Home Biological variation of high sensitivity cardiac troponin-T in stable dialysis patients: implications for clinical practice
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Biological variation of high sensitivity cardiac troponin-T in stable dialysis patients: implications for clinical practice

  • Magid A. Fahim EMAIL logo , Andrew D. Hayen , Andrea R. Horvath , Goce Dimeski , Amanda Coburn , Ken-Soon Tan , David W. Johnson , Jonathan C. Craig , Scott B. Campbell and Carmel M. Hawley
Published/Copyright: December 20, 2014

Abstract

Background: Changes in high sensitivity cardiac troponin-T (hs-cTnT) concentrations may reflect either acute myocardial injury or biological variation. Distinguishing between these entities is essential to accurate diagnosis, however, the biological variation of hs-cTnT in dialysis population is currently unknown. We sought to estimate the within- and between-person coefficients of variation of hs-cTnT in stable dialysis patients, and derive the critical difference between measurements needed to exclude biological variation with 99% confidence.

Methods: Fifty-five prevalent haemo- and peritoneal-dialysis patients attending two metropolitan hospitals were assessed on 10 consecutive occasions; weekly for 5 weeks then monthly for 4 months. Assessments were conducted at the same dialysis cycle time-point and entailed hs-cTnT testing, clinical review, electrocardiography, and bioimpedance spectroscopy. Patients were excluded if they developed clinical or physiological instability.

Results: In total 137 weekly and 114 monthly hs-cTnT measurements from 42 stable patients were analysed. Respective between- and within-person coefficients of variation were 83% and 7.9% for weekly measurements, and 79% and 12.6% for monthly measurements. Within-person variation was unaffected by dialysis modality or cardiac co-morbidity. The bidirectional 99% reference change value was –25% and +33% for weekly measurements, and –37% and +58% for monthly measurements.

Conclusions: The between-person variation of hs-cTnT in the dialysis population is markedly greater than within-person variation indicating that hs-cTnT testing is best applied in this population using a relative change strategy. An increase of 33% or a reduction of 25% in serial hs-cTnT concentrations measured at weekly intervals excludes change due to analytical and biological variation alone with 99% confidence.


Corresponding author: Magid A. Fahim, Department of Nephrology, ARTS Building 31, Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, Brisbane 4102, QLD, Australia, Phone: +61 7 3176 5080, Fax: +61 7 3176 5480, E-mail: ; and School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; and Translational Research Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

Acknowledgments

This study was presented at the ‘Young Investigator of The Year’ award session of The Australia and New Zealand Society of Nephrology (ANZSN) Annual Scientific Meeting 2013, Brisbane, Australia. We acknowledge the nephrologists, nurses, and dialysis patients at Princess Alexandra hospital, Brisbane, and Logan Hospital, Logan, Australia for their support throughout the study.

Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

Financial support: The study funded in part by a research project grant from Kidney Health Australia (PG05 11) and an unrestricted equipment loan from Fresenius Medical Care, Asia-Pacific. Magid Fahim is a recipient of a National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Postgraduate Research Scholarship and David Johnson is a current recipient of a Queensland Health Research Fellowship.

Employment or leadership: None declared.

Honorarium: None declared.

Competing interests: The funding organisation(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Cheung AK, Sarnak MJ, Yan G, Berkoben M, Heyka R, Kaufman A, et al. Cardiac diseases in maintenance hemodialysis patients: results of the HEMO Study. Kidney Int 2004;65:2380–9.10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00657.xSearch in Google Scholar

2. Wanner C, Krane V, Marz W, Olschewski M, Mann JF, Ruf G, et al. Atorvastatin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus undergoing hemodialysis. N Engl J Med 2005;353:238–48.10.1056/NEJMoa043545Search in Google Scholar

3. US Renal Data System. USRDS 2012 annual data report: atlas of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease in the United States. National Institutes of Health, National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases: Bethseda, MD, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

4. McDonald SP, Tong B. Morbidity burden of end-stage kidney disease in Australia: hospital separation rates among people receiving kidney replacement therapy. Nephrology (Carlton) 2011;16:758–66.10.1111/j.1440-1797.2011.01486.xSearch in Google Scholar

5. Sacchetti A, Harris R, Patel K, Attewell R. Emergency department presentation of renal dialysis patients: indications for EMS transport directly to dialysis centers. J Emerg Med 1991;9:141–4.10.1016/0736-4679(91)90320-FSearch in Google Scholar

6. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Simoons ML, Chaitman BR, White HD, et al. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation 2012;126:2020–35.10.1161/CIR.0b013e31826e1058Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Group NW, Wu AH, Jaffe AS, Apple FS, Jesse RL, Francis GL, et al. National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry laboratory medicine practice guidelines: use of cardiac troponin and B-type natriuretic peptide or N-terminal proB-type natriuretic peptide for etiologies other than acute coronary syndromes and heart failure. Clin Chem 2007;53:2086–96.10.1373/clinchem.2007.095679Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Jaffe AS, Apple FS. The third universal definition of myocardial infarction – moving forward. Clin Chem 2012;58:1727–8.10.1373/clinchem.2012.196832Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Fraser C. The nature of biological variation. In: Fraser C, Biological variation: from principles to practice. Washington, DC: AACC Press, 2001:1–27.Search in Google Scholar

10. Astion ML, Shojania KG, Hamill TR, Kim S, Ng VL. Classifying laboratory incident reports to identify problems that jeopardize patient safety. Am J Clin Pathol 2003;120:18–26.10.1309/8U5D0MA6MFH2FG19Search in Google Scholar

11. Saenger AK, Beyrau R, Braun S, Cooray R, Dolci A, Freidank H, et al. Multicenter analytical evaluation of a high-sensitivity troponin T assay. Clin Chim Acta 2011;412:748–54.10.1016/j.cca.2010.12.034Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Fraser CG, Harris EK. Generation and application of data on biological variation in clinical chemistry. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 1989;27:409–37.10.3109/10408368909106595Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Park J, Chung HC, Kim MS, Kim SJ, Chang JW, Lee JS. Relationship between extracellular water fraction of total body water estimated by bioimpedance spectroscopy and cardiac troponin T in chronic haemodialysis patients. Blood Purif 2009;28:61–8.10.1159/000210663Search in Google Scholar

14. Turer AT, Addo TA, Martin JL, Sabatine MS, Lewis GD, Gerszten RE, et al. Myocardial ischemia induced by rapid atrial pacing causes troponin T release detectable by a highly sensitive assay: insights from a coronary sinus sampling study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:2398–405.10.1016/j.jacc.2010.11.066Search in Google Scholar

15. Giannitsis E, Becker M, Kurz K, Hess G, Zdunek D, Katus HA. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T for early prediction of evolving non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome and negative troponin results on admission. Clin Chem 2010;56:642–50.10.1373/clinchem.2009.134460Search in Google Scholar

16. Pianta TJ, Horvath AR, Ellis VM, Leonetti R, Moffat C, Josland EA, et al. Cardiac high-sensitivity troponin T measurement: a layer of complexity in managing haemodialysis patients. Nephrology (Carlton) 2012;17:636–41.10.1111/j.1440-1797.2012.01625.xSearch in Google Scholar

17. Lippi G, Tessitore N, Montagnana M, Salvagno GL, Lupo A, Guidi GC. Influence of sampling time and ultrafiltration coefficient of the dialysis membrane on cardiac troponin I and T. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2008;132:72–6.10.5858/2008-132-72-IOSTAUSearch in Google Scholar

18. Campeau L. Letter: grading of angina pectoris. Circulation 1976;54:522–3.10.1161/circ.54.3.947585Search in Google Scholar

19. Ho KK, Pinsky JL, Kannel WB, Levy D. The epidemiology of heart failure: the Framingham Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22(4 Suppl A):6A–13A.10.1016/0735-1097(93)90455-ASearch in Google Scholar

20. Moissl UM, Wabel P, Chamney PW, Bosaeus I, Levin NW, Bosy-Westphal A, et al. Body fluid volume determination via body composition spectroscopy in health and disease. Physiological measurement 2006;27:921–33.10.1088/0967-3334/27/9/012Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Kraemer M, Rode C, Wizemann V. Detection limit of methods to assess fluid status changes in dialysis patients. Kidney Int 2006;69:1609–20.10.1038/sj.ki.5000286Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Gillis JM, Dunselman P, Jarausch J, de Jong N, Cobbaert CM. Preanalytical storage does not affect 99th percentile cardiac troponin T concentrations measured with a high-sensitivity assay. Clin Chem 2013;59:442–3.10.1373/clinchem.2012.192211Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Roraas T, Petersen PH, Sandberg S. Confidence intervals and power calculations for within-person biological variation: effect of analytical imprecision, number of replicates, number of samples, and number of individuals. Clin Chem 2012;58:1306–13.10.1373/clinchem.2012.187781Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Redfield MM, Jacobsen SJ, Burnett JC, Jr., Mahoney DW, Bailey KR, Rodeheffer RJ. Burden of systolic and diastolic ventricular dysfunction in the community: appreciating the scope of the heart failure epidemic. J Am Med Assoc 2003;289:194–202.10.1001/jama.289.2.194Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Fokkema MR, Herrmann Z, Muskiet FA, Moecks J. Reference change values for brain natriuretic peptides revisited. Clin Chem 2006;52:1602–3.10.1373/clinchem.2006.069369Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Iglesias N, Petersen PH, Ricos C. Power function of the reference change value in relation to cut-off points, reference intervals and index of individuality. Clin Chem Lab Med 2005;43:441–8.10.1515/CCLM.2005.078Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Pretorius CJ, Wilgen U, Ungerer JP. Serial cardiac troponin differences measured on four contemporary analyzers: relative differences, actual differences and reference change values compared. Clin Chim Acta 2012;413:1786–91.10.1016/j.cca.2012.07.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Ie EH, Klootwijk PJ, Weimar W, Zietse R. Significance of acute versus chronic troponin T elevation in dialysis patients. Nephron Clin Pract 2004;98:c87–92.10.1159/000080679Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Hill SA, Cleve R, Carlisle E, Young E, McQueen MJ. Intra-individual variability in troponin T concentration in dialysis patients. Clin Biochem 2009;42:991–5.10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2009.03.027Search in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Frankenstein L, Wu AH, Hallermayer K, Wians FH, Jr., Giannitsis E, Katus HA. Biological variation and reference change value of high-sensitivity troponin T in healthy individuals during short and intermediate follow-up periods. Clin Chem 2011;57:1068–71.10.1373/clinchem.2010.158964Search in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Nordenskjold AM, Ahlstrom H, Eggers KM, Frobert O, Jaffe AS, Venge P, et al. Short- and long-term individual variation in cardiac troponin in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Clin Chem 2013;59:401–9.10.1373/clinchem.2012.191700Search in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Aakre KM, Roraas T, Petersen PH, Svarstad E, Sellevoll H, Skadberg O, et al. Weekly and 90-minute biological variations in cardiac troponin T and cardiac troponin I in hemodialysis patients and healthy controls. Clin Chem 2014;60:838–47.10.1373/clinchem.2013.216978Search in Google Scholar PubMed

33. Jacobs LH, van de Kerkhof J, Mingels AM, Kleijnen VW, van der Sande FM, Wodzig WK, et al. Haemodialysis patients longitudinally assessed by highly sensitive cardiac troponin T and commercial cardiac troponin T and cardiac troponin I assays. Ann Clin Biochem 2009;46:283–90.10.1258/acb.2009.008197Search in Google Scholar PubMed

34. Jefferies HJ, Virk B, Schiller B, Moran J, McIntyre CW. Frequent hemodialysis schedules are associated with reduced levels of dialysis-induced cardiac injury (myocardial stunning). Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2011;6:1326–32.10.2215/CJN.05200610Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

35. McDonald SP, Marshall MR, Johnson DW, Polkinghorne KR. Relationship between dialysis modality and mortality. J Am Soc Nephrol 2009;20:155–63.10.1681/ASN.2007111188Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

36. Morrow DA, Cannon CP, Rifai N, Frey MJ, Vicari R, Lakkis N, et al. Ability of minor elevations of troponins I and T to predict benefit from an early invasive strategy in patients with unstable angina and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: results from a randomized trial. J Am Med Assoc 2001;286:2405–12.10.1001/jama.286.19.2405Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2014-8-19
Accepted: 2014-11-13
Published Online: 2014-12-20
Published in Print: 2015-4-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. High-sensitivity assays for cardiac troponins
  4. Reviews
  5. High sensitivity cardiac troponin assays in the clinical laboratories
  6. Laboratory medicine as the science that underpins medicine: the “high-sensitivity” troponin paradigm
  7. Cardiac troponin assays: a review of quantitative point-of-care devices and their efficacy in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction
  8. Cardiovascular Diseases
  9. Evaluation of standardization capability of current cardiac troponin I assays by a correlation study: results of an IFCC pilot project
  10. Estimation of age- and comorbidities-adjusted percentiles of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T levels in the elderly
  11. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I in the general population – defining reference populations for the determination of the 99th percentile in the Gutenberg Health Study
  12. Kinetics of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T or troponin I compared to creatine kinase in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction
  13. Biological variation of high sensitivity cardiac troponin-T in stable dialysis patients: implications for clinical practice
  14. Diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients with renal insufficiency using high-sensitivity troponin T
  15. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  16. Active intervention in hospital test request panels pays
  17. An approach to establish the uncertainty budget of catalytic activity concentration measurements in a reference laboratory
  18. Uric acid: a potential biomarker of multiple sclerosis and of its disability
  19. Experience with the first fully automated chemiluminescence immunoassay for the quantification of 1α, 25-dihydroxy-vitamin D
  20. I-FABP and L-FABP are early markers for abdominal injury with limited prognostic value for secondary organ failures in the post-traumatic course
  21. Quantification of piperacillin, tazobactam, cefepime, meropenem, ciprofloxacin and linezolid in serum using an isotope dilution UHPLC-MS/MS method with semi-automated sample preparation
  22. Plasma visfatin/nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase (visfatin/NAMPT) concentration is not related to kidney function in elderly subjects
  23. Diagnostic performance study of an antigen microarray for the detection of antiphospholipid antibodies in human serum
  24. Dry ice exposure of plasma samples influences pH and lupus anticoagulant analysis
  25. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  26. A new robust statistical model for interpretation of differences in serial test results from an individual
  27. Cancer Diagnostics
  28. The value of red blood cell distribution width in endometrial cancer
  29. Letters to the Editors
  30. Serum high-sensitivity troponin concentrations in a multi-ethnic Asian population of stable chronic kidney disease patients
  31. Comparison between BNP values measured in capillary blood samples with a POCT method and those measured in plasma venous samples with an automated platform
  32. Reply to the article entitled “Impact of assay design on test performance: lessons learned from 25-hydroxyvitamin D” by Farrell et al., Clin Chem Lab Med 2014;52:1579–87
  33. Reply. Impact of assay design on test performance: lessons learned from 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Authors’ response to the Letter to the Editor by Donnelly et al.
  34. Therapeutic drug monitoring of voriconazole: validation of a novel ARK™ immunoassay and comparison with ultra-high performance liquid chromatography
  35. Interference of C-reactive protein with clotting times
Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2014-0838/html
Scroll to top button