Home Immunoassays for the detection of IgA antibodies to tissue transglutaminase: significance of multiples of the upper limit of normal and inter-assay correlations
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Immunoassays for the detection of IgA antibodies to tissue transglutaminase: significance of multiples of the upper limit of normal and inter-assay correlations

  • Brenda B. Suh-Lailam , K. Wayne Davis and Anne E. Tebo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: July 14, 2015

Abstract

Background: The presence of IgA antibodies to tissue transglutaminase (anti-tTg) is associated with variable risk for celiac disease. The use of common multiples of the upper limit of normal (ULN) has been suggested to optimize diagnostic pathways as well as improve harmonization between assays.

Methods: The characteristics of four anti-tTG IgA assays relative to endomysial IgA (EMA) by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) as reference test were assessed. Commutability between anti-tTG immunoassays and/or EMA based on manufacturer’s recommended cut-off values and three common multiples of ULN (3×, 5× and 10×) was also investigated. Sera from 200 patients and 100 healthy individuals were analyzed.

Results: At manufacturer’s cut-off; the sensitivities for the tTG assays ranged from 72.5% to 98.6% and specificities from 60.3% to 99.2%. The percent positive agreements between any anti-tTG and EMA or any two anti-tTG immunoassays varied from 56.7% to 98.0% and 46.7% to 100.0%, respectively. At 3×, 5× or 10× ULNs, the inter-rater reliability as measured by Cohen κ between any two anti-tTG assays were quite variable and ranged from 0.28 to 0.96, 0.26 to 0.89 or 0.13 to 0.78, respectively. Furthermore, the percent positive agreements between any two anti-tTg IgA immunoassays ranged from 83.1% to 98.2%, 92.0% to 100%, or 100%, at 3×, 5× or 10×, respectively.

Conclusions: Commutability between tTG IgA immunoassays or tTG IgA and EMA is kit-dependent and common multiples of the ULN are not sufficient to correct for inter-assay variations. Many factors influence the performance of anti-tTG IgA assays which limit their commutability.


Corresponding author: Anne E. Tebo, PhD, ARUP Laboratories, 500 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108-1221, USA, Phone: +1 801 5832787 ext 3138, E-mail: ; ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; and Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the staff of the Autoimmune Immunology Section of ARUP Laboratories for the technical assistance and Elisabeth Malmberg, ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology for statistical support. The authors also acknowledge material support from INOVA Diagnostics and Phadia. This work was supported by the ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

Research funding: None declared.

Employment or leadership: None declared.

Honorarium: None declared.

Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Carroccio A, Vitale G, Di Prima L, Chifari N, Napoli S, La Russa C, et al. Comparison of anti-transglutaminase ELISAs and an anti-endomysial antibody assay in the diagnosis of celiac disease: a prospective study. Clin Chem 2002;48:1546–50.10.1093/clinchem/48.9.1546Search in Google Scholar

2. Van Meensel B, Hiele M, Hoffman I, Vermeire S, Rutgeerts P, Geboes K, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of ten second-generation (human) tissue transglutaminase antibody assays in celiac disease. Clin Chem 2004;50:2125–35.10.1373/clinchem.2004.035832Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Reeves GE, Squance ML, Duggan AE, Murugasu RR, Wilson RJ, Wong RC, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of coeliac serological tests: a prospective study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;18:493–501.10.1097/00042737-200605000-00006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Weiss B, Bujanover Y, Avidan B, Fradkin A, Weintraub I, Shainberg B. Positive tissue transglutaminase antibodies with negative endomysial antibodies: low rate of celiac disease. Isr Med Assoc J 2004;6:9–12.Search in Google Scholar

5. Barker CC, Mitton C, Jevon G, Mock T. Can tissue transglutaminase antibody titers replace small-bowel biopsy to diagnose celiac disease in select pediatric populations? Pediatrics 2005;115:1341–46.10.1542/peds.2004-1392Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Hill PG, Holmes GK. Coeliac disease: a biopsy is not always necessary for diagnosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2008;27:572–7.10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03609.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Donaldson MR, Book LS, Leiferman KM, Zone JJ, Neuhausen SL. Strongly positive tissue transglutaminase antibodies are associated with Marsh 3 histopathology in adult and pediatric celiac disease. J Clin Gastroenterol 2008;42:256–60.10.1097/MCG.0b013e31802e70b1Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Li M, Yu L, Tiberti C, Bonamico M, Taki I, Miao D, et al. A report on the international transglutaminase autoantibody workshop for Celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2009;104:154–63.10.1038/ajg.2008.8Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

9. Naiyer AJ, Hernandez L, Ciaccio EJ, Papadakis K, Manavalan JS, Bhagat G, et al. Comparison of commercially available serologic kits for the detection of celiac disease. J Clin Gastroenterol 2009;43:225–32.10.1097/MCG.0b013e31816200e5Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Parizade M, Bujanover Y, Weiss B, Nachmias V, Shainberg B. Performance of serology assays for diagnosing celiac disease in a clinical setting. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2009;16:1576–82.10.1128/CVI.00205-09Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Vermeersch P, Coenen D, Geboes K, Mariën G, Hiele M, Bossuyt X. Use of likelihood ratios improves clinical interpretation of IgA anti-tTG antibody testing for celiac disease. Clin Chim Acta 2010;411:13–7.10.1016/j.cca.2009.09.030Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Kurppa K, Salminiemi J, Ukkola A, Saavalainen P, Löytynoja K, Laurila K, et al. Utility of the new ESPGHAN criteria for the diagnosis of celiac disease in at-risk groups: a large family-based cohort study. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2012;54:387–91.10.1097/MPG.0b013e3182407c6bSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Liu E, Li M, Bao F, Miao D, Rewers MJ, Eisenbarth GS, et al. Need for quantitative assessment of transglutaminase autoantibodies for celiac disease in screening-identified children. J Pediatr 2005;146:494–9.10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.11.028Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Husby S, Koletzko S, Korponay-Szabó IR, Mearin ML, Phillips A, Shamir R, et al. European society for pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology, and nutrition guidelines for the diagnosis of CoeliAc disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2012;54:136–60.10.1097/MPG.0b013e31821a23d0Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Egner W, Shrimpton A, Sargur R, Patel D, Swallow K. ESPGHAN guidance on coeliac disease 2012: multiples of ULN for decision making do not harmonise assay performance across centres. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2012;55:733–5.10.1097/MPG.0b013e31826531f6Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Kurppa K, Räsänen T, Collin P, Iltanen S, Huhtala H, Ashorn M, et al. Endomysial antibodies predict celiac disease irrespective of the titers or clinical presentation. World J Gastroenterol 2012;18:2511–6.10.3748/wjg.v18.i20.2511Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Taavela J, Kurppa K, Collin P, Lähdeaho ML, Salmi T, Saavalainen P, et al. Degree of damage to the small bowel and serum antibody titers correlate with clinical presentation of patients with celiac disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013;11:166–71.10.1016/j.cgh.2012.09.030Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Basso D, Guariso G, Bozzato D, Rossi E, Pescarin M, Fogar P, et al. New screening tests enrich anti-transglutaminase results and support a highly sensitive two-test based strategy for celiac disease diagnosis. Clin Chim Acta 2011;412:1662–7.10.1016/j.cca.2011.05.024Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Leffler DA, Schuppan D. Update on serologic testing in celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105:2520–4.10.1038/ajg.2010.276Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. van der Windt DA, Jellema P, Mulder CJ, Kneepkens CM, van der Horst HE. Diagnostic testing for celiac disease among patients with abdominal symptoms: a systematic review. J Am Med Assoc 2010;303:1738–46.10.1001/jama.2010.549Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Holding S, Wilson F, Spradbery D. Clinical evaluation of the BioPlex 2200 Celiac IgA and IgG Kits – a novel multiplex screen incorporating an integral check for IgA deficiency. J Immunol Methods 2014;405:29–34.10.1016/j.jim.2014.01.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Lakos G, Norman GL, Mahler M, Martis P, Bentow C, Santora D, et al. Analytical and clinical comparison of two fully automated immunoassay systems for the diagnosis of celiac disease. J Immunol Res 2014;2014:371263.10.1155/2014/371263Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2015-4-13
Accepted: 2015-6-10
Published Online: 2015-7-14
Published in Print: 2016-2-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Total error vs. measurement uncertainty: the match continues
  4. Review
  5. Application of fatty acid and lipid measurements in neuropsychiatry
  6. Mini Review
  7. The Janus faces of acquired angioedema: C1-inhibitor deficiency, lymphoproliferation and autoimmunity
  8. Opinion Papers
  9. How to report results of prothrombin and activated partial thromboplastin times
  10. Useful measures and models for analytical quality management in medical laboratories
  11. Total error vs. measurement uncertainty: revolution or evolution?
  12. Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics
  13. Rapid detection of Mmalton α1-antitrypsin deficiency allele by real-time PCR and melting curves in whole blood, serum and dried blood spot samples
  14. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  15. Diagnostic and clinical significance of Crohn’s disease-specific pancreatic anti-GP2 and anti-CUZD1 antibodies
  16. Immunoassays for the detection of IgA antibodies to tissue transglutaminase: significance of multiples of the upper limit of normal and inter-assay correlations
  17. Effects of biobanking conditions on six antibiotic substances in human serum assessed by a novel evaluation protocol
  18. Haematology and Coagulation
  19. Measurement of dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban in samples of plasma, serum and urine, under real life conditions. An international study
  20. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  21. Upper reference limits for cerebrospinal fluid total protein and albumin quotient based on a large cohort of control patients: implications for increased clinical specificity
  22. Reference intervals for bone turnover markers in Spanish premenopausal women
  23. Cancer Diagnostics
  24. Citrulline as a biomarker of gastrointestinal toxicity in patients with rectal carcinoma treated with chemoradiation
  25. mRNA overexpression of kallikrein-related peptidase 14 (KLK14) is an independent predictor of poor overall survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients
  26. Cardiovascular Diseases
  27. TBX20 loss-of-function mutation associated with familial dilated cardiomyopathy
  28. Cardiac troponin I release after a basketball match in elite, amateur and junior players
  29. The role of timely measurement of galectin-3, NT-proBNP, cystatin C and hsTnT in predicting prognosis and heart function after heart transplantation
  30. Infectious Diseases
  31. Neutrophil CD64 combined with PCT, CRP and WBC improves the sensitivity for the early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis
  32. A comparison of three commercial platforms for urinary NGAL in critically ill adults
  33. Diabetes
  34. Liquid citrate acidification introduces significant glucose bias and leads to misclassification of patients with diabetes
  35. Letter to the Editors
  36. A rare and unstable hemoglobin variant, Hb M Dothan β 25/26 (-GTG), detected by the anomalous cytogram on Sysmex XE-2100
  37. Hb Hope [β136Gly→Asp] and Hb Grady [α119_120insGluPheThr] compound heterozygosity in a Mauritanian patient
  38. Falsely elevated ferritin in patients with a high concentration of rheumatoid factor
  39. Susceptibility of commonly used ferritin assays to the classic hook effect
  40. Comparison of the Elecsys calcitonin assay with the Immulite 1000 assay. Describing one case with heterophilic antibody interference
  41. Performance evaluation of low platelet count and platelet clumps detection on Mindray BC-6800 hematology analyzer
  42. Fetal sex discordance between sequencing-based and real-time PCR non-invasive prenatal test due to a vanishing twin
  43. Total HIV-1 DNA detection and quantification in peripheral blood by COBAS®AmpliPrep/COBAS® TaqMan® HIV-1 Test, v2.0
  44. A replacement for the testosterone “sex gap”
  45. Added value of indirect immunofluorescence intensity of automated antinuclear antibody testing in a secondary hospital setting
Downloaded on 11.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2015-0348/html
Scroll to top button