Startseite The relationship between vacuum and hemolysis during catheter blood collection: a retrospective analysis of six large cohorts
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

The relationship between vacuum and hemolysis during catheter blood collection: a retrospective analysis of six large cohorts

  • Cornelia Mrazek , Ana-Maria Simundic , Helmut Wiedemann , Florian Krahmer , Thomas Klaus Felder , Ulrike Kipman , Uta Hoppe , Elisabeth Haschke-Becher und Janne Cadamuro EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 20. Januar 2017
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Background:

Blood collection through intravenous (IV) catheters is a common practice at emergency departments (EDs). This technique is associated with higher in vitro hemolysis rates and may even be amplified by the use of vacuum collection tubes. Our aim was to investigate the association of five different vacuum tubes with hemolysis rates in comparison to an aspiration system under real-life conditions and to propose an equation to estimate the amount of hemolysis, depending on the vacuum collection tube type.

Methods:

We retrospectively evaluated hemolysis data of plasma samples from our ED, where blood is drawn through IV catheters. Over the past 5 years, we compared 19,001 hemolysis index values amongst each other and against the respective vacuum pressure (Pv) of the collection tubes, which were used within the six observational periods.

Results:

The highest hemolysis rates were associated with full-draw evacuated tubes. Significantly reduced hemolysis was observed for two kinds of partial-draw tubes. The hemolysis rate of one partial-draw blood collection tube was comparable to those of the aspiration system. Regression analysis of Pv and mean free hemoglobin (fHb) values yielded the formula fHb (g/L)=0.0082*Pv2–0.1143*Pv+ 0.5314 with an R2 of 0.99.

Conclusions:

If IV catheters are used for blood collection, hemolysis rates directly correlate with the vacuum within the tubes and can be estimated by the proposed formula. By the use of partial-draw vacuum blood collection tubes, hemolysis rates in IV catheter collections can be reduced to levels comparable with collections performed by aspiration systems.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Lippi G, Blanckaert N, Bonini P, Green S, Kitchen S, Palicka V, et al. Haemolysis: an overview of the leading cause of unsuitable specimens in clinical laboratories. Clin Chem Lab Med 2008;46:764–72.10.1515/CCLM.2008.170Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Plebani M, Sciacovelli L, Aita A, Chiozza ML. Harmonization of pre–analytical quality indicators. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2014;24:105–13.10.11613/BM.2014.012Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Gimenez-Marin A, Rivas-Ruiz F, Perez-Hidalgo Mdel M, Molina-Mendoza P. Pre-analytical errors management in the clinical laboratory: a five-year study. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2014;24:248–57.10.11613/BM.2014.027Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Lippi G, Plebani M, Di Somma S, Cervellin G. Hemolyzed specimens: a major challenge for emergency departments and clinical laboratories. Crit Rev Cl Lab Sci 2011;48:143–53.10.3109/10408363.2011.600228Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Montagnana M, Brocco G, Guidi GC. Influence of hemolysis on routine clinical chemistry testing. Clin Chem Lab Med 2006;44:311–6.10.1515/CCLM.2006.054Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Lowe G, Stike R, Pollack M, Bosley J, O’Brien P, Hake A, et al. Nursing blood specimen collection techniques and hemolysis rates in an emergency department: analysis of venipuncture versus intravenous catheter collection techniques. J Emerg Nurs 2008;34:26–32.10.1111/acem.12245Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Wollowitz A, Bijur PE, Esses D, John Gallagher E. Use of butterfly needles to draw blood is independently associated with marked reduction in hemolysis compared to intravenous catheter. Acad Emerg Med 2013;20:1151–5.10.1515/labmed-2015-0078Suche in Google Scholar

8. Cadamuro J, Fiedler GM, Mrazek C, Felder TK, Oberkofler H, Kipman U, et al. In-vitro hemolysis and its financial impact using different blood collection systems. J Lab Med 2016;40:49–55.10.1111/ijlh.12135Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Lippi G, Bonelli P, Cervellin G. Prevalence and cost of hemolyzed samples in a large urban emergency department. Int J Lab Hematol 2014;36:e24–6.10.1515/cclm-2015-0363Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Cadamuro J, Wiedemann H, Mrazek C, Felder TK, Oberkofler H, Fiedler GM, et al. The economic burden of hemolysis. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:e285–8.10.1258/acb.2009.008228Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Saleem S, Mani V, Chadwick MA, Creanor S, Ayling RM. A prospective study of causes of haemolysis during venepuncture: tourniquet time should be kept to a minimum. Ann Clin Biochem 2009;46:244–6.10.1515/cclm.2011.779Suche in Google Scholar

12. Tiwari AK, Pandey P, Dixit S, Raina V. Speed of sample transportation by a pneumatic tube system can influence the degree of hemolysis. Clin Chem Lab Med 2012;50:471–4.10.1515/cclm-2016-0175Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Cadamuro J, von Meyer A, Wiedemann H, Felder TK, Moser F, Kipman U, et al. Hemolysis rates in blood samples: differences between blood collected by clinicians and nurses and the effect of phlebotomy training. Clin Chem Lab Med 2016;54:1987–92.10.11613/BM.2015.008Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Lippi G, Bonelli P, Bonfanti L, Cervellin G. The use of s-monovette is effective to reduce the burden of hemolysis in a large urban emergency department. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2015;25:69–72.10.11613/BM.2015.008Suche in Google Scholar

15. Agos MD, Lizarraga R, Gambra D, Maranon A, Orozco C, Diaz E. [Factors related to haemolysis in the extraction of blood samples]. An Sist Sanit Navar 2008;31:153–8.Suche in Google Scholar

16. Giavarina D, Pasquale L, Mezzena G, Soffiati G. Hemolysis by peripheral intravenous catheters: materials comparison. RIMeL/IJLaM 2010;6:216–21.Suche in Google Scholar

17. Specimencare. Available at: http://www.specimencare.com. Accessed: 4 Aug 2016.10.1093/clinchem/46.2.306Suche in Google Scholar

18. Carraro P, Servidio G, Plebani M. Hemolyzed specimens: A reason for rejection or a clinical challenge? Clin Chem 2000;46:306–7.10.1007/s11739-011-0568-9Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Straszewski SM, Sanchez L, McGillicuddy D, Boyd K, Dufresne J, Joyce N, et al. Use of separate venipunctures for IV access and laboratory studies decreases hemolysis rates. Intern Emerg Med 2011;6:357–9.10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2013.01.021Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Lippi G, Avanzini P, Cervellin G. Prevention of hemolysis in blood samples collected from intravenous catheters. Clin Biochem 2013;46:561–4.10.11613/BM.2013.022Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

21. Lippi G, Cervellin G, Mattiuzzi C. Critical review and meta-analysis of spurious hemolysis in blood samples collected from intravenous catheters. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2013;23:193–200.10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.08.002Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

22. Heyer NJ, Derzon JH, Winges L, Shaw C, Mass D, Snyder SR, et al. Effectiveness of practices to reduce blood sample hemolysis in EDS: a laboratory medicine best practices systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Biochem 2012;45:1012–32.10.1016/j.jen.2004.10.004Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Cox SR, Dages JH, Jarjoura D, Hazelett S. Blood samples drawn from IV catheters have less hemolysis when 5-mL (vs 10-mL) collection tubes are used. J Emerg Nurs 2004;30:529–33.10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2013.04.005Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Heiligers-Duckers C, Peters NA, van Dijck JJ, Hoeijmakers JM, Janssen MJ. Low vacuum and discard tubes reduce hemolysis in samples drawn from intravenous catheters. Clin Biochem 2013;46:1142–4.10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2013.12.004Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Lippi G, Bonelli P, Graiani V, Caleffi C, Cervellin G. Low volume tubes are not effective to reduce the rate of hemolyzed specimens from the emergency department. Clin Biochem 2014;47:227–9.10.1373/clinchem.2007.091421Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Unger J, Filippi G, Patsch W. Measurements of free hemoglobin and hemolysis index: edta- or lithium-heparinate plasma? Clin Chem 2007;53:1717–8.10.1016/j.cca.2013.10.012Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Dolci A, Panteghini M. Harmonization of automated hemolysis index assessment and use: Is it possible? Clin Chim Acta 2014;432:38–43.10.1016/j.cca.2009.03.025Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Sciacovelli L, Plebani M. The ifcc working group on laboratory errors and patient safety. Clin Chim Acta 2009;404:79–85.10.1016/j.cca.2009.03.025Suche in Google Scholar

29. IFCC Working Group on laboratory errors and patient safety (WG-LEPS). Quality indicators project. Available at: http://www.ifcc-mqi.com. Accessed: 6 Oct 2016.Suche in Google Scholar

30. Draper J. A textbook on chemistry. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1861.10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2014.06.016Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Heiligers-Duckers C, Janssen MJW. Low vacuum versus low volume tubes and the reduction of hemolyzed specimens from the emergency department. Clin Biochem 2014;47:1344.10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2014.06.016Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-10-17
Accepted: 2016-11-29
Published Online: 2017-1-20
Published in Print: 2017-7-26

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Biomarkers of acute kidney injury: a step forward
  4. Reviews
  5. Biomarkers of acute kidney injury: the pathway from discovery to clinical adoption
  6. Prognostic value of glycated hemoglobin among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  7. Opinion Paper
  8. Traceability in laboratory medicine: a global driver for accurate results for patient care
  9. Point
  10. To report or not to report: a proposal on how to deal with altered test results in hemolytic samples
  11. Counterpoint
  12. Reporting altered test results in hemolyzed samples: is the cure worse than the disease?
  13. Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics
  14. Early mixed hematopoietic chimerism detection by digital droplet PCR in patients undergoing gender-mismatched hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
  15. Comparison of Abbott RealTime genotype II, GeneMatrix restriction fragment mass polymorphism and Sysmex HISCL HCV Gr assays for hepatitis C virus genotyping
  16. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  17. The relationship between vacuum and hemolysis during catheter blood collection: a retrospective analysis of six large cohorts
  18. Evaluation of the Greiner Bio-One serum separator BCA Fast Clot tube
  19. Implementation and application of moving average as continuous analytical quality control instrument demonstrated for 24 routine chemistry assays
  20. Parathormone stability in hemodialyzed patients and healthy subjects: comparison on non-centrifuged EDTA and serum samples with second- and third-generation assays
  21. Association between plasma proANP and hyperuricemia in Chinese Han women: a cross-sectional study
  22. Activity of the liver enzyme ornithine carbamoyltransferase (OTC) in blood: LC-MS/MS assay for non-invasive diagnosis of ornithine carbamoyltransferase deficiency
  23. Detecting paraprotein interference on a direct bilirubin assay by reviewing the photometric reaction data
  24. Prediction of human iron bioavailability using rapid c-ELISAs for human plasma hepcidin
  25. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  26. Determination of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase cut-off values in a Tunisian population
  27. Plasma levels of endothelin-1 and renal function among young and healthy adults
  28. Cancer Diagnostics
  29. A new strategy for calculating the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA)
  30. Laboratory characterization of leukemic cell procoagulants
  31. Diabetes
  32. Preparation, calibration and evaluation of the First International Standard for human C-peptide
  33. Hb variants in Korea: effect on HbA1c using five routine methods
  34. Letters to the Editor
  35. Pseudohyperkalemia in capillary whole-blood samples – an occasional error or a significant problem in a pediatric hospital?
  36. Elevation of creatine kinase is linked to disease severity and predicts fatal outcomes in H7N9 infection
  37. Analytical evaluation of point-of-care procalcitonin (PCT) and clinical performances in an unselected population as compared with central lab PCT assay
  38. Evaluation of an automated commercial ELISA method for calprotectin determination in pleural fluid
  39. The unfinished story of interference in thyroid hormones with Roche immunoassays: when prewashing procedures matter
  40. Effects of apixaban on prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time and anti-Xa assays: a European survey
  41. Evaluation of a chemiluminescent immunoassay for urinary aldosterone on the DiaSorin LIAISON automated platform against RIA and LC-MS/MS
  42. Complex considerations when tendering for HbA1c analysers
Heruntergeladen am 28.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2016-0940/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen