Home Systematic comparison of routine laboratory measurements with in-hospital mortality: ICU-Labome, a large cohort study of critically ill patients
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Systematic comparison of routine laboratory measurements with in-hospital mortality: ICU-Labome, a large cohort study of critically ill patients

  • Edris M. Alkozai , Bakhtawar K. Mahmoodi , Johan Decruyenaere , Robert J. Porte , Annemieke Oude Lansink-Hartgring , Ton Lisman and Maarten W. Nijsten EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: January 8, 2018

Abstract

Background:

In intensive care unit (ICU) patients, many laboratory measurements can be deranged when compared with the standard reference interval (RI). The assumption that larger derangements are associated with worse outcome may not always be correct. The ICU-Labome study systematically evaluated the univariate association of routine laboratory measurements with outcome.

Methods:

We studied the 35 most frequent blood-based measurements in adults admitted ≥6 h to our ICU between 1992 and 2013. Measurements were from the first 14 ICU days and before ICU admission. Various metrics, including variability, were related with hospital survival. ICU- based RIs were derived from measurements obtained at ICU discharge in patients who were not readmitted to the ICU and survived for >1 year.

Results:

In 49,464 patients (cardiothoracic surgery 43%), we assessed >20·106 measurements. ICU readmissions, in-hospital and 1-year mortality were 13%, 14% and 19%, respectively. On ICU admission, lactate had the strongest relation with hospital mortality. Variability was independently related with hospital mortality in 30 of 35 measurements, and 16 of 35 measurements displayed a U-shaped outcome-relation. Medians of 14 of 35 ICU-based ranges were outside the standard RI. Remarkably, γ-glutamyltransferase (GGT) had a paradoxical relation with hospital mortality in the second ICU week because more abnormal GGT-levels were observed in hospital survivors.

Conclusions:

ICU-based RIs for may be more useful than standard RIs in identifying ICU patients at risk. The association of variability with outcome for most of the measurements suggests this is a consequence and not a cause of a worse ICU outcome. Late elevation of GGT may confer protection to ICU patients.

Acknowledgments

We thank Frank Doesburg for computer support and Iwan van der Horst for critically reading the manuscript.

  1. Author contributions: EA conceived, helped execute the study and drafted the manuscript. BM helped execute the study and drafted the manuscript. JD helped execute the study and drafted the manuscript. RP helped execute the study and revised the manuscript. AOL helped execute the study and drafted the manuscript. TL conceived, helped execute the study and drafted the manuscript. MN conceived, helped execute and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved final manuscript. All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Pickering BW, Gajic O, Ahmed A, Herasevich V, Keegan MT. Data utilization for medical decision making at the time of patient admission to ICU. Crit Care Med 2013;41:1502–10.10.1097/CCM.0b013e318287f0c0Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Zimmerman JE, Kramer AA, McNair DS, Malila FM. Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) IV: hospital mortality assessment for today’s critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 2006;34:1297–310.10.1097/01.CCM.0000215112.84523.F0Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Moreno RP, Metnitz PG, Almeida E, Jordan B, Bauer P, Campos RA, et al. SAPS 3 – from evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 2: development of a prognostic model for hospital mortality at ICU admission. Intensive Care Med 2005;31:1345–55.10.1007/s00134-005-2763-5Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Marshall JC, Cook DJ, Christou NV, Bernard GR, Sprung CL, Sibbald WJ. Multiple organ dysfunction score: a reliable descriptor of a complex clinical outcome. Crit Care Med 1995;23:1638–52.10.1097/00003246-199510000-00007Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonça A, Bruining H, et al. The SOFA (sepsis-related organ failure assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 1996;22:707–10.10.1007/BF01709751Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Kouri T, Kairisto V, Virtanen A, Uusipaikka E, Rajamäki A, Finneman H, et al. Reference intervals developed from data for hospitalized patients: computerized method based on combination of laboratory and diagnostic data. Clin Chem 1994;40:2209–15.10.1093/clinchem/40.12.2209Search in Google Scholar

7. Finfer S, Wernerman J, Preiser JC, Cass T, Desaive T, Hovorka R, et al. Clinical review: consensus recommendations on measurement of blood glucose and reporting glycemic control in critically ill adults. Crit Care 2013;17:229.10.1186/cc12537Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Krinsley JS. Glycemic variability: a strong independent predictor of mortality in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 2008;36:3008–13.10.1097/CCM.0b013e31818b38d2Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Hessels L, Hoekstra M, Mijzen LJ, Vogelzang M, Dieperink W, Oude Lansink A, et al. The relationship between serum potassium, potassium variability and in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients and a before-after analysis on the impact of computer-assisted potassium control. Crit Care 2015;19:4.10.1186/s13054-014-0720-9Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Oude Lansink-Hartgring A, Hessels L, Weigel J, de Smet AM, Gommers D, Nannan Panday PV, et al. Long term changes in dysnatremia incidence in the ICU: a shift from hyponatremia to hypernatremia. Ann Intensive Care 2016;6:22.10.1186/s13613-016-0124-xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Royston P, Ambler G, Sauerbrei W. The use of fractional polynomials to model continuous risk variables in epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol 1999;28:964–74.10.1093/ije/28.5.964Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Hansen JB, Wilsgard L, Osterud B. Biphasic changes in leukocytes induced by strenuous exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1991;62:157–61.10.1007/BF00643735Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Kilickaya O, Schmickl C, Ahmed A, Pulido J, Onigkeit J, Kashani K, et al. Customized reference ranges for laboratory values decrease false positive alerts in intensive care unit patients. PLoS One 2014;9:e107930.10.1371/journal.pone.0107930Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Stachon A, Segbers E, Hering S, Kempf R, Holland-Letz T, Krieg M. A laboratory-based risk score for medical intensive care patients. Clin Chem Lab Med 2008;46:855–62.10.1515/CCLM.2008.136Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Solinger AB, Rothman SI. Risks of mortality associated with common laboratory tests: a novel, simple and meaningful way to set decision limits from data available in the Electronic Medical Record. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013;51:1803–13.10.1515/cclm-2013-0167Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Bakker J, Nijsten MW, Jansen TC. Clinical use of lactate monitoring in critically ill patients. Ann Intensive Care 2013;3:12.10.1186/2110-5820-3-12Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Vincent JL, Quintairos E Silva A, Couto Jr. L, Taccone FS. The value of blood lactate kinetics in critically ill patients: a systematic review. Crit Care 2016;20:257.10.1186/s13054-016-1403-5Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Jansen TC, van Bommel J, Schoonderbeek FJ, Sleeswijk Visser SJ, van der Klooster JM, Lima AP, et al. Early lactate-guided therapy in intensive care unit patients: a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010;82:752–61.10.1164/rccm.200912-1918OCSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). J Am Med Assoc 2016;315:801–10.10.1001/jama.2016.0287Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

20. Addison DJ. Is routine ordering of both hemoglobin and hematocrit justifiable? Canad Med Ass J 1966;95:974–5.Search in Google Scholar

21. Nijboer JM, van der Horst IC, Hendriks HG, ten Duis HJ, Nijsten MW. Myth or reality: hematocrit and hemoglobin differ in trauma. J Trauma 2007;62:1310–2.10.1097/TA.0b013e3180341f54Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Sakr Y, Rother S, Ferreira AM, Ewald C, Dünisch P, Riedemmann N, et al. Fluctuations in serum sodium level are associated with an increased risk of death in surgical ICU Patients. Critical Care Med 2013;41:133–42.10.1097/CCM.0b013e318265f576Search in Google Scholar

23. Whitfield JB. Gamma glutamyltransferase. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 2001;38:263–355.10.1080/20014091084227Search in Google Scholar

24. Stenius U, Rubin K, Gullberg D, Hogberg J. Gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase-positive rat hepatocytes are protected from GSH depletion, oxidative stress and reversible alterations of collagen receptors. Carcinogenesis 1990;11:69–73.10.1093/carcin/11.1.69Search in Google Scholar

25. Kobayashi H, Nonami T, Kurokawa T, Kitahara S, Harada A, Nakao A, et al. Changes in the glutathione redox system during ischemia and reperfusion in rat liver. Scand J Gastroenterol 1992;27:711–16.10.3109/00365529209000146Search in Google Scholar

26. Rajpert-De Meyts E, Shi M, Robison TW, Groffen J, Heisterkamp N, Forman HJ. Transfection with gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase enhances recovery from glutathione depletion using extracellular glutathione. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1992;114: 56–62.10.1016/0041-008X(92)90096-BSearch in Google Scholar

27. Lee DS, Evans JC, Robins SJ, Wilson PW, Albano I, Fox CS, et al. Gamma glutamyltransferase and metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, and mortality risk: the Framingham heart study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2007;27: 127–33.10.1161/01.ATV.0000251993.20372.40Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Alkozai EM, Lisman T, Porte RJ, Nijsten MW. Early elevated serum gamma glutamyl transpeptidase after liver transplantation is associated with better survival. F1000Res 2014;3:85.10.12688/f1000research.3316.1Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

29. Alkozai EM, Nijsten MW, de Jong KP, de Boer MT, Peeters PM, Slooff MJ, et al. Immediate postoperative low platelet count is associated with delayed liver function recovery after partial liver resection. Ann Surg 2010;251:300–6.10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b76557Search in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Haveman JW, Zeebregts CJ, Verhoeven EL, van den Berg P, van den Dungen JJ, Zwaveling JH, et al. Changes in laboratory values and their relationship with time after rupture of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. Surg Today 2008;38: 1091–101.10.1007/s00595-008-3798-3Search in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Keays R, Harrison PM, Wendon JA, Forbes A, Gove C, Alexander GJ, et al. Intravenous acetylcysteine in paracetamol induced fulminant hepatic failure: a prospective controlled trial. Br Med J 1991;303:1026–9.10.1136/bmj.303.6809.1026Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

32. Heard KJ. Acetylcysteine for acetaminophen poisoning. N Engl J Med 2008;359:285–92.10.1056/NEJMct0708278Search in Google Scholar

33. Sklar GE, Subramaniam M. Acetylcysteine treatment for non-acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure. Ann Pharmacother 2004;38:498–500.10.1345/aph.1D209Search in Google Scholar

34. Van de Moortel L, Speeckaert MM, Fiers T, Oeyen S, Decruyenaere J, Delanghe J. Low serum creatine kinase activity is associated with worse outcome in critically ill patients. J Crit Care 2014;29:786–90.10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.03.010Search in Google Scholar

35. Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med 1996;15:361–87.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960229)15:4<361::AID-SIM168>3.0.CO;2-4Search in Google Scholar


Supplemental Material:

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2016-1028).


Received: 2016-11-8
Accepted: 2017-11-23
Published Online: 2018-1-8
Published in Print: 2018-6-27

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Free light chains in the cerebrospinal fluid. Do we still need oligoclonal IgG?
  4. Reviews
  5. Obese phenotype and natriuretic peptides in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
  6. Prognostic value of HE4 in patients with ovarian cancer
  7. Opinion Paper
  8. Laboratory hemostasis: from biology to the bench
  9. Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics
  10. Multicenter validation study for the certification of a CFTR gene scanning method using next generation sequencing technology
  11. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  12. IL8 and IL16 levels indicate serum and plasma quality
  13. “Send & hold” clinical decision support rules improvement to reduce unnecessary testing of vitamins A, E, K, B1, B2, B3, B6 and C
  14. CSF free light chain identification of demyelinating disease: comparison with oligoclonal banding and other CSF indexes
  15. Search for new biomarkers of pediatric multiple sclerosis: application of immunoglobulin free light chain analysis
  16. The importance of detecting anti-DFS70 in routine clinical practice: comparison of different care settings
  17. Higher D-lactate levels are associated with higher prevalence of small dense low-density lipoprotein in obese adolescents
  18. LC-MSMS assays of urinary cortisol, a comparison between four in-house assays
  19. Optimized angiotensin-converting enzyme activity assay for the accurate diagnosis of sarcoidosis
  20. Quantitative urine test strip reading for leukocyte esterase and hemoglobin peroxidase
  21. Performance evaluation of cobas HBV real-time PCR assay on Roche cobas 4800 System in comparison with COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HBV Test
  22. Systematic comparison of routine laboratory measurements with in-hospital mortality: ICU-Labome, a large cohort study of critically ill patients
  23. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  24. Establishing reference intervals for sex hormones and SHBG in apparently healthy Chinese adult men based on a multicenter study
  25. Plasma midregional proadrenomedullin (MR-proADM) concentrations and their biological determinants in a reference population
  26. Cancer Diagnostics
  27. Analytical validation of the Hevylite assays for M-protein quantification
  28. Cardiovascular Diseases
  29. Assessing matrix, interferences and comparability between the Abbott Diagnostics and the Beckman Coulter high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assays
  30. Infectious Diseases
  31. Evaluation of a novel prognostic score based on thrombosis and inflammation in patients with sepsis: a retrospective cohort study
  32. Letters to the Editor
  33. Independent evaluation using fresh patient samples under real clinical conditions is vital for confirming the suitability and marketability of any new HbA1c assay. An example
  34. Anti-streptavidin antibodies mimicking heterophilic antibodies in thyroid function tests
  35. Site-specific DNA methylation detection based on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using recombinant methyl-CpG binding protein
  36. 3q29 microduplication in a small family with complex metabolic phenotype from Southern Italy
  37. A D1424N mutation in the MYH9 gene results in macrothrombocytopenia and granulocytic inclusion bodies in a Chinese inherited macrothrombocytopenia pedigree
  38. Evaluation of analytical performance of a chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA) for cTnI using the automated AIA-CL2400 platform
  39. Cellular markers of eryptosis are altered in type 2 diabetes
  40. Platelet serotonin is not elevated in patients with benign head and neck paragangliomas
Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2016-1028/html
Scroll to top button