Estimation of hematocrit in filter paper dried bloodspots by potassium measurement: advantage of use of perimeter ring samples over circular center sub-punch samples

Miguel L. Rufail; Laura J. McCloskey; Douglas F. Stickle

doi:10.1515/cclm-2016-0161

Article

Estimation of hematocrit in filter paper dried bloodspots by potassium measurement: advantage of use of perimeter ring samples over circular center sub-punch samples

Miguel L. Rufail , Laura J. McCloskey and Douglas F. Stickle

Published/Copyright: June 22, 2016

Published by

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Submit Manuscript Author Information

From the journal Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) Volume 55 Issue 1

Abstract

Background:

Quantitative assays using dried filter paper bloodspots (DBS) may be adversely affected by hematocrit (HCT) as an unknown variable. Studies have demonstrated the utility of the measurement of potassium (K) from DBS punches to estimate HCT. Because there is significant accrual of RBCs at the DBS perimeter, we investigated whether K measurement from ring-shaped specimens inclusive of the perimeter might provide an advantage over conventional interior circular sub-punch samples to estimate HCT.

Methods:

Primary samples were Li-heparin whole blood, with HCT as measured on concurrently-drawn K-EDTA specimens. DBS were formed by bolus addition of 40 μL whole blood to filter paper cards. Total bloodspot area was determined by image analysis. Removal of center sub-punch (P) samples of fixed area produced remainder ring (R) samples inclusive of the perimeter. Samples were extracted in K-EDTA (2.5 mmol/L) and measured for diluent-corrected K per area (α, μmol K/cm²).

Results:

Forty-three patient samples were utilized. α was normally distributed: α(P)=1.23±0.26 μmol K/cm²; α(R)=1.86±0.41 μmol K/cm²; α(R)/α(P)=1.51±0.15. α was correlated with HCT: α(P)=0.030 HCT(%)+0.015 μmol K/cm² (r²=0.795); α(R)=0.052 HCT(%)+0.010 μmol K/cm² (r² = 0.912), but with higher resolution and lesser error for α(R).

Conclusions:

K per area (α) was significantly higher in R samples vs. P samples, with higher resolution for α(R) vs. HCT. Use of ring samples inclusive of the perimeter to estimate HCT for DBS via K measurement can provide an advantage over use of center sub-punch samples.

Keywords: dried blood spot; dried filter paper bloodspots (DBS); filter paper; hematocrit; potassium; preanalytical variables

Corresponding author: Douglas F. Stickle, PhD, Department of Pathology, Jefferson University Hospitals, 117 S 11th Street, Pavilion 401, Philadelphia, PA 19107 United States of America, Phone: +1 215 503 5837

Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: None declared.
Employment or leadership: None declared.
Honorarium: None declared.
Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Denniff P, Spooner N. The effect of hematocrit on assay bias when using DBS samples for the quantitative bioanalysis of drugs. Bioanalysis 2010;2:1385–95.10.4155/bio.10.103Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. De Kesel PM, Sadones N, Capiau S, Lambert WE, Stove CP. Hemato-critical issues in quantitative analysis of dried blood spots: challenges and solutions. Bioanalysis 2013;5:2023–41.10.4155/bio.13.156Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. De Kesel PM, Capiau S, Lambert WE, Stove CP. Current strategies for coping with the hematocrit problem in dried blood spot analysis. Bioanalysis 2014;6:1871–4.10.4155/bio.14.151Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Wilhelm AJ, den Burger JC, Swart EL. Therapeutic drug monitoring by dried blood spot: progress to date and future directions. Clin Pharmacokinet 2014;53:961–73.10.1007/s40262-014-0177-7Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Capiau S, Stove VV, Lambert WE, Stove CP. Prediction of the hematocrit of dried blood spots via potassium measurement on a routine clinical chemistry analyzer. Anal Chem 2013;85:404–10.10.1021/ac303014bSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

6. De Kesel PM, Capiau S, Stove VV, Lambert WE, Stove CP. Potassium-based algorithm allows correction for the hematocrit bias in quantitative analysis of caffeine and its major metabolite in dried blood spots. Anal Bioanal Chem 2014;406:6749–55.10.1007/s00216-014-8114-zSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

7. den Burger JC, Wilhelm AJ, Chahbouni AC, Vos RM, Sinjewel A, Swart EL. Haematocrit corrected analysis of creatinine in dried blood spots through potassium measurement. Anal Bioanal Chem 2015;407:621–7.10.1007/s00216-014-8291-9Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. El-Hajjar DF, Swanson KH, Landmark JD, Stickle DF. Validation of use of annular once-punched filter paper bloodspot samples for repeat lead testing. Clin Chim Acta 2007;377:179–84.10.1016/j.cca.2006.09.020Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Stickle DF, Rawlinson NJ, Landmark JD. Increased perimeter red cell concentration in filter paper bloodspot samples is consistent with constant-load size exclusion chromatography occurring during application. Clin Chim Acta 2009;401:42–5.10.1016/j.cca.2008.11.011Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Spooner N. A glowing future for dried blood spot sampling. Bioanalysis 2010;2:1343–4.10.4155/bio.10.111Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Deglon J, Leuthold LA, Thomas A. Potential missing steps for a wide use of dried matrix spots in biomedical analysis. Bioanalysis 2015;7:2375–85.10.4155/bio.15.166Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. McCloskey LJ, Yoo JH, Stickle DF. Interpatient distributions of bloodspot area per fixed volume of application: comparison between filter paper and non-cellulose dried matrix spotting cards. Clin Chim Acta 2014;437:187–90.10.1016/j.cca.2014.07.026Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Peck HR, Timko DM, Landmark JD, Stickle DF. A survey of apparent blood volumes and sample geometries among filter paper bloodspot samples submitted for lead screening. Clin Chim Acta 2009;400:103–6.10.1016/j.cca.2008.10.020Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Spooner N, Denniff P, Michielsen L, De Vries R, Ji QC, Arnold ME, et al. A device for dried blood microsampling in quantitative bioanalysis: overcoming the issues associated blood hematocrit. Bioanalysis 2015;7:653–9.10.4155/bio.14.310Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Leuthold LA, Heudi O, Deglon J, Raccuglia M, Augsburger M, Picard F, et al. New microfluidic-based sampling procedure for overcoming the hematocrit problem associated with dried blood spot analysis. Anal Chem 2015;87:2068–71.10.1021/ac503931gSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2016-2-28

Accepted: 2016-5-25

Published Online: 2016-6-22

Published in Print: 2017-1-1

You are currently not able to access this content.

Articles in the same Issue

https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2016-0161

Keywords for this article

dried blood spot; dried filter paper bloodspots (DBS); filter paper; hematocrit; potassium; preanalytical variables