Home Cost evaluation of clinical laboratory in Taiwan’s National Health System by using activity-based costing
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Cost evaluation of clinical laboratory in Taiwan’s National Health System by using activity-based costing

  • Bin-Guang Su , Shao-Fen Chen , Shu-Hsing Yeh , Po-Wen Shih and Ching-Chiang Lin EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: May 13, 2016

Abstract

Background:

To cope with the government’s policies to reduce medical costs, Taiwan’s healthcare service providers are striving to survive by pursuing profit maximization through cost control. This article aimed to present the results of cost evaluation using activity-based costing performed in the laboratory in order to throw light on the differences between costs and the payment system of National Health Insurance (NHI).

Methods:

This study analyzed the data of costs and income of the clinical laboratory. Direct costs belong to their respective sections of the department. The department’s shared costs, including public expenses and administrative assigned costs, were allocated to the department’s respective sections. A simple regression equation was created to predict profit and loss, and evaluate the department’s break-even point, fixed cost, and contribution margin ratio.

Results:

In clinical chemistry and seroimmunology sections, the cost per test was lower than the NHI payment and their major laboratory tests had revenues with the profitability ratio of 8.7%, while the other sections had a higher cost per test than the NHI payment and their major tests were in deficit. The study found a simple linear regression model as follows: “Balance=–84,995+0.543×income (R2=0.544)”.

Conclusions:

In order to avoid deficit, laboratories are suggested to increase test volumes, enhance laboratory test specialization, and become marginal scale. A hospital could integrate with regional medical institutions through alliances or OEM methods to increase volumes to reach marginal scale and reduce laboratory costs, enhancing the level and quality of laboratory medicine.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. National Health Insurance in Taiwan 2015–2016 Annual Report (bilingual). [cited April 4, 2016]. Available from: http://www.nhi.gov.tw/Resource/webdata/13767_1_2015-2016%20NHI%20ANNUAL%20REPORT.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

2. Lippi G, Mattiuzzi C. Testing volume is not synonymous of cost, value and efficacy in laboratory diagnostics. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013;51:243–5.10.1515/cclm-2012-0502Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Callahan D. Cost control-time to get serious. N Engl J Med 2009;361:e10.10.1056/NEJMp0905630Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Chen HL, Chang RE, Tay HH. Contrasting cost conponents of ABC and RVU for 60 dental procedures. Taiwan J Public Health 2004;23:291–308.Search in Google Scholar

5. Plebani M. Laboratory diagnostics in the third millennium: where, how and why. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:901–2.10.1515/CCLM.2010.181Search in Google Scholar

6. Cao P, Toyabe S, Kurashima S, Okada M, Akazawa K. A modified method of activity-based costing for objectively reducing cost drivers in hospitals. Method Inform Med 2006;45:462–9.10.1055/s-0038-1634085Search in Google Scholar

7. Barletta G, Pastacaldi V, Peracino AP. La misura dei processinella medicina di laboratorio. Genova, Italy: Caleidoscopio Italiano, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

8. Hansen BL. Il work sampling series: Azienda Moderna. Milano, Italy: Franco Angeli, 1975.Search in Google Scholar

9. Price CP, Bossuyt PM, Bruns DE. Introduction to laboratory medicine and evidence-basedlaboratory medicine. In: Burtis CA, Ashwood ER, Bruns DE, editors. Tietz textbook of clinical chemistry and molecular diagnostics, 4th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier Saunders, 2006:323–51.Search in Google Scholar

10. Just PM, de Charro FT, Tschosik EA, Noe LL, Bhattacharyya SK, Riella MC. Reimbursement and economic factors influencing dialysis modality choice around the world. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008;23:2365–73.10.1093/ndt/gfm939Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Kiani R, Sangeladji M. An empirical study about the use of the ABC/ABM models by some of the Fortune 500 largest industrial corporations in the USA. J Am Acad Bus Camb 2003;3:174.Search in Google Scholar

12. Greene JK, Metwalli A. The impact of activity based cost accounting on health care capital investment decisions. J Health Care Finance 2001;28:50–64.Search in Google Scholar

13. Laurila J, Suramo I, Brommels M, Tolppanen EM, Koivukangas P, Lanning P, et al. Activity-based costing in radiology-application in a pediatric radiological unit. Acta Radiological 2000;41:189–95.10.1080/028418500127345037Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Ridderstolpe L, Johansson A, Skau T, Rutberge H, Ahlfeldt H. Clinical process analysis and activity-based costing at a heart center. J Med Syst 2002;26:309–22.10.1023/A:1015816703951Search in Google Scholar

15. Udpa S. Activity-based costing for hospitals. Health Care Manage Rev 1996;21:83–96.10.1097/00004010-199622000-00009Search in Google Scholar

16. Blocher E, Stout D, Cokins G. Cost management: a strategic emphasis, 5th ed. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

17. Cooper R, Kaplan RS. Measure costs right: make the right decisions. Harvard Bus Rev 1988;66:96–103.Search in Google Scholar

18. Cooper R, Kaplan RS. Activity-based systems: measuring the costs of resource usage. Account Horiz 1992;7:1–13.Search in Google Scholar

19. Cokins G. Activity-based cost management: an executive’s guide. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

20. Barletta G, Zaninotto M, Faggian D, Plebani M. Shop for quality or quantity? Volumes and costs in clinical laboratories. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013;51:295–301.10.1515/cclm-2012-0415Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Plebani M, Lippi G. Is laboratory medicine a dying profession? Blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed. Clin Biochem 2010;43:939–41.10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2010.05.015Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2016-3-8
Accepted: 2016-4-11
Published Online: 2016-5-13
Published in Print: 2016-11-1

©2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorials
  3. CCLM Award for the Most Cited Paper Recently Published
  4. Laboratory economics. Risk or opportunity?
  5. Reviews
  6. Molecular diagnosis and precision medicine in allergy management
  7. The insulin autoimmune syndrome (IAS) as a cause of hypoglycaemia: an update on the pathophysiology, biochemical investigations and diagnosis
  8. Opinion Paper
  9. Role of microsatellite instability, immunohistochemistry and mismatch repair germline aberrations in immunosuppressed transplant patients: a phenocopy dilemma in Muir-Torre syndrome
  10. Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics
  11. Time and tumor type (primary or metastatic) do not influence the detection of BRAF/NRAS mutations in formalin fixed paraffin embedded samples from melanomas
  12. False low holotranscobalamin levels in a patient with a novel TCN2 mutation
  13. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  14. Quality performance of laboratory testing in pharmacies: a collaborative evaluation
  15. Cost evaluation of clinical laboratory in Taiwan’s National Health System by using activity-based costing
  16. Impact of sample processing on the measurement of circulating microparticles: storage and centrifugation parameters
  17. HbA1c: EQA in Germany, Belgium and the Netherlands using fresh whole blood samples with target values assigned with the IFCC reference system
  18. Iohexol clearance in unstable critically ill patients: a tool to assess glomerular filtration rate
  19. Characteristics of Chinese patients with antiphospholipid syndrome and the ability of lupus anticoagulant assays to identify them
  20. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  21. Distribution of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), high sensitive troponin I and high-sensitive troponin T in umbilical cord blood
  22. Hematology and Coagulation
  23. Evaluation of Mindray BC-6800 body fluid mode for automated cerebrospinal fluid cell counting
  24. Cancer Diagnostics
  25. Increased sialylation and reduced fucosylation of exfoliated cervical cells are potential markers of carcinogenesis in the cervix
  26. Cardiovascular Diseases
  27. High incidence of macrotroponin I with a high-sensitivity troponin I assay
  28. Infectious Diseases
  29. Prospective evaluation of biomarkers for prediction of quality of life in community-acquired pneumonia
  30. Letter to the Editor
  31. The use of extra-analytical phase quality indicators by clinical laboratories: the results of an international survey
  32. Quality of reporting of diagnostic test accuracy studies in medical laboratory journals
  33. Impact of under-filled blood collection tubes containing K2EDTA and K3EDTA as anticoagulants on automated complete blood count (CBC) testing
  34. Stability of plasma albumin depends on measurement method
  35. Evaluation of screening method for Bence Jones protein analysis
  36. Reference intervals for the Kryptor second-generation chromogranin A assay
  37. Evaluation of an automated urinary iodine measurement using AU5800 analyzer with AutoLab Iodine reagent
  38. Evaluation of the accuracy of complete blood count for insufficient blood samples
  39. The use of a “gray zone” considering measurement uncertainty in pharmacological tests. The serum growth hormone stimulation test as an example
  40. Keeping Ebola out of the lab: a practical solution on how to analyze Ebola associated blood anomalies
  41. Standardized fixation process is crucial to permit molecular analyses in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded melanoma samples
  42. Congress Abstracts
  43. 48th National Congress of the Italian Society of Clinical Biochemistry and Clinical Molecular Biology (SIBioC – Laboratory Medicine)
  44. 8th Santorini Conference Systems Medicine and Personalised Health and Therapy
  45. Congress of Laboratory Medicine and Clinical Chemistry
Downloaded on 29.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2016-0193/html
Scroll to top button