Startseite S100B blood level measurement to exclude cerebral lesions after minor head injury: the multicenter STIC-S100 French study
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

S100B blood level measurement to exclude cerebral lesions after minor head injury: the multicenter STIC-S100 French study

  • Said Laribi , Jamal Kansao , Didier Borderie , Corinne Collet , Patrick Deschamps , Redha Ababsa , Léonard Mouniam , Laurence Got , Alain Leon , Henri Thoannes , Aline Santin , Jean-Claude Kouyoumdjian , Claire Dahyot-Fizelier , Catherine Millet , Jean-Louis Golmard , Jean-Louis Beaudeux EMAIL logo und on behalf of the Stic-S100 Study Groupa
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 13. November 2013
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Background: S100B protein measurement in blood is proposed to exclude the presence of computed tomography (CT) lesions after minor head injury (MHI). We aimed to validate S100B as an accurate and valuable screening tool for MHI diagnosis in a large multicenter study, as well as: 1) to evaluate whether a second S100B blood level determination 3 h after the first one would be informative; 2) to compare the bioclinical performances of the two commercially available automated methods of measurement of S100B for the screening of patients.

Methods: Four thousand and thirty MHI subjects were enrolled in a prospective observational multicenter study; results for serum S100B measurement determined within 3 h after the clinical event (H0) then at H3 were compared to that of cranial CT scans performed with 6 h following the presentation to emergency department. Both the Diasorin and the Roche Diagnostics assays were systematically performed.

Results: Cerebral lesions on CT scan were identified with sensitivity and negative-predictive value (NPV) of 96.3% and 99.4% (Diasorin, 1 dissonant case), and of 100% and 100% (Roche Diagnostics, no dissonant case). Sensitivity and NPV at H3 appeared lower than those at H0, due to the rapid decrease in S100B levels.

Conclusions: Serum S100B level on admission of patients with MHI is an accurate and useful screening tool to exclude intracranial lesions. Performing a second late S100B level determination is not informative. The two automated immunoassays appear usable in a similar manner, although the two methods are not interchangeable.


Corresponding author: Jean-Louis Beaudeux, Clinical Chemistry Department, APHP, 149, rue de Sèvres, 75015 Paris, France, Phone: +33 1 44495111, E-mail:
aThe Study Group also included: N. Ouled, O. Walha-Chakroun, C. Welsch, C. Durand, P. Plaisance (Emergency Department, Lariboisière Hospital, Paris), M.-P. Coulhon (Clinical Biology Department, Pontoise Hospital).

Acknowledgments

This study was supported and funded by the STIC program of The French Ministry of Public Health, Paris, France, in favor of DRCD (Département de la Recherche Clinique et du Dévelopement) APHP-Ile-de France, France.

Conflict of interest statement

Authors’ conflict of interest disclosure: The authors stated that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article. Research funding played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

Research funding: None declared.

Employment or leadership: None declared.

Honorarium: J.-L. Beaudeux punctually receives fees for consulting from Roche Diagnostics.

References

1. Cassidy JD, Carroll LJ, Peloso PM, Borg J, von Holst H, Holm L, et al. Incidence, risk factors and prevention of mild traumatic brain injury: results of the WHO collaborating centre task force on mild traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil Med 2004;43: 28–60.10.1080/16501960410023732Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Smith-Bindman R. Is computed tomography safe? N Engl J Med 2010;363:1–4.10.1056/NEJMp1002530Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Haydel MJ, Preston CA, Mills TJ, Luber S, Blaudeau E, DeBlieux PM. Indications for computed tomography in patients with minor head injury. N Engl J Med 2000;343:100–5.10.1056/NEJM200007133430204Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Nash DL, Bellolio MF, Stead LG. S100 as a marker of acute brain ischemia: a systematic review. Neurocrit Care 2008;8:301–7.10.1007/s12028-007-9019-xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Metting Z, Wilczak N, Rodiger LA, Schaaf JM, van der Naalt J. GFAP and S100B in the acute phase of mild traumatic brain injury. Neurology 2012;78:1428–33.10.1212/WNL.0b013e318253d5c7Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Cervellin G, Benatti M, Carbucicchio A, Mattei L, Cerasti D, Aloe R, et al. Serum levels of protein S100B predict intracranial lesions in mild head injury. Clin Biochem 2012;45:408–11.10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.01.006Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Tavarez MM, Atabaki SM, Teach SJ. Acute evaluation of pedriatric patients with minor traumatic brain injury. Curr Opin Pediatr 2012;24:307–13.10.1097/MOP.0b013e3283531ce6Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Egea-Guerrero JJ, Revuelto-Rey J, Murillo-Cabezas F, Munoz-Sanchez MA, Vilches-Arenas A, Sanchez-Linares P, et al. Accuracy of the S100B protein as a marker of brain damage in traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 2012;26:76–82.10.3109/02699052.2011.635360Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Unden J, Romner B. Can low serum levels of S100B predict normal CT findings after minor head injury in adults?: an evidence-based review and meta-analysis. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2010;25:228–40.10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181e57e22Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Townend W, Dibble C, Abid K, Vail A, Sherwood R, Lecky F. Rapid elimination of protein S100B from serum after minor head injury. J Neurotrauma 2006;23:149–55.10.1089/neu.2006.23.149Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Jonsson H, Johnsson P, Hoglund P, Alling C, Blomquist S. Elimination of S100B and renal function after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2000;14:698–701.10.1053/jcan.2000.18444Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Morochovic R, Racz O, Kitka M, Pingorova S, Cibur P, Tomkova D, et al. Serum S100B protein in early management of patients after mild traumatic brain injury. Eur J Neurol 2009;16:1112–7.10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02653.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Bouvier D, Oddoze C, Ben Haim D, Moustafa F, Legrand A, Alazia M, et al. Interest of S100B protein blood level determination for the management of patients with minor head traum. Ann Biol Clin (Paris) 2009;67:425–31.Suche in Google Scholar

14. Poli-de-Figueiredo LF, Biberthaler P, Simao Filho C, Hauser C, Mutschler W, Jochum M. Measurement of S-100B for risk classification of vitims sustaining minor head injury – First pilot study in Brazil. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2006;61:41–6.10.1590/S1807-59322006000100008Suche in Google Scholar

15. Bazarian JJ, Beck C, Blyth B, von Ahsen N, Hasselblatt M. Impact of creatine kinase correction on the predictive value of S100B after mild traumatic brain injury. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2006;24:163–72.Suche in Google Scholar

16. Biberthaler P, Linsenmeier U, Pfeifer KJ, Kroetz M, Mussack T, Kanz KG, et al. Serum S-100B concentration provides additional information for the indication of computed tomography in patients after minor head injury: a propsective multicentre study. Shock 2006;25:446–53.10.1097/01.shk.0000209534.61058.35Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Nygren de Boussard C, Fredman P, Lundin A, Andersson K, Edman G, Borg J. S100 in mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 2004;18:671–83.10.1080/02699050310001646215Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Mussack T, Biberthaler P, Kanz KG, Heckl U, Gruber R, Linsenmaier U, et al. Immediate S-100B and neuron-specific enolase plasma measurements for rapid evaluation of primary brain damage in alcohol-intoxicated, minor head-injured patients. Shock 2002;18:395–400.10.1097/00024382-200211000-00002Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Biberthaler P, Mussack T, Wiedemann E, Kanz KG, Mutschler W, Linsenmaier U, et al. Rapid identification of high-risk patients after minor head traum (MHT) by assessment of S-100B: ascertainement of a cut-off level. Eur Med Res J 2002;7: 164–70.Suche in Google Scholar

20. Biberthaler P, Mussack T, Wiedemann E, Kanz KG, Koelsch M, Gippner-Steppert C, et al. Evaluation of S-100b as a specific marker for neuronal damage due to minor head trauma. World J Surg 2001;25:93–7.10.1007/s002680020370Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Ingebrigtsen T, Romner B, Marup-Jensen S, Dons M, Lundqvist C, Bellner J, et al. The clinical value of serum S-100 protein measurements in minor head injury: a Scandinavian multicentre study. Brain Inj 2000;14:1047–55.10.1080/02699050050203540Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Ingebrigtsen T, Waterloo K, Jacobsen EA, Langbakk B, Romner B. Traumatic brain damage in minor head injury: relation of serum S-100 protein measurements to magnetic resonance imaging and neurobehavorial outcome. Neurosurgery 1999;45:468–75.10.1097/00006123-199909000-00010Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Zongo D, Ribéreau-Gayon R, Masson F, Laborey M, Contrand B, Salmi LR, et al. S100-B protein as a screening tool for the early assessment of minor head injury. Ann Emerg Med 2012;59: 209–18.10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.07.027Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Bouvier D, Fournier M, Dauphin JB, Amat F, Ughetto S, LabbéA, et al. Serum S100B determination in the management of pediatric mild traumatic brain injury. Clin Chem 2012;58: 1116–22.10.1373/clinchem.2011.180828Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Oh EJ, Kim YM, Jegal DW, Kahng J, Park YJ, Han K. Diagnostic value of Elecsys S100 as a marker of acute brain injury in the emergency department. J Clin Lab Anal 2007;21:387–92.10.1002/jcla.20201Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

26. Pickering A, Carter J, Hanning I, Townend W. Emergency department measurement of urinary S100B in children following head injury: can extracranial injury confound findings? Emerg Med J 2008;25:88–9.10.1136/emj.2007.046631Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Unden J, Bellner J, Eneroth M, Alling C, Ingebrigtsen T, Romner B. Raised serum S100B levels after acute bone fractures without cerebral injury. J Trauma 2005;58:59–61.10.1097/01.TA.0000130613.35877.75Suche in Google Scholar

28. Pham N, Fazio V, Cucullo L, Teng Q, Biberthaler P, Bazarian JJ, et al. Extracranial sources so S100B do not affect serum levels. Plos One 2010;5:e12691.10.1371/journal.pone.0012691Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

29. Sloan EP, Zalenski RJ, Smith RF, Sheaff CM, Chen EH, Keys NI, et al. Toxicology screening in urban trauma patients: drug prevalence and its relationship to trauma severity and management. J Trauma 1989;29:1647–53.10.1097/00005373-198912000-00011Suche in Google Scholar

30. Lange RT, Iverson GL, Brubacher JR. Clinical utility of the protein S100B to evaluate traumatic brain injury in the presence of acute alcohol intoxication. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2012;27:123–34.10.1097/HTR.0b013e31820e6840Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Enochsson L, Carlsson-Sanz S, van der Linden J. The influence of alcohol and time on the S-100B levels of patients with minor head injury. Eur J Neurol 2005;12:445–8.10.1111/j.1468-1331.2005.00996.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Einav S, Itshayek E, Kark JD, Ovadia H, Weiniger CF, Shoshan Y. Serum S100B levels after meningioma surgery: a comparison of two laboratory assays. BMC Clin Pathol 2008;19:8–9.10.1186/1472-6890-8-9Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

33. Muller K, Elverland A, Romner B, Waterloo K, Langbakk B, Undén J, et al. Analysis of protein S100B in serum: a methodological study. Clin Chem Lab Med 2006;44:1111–4.10.1515/CCLM.2006.211Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

34. Erickson JA, Grenache DG. Comparison of three assays for quantifying S100B in serum. Clin Chim Acta 2011;412:2122–7.10.1016/j.cca.2011.07.020Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

35. Calcagnile O, Unden L, Unden J. Clinical validation of S100B use in management of mild head injury. BMC Emerg Med 2012;12:13.10.1186/1471-227X-12-13Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

36. Bloomfield SM, McKinney J, Smith L, Brisman J. Reliability of S100B in predicting severity of central nervous system injury. Neurocrit Care 2007;6:121–38.10.1007/s12028-007-0008-xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

37. Nylén K, Ost M, Csajbok LZ, Nilsson I, Hall C, Blennow K, et al. Serum levels of S100B, S100A1B and S100BB are all related to outcome after severe traumatic brain injury. Acta Neurochir 2008;150:221–7.10.1007/s00701-007-1489-2Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

38. Topolovec-Vranic J, Pollmann-Mudryj MA, Ouchterlony D, Klein D, Spence J, Romaschin A, et al. The value of serum biomarkers in prediction models of outcome after mild traumatic brain injury. J Trauma 2011;71:S478–86.10.1097/TA.0b013e318232fa70Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2013-8-4
Accepted: 2013-10-7
Published Online: 2013-11-13
Published in Print: 2014-04-01

©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Masthead
  2. Masthead
  3. Editorials
  4. Inflammatory bowel diseases: where we are and where we should go
  5. Thrombophilia testing. Useful or hype?
  6. Reviews
  7. Inflammatory bowel diseases: from pathogenesis to laboratory testing
  8. Crohn’s disease specific pancreatic antibodies: clinical and pathophysiological challenges
  9. Point/Counterpoint
  10. The utility of thrombophilia testing
  11. The futility of thrombophilia testing
  12. Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics
  13. Identification of an 18 bp deletion in the TWIST1 gene by CO-amplification at lower denaturation temperature-PCR (COLD-PCR) for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of craniosynostosis: first case report
  14. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  15. Agreement of seven 25-hydroxy vitamin D3 immunoassays and three high performance liquid chromatography methods with liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry
  16. First trimester pregnancy-associated plasma protein A and human chorionic gonadotropin-beta in early and late pre-eclampsia
  17. S100B blood level measurement to exclude cerebral lesions after minor head injury: the multicenter STIC-S100 French study
  18. NGAL, L-FABP, and KIM-1 in comparison to established markers of renal dysfunction
  19. Value-added reporting of antinuclear antibody testing by automated indirect immunofluorescence analysis
  20. Cardiovascular Diseases
  21. A fit-for-purpose approach to analytical sensitivity applied to a cardiac troponin assay: time to escape the ‘highly-sensitive’ trap
  22. Diabetes
  23. A simple and precise method for direct measurement of fractional esterification rate of high density lipoprotein cholesterol by high performance liquid chromatography
  24. Infectious Diseases
  25. Detection of unamplified HCV RNA in serum using a novel two metallic nanoparticle platform
  26. Increased plasma arginase activity in human sepsis: association with increased circulating neutrophils
  27. Corrigendum
  28. The relationship between estimated average glucose and fasting plasma glucose
  29. Letter to the Editors
  30. The obsessive-compulsory clinical pathologist
  31. Prism effect of specimen receiving – generation of fundamentals for the smooth progress of analytical processing
  32. Preanalytical errors: the professionals’ perspective
  33. Corrected reports in laboratory medicine in a Chinese university hospital for 3 years
  34. Comparison of an enzymatic assay with liquid chromatography-pulsed amperometric detection for the determination of lactulose and mannitol in urine of healthy subjects and patients with active celiac disease
  35. Effect of freezing-thawing process on neuron specific enolase concentration in severe traumatic brain injury sera samples
  36. Undetected creatinine levels
  37. The effect of centrifugation on three urine protein assays: benzethonium chloride, benzalkonium chloride and pyrogallol red
Heruntergeladen am 26.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2013-0621/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen