Home Value of a commercial kit for detecting anti-C1q autoantibodies and correlation with immunological and clinical activity of lupus nephritis
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Value of a commercial kit for detecting anti-C1q autoantibodies and correlation with immunological and clinical activity of lupus nephritis

  • Federica de Liso EMAIL logo , Caterina Matinato , Cristina Novembrino , Antonella Radice , Francesca Raffiotta , Mariangela Ronchi , Maria Daniela Croci , Renato Alberto Sinico , Piergiorgio Messa , Erminio Torresani and Gabriella Moroni
Published/Copyright: April 14, 2015

Abstract

Background: The association of anti-C1q antibodies (anti-C1q) with the renal activity of lupus nephritis (LN) and the methods for their determination is still a matter of debate.

Methods: In 116 serum samples of 66 patients with biopsy proven LN, we aimed: 1) to compare the results of the determination of anti-C1q obtained by a commercial kit with a clinically validated in-house ELISA; 2) to evaluate the correlation of anti-C1q with the most important immunological and clinical parameters employed in LN, i.e., antibodies to dsDNA (anti-dsDNA), C3 and C4 complement component, haemoglobin and haematuria.

Results: Good correlation and agreement between the two methods (r=0.81, p<0.0001; contingency coefficient=0.70, p<0.0001, respectively) were demonstrated. No differences were observed between the two assays by ROC curves comparison. Anti-C1q levels were significantly higher in patients with active LN [44 arbitrary units (AUs)] in comparison to those with inactive LN (23 AUs, p=0.047) and significantly correlated with anti-dsDNA (r=0.44, p<0.0001), complement fractions (C3: r=−0.33, p=0.001; C4: r=−0.29, p=0.003), haemoglobin levels (r=−0.34, p=0.0004) and the number of urinary red blood cells (r=0.26, p=0.01).

Conclusions: Our results suggest the validity of this commercial assay in detecting anti-C1q and confirm the association of anti-C1q with renal involvement of LN and the importance of introducing this parameter in the analytical panel for the evaluation of LN activity.


Corresponding author: Federica de Liso, Laboratory of Clinical Chemistry and Microbiology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122 Milan, Italy, Phone: +39 0255032582, Fax: +39 0255032397, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

The work was supported by the grant “Project in glomerulonephritis” in memory of Pippo Neglia.

Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

Financial support: None declared.

Employment or leadership: None declared.

Honorarium: None declared.

Competing interests: The funding organisation(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Sherer Y, Gorstein A, Fritzler MJ, Shoenfeld Y. Autoantibodies explosion in systemic lupus eryutematosus: more than 100 different antibodies found in SLE patients. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2004;34:501–37.10.1016/j.semarthrit.2004.07.002Search in Google Scholar

2. Abu-Shakra M, Urowitz MB, Gladman DD, Gough J. Mortality studies in systemic lupus erythematosus. Results from a single center. I. Causes of death. J Rheumatol 1995;22:1259–64.Search in Google Scholar

3. Bono L, Cameron JS, Hicks JA. The very long-term prognosis and complications of lupus nephritis and its treatment. QJM 1999;92:211–8.10.1093/qjmed/92.4.211Search in Google Scholar

4. Cervera R, Khamashta MA, Font J, Sebastiani GD, Gil A, Lavilla P, et al. Morbidity and mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus during a 10-year period: a comparison of early and late manifestations in a cohort of 1000 patients. Medicine 2003;82:299–308.10.1097/01.md.0000091181.93122.55Search in Google Scholar

5. Doria A, Iaccarino L, Ghirardello A, Zampieri S, Arienti S, Sarzi-Puttini P, et al. Long-term prognosis and causes of death in systemic lupus erythematosus. Am J Med 2006;119:700–6.10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.11.034Search in Google Scholar

6. Moroni G, Quaglini S, Maccario M, Banfi G, Ponticelli C. Nephritic flares are predictors of bad long-term outcome in lupus nephritis. Kidney Int 1996;50:2047–53.10.1038/ki.1996.528Search in Google Scholar

7. Ravirarjan CT, Rowse L, MacGowan JR, Isemberg DA. An analysis of clinical disease activity and nephritis-associated serum autoantibody profiles in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a cross-sectional study. Rheumatology 2001;40:1405–12.10.1093/rheumatology/40.12.1405Search in Google Scholar

8. Ho A, Magder LS, Barr SG, Petri M. Decreases in anti-double-stranded DNA levels are associated with concurrent flares in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 2001;44:2342–9.10.1002/1529-0131(200110)44:10<2342::AID-ART397>3.0.CO;2-8Search in Google Scholar

9. Linnik MD, Hu JZ, Heilbrunn KR, Strand V, Hurley FL, Joh T. LJP 394 Investigator Consortium. Relationship between anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies and exacerbation of renal disease in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 2005;52:1129–37.10.1002/art.20980Search in Google Scholar

10. Esdaile JM, Abrahamowicz M, Joseph L, MacKenzie T, Li Y, Danoff D. Laboratory tests as predictors of disease exacerbations in systemic lupus erythematosus. Why some tests fail. Arthritis Rheum 1996;39:370–8.10.1002/art.1780390304Search in Google Scholar

11. Trendelenburg M, Marfurt J, Gerber I, Tyndall A, Schifferli JA. Lack of occurrence of severe lupus nephritis among anti-C1q autoantibody-negative patients. Arthritis Rheum 1999;42:187–8.10.1002/1529-0131(199901)42:1<187::AID-ANR24>3.0.CO;2-USearch in Google Scholar

12. Sinico RA, Radice A, Ikehata M, Giammarresi G, Corace C, Arrigo G, et al. Anti-C1q autoantibodies in lupus nephritis: prevalence and clinical significance. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2005;1050:193–200.10.1196/annals.1313.020Search in Google Scholar

13. Coremans IE, Spronk PE, Bootsma H, Daha MR, van der Voort EA, Kater L, et al. Changes in antibodies to C1q predict renal relapses in systemic lupus erythematosus. Am J Kidney Dis 1995;26:595–601.10.1016/0272-6386(95)90595-2Search in Google Scholar

14. Trendelenburg M, Lopez-Trascasa M, Potlukova E, Moll S, Regenass S, Frémeaux-Bacchi V, et al. Prevalence of anti-C1q antibodies in biopsy-proven active lupus nephritis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006;21:3115–21.10.1093/ndt/gfl436Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Moroni G, Trendelenburg M, Del Papa N, Quaglini S, Raschi E, Panzeri P, et al. Anti-C1q antibodies may help in diagnosing a renal flare in lupus nephritis. Am J Kidney Dis 2001;37:490–8.10.1053/ajkd.2001.22071Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Mosca M, Chimenti D, Pratesi F, Baldini C, Anzilotti C, Bombardieri S, et al. Prevalence and clinico-serological correlations of anti-alpha-enolase, anti-C1q, and anti-dsDNA antibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol 2006;33:695–7.Search in Google Scholar

17. Seelen MA, Trouw LA, Daha MR. Diagnostic and prognostic significance of anti-C1q antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2003;12: 619–24.10.1097/00041552-200311000-00008Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Holers VM. Anti-C1q autoantibodies amplify pathogenic complement activation in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Clin Invest 2004;114:616–9.10.1172/JCI200422820Search in Google Scholar

19. Yang XW, Tan Y, Yu F, Zhao MH. Combination of anti-C1q and anti-dsDNA antibodies is associated with higher renal disease activity and predicts renal prognosis of patients with lupus nephritis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2012;27:3552–9.10.1093/ndt/gfs179Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Yin Y, Wu X, Shan G, Zhang X. Diagnostic value of serum anti-C1q antibodies in patients with lupus nephritis: a meta-analysis. Lupus 2012;21:1088–97.10.1177/0961203312451202Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Moroni G, Radice A, Giammarresi G, Quaglini S, Gallelli B, Leoni A, et al. Are laboratory tests useful for monitoring the activity of lupus nephritis? A 6-year prospective study in a cohort of 228 patients with lupus nephritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:234–7.10.1136/ard.2008.094508Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Siegert C, Daha M, Westedt ML, van der Voort E, Breedveld F. IgG autoantibodies against C1q are correlated with nephritis, hypocomplementemia, and dsDNA antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol 1991;18:230–4.Search in Google Scholar

23. Mahler M, van Schaarenburg RA, Trouw LA. Anti-C1q autoantibodies, novel tests, and clinical consequences. Front Immunol 2013;4:1–5.10.3389/fimmu.2013.00117Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

24. Eggleton P, Ukoumunne OC, Cottrell I, Khan A, Maqsood S, Thornes J, et al. Autoantibodies against C1q as a diagnostic measure of lupus nephritis: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Cell Immunol 2014;5:1–23.Search in Google Scholar

25. Orbai AM, Truedsson L, Sturfelt G, Nived O, Fang H, Alarcón GS, et al. Anti-C1q antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 2015;24:42–9.10.1177/0961203314547791Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

26. Siegert CE, Daha MR, Tseng CM, Coremans IE, van Es LA, Breedveld FC. Predictive value of IgG autoantibodies against C1q for nephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis 1993;52:851–6.10.1136/ard.52.12.851Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

27. Hochberg MC. Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1997;40:1725.10.1002/art.1780400928Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Weening JJ, D’Agati VD, Schwartz MM, Seshan SV, Alpers CE, Appel GB, et al. The classification of glomerulonephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus revisited. J Am Soc Nephrol 2004;15:241–50.10.1097/01.ASN.0000108969.21691.5DSearch in Google Scholar

29. Akhter E, Burlingame RW, Seaman AL, Magder L, Petri M. Anti-C1q antibodies have higher correlation with flares of lupus nephritis than other serum markers. Lupus 2011;20:1267–74.10.1177/0961203311411597Search in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Stephan C, Wesseling S, Schink T, Jung K. Comparison of eight computer programs for receiver-operatic characteristic analysis. Clin Chem 2003;49:433–9.10.1373/49.3.433Search in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Mok CC, Ho LY, Leung HW, Wong LG. Performance of anti-C1q, antinucleosome, and anti-dsDNA antibodies for detecting concurrent disease activity of systemic lupus erythematosus. Transl Res 2010;156:320–5.10.1016/j.trsl.2010.07.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Julkunen H, Ekblom-Kullberg S, Miettinen A. Nonrenal and renal activity of systemic lupus erythematosus: a comparison of two anti-C1q and five anti-dsDNA assays and complement C3 and C4. Rheumatol Int 2012;32:2445–51.10.1007/s00296-011-1962-3Search in Google Scholar PubMed

33. Smykal-Jankowiak K, Smykał;-Jankowiak K, Niemir ZI, Polcyn-Adamczak M. Do circulating antibodies against C1q reflect the activity of lupus nephritis? Pol Arch Med Wewn 2011;121:287–95.10.20452/pamw.1077Search in Google Scholar

34. Kallenberg CG. Anti-C1q autoantibodies. Autoimmun Rev 2008;7:612–5.10.1016/j.autrev.2008.06.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

35. Matrat A, Veysseyre-Balter C, Trolliet P, Villar E, Dijoud F, Bienvenu J, et al. Simultaneous detection of anti-C1q and anti-double stranded DNA autoantibodies in lupus nephritis: predictive value for renal flares. Lupus 2011;20:28–34.10.1177/0961203310379871Search in Google Scholar PubMed

36. Bertsias G, Ioannidis JP, Boletis J, Bombardieri S, Cervera R, Dostal C, et al. Task Force of the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus. Report of a Task Force of the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics. Ann Rheum Dis 2008;67:195–205.10.1136/ard.2007.070367Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2015-1-21
Accepted: 2015-3-8
Published Online: 2015-4-14
Published in Print: 2015-10-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorials
  3. Laboratory medicine does matter in science (and medicine)… yet many seem to ignore it
  4. The standardization of the urine albumin assays: no longer deferrable
  5. Reviews
  6. The role of telomeres and vitamin D in cellular aging and age-related diseases
  7. Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: from diagnosis to treatment
  8. Clinical relevance and contemporary methods for counting blood cells in body fluids suspected of inflammatory disease
  9. EFLM Opinion Paper
  10. How to assess the quality of your analytical method?
  11. Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics
  12. Validation of CFTR intronic variants identified during cystic fibrosis population screening by a minigene splicing assay
  13. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  14. Uncertainty in measurement for 43 biochemistry, immunoassay, and hemostasis routine analytes evaluated by a method using only external quality assessment data
  15. A study examining the bias of albumin and albumin/creatinine ratio measurements in urine
  16. National survey on appropriateness of clinical biochemistry reporting in China
  17. Potentiometric measurement of urinary iodine concentration in patients with thyroid diseases with and without previous exposure to non-radioactive iodine
  18. Determination of 21-hydroxylase autoantibodies: inter-laboratory concordance in the Euradrenal International Serum Exchange Program
  19. Value of a commercial kit for detecting anti-C1q autoantibodies and correlation with immunological and clinical activity of lupus nephritis
  20. Comparison of the bead-based simultaneous analysis of specific platelet antibodies assay (SASPA) and Pak Lx Luminex technology with the monoclonal antibody immobilization of platelet antigens assay (MAIPA) to detect platelet alloantibodies
  21. Measurement of the inflammatory response in the early postoperative period after hip and knee arthroplasty
  22. Whole blood thromboelastometry profiles in women with preeclampsia
  23. Increased plasma soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor levels in systemic sclerosis: possible association with microvascular abnormalities and extent of fibrosis
  24. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  25. Reference ranges of serum bile acids in children and adolescents
  26. Infectious Diseases
  27. Elevated circulating ghrelin, but not peptide YY(3-36) levels, in term neonates with infection
  28. Cardiovascular Diseases
  29. Head-to-head comparison of 10 natriuretic peptide assays
  30. Prognostic role of BNP in children undergoing surgery for congenital heart disease: analysis of prediction models incorporating standard risk factors
  31. Elevations of inflammatory markers PTX3 and sST2 after resuscitation from cardiac arrest are associated with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and early death
  32. Identification of molecular species of oxidized triglyceride in plasma and its distribution in lipoproteins
  33. A new formula for estimation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in an ethnic Chinese population
  34. Letter to the Editors
  35. Laboratory medicine: let’s say it is the mirror of science (and medicine)
  36. The economic burden of hemolysis
  37. Acute effects of conventional and extended hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration on high-sensitivity cardiac troponins
  38. Cuvette carryover with the gentamicin assay on the Beckman AU480 analyser
  39. Comparison study of two commercially available methods for the determination of golimumab and anti-golimumab antibody levels in patients with rheumatic diseases
  40. Automated alkaline-pH electrophoresis followed by densitometry does not correlate with cation-exchange (CE)-HPLC in quantification of HbA2 and variant hemoglobins
  41. Progression from light chain myeloma to secondary plasma cell leukemia accompanied by peripheral blood eosinophilia
  42. Harmonization of results has not been fully achieved for serum immunoglobulin measurements
  43. The risk of macrovascular complications in subjects genotyped for common IL-6 gene and TNF-α gene variants
  44. Comparison of nucleated red blood cell count with four commercial hematological analyzers
  45. Reply to: The risk of macrovascular complications in subjects genotyped for common IL-6 gene and TNF-α gene variants
  46. Congress Abstracts
  47. Congress of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  48. 47th National Congress of the Italian Society of Clinical Biochemistry and Clinical Molecular Biology (SIBioC – Laboratory Medicine)
  49. 15th EFLM Continuous Postgraduate Course in Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
Downloaded on 6.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2015-0072/html
Scroll to top button