Home A real-world evidence-based approach to laboratory reorganization using e-Valuate benchmarking data
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

A real-world evidence-based approach to laboratory reorganization using e-Valuate benchmarking data

  • Fabio Bonini , Giovanni Barletta and Mario Plebani ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: September 22, 2016

Abstract

Background:

Pressure to cut health-care costs has involved clinical laboratories underpinning the need to reduce cost per test through programs designed to consolidate activities and increase volumes. Currently, however, there is little evidence of the effectiveness of these measures. The aim of the present study was to verify whether a rational, evidence-based decision-making process might be achieved based on an activity-based cost analysis performed by collecting the data of all variables affecting cost per test.

Methods:

An activity-based costing analysis was performed using a program that provides collected data on performance indicators, benchmark between different laboratories based on performance indicators, and information on reorganization initiatives.

Results:

The data provided were used in two different settings to (1) verify the results of the internal re-organization of specific protein assay and (2) simulate some scenarios for the reorganization of autoimmune testing in the network of clinical laboratories in a large territory.

Conclusions:

The data produced by the e-Valuate project enabled the quantification of variation in costs, the utilization of human and technological resources and efficiency, both as final result of a reorganization project (proteins) and as a simulation of a possible future organization (autoimmune tests).


Corresponding author: Prof. Mario Plebani, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University-Hospital of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy, Phone: +390498212792, Fax: +39049663240

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Healthcare Costs Institute mission and vision. Available at: http://www.healthcostinstitute.org/mission-and-vision.Search in Google Scholar

2. Callahan D. Cost control – time to get serious. N Engl J Med 2009;361:e10.10.1056/NEJMp0905630Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Berwick DM, Hackbarth AD. Eliminating waste in US health care. JAMA 2012;307:1513–6.10.1001/jama.2012.362Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Cao P, Toyabe S, Kurashima S, Okada M, Akazawa K. A modified method of activity-based costing for objectively reducing cost drivers in hospitals. Methods Inf Med 2006;45:462–9.10.1055/s-0038-1634085Search in Google Scholar

5. Barletta G, Zaninotto M, Faggian D, Plebani M. Shop for quality or quantity? Volumes and costs in clinical laboratories. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013;51:295–301.10.1515/cclm-2012-0415Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Lippi G, Mattiuzzi C. Testing volume is not synonymous of cost, value and efficacy in laboratory diagnostics. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013;51:243–5.10.1515/cclm-2012-0502Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Price CP, Bossuyt PM, Bruns DE. Introduction to laboratory medicine and evidence-based laboratory medicine. In: Burtis CA, Ashwood ER, Bruns DE, editors. Tietz textbook of clinical chemistry and molecular diagnostics, 4th ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Saunders, 2006:323–51.Search in Google Scholar

8. Cooper R, Kaplan RS. Measure costs right: make the right decisions. Harvard Bus Rev 1988;66:96–103.Search in Google Scholar

9. Cooper R, Kaplan RS. Activity-based systems: measuring the costs of resource usage. Account Horiz 1992;1–13.Search in Google Scholar

10. Barletta G, Pastacaldi V, Peracino AP. La misura dei processi nella medicina di laboratorio. Genova, Italy: Caleidoscopio Italiano, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

11. Su B-G, Chen S-F, Yeh S-H, Shih P-W, Lin C-C. Cost evaluation of clinical laboratory in Taiwan’s National Health System by using activity-based costing. Clin Chem Lab Med 2016;54:1753–8.10.1515/cclm-2016-0193Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Lippi G, Plebani M. Laboratory economics. Risk or opportunity? Clin Chem Lab Med 2016;54:1701–3.10.1515/cclm-2016-0313Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Porter ME. What is the value in health care? N Engl J Med 2010;363:2477–81.10.1056/NEJMp1011024Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2016-5-4
Accepted: 2016-7-19
Published Online: 2016-9-22
Published in Print: 2017-3-1

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorials
  3. Targeting errors in microbiology: the case of the Gram stain
  4. Time for a holistic approach and standardization education in laboratory medicine
  5. Reviews
  6. Serum uric acid levels and risk of prehypertension: a meta-analysis
  7. Lactic acidosis: an update
  8. Mini Review
  9. Progress and impact of enzyme measurement standardization
  10. Opinion Paper
  11. Critical comments to a recent EFLM recommendation for the review of reference intervals
  12. IFCC Paper
  13. Quality Indicators in Laboratory Medicine: the status of the progress of IFCC Working Group “Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety” project
  14. Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics
  15. Evaluation and comparison of three assays for molecular detection of spinal muscular atrophy
  16. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  17. Risk analysis of the preanalytical process based on quality indicators data
  18. Analytical and clinical validation of the new Abbot Architect 25(OH)D assay: fit for purpose?
  19. Looking beyond linear regression and Bland-Altman plots: a comparison of the clinical performance of 25-hydroxyvitamin D tests
  20. Next-generation osmotic gradient ektacytometry for the diagnosis of hereditary spherocytosis: interlaboratory method validation and experience
  21. Diagnosis of sphingolipidoses: a new simultaneous measurement of lysosphingolipids by LC-MS/MS
  22. Monitoring nicotine intake from e-cigarettes: measurement of parent drug and metabolites in oral fluid and plasma
  23. Development of a rapid and quantitative lateral flow assay for the simultaneous measurement of serum κ and λ immunoglobulin free light chains (FLC): inception of a new near-patient FLC screening tool
  24. A real-world evidence-based approach to laboratory reorganization using e-Valuate benchmarking data
  25. Cancer Diagnostics
  26. Utility of proGRP as a tumor marker in the medullary thyroid carcinoma
  27. Cardiovascular Diseases
  28. Can non-cholesterol sterols and lipoprotein subclasses distribution predict different patterns of cholesterol metabolism and statin therapy response?
  29. Infectious Diseases
  30. Improving Gram stain proficiency in hospital and satellite laboratories that do not have microbiology
  31. Diabetes
  32. Volumetric absorptive microsampling at home as an alternative tool for the monitoring of HbA1c in diabetes patients
  33. Corrigendum
  34. EFLM Recommendation
  35. Corrigendum to: Recommendation for the review of biological reference intervals in medical laboratories
  36. Letters to the Editor
  37. Evaluation of the trueness of serum alkaline phosphatase measurement in a group of Italian laboratories
  38. Innovative software for recording preanalytical errors in accord with the IFCC quality indicators
  39. Mixing studies for abnormal coagulation screen – the current trend
  40. Identification of 5-fluorocytosine as a new interfering compound in serum capillary zone electrophoresis
  41. How to define reference intervals to rule in healthy individuals for clinical trials?
  42. Evaluation of the performance of INDEXOR® in the archive unit of a clinical laboratory: a step to Lean laboratory
  43. Evaluation of an automated chemiluminescent immunoassay for salivary cortisol measurement. Utility in the diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome
  44. Analysis of hemolysis, icterus and lipemia in arterial blood gas specimens
  45. Comparison of three routine insulin immunoassays: implications for assessment of insulin sensitivity and response
Downloaded on 15.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2016-0393/html
Scroll to top button