. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107:4561–6.10.1073/pnas.0914495107Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

34. Nedelkov D. Population proteomics: investigation of protein diversity in human populations. Proteomics 2008;8:779–86.10.1002/pmic.200700501Search in Google Scholar PubMed

35. Findeisen P, Post S, Wenz F, Neumaier M. Addition of exogenous reporter peptides to serum samples before mass spectrometry-based protease profiling provides advantages over profiling of endogenous peptides. Clin Chem 2007;53:1864–6.10.1373/clinchem.2006.083030Search in Google Scholar PubMed

36. Yin P, Peter A, Franken H, Zhao X, Neukamm SS, RosenbaumL, et al. Preanalytical aspects and sample quality assessment in metabolomics studies of human blood. Clin Chem 2013;59:833–45.10.1373/clinchem.2012.199257Search in Google Scholar PubMed

37. Kofanova O, Henry E, Aguilar Quesada R, Bulla A, Navarro Linares H, Lescuyer P, et al. IL8 and IL16 levels indicate serum and plasma quality. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56:1054–62.10.1515/cclm-2017-1047Search in Google Scholar PubMed

38. Banks R, Stanley A, Cairns D, Barrett J, Clarke P, Thompson D, et al. Influences of blood sample processing on low-molecular-weight proteome identified by surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry. Clin Chem 2005;51:1637–49.10.1373/clinchem.2005.051417Search in Google Scholar PubMed

39. Tammen H, Hess R. Collection and handling of blood specimens for peptidomics. Methods Mol Biol 2013;1023:161–8.10.1007/978-1-4614-7209-4_10Search in Google Scholar PubMed

40. Randall SA, McKay MJ, Baker MS, Molloy MP. Evaluation of blood collection tubes using selected reaction monitoring MS: implications for proteomic biomarker studies. Proteomics 2010;10:2050–6.10.1002/prca.201090051Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-07-30
Accepted: 2018-11-05
Published Online: 2018-12-04
Published in Print: 2019-04-24

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Cardiac biomarkers – 2019
  4. Reviews
  5. Current understanding and future directions in the application of TIMP-2 and IGFBP7 in AKI clinical practice
  6. Serum cytokines, adipokines and ferritin for non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis in chronic liver disease: a systematic review
  7. Opinion Papers
  8. Detection capability of quantitative faecal immunochemical tests for haemoglobin (FIT) and reporting of low faecal haemoglobin concentrations
  9. Should phosphatidylethanol be currently analysed using whole blood, dried blood spots or both?
  10. IFCC Papers
  11. High sensitivity, contemporary and point-of-care cardiac troponin assays: educational aids developed by the IFCC Committee on Clinical Application of Cardiac Bio-Markers
  12. Cardiac troponin and natriuretic peptide analytical interferences from hemolysis and biotin: educational aids from the IFCC Committee on Cardiac Biomarkers (IFCC C-CB)
  13. Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics
  14. Droplet digital PCR for the simultaneous analysis of minimal residual disease and hematopoietic chimerism after allogeneic cell transplantation
  15. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  16. Commutable whole blood reference materials for hemoglobin A1c validated on multiple clinical analyzers
  17. When results matter: reliable creatinine concentrations in hyperbilirubinemia patients
  18. Mass spectrometry based analytical quality assessment of serum and plasma specimens with patterns of endo- and exogenous peptides
  19. Association of serum sphingomyelin profile with clinical outcomes in patients with lower respiratory tract infections: results of an observational, prospective 6-year follow-up study
  20. Effect of an activated charcoal product (DOAC Stop™) intended for extracting DOACs on various other APTT-prolonging anticoagulants
  21. Hematology and Coagulation
  22. Commutability assessment of reference materials for the enumeration of lymphocyte subsets
  23. Circulating platelet-neutrophil aggregates as risk factor for deep venous thrombosis
  24. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  25. A comparison of complete blood count reference intervals in healthy elderly vs. younger Korean adults: a large population study
  26. Indirect determination of hematology reference intervals in adult patients on Beckman Coulter UniCell DxH 800 and Abbott CELL-DYN Sapphire devices
  27. Cancer Diagnostics
  28. Large platelet size is associated with poor outcome in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer
  29. Cardiovascular Diseases
  30. Sample matrix and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assays
  31. Preoperative proteinuria and clinical outcomes in type B aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair
  32. Infectious Diseases
  33. The rational specimen for the quantitative detection of Epstein-Barr virus DNA load
  34. Letters to the Editor
  35. Letter to the Editor on article Dimech W, Karakaltsas M, Vincini G. Comparison of four methods of establishing control limits for monitoring quality controls in infectious disease serology testing. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56:1970–8
  36. Counterpoint to the Letter to the Editor by Badrick and Parvin in regard to Comparison of four methods of establishing control limits for monitoring quality controls in infectious disease serology testing
  37. Is creatine kinase an ideal biomarker in rhabdomyolysis? Reply to Lippi et al.: Diagnostic biomarkers of muscle injury and exertional rhabdomyolysis (https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2018-0656)
  38. Blood neuron cell-derived microparticles as potential biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease
  39. A fast, nondestructive, low-cost method for the determination of hematocrit of dried blood spots using image analysis
  40. Association of fibroblast growth factor 21 plasma levels with neonatal sepsis: preliminary results
  41. Impact of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and other extracorporeal support techniques on procalcitonin guided antibiotic therapy in critically ill patients with septic shock
  42. Determining the cutoff value of the APTT mixing test for factor VIII inhibitor
  43. Determining the cut-off value of the APTT mixing test for factor VIII inhibitor: reply
  44. Euthyroid Graves’ disease with spurious hyperthyroidism: a diagnostic challenge
  45. A pilot plasma-ctDNA ring trial for the Cobas® EGFR Mutation Test in clinical diagnostic laboratories
  46. MS-based proteomics: a metrological sound and robust alternative for apolipoprotein E phenotyping in a multiplexed test
Downloaded on 13.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2018-0811/html
Scroll to top button