Startseite Comparison of three analytical platforms for quantification of the neurofilament light chain in blood samples: ELISA, electrochemiluminescence immunoassay and Simoa
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Comparison of three analytical platforms for quantification of the neurofilament light chain in blood samples: ELISA, electrochemiluminescence immunoassay and Simoa

  • Jens Kuhle EMAIL logo , Christian Barro , Ulf Andreasson , Tobias Derfuss , Raija Lindberg , Åsa Sandelius , Victor Liman , Niklas Norgren , Kaj Blennow und Henrik Zetterberg
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 12. April 2016
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Background:

Neuronal damage is the morphological substrate of persisting neurological disability. Neurofilaments (Nf) are specific cytoskeletal proteins of neurons and their quantification has shown encouraging results as a biomarker for axonal injury.

Methods:

We aimed at comparing a widely used conventional ELISA for Nf light chain (NfL) with an electrochemiluminescence-based method (ECL assay) and a newly developed single-molecule array (Simoa) method in clinically relevant cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum samples.

Results:

Analytical sensitivity was 0.62 pg/mL for Simoa, 15.6 pg/mL for the ECL assay, and 78.0 pg/mL for the ELISA. Correlations between paired CSF and serum samples were strongest for Simoa (r=0.88, p<0.001) and the ECL assay (r=0.78, p<0.001) and weaker for ELISA measurements (r=0.38, p=0.030). CSF NfL measurements between the platforms were highly correlated (r=1.0, p<0.001). Serum NfL levels were highly related between ECL assay and Simoa (r=0.86, p<0.001), and this was less visible between ELISA-ECL assay (r=0.41, p=0.018) and ELISA-Simoa (r=0.43, p=0.013). Multiple sclerosis (MS) patients had significantly higher serum NfL levels than controls when measured with Simoa (p=0.001) but not with the other platforms.

Conclusions:

We found Simoa to be more sensitive than ELISA or the ECL assay. Our results support the feasibility of quantifying NfL in serum; the results correlate with the more-established CSF NfL test. The highly sensitive Simoa technology deserves further studies in larger patient cohorts to clarify whether serum NfL could be used in the future to measure disease severity and determine prognosis or response to treatment interventions in neurological diseases.


Corresponding author: Jens Kuhle, MD, PhD, Neurology, Departments of Medicine, Biomedicine and Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland, Phone: +41 (0)613287191; Fax: +41 (0)612654100
aKaj Blennow and Henrik Zetterberg contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments:

We thank M. Limberg for technical assistance.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: The study was supported by grants from the Swiss MS Society, Swiss National Science Foundation (Grant/Award Number: ‘320030_160221’), Bayer (Switzerland) AG, Genzyme, Novartis, Swedish Research Council, VINNOVA, the Torsten Söderberg Foundation, the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, Swedish State Support for Clinical Research, and Frimurarestiftelsen.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Teunissen CE, Khalil M. Neurofilaments as biomarkers in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2012;18:552–6.10.1177/1352458512443092Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Deisenhammer F, Egg R, Giovannoni G, Hemmer B, Petzold A, Sellebjerg F, et al. EFNS guidelines on disease-specific CSF investigations. Eur J Neurol 2009;16:760–70.10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02595.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Teunissen CE, Iacobaeus E, Khademi M, Brundin L, Norgren N, Koel-Simmelink MJ, et al. Combination of CSF N-acetylaspartate and neurofilaments in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2009;72:1322–9.10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181a0fe3fSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Norgren N, Karlsson JE, Rosengren L, Stigbrand T. Monoclonal antibodies selective for low molecular weight neurofilaments. Hybrid Hybridomics 2002;21:53–9.10.1089/15368590252917647Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Gaiottino J, Norgren N, Dobson R, Topping J, Nissim A, Malaspina A, et al. Increased neurofilament light chain blood levels in neurodegenerative neurological diseases. PLoS One 2013;8:e75091.10.1371/journal.pone.0075091Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Rissin DM, Kan CW, Campbell TG, Howes SC, Fournier DR, Song L, et al. Single-molecule enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay detects serum proteins at subfemtomolar concentrations. Nat Biotechnol 2010;28:595–9.10.1038/nbt.1641Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Wilson DH, Rissin DM, Kan CW, Fournier DR, Piech T, Campbell TG, et al. The simoa HD-1 analyzer: a novel fully automated digital immunoassay analyzer with single-molecule sensitivity and multiplexing. J Lab Autom 2015 [Epub ahead of print].10.1177/2211068215589580Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Teunissen CE, Petzold A, Bennett JL, Berven FS, Brundin L, Comabella M, et al. A consensus protocol for the standardization of cerebrospinal fluid collection and biobanking. Neurology 2009;73:1914–22.10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181c47cc2Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

9. Valentin MA, Ma S, Zhao A, Legay F, Avrameas A. Validation of immunoassay for protein biomarkers: bioanalytical study plan implementation to support pre-clinical and clinical studies. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2011;55:869–77.10.1016/j.jpba.2011.03.033Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Lee JW, Devanarayan V, Barrett YC, Weiner R, Allinson J, Fountain S, et al. Fit-for-purpose method development and validation for successful biomarker measurement. Pharm Res 2006;23:312–28.10.1007/s11095-005-9045-3Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Andreasson U, Perret-Liaudet A, van Waalwijk van Doorn LJ, Blennow K, Chiasserini D, Engelborghs S, et al. A Practical Guide to Immunoassay Method Validation. Front Neurol 2015;6:179.10.3389/fneur.2015.00179Suche in Google Scholar

12. Lu CH, Macdonald-Wallis C, Gray E, Pearce N, Petzold A, Norgren N, et al. Neurofilament light chain: a prognostic biomarker in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurology 2015;84:2247–57.10.1212/WNL.0000000000001642Suche in Google Scholar

13. Lundberg M, Curbo S, Reiser K, Masterman T, Braesch-Andersen S, Arestrom I, et al. Methodological aspects of ELISA analysis of thioredoxin 1 in human plasma and cerebrospinal fluid. PLoS One 2014;9:e103554.10.1371/journal.pone.0103554Suche in Google Scholar

14. Kuhle J, Pohl C, Mehling M, Edan G, Freedman MS, Hartung HP, et al. Lack of association between antimyelin antibodies and progression to multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2007;356:371–8.10.1056/NEJMoa063602Suche in Google Scholar

15. Brickshawana A, Hinson SR, Romero MF, Lucchinetti C, Guo Y, Buttmann M, et al. Investigation of the KIR4.1 potassium channel as a putative antigen in patients with multiple sclerosis: a comparative study. Lancet Neurol 2014;13:795–806.10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70141-3Suche in Google Scholar

16. Teunissen CE, Malekzadeh A, Leurs C, Bridel C, Killestein J. Body fluid biomarkers for multiple sclerosis–the long road to clinical application. Nat Rev Neurol 2015;11:585–96.10.1038/nrneurol.2015.173Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2015-12-2
Accepted: 2016-3-7
Published Online: 2016-4-12
Published in Print: 2016-10-1

©2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Serum myoglobin immunoassays: obsolete or still clinically useful?
  4. Reviews
  5. Kounis syndrome: an update on epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and therapeutic management
  6. What do we know about homocysteine and exercise? A review from the literature
  7. Mini Review
  8. Osteocalcin as a potential risk biomarker for cardiovascular and metabolic diseases
  9. Opinion Paper
  10. Statistical approach for optimization of external quality assurance (EQA) studies of molecular and serological viral diagnostics
  11. EFLM Article
  12. Sample collections from healthy volunteers for biological variation estimates’ update: a new project undertaken by the Working Group on Biological Variation established by the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  13. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  14. Analyte stability during the total testing process: studies of vitamins A, D and E by LC-MS/MS
  15. Improvement in the predictive ability of the Intermountain Mortality Risk Score by adding routinely collected laboratory tests such as albumin, bilirubin, and white cell differential count
  16. Cystatin C provides a better estimate of the effect of glomerular filtration rate on serum human epididymis protein 4 concentrations
  17. Verification of the harmonization of human epididymis protein 4 assays
  18. Clinical utility of urinary liver-type fatty acid binding protein measured by latex-enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay in chronic kidney disease
  19. Comparison of three analytical platforms for quantification of the neurofilament light chain in blood samples: ELISA, electrochemiluminescence immunoassay and Simoa
  20. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  21. Distribution of antiphospholipid antibodies in a large population-based German cohort
  22. Cardiovascular Diseases
  23. Serum protein S100 as marker of postoperative delirium after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: secondary analysis of two prospective randomized controlled trials
  24. Infectious Diseases
  25. Copeptin predicts 10-year all-cause mortality in community patients: a 10-year prospective cohort study
  26. Clinical and laboratory findings in the diagnosis of right lower quadrant abdominal pain: outcome analysis of the APPAC trial
  27. Letters to the Editor
  28. Why a new algorithm using high-sensitivity cardiac troponins for the rapid rule-out of NSTEMI is not adapted to routine practice
  29. Optimal collection tubes for plasma glucose determination: confusion reigns supreme
  30. Long-term stability of serum samples positive for carbohydrate deficient transferrin (CDT) routinely stored at −20 °C
  31. Seasonal variations in plasma free metanephrine concentrations are not evident in the West of Ireland
  32. Potential errors in the determination of urinary ammonium by formol titration
  33. Interference by biological anti-cancer drugs in electrophoretic and immunofixation techniques
  34. A point mutation in the thiopurine S-methyltransferase gene that led to exon 5 deletion in the transcribed mRNA
  35. Detection of the heterozygote of hemoglobin Constant Spring by α-thalassemia immunochromatographic strip test
  36. Automated CH50 liposome-based immunoassay: consideration in dilution and validation of reference interval
  37. Theranos phenomenon – Part 5: Theranos’ presentation at the American Association for Clinical Chemistry Annual Conference 2016
  38. Congress Abstracts
  39. 58th National Congress of the Hungarian Society of Laboratory Medicine
  40. The 4th Joint EFLM-UEMS Congress “Laboratory Medicine at the Clinical Interface” Warsaw, Poland, 21th–24th September, 2016
  41. Congress of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
Heruntergeladen am 10.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2015-1195/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen