Home Calprotectin and lactoferrin in the cerebrospinal fluid; biomarkers utilisable for differential diagnostics of bacterial and aseptic meningitis?
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Calprotectin and lactoferrin in the cerebrospinal fluid; biomarkers utilisable for differential diagnostics of bacterial and aseptic meningitis?

  • Milan Dastych EMAIL logo , Jana Gottwaldová and Zdenka Čermáková
Published/Copyright: November 18, 2014

Abstract

Background: The aim of our work was to assess the diagnostic contribution of calprotectin and lactoferrin determinations in the cerebrospinal fluid when distinguishing between bacterial and aseptic meningitides.

Methods: In 23 patients with bacterial meningitis (BM) and in 50 patients with aseptic meningitis (AM), we determined the concentrations of calprotectin, lactoferrin and the conventional biomarkers like glucose, total protein, lactate and polynuclear count in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The discriminative power of the various parameters studied was determined by means of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves: the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, the positive likelihood ratio (+LR), and the negative likelihood ratio (–LR).

Results: The diagnostic efficiency of calprotectin, lactoferrin, lactate, and polynuclear count when distinguishing between bacterial and aseptic meningitides, expressed by ROC curve parameters, was as follows: AUC (0.736, 0.946, 0.932, 0.932), sensitivity (86.2, 96.6, 90.0, 89.7), specificity (58.5, 92.4, 87.0, 90.6), +LR (2.08, 12.8, 6.9, 9.50), –LR (0.24, 0.04, 0.11, 0.11), respectively. The optimal cut point for calprotectin and lactoferrin was 191 ng/mL and 17.8 ng/mL, respectively.

Conclusions: Our findings show, that the determination of lactoferrin in the CSF was diagnostically the most efficient marker in distinguishing between bacterial and viral meningitides. Calprotectin was far less efficient diagnostic marker. The polynuclear count and lactate concentration showed a very good diagnostic efficiency as well. The determination of protein and glucose was diagnostically less beneficial.


Corresponding author: Dr. Milan Dastych, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, University Hospital Brno, Jihlavská 20, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic, Phone: +42 0532233948, Fax: +42 0532233067, E-mail: ; and Faculty of Medicine, Department of Laboratory methods, Masaryk University, Czech Republic

References

1. Cunha BA.The clinical and laboratory diagnosis of acute meningitis and acute encephalitis. Expert Opin Med Diagn 2013;7:343–64.10.1517/17530059.2013.804508Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Viallon A, Desseigne N, Marjollet O, Birynczyk A, Belin M, Guyomarch S, et al. Meningitis in adult patients with a negative direct cerebrospinal fluid examination: value of cytochemical markers for differential diagnosis. Crit Care 2011;15:R136.10.1186/cc10254Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Huy NT, Thao NT, Diep DT, Kikuchi M, Zamora J, Hirayama K. Cerebrospinal fluid lactate concentration to distiguish bacterial from aseptic meningitis: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 2010;14:R240.10.1186/cc9395Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Agueda S, Campos T, Maia A. Prediction of bacterial meningitis based on cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis in children. Braz J Infect Dis 2013;17:401–4.10.1016/j.bjid.2012.12.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Tamune H, Takeya H, Suzuki W, Tagashira Y, Kuki T, Honda H, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid/blood glucose ratio as an indicator for bacterial meningitis. Am J Emerg Med 2014;32:263–6.10.1016/j.ajem.2013.11.030Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Sakushima K, Hayashino Y, Kawaguchi T, Jackson JL, Fukuhara S. Diagnostic accuracy of cerebrospinal fluid lactate for differentiating bacterial meningitis from aseptic meningitis: a meta-analysis. J Infection 2011;62:255–62.10.1016/j.jinf.2011.02.010Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Abro AH, Abdou AS, Ustadi AM, Saleh AA, Younis NJ, Doleh WF. CSF lactate level: a useful diagnostic tool to differentiate acute bacterial and viral meningitis. J Pak Med Assoc 2009;59:508–11.Search in Google Scholar

8. Chen Z, Wang Y, Zeng A, Chen L, Wu R, Chen B, et al. The clinical diagnostic significance of cerebrospinal fluid D-lactate for bacterial meningitis. Clin Chim Acta 2012;413:1512–5.10.1016/j.cca.2012.06.018Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Dhas DB, Bhat BV, Gane DB. Role of calprotectin in infection and inflammation. Curr Pediatr Res 2012;16:83–94.Search in Google Scholar

10. Johne B, Fagerhol MK, Lyberg T, Prydz H, Brandtzaeg P, Naess-Andresen CF, et al. Functional and clinical aspects of the myelomonocyte protein calprotectin. J Clin Pathol: Mol Pathol 1997;50:113–23.10.1136/mp.50.3.113Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Satoru Y, Nakatani Y, Mikami M. Calprotectin (S100A8/S100A9), an inflammatory protein complex from neutrophils with a broad apoptosis-inducting activity. Biol Pharm Bull 2003;26:753–60.10.1248/bpb.26.753Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Bryant RE, Crouse R, Deagen JT. Zinc, iron, copper, selenium, lactoferin, and ferritin in human pus. Am J Med Sci 2004;327:73–6.10.1097/00000441-200402000-00003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Sánchez L, Calvo M, Brock JH. Biological role of lactoferrin. Arch Dis Child 1992;67:657–61.10.1136/adc.67.5.657Search in Google Scholar

14. Sipponen T, Savilahti E, Kolho KL, Nuutinen H, Turunen U, Färkkilä M. Crohn’s disease activity assessed by fecal calprotectin and lactoferrin: correlation with Crohn’s disease activity index and endoscopic findings. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2008;14:40–6.10.1002/ibd.20312Search in Google Scholar

15. Gisbert JP, McNicholl AG. Questions and answers on the role of faecal calprotectin as biological marker in inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Liver Dis 2009;41:56–66.10.1016/j.dld.2008.05.008Search in Google Scholar

16. Amati L, Passeri ME, Sellicato F, Mastronardi ML, Penna A, Jirillo E, et al. New insights into the biological significance of fecal calprotectin in inflammatory bowel disease. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol 2006;28:665–81.10.1080/08923970601067326Search in Google Scholar

17. Husebye E, Tøn H, Berit J. Biological variability of fecal calprotectin in patients referred for colonoscopy without colonic inflammation or neoplasm. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:2683–7.10.1016/S0002-9270(01)02688-0Search in Google Scholar

18. Lykova OF, Zakharova EV, Konysheva TV, Khokhlova ZA. Level of lactoferrin in serum and cerebrospinal fluid of patients with meningitis. Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol 2007;2:80–4.Search in Google Scholar

19. Maffei FA, Heine RP, Whalen MJ, Mortimer LF, Carcillo JA. Levels of antimicrobial molecules defensin and lactoferrin are elevated in the cerebrospinal fluid of children with meningitis. Pediatrics 1999;103:987–92.10.1542/peds.103.5.987Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Dunlop O, Bruun JN, Myrvang B, Fagerhol MK. Calprotectin in cerebrospinal fluid of the HIV infected: a diagnostic marker of opportunistic central nervous system infection? Scand J Infect Dis 1991;23:687–9.10.3109/00365549109024294Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Florkowski Ch. Sensitivity, specificity, receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves and likehood ratios: communicating the performance of diagnostic test. Clin Biochem Rev 2008;29:83–7.Search in Google Scholar

22. Schisterman EF, Perkins NJ, Liu A, Bondell H. Optimal cut-point and its corresponding youden index to discriminate individuals using pooled blood samples. Epidemiology 2005;16:73–81.10.1097/01.ede.0000147512.81966.baSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Berg-Hansen P, Vandvik B, Fagerhol M, Holmoy T. Calprotectin levels in the cerebrospinal fluid reflect disease aktivity in multiple sclerosis. J Neurommunol 2009;216:98–102.10.1016/j.jneuroim.2009.09.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2014-7-29
Accepted: 2014-10-2
Published Online: 2014-11-18
Published in Print: 2015-3-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorials
  3. “Personalized” sepsis care with the help of specific biomarker levels on admission and during follow up: are we there yet?
  4. Procalcitonin-guided antibiotic therapy: a potentially effective and efficient strategy
  5. Review
  6. The prognostic blood biomarker proadrenomedullin for outcome prediction in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a qualitative clinical review
  7. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  8. Diagnostic testing for a high-grade inflammation: parameter dynamics and novel markers
  9. Serial changes in serum procalcitonin, interleukin 6, and C-reactive protein levels according to non-specific surgical stimulation
  10. Utility of procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and white blood cells alone and in combination for the prediction of clinical outcomes in community-acquired pneumonia
  11. Presepsin as a potential marker for bacterial infection relapse in critical care patients. A preliminary study
  12. Diagnosis and evaluation of severity of sepsis via the use of biomarkers and profiles of 13 cytokines: a multiplex analysis
  13. Economic evaluation of procalcitonin-guided antibiotic therapy in acute respiratory infections: a US health system perspective
  14. Analytical evaluation of Diazyme procalcitonin (PCT) latex-enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay on Beckman Coulter AU5800
  15. Calprotectin and lactoferrin in the cerebrospinal fluid; biomarkers utilisable for differential diagnostics of bacterial and aseptic meningitis?
  16. Cancer Diagnostics
  17. Increased level of circulating U2 small nuclear RNA fragments indicates metastasis in melanoma patients
  18. Cardiovascular Diseases
  19. Comparison between admission natriuretic peptides, NGAL and sST2 testing for the prediction of worsening renal function in patients with acutely decompensated heart failure
  20. Diabetes
  21. Weight loss reduces serum monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 concentrations in association with improvements in renal injury in obese men with metabolic syndrome
  22. Letters to the Editors
  23. Ranking prestige of medical and laboratory technology journals
  24. Expression of CD64 on neutrophils (CD64 index): diagnostic accuracy of CD64 index to predict sepsis in critically ill patients
  25. Measurement of apolipoprotein M in sepsis-related deaths
  26. The stability of select biomarkers in frozen plasma over time: an evaluation of a low-volume sample analyzer
  27. Is the new Beckman AccuTnI+3 assay capable of producing false-positive troponin I results?
  28. Spectrum of red cell abnormalities in undiagnosed hemolytic anemias and methemoglobinemias: a single center experience
  29. Correlation of methadone concentrations in plasma and saliva collected with and without stimulation in pain management patients
  30. Higher alkaline phosphatase was associated with the short-term adverse outcomes of peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis
  31. The use of a rapid fluorogenic neuraminidase assay to differentiate acute Streptococcus pneumoniae-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) from other forms of HUS
  32. Congress Abstracts
  33. 3rd EFLM-BD European Conference on Preanalytical Phase
Downloaded on 17.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2014-0775/html
Scroll to top button