Home Diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients with renal insufficiency using high-sensitivity troponin T
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients with renal insufficiency using high-sensitivity troponin T

  • Hualan Huang , Shuai Zhu , Weiqing Wang , Hong Yi , Xiangyang Du , Xin Nie , Yong He , Haolan Song , Qiang Miao , Lanlan Wang EMAIL logo and Guixing Li EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: January 13, 2015

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to examine the diagnostic accuracy of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in patients with renal insufficiency, since this population has a high incidence of non-AMI elevations of hs-cTnT.

Methods: In this prospective study, we enrolled 2249 consecutive patients presenting with chest pain in the emergency department (ED), of whom 19.5% had an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)cys of <60 mL·min–1 (1.73 m2)–1. Hs-cTnT levels were measured blindly at presentation.

Results: Of the patients, 1108 (49.3%) were diagnosed as having AMI [321 with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI)]. In patients whose final diagnosis was not AMI, there was a low but significant correlation between hs-cTnT and renal function [eGFRcys, r=–0.43 (–0.48, –0.38), p<0.001; eGFRcreat, r=–0.33 (–0.38, –0.27), p<0.001]. The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) for hs-cTnT to diagnose AMI was 0.93 in patients with eGFRcys levels of <30 mL·min–1 (1.73 m2)–1, and AUCs did not vary significantly according to eGFR categories. On the basis of the ROC curve, the optimal threshold value for hs-cTnT was 143.6 ng·L–1 to diagnose AMI in patients with eGFRcys of <30 mL·min–1 (1.73 m2)–1, with a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 91%; 54.1 ng·L–1 in patients with eGFRcys between 30 and 59 mL·min–1, with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 87%; 30.0 ng·L–1 in patients with eGFRcys between 60 and 89 mL·min–1, with a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 85%; and 20.3 ng·L–1 in patients with eGFRcys ≥90 mL·min–1 (1.73 m2)–1, with a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 88%. The same observations were done for the diagnosis of NSTEMI.

Conclusions: Using a higher hs-cTnT cut-off value based on eGFR level is necessary for accurate diagnosis of AMI or NSTEMI in patients with renal insufficiency.


Corresponding authors: Guixing Li, Department of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, P.R. China, Phone/Fax: +86 028 85422615, E-mail: ; and Lanlan Wang, Department of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, P.R. China, Phone/Fax: +86 028 85422752, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the participation of members of the emergency department of West China Hospital in this study.

Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

Financial support: This study was supported by Roche Diagnostics GmbH in Shanghai (H1311115).

Employment or leadership: None declared.

Honorarium: None declared.

Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Januzzi JJ, Bamberg F, Lee H, Truong QA, Nichols JH, Karakas M, et al. High-sensitivity troponin T concentrations in acute chest pain patients evaluated with cardiac computed tomography. Circulation 2010;121:1227–34.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.893826Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

2. OmLand T, Pfeffer MA, Solomon SD, de Lemos JA, Rosjo H, Saltyte BJ, et al. Prognostic value of cardiac troponin I measured with a highly sensitive assay in patients with stable coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:1240–9.10.1016/j.jacc.2012.12.026Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Freund Y, Chenevier-Gobeaux C, Bonnet P, Claessens YE, Allo JC, Doumenc B, et al. High-sensitivity versus conventional troponin in the emergency department for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Crit Care 2011;15:R147.10.1186/cc10270Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Zuily S, Chenevier-Gobeaux C, Claessens YE, Wahbi K, Weber S, Meune C. High diagnostic performance of a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T assay in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. Int J Cardiol 2011;146:115–6.10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.09.084Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Abbas NA, John RI, Webb MC, Kempson ME, Potter AN, Price CP, et al. Cardiac troponins and renal function in nondialysis patients with chronic kidney disease. Clin Chem 2005;51: 2059–66.10.1373/clinchem.2005.055665Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. DeFilippi C, Seliger SL, Kelley W, Duh SH, Hise M, Christenson RH, et al. Interpreting cardiac troponin results from high-sensitivity assays in chronic kidney disease without acute coronary syndrome. Clin Chem 2012;58:1342–51.10.1373/clinchem.2012.185322Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Coppolino G. [Focus on high sensitivity cardiac troponin tests in patients with altered renal function]. G Ital Nefrol 2011;28:138.Search in Google Scholar

8. Jain N, Hedayati SS. How should clinicians interpret cardiac troponin values in patients with ESRD? Semin Dial 2011;24: 398–400.10.1111/j.1525-139X.2011.00912.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

9. Muller-Bardorff M, Hallermayer K, Schroder A, Ebert C, Borgya A, Gerhardt W, et al. Improved troponin T ELISA specific for cardiac troponin T isoform: assay development and analytical and clinical validation. Clin Chem 1997;43:458–66.10.1093/clinchem/43.3.458Search in Google Scholar

10. Giannitsis E, Kurz K, Hallermayer K, Jarausch J, Jaffe AS, Katus HA. Analytical validation of a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T assay. Clin Chem 2010;56:254–61.10.1373/clinchem.2009.132654Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Stevens LA, Coresh J, Schmid CH, Feldman HI, Froissart M, Kusek J, et al. Estimating GFR using serum cystatin C alone and in combination with serum creatinine: a pooled analysis of 3,418 individuals with CKD. Am J Kidney Dis 2008;51:395–406.10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.11.018Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med 1999;130:461–70.10.7326/0003-4819-130-6-199903160-00002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Simoons ML, Chaitman BR, White HD, et al. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2012;33:2551–67.10.1093/eurheartj/ehs184Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Diris JH, Hackeng CM, Kooman JP, Pinto YM, Hermens WT, van Dieijen-Visser MP. Impaired renal clearance explains elevated troponin T fragments in hemodialysis patients. Circulation 2004;109:23–5.10.1161/01.CIR.0000109483.45211.8FSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Ziebig R, Lun A, Hocher B, Priem F, Altermann C, Asmus G, et al. Renal elimination of troponin T and troponin I. Clin Chem 2003;49:1191–3.10.1373/49.7.1191Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Fahie-Wilson MN, Carmichael DJ, Delaney MP, Stevens PE, Hall EM, Lamb EJ. Cardiac troponin T circulates in the free, intact form in patients with kidney failure. Clin Chem 2006;52: 414–20.10.1373/clinchem.2005.062307Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Chenevier-Gobeaux C, Meune C, Freund Y, Wahbi K, Claessens YE, Doumenc B, et al. Influence of age and renal function on high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T diagnostic accuracy for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2013;111:1701–7.10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.02.024Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Pfortmueller CA, Funk GC, Marti G, Leichtle AB, Fiedler GM, Schwarz C, et al. Diagnostic performance of high-sensitive troponin T in patients with renal insufficiency. Am J Cardiol 2013;112:1968–72.10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.08.028Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Terkelsen CJ, Lassen JF, Norgaard BL, Gerdes JC, Jensen T, Gotzsche LB, et al. Mortality rates in patients with ST-elevation vs. non-ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction: observations from an unselected cohort. Eur Heart J 2005;26:18–26.10.1093/eurheartj/ehi002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Mekontso DA, Lellouche N, Audard V, Roudot-Thoraval F, Champagne S, Lim P, et al. Effect of renal failure on peak troponin Ic level in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Cardiology 2008;109:217–21.10.1159/000107783Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Knight EL, Verhave JC, Spiegelman D, Hillege HL, de Zeeuw D, Curhan GC, et al. Factors influencing serum cystatin C levels other than renal function and the impact on renal function measurement. Kidney Int 2004;65:1416–21.10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00517.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Hallermayer K, Jarausch J, Menassanch-Volker S, Zaugg C, Ziegler A. Implications of adjustment of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T assay. Clin Chem 2013;59:572–4.10.1373/clinchem.2012.197103Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Kavsak PA, Hill SA, McQueen MJ, Devereaux PJ. Implications of adjustment of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T assay. Clin Chem 2013;59:574–6.10.1373/clinchem.2012.197434Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2014-7-12
Accepted: 2014-11-27
Published Online: 2015-1-13
Published in Print: 2015-4-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. High-sensitivity assays for cardiac troponins
  4. Reviews
  5. High sensitivity cardiac troponin assays in the clinical laboratories
  6. Laboratory medicine as the science that underpins medicine: the “high-sensitivity” troponin paradigm
  7. Cardiac troponin assays: a review of quantitative point-of-care devices and their efficacy in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction
  8. Cardiovascular Diseases
  9. Evaluation of standardization capability of current cardiac troponin I assays by a correlation study: results of an IFCC pilot project
  10. Estimation of age- and comorbidities-adjusted percentiles of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T levels in the elderly
  11. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I in the general population – defining reference populations for the determination of the 99th percentile in the Gutenberg Health Study
  12. Kinetics of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T or troponin I compared to creatine kinase in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction
  13. Biological variation of high sensitivity cardiac troponin-T in stable dialysis patients: implications for clinical practice
  14. Diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients with renal insufficiency using high-sensitivity troponin T
  15. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  16. Active intervention in hospital test request panels pays
  17. An approach to establish the uncertainty budget of catalytic activity concentration measurements in a reference laboratory
  18. Uric acid: a potential biomarker of multiple sclerosis and of its disability
  19. Experience with the first fully automated chemiluminescence immunoassay for the quantification of 1α, 25-dihydroxy-vitamin D
  20. I-FABP and L-FABP are early markers for abdominal injury with limited prognostic value for secondary organ failures in the post-traumatic course
  21. Quantification of piperacillin, tazobactam, cefepime, meropenem, ciprofloxacin and linezolid in serum using an isotope dilution UHPLC-MS/MS method with semi-automated sample preparation
  22. Plasma visfatin/nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase (visfatin/NAMPT) concentration is not related to kidney function in elderly subjects
  23. Diagnostic performance study of an antigen microarray for the detection of antiphospholipid antibodies in human serum
  24. Dry ice exposure of plasma samples influences pH and lupus anticoagulant analysis
  25. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  26. A new robust statistical model for interpretation of differences in serial test results from an individual
  27. Cancer Diagnostics
  28. The value of red blood cell distribution width in endometrial cancer
  29. Letters to the Editors
  30. Serum high-sensitivity troponin concentrations in a multi-ethnic Asian population of stable chronic kidney disease patients
  31. Comparison between BNP values measured in capillary blood samples with a POCT method and those measured in plasma venous samples with an automated platform
  32. Reply to the article entitled “Impact of assay design on test performance: lessons learned from 25-hydroxyvitamin D” by Farrell et al., Clin Chem Lab Med 2014;52:1579–87
  33. Reply. Impact of assay design on test performance: lessons learned from 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Authors’ response to the Letter to the Editor by Donnelly et al.
  34. Therapeutic drug monitoring of voriconazole: validation of a novel ARK™ immunoassay and comparison with ultra-high performance liquid chromatography
  35. Interference of C-reactive protein with clotting times
Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2014-0715/html
Scroll to top button