Startseite Predicting outcomes of EGFR-targeted therapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients using pleural effusions samples and peptide nucleic acid probe assay
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Predicting outcomes of EGFR-targeted therapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients using pleural effusions samples and peptide nucleic acid probe assay

  • Mei-Chia Wang , Chih-Liang Wang , Tai-Long Chen , John Wen-Cheng Chang , Jang-Jih Lu , Pi-Yueh Chang EMAIL logo und Chiuan-Chian Chiou EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 8. August 2017
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Background:

Mutation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a prediction marker of the response to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) drugs in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. As late stage lung cancer patients rarely undergo surgery, samples for EGFR mutation identification usually come from computed tomography (CT)-guided or endoscopic biopsies, which is invasive and costly. Pleural effusion may serve as a less invasive sample for EGFR mutation detection.

Methods:

We designed a fluorophore-labeled peptide nucleic acid (PNA) probe assay for three types of EGFR mutations, including exon 19 deletions, L858R point mutations and T790M point mutations. The assay was applied in 39 pleural effusion samples from NSCLC patients. The correlation between detected EGFR status and clinical outcome were analyzed.

Results:

In 15 paired samples, PNA probe assay in pleural effusion samples could detect all the mutations that were identified by conventional PCR plus Sanger sequencing in tissue biopsies. In addition, PNA probe assay detected three more T790M mutations. In all 39 pleural effusions, the PNA probe assay detected 27 having at least one of the three EGFR mutations. Among the patients before TKI treatment, those with a sensitizing mutation (either exon 19 deletion or L858R) but without T790M, had 94.1% response rate and longer progression-free survival (mean 10.8 months) than patients without detected mutation (mean 4.2 months) and patients with T790M (mean 1.7 months).

Conclusions:

Mutations detected in pleural effusions using PNA probe assay are highly associated with clinical outcome. This method appears to be a reliable way for the prediction of the efficacy of EGFR-targeted therapy.


Corresponding authors: Pi-Yueh Chang, PhD, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan; and Chiuan-Chian Chiou, PhD, Department of Medical Biotechnology and Laboratory Science, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
aMei-Chia Wang and Chih-Liang Wang contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

We thank professor Hsin-Chih Lai and Alexander J. Boyd for the comments and suggestions on the manuscript structure and language editing.

  1. Author contributions: Conception and designation: MW CW JL PC CC. Perform the experiment: MW CW TC WC. Data collection and analysis: MW CW TC WC. Wrote the paper: MW TC PC CC.

  2. Research funding: This study was supported by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (CMRPG391891), Taiwan.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Ramalingam SS, Owonikoko TK, Khuri FR. Lung cancer: new biological insights and recent therapeutic advances. CA Cancer J Clin 2011;61:91–112.10.3322/caac.20102Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Dahabreh IJ, Linardou H, Siannis F, Kosmidis P, Bafaloukos D, Murray S. Somatic EGFR mutation and gene copy gain as predictive biomarkers for response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2010;16:291–303.10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1660Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Sharma SV, Bell DW, Settleman J, Haber DA. Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2007;7:169–81.10.1038/nrc2088Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Zhou C, Wu YL, Chen G, Feng J, Liu XQ, Wang C, et al. Erlotinib versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 2011;12:735–42.10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70184-XSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Lee CK, Brown C, Gralla RJ, Hirsh V, Thongprasert S, Tsai CM, et al. Impact of EGFR inhibitor in non-small cell lung cancer on progression-free and overall survival: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 2013;105:595–605.10.1093/jnci/djt072Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Maemondo M, Inoue A, Kobayashi K, Sugawara S, Oizumi S, Isobe H, et al. Gefitinib or chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with mutated EGFR. N Engl J Med 2010;362:2380–8.10.1056/NEJMoa0909530Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Su KY, Chen HY, Li KC, Kuo ML, Yang JC, Chan WK, et al. Pretreatment epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation predicts shorter EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor response duration in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:433–40.10.1200/JCO.2011.38.3224Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Yu HA, Arcila ME, Rekhtman N, Sima CS, Zakowski MF, Pao W, et al. Analysis of tumor specimens at the time of acquired resistance to EGFR-TKI therapy in 155 patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancers. Clin Cancer Res 2013;19:2240–7.10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2246Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

9. Gazdar AF. Activating and resistance mutations of EGFR in non-small-cell lung cancer: role in clinical response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Oncogene 2009;28:S24–3110.1038/onc.2009.198Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Sequist LV, Waltman BA, Dias-Santagata D, Digumarthy S, Turke AB, Fidias P, et al. Genotypic and histological evolution of lung cancers acquiring resistance to EGFR inhibitors. Sci Transl Med 2011;3:75ra26.10.1126/scitranslmed.3002003Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Katakami N, Atagi S, Goto K, Hida T, Horai T, Inoue A, et al. LUX-Lung 4: a phase II trial of afatinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer who progressed during prior treatment with erlotinib, gefitinib, or both. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:3335–41.10.1200/JCO.2012.45.0981Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Cross DA, Ashton SE, Ghiorghiu S, Eberlein C, Nebhan CA, Spitzler PJ, et al. AZD9291, an irreversible EGFR TKI, overcomes T790M-mediated resistance to EGFR inhibitors in lung cancer. Cancer Discov 2014;4:1046–61.10.1158/2159-8290.CD-14-0337Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Kimura H, Fujiwara Y, Sone T, Kunitoh H, Tamura T, Kasahara K, et al. EGFR mutation status in tumour-derived DNA from pleural effusion fluid is a practical basis for predicting the response to gefitinib. Br J Cancer 2006;95:1390–5.10.1038/sj.bjc.6603428Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Han HS, Eom DW, Kim JH, Kim KH, Shin HM, An JY, et al. EGFR mutation status in primary lung adenocarcinomas and corresponding metastatic lesions: discordance in pleural metastases. Clin Lung Cancer 2011;12:380–6.10.1016/j.cllc.2011.02.006Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Buttitta F, Felicioni L, Del Grammastro M, Filice G, Di Lorito A, Malatesta S, et al. Effective assessment of EGFR mutation status in bronchoalveolar lavage and pleural fluids by next-generation sequencing. Clin Cancer Res 2013;19:691–8.10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1958Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Kimura H, Fujiwara Y, Sone T, Kunitoh H, Tamura T, Kasahara K, et al. High sensitivity detection of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in the pleural effusion of non-small cell lung cancer patients. Cancer Sci 2006;97:642–8.10.1111/j.1349-7006.2006.00216.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Liu D, Lu Y, Hu Z, Wu N, Nie X, Xia Y, et al. Malignant pleural effusion supernatants are substitutes for metastatic pleural tumor tissues in EGFR mutation test in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma. PLoS One 2014;9:e89946.10.1371/journal.pone.0089946Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Yeo CD, Kim JW, Kim KH, Ha JH, Rhee CK, Kim SJ, et al. Detection and comparison of EGFR mutations in matched tumor tissues, cell blocks, pleural effusions, and sera from patients with NSCLC with malignant pleural effusion, by PNA clamping and direct sequencing. Lung Cancer 2013;81:207–12.10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.04.023Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Thomas RK, Nickerson E, Simons JF, Janne PA, Tengs T, Yuza Y, et al. Sensitive mutation detection in heterogeneous cancer specimens by massively parallel picoliter reactor sequencing. Nat Med 2006;12:852–5.10.1038/nm1437Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Luo JD, Chan EC, Shih CL, Chen TL, Liang Y, Hwang TL, et al. Detection of rare mutant K-ras DNA in a single-tube reaction using peptide nucleic acid as both PCR clamp and sensor probe. Nucleic Acids Res 2006;34:e12.10.1093/nar/gnj008Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

21. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 2009;45:228–47.10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Chen TL, Chang JW, Wang CC, Yang CT, Wang MC, Chiou CC. A primer and probe set for detecting multiple types of EGFR exon 19 deletions. Anal Biochem 2016;16:30280–9.10.1016/j.ab.2016.09.002Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Sequist LV, Joshi VA, Janne PA, Muzikansky A, Fidias P, Meyerson M, et al. Response to treatment and survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer undergoing somatic EGFR mutation testing. Oncologist 2007;12:90–8.10.1634/theoncologist.12-1-90Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Cho SH, Park LC, Ji JH, Park S, Hwang DW, Lee JY, et al. Efficacy of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors for non-adenocarcinoma NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2012;70:315–20.10.1007/s00280-012-1876-0Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Tsao MS, Sakurada A, Cutz JC, Zhu CQ, Kamel-Reid S, Squire J, et al. Erlotinib in lung cancer – molecular and clinical predictors of outcome. N Engl J Med 2005;353:133–44.10.1056/NEJMoa050736Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Mitsudomi T, Kosaka T, Endoh H, Horio Y, Hida T, Mori S, et al. Mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene predict prolonged survival after gefitinib treatment in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer with postoperative recurrence. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:2513–20.10.1200/JCO.2005.00.992Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Shigematsu H, Lin L, Takahashi T, Nomura M, Suzuki M, Wistuba, II, et al. Clinical and biological features associated with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations in lung cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:339–46.10.1093/jnci/dji055Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Wu SG, Yu CJ, Tsar MF, Liao WY, Yang CH, Jan IS, et al. Survival of lung adenocarcinoma patients with malignant pleural effusion. Eur Respir J 2013;41:1409–18.10.1183/09031936.00069812Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Fujita Y, Suda K, Kimura H, Matsumoto K, Arao T, Nagai T, et al. Highly sensitive detection of EGFR T790M mutation using colony hybridization predicts favorable prognosis of patients with lung cancer harboring activating EGFR mutation. J Thorac Oncol 2012;7:1640–4.10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182653d7fSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Maheswaran S, Sequist LV, Nagrath S, Ulkus L, Brannigan B, Collura CV, et al. Detection of mutations in EGFR in circulating lung-cancer cells. N Engl J Med 2008;359:366–77.10.1056/NEJMoa0800668Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

31. Didelot A, Le Corre D, Luscan A, Cazes A, Pallier K, Emile JF, et al. Competitive allele specific TaqMan PCR for KRAS, BRAF and EGFR mutation detection in clinical formalin fixed paraffin embedded samples. Exp Mol Pathol 2012;92:275–80.10.1016/j.yexmp.2012.03.001Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Uhara M, Matsuda K, Taira C, Higuchi Y, Okumura N, Yamauchi K. Simple polymerase chain reaction for the detection of mutations and deletions in the epidermal growth factor receptor gene: applications of this method for the diagnosis of non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin Chim Acta 2009;401:68–72.10.1016/j.cca.2008.11.018Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

33. Yatabe Y, Hida T, Horio Y, Kosaka T, Takahashi T, Mitsudomi T. A rapid, sensitive assay to detect EGFR mutation in small biopsy specimens from lung cancer. J Mol Diagn 2006;8:335–41.10.2353/jmoldx.2006.050104Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

34. Kim HR, Lee SY, Hyun DS, Lee MK, Lee HK, Choi CM, et al. Detection of EGFR mutations in circulating free DNA by PNA-mediated PCR clamping. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2013;32:50.10.1186/1756-9966-32-50Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

35. Willam P, Marc L. Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation testing in lung cancer: searching for the ideal method. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13:4954–5.10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1387Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

36. Wu JY, Yu CJ, Chang YC, Yang CH, Shih JY, Yang PC. Effectiveness of tyrosine kinase inhibitors on “uncommon” epidermal growth factor receptor mutations of unknown clinical significance in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2011;17:3812–21.10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-3408Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

37. Pallis AG, Voutsina A, Kalikaki A, Souglakos J, Briasoulis E, Murray S, et al. ‘Classical’ but not ‘other’ mutations of EGFR kinase domain are associated with clinical outcome in gefitinib-treated patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer 2007;97:1560–6.10.1038/sj.bjc.6604068Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central


Supplemental Material:

The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2016-0809) offers supplementary material, available to authorized users.


Received: 2016-9-8
Accepted: 2017-5-17
Published Online: 2017-8-8
Published in Print: 2017-10-26

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Tumor microenvironment and systemic disease: a dual target in medical oncology (also in the case of biomarkers)
  4. Reviews
  5. Sample types applied for molecular diagnosis of therapeutic management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the precision medicine
  6. The impact of pneumatic tube system on routine laboratory parameters: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  7. Opinion Paper
  8. How to reduce scientific irreproducibility: the 5-year reflection
  9. EFLM Paper
  10. Strategies to define performance specifications in laboratory medicine: 3 years on from the Milan Strategic Conference
  11. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  12. Intensive educational efforts combined with external quality assessment improve the preanalytical phase in general practitioner offices and nursing homes
  13. Separate patient serum sodium medians from males and females provide independent information on analytical bias
  14. Are admission procalcitonin levels universal mortality predictors across different medical emergency patient populations? Results from the multi-national, prospective, observational TRIAGE study
  15. Biochemical testing in a laboratory tent and semi-intensive care of Ebola patients on-site in a remote part of Guinea: a paradigm shift based on a bleach-sensitive point-of-care device
  16. Efficient reporting of the estimated glomerular filtration rate without height in pediatric patients with cancer
  17. Evaluation of thyroid test utilization through analysis of population-level data
  18. Relation of serum γ-glutamyl transferase activity with copper in an adult population
  19. Impact of a single oral dose of 100,000 IU vitamin D3 on profiles of serum 25(OH)D3 and its metabolites 24,25(OH)2D3, 3-epi-25(OH)D3, and 1,25(OH)2D3 in adults with vitamin D insufficiency
  20. Automated antinuclear immunofluorescence antibody analysis is a reliable approach in routine clinical laboratories
  21. Infrared analyzers for breast milk analysis: fat levels can influence the accuracy of protein measurements
  22. Hematology and Coagulation
  23. A new approach to define acceptance limits for hematology in external quality assessment schemes
  24. The effects of transport by car on coagulation tests
  25. Combined measurement of factor XIII and D-dimer is helpful for differential diagnosis in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism
  26. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  27. Influence of age, gender and body mass index on late-night salivary cortisol in healthy adults
  28. Cancer Diagnostics
  29. Assessment of real-time PCR method for detection of EGFR mutation using both supernatant and cell pellet of malignant pleural effusion samples from non-small-cell lung cancer patients
  30. Detection of EGFR mutations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer by high resolution melting. Comparison with other methods
  31. Predicting outcomes of EGFR-targeted therapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients using pleural effusions samples and peptide nucleic acid probe assay
  32. Analytical and clinical performance of thyroglobulin autoantibody assays in thyroid cancer follow-up
  33. Thyroglobulin autoantibodies before radioiodine ablation predict differentiated thyroid cancer outcome
  34. Cardiovascular Diseases
  35. Real life dabigatran and metabolite concentrations, focused on inter-patient variability and assay differences in patients with atrial fibrillation
  36. Infectious Diseases
  37. HIV avidity index performance using a modified fourth-generation immunoassay to detect recent HIV infections
  38. Letters to the Editor
  39. Effect of age on serum prostate-specific antigen in women
  40. Falsely elevated thyroid-stimulating hormone value due to anti-ruthenium antibodies in a patient with primary hypothyroidism: a case report
  41. High titers of anti-infliximab antibody do not interfere with Abbott immunoassays
  42. Extraordinarily elevated serum CA19-9 in a patient with posterior mediastinum cyst: a case report
  43. Low levels of 25-OH vitamin D in women with endometriosis and associated pelvic pain
  44. Evaluation of serum cortisol biological variation in the evening withdrawal
  45. Distinction between urine crystals by automated urine analyzer SediMAX conTRUST is specific but lacks sensitivity
  46. Impact of heat-inactivation on anti-Toxoplasma IgM antibody levels
Heruntergeladen am 12.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2016-0809/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen