Home The value of clinical and laboratory diagnostics for chest pain patients at the emergency department
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The value of clinical and laboratory diagnostics for chest pain patients at the emergency department

  • Laurens-Jan C. Jellema EMAIL logo , Barbra E. Backus , A. Jacob Six , Richard Braam , Bjorn Groenemeijer , Hester J. van der Zaag-Loonen , Rene Tio and Jeroen D.E. van Suijlen
Published/Copyright: August 12, 2013

Abstract

Background: The focus during the diagnostic process for patients with acute chest pain is to discriminate patients who can be safely discharged from those who are at risk for an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). In this study the diagnostic value of the clinical examination is compared with laboratory testing of troponin.

Methods: This study included 710 chest pain patients who presented at the ED of two hospitals in the Netherlands. Clinical examination and laboratory testing were combined in the recently developed HEART-score. The diagnostic values of clinical presentation, troponin and the HEART-score for a major adverse coronary event (MACE) and an ACS within 6 weeks were assessed. Furthermore, the improvement of HEART with the second troponin measurement after 6 h was assessed using the net reclassification improvement (NRI).

Results: The use of HEART (AUCMACE: 0.77; AUCACS: 0.82) obtains a higher diagnostic value than troponin (AUCMACE: 0.72; AUCACS: 0.74) or clinical evaluation (AUCMACE: 0.69; AUCACS: 0.74). Statistical significant different AUCs were obtained when HEART is compared to troponin or clinical evaluation (p<0.01). The use of the second troponin test (after 6 h of admission) within HEART resulted in an improvement of 8.0%.

Conclusions: The HEART-score combines clinical evaluation and results from laboratory testing, which should be used together, to discriminate patients at risk of a cardiac event from patients who can be safely discharged. In addition, it is shown that a second troponin measurement slightly improves the discriminative ability of the HEART-score.


Corresponding author: Laurens-Jan C. Jellema, Gelre ziekenhuizen Apeldoorn, Albert Schweitzerlaan 31, 7334 DZ Apeldoorn, The Netherlands, E-mail:

References

1. Bassand JP, Hamm CW, Ardissino D, Boersma E, Budaj A, Avilés FF, et al. ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 2007;28:1598–60.10.1093/eurheartj/ehm161Search in Google Scholar

2. Six AJ, Backus BE, Kelder JC. Chest pain in the emergency room: value of the HEART score. Neth Heart J 2008;16:191–6.10.1007/BF03086144Search in Google Scholar

3. Backus BE, Six AJ, Kelder JC, Mast TP, van den Akker F, Mast G, et al. Chest pain in the emergency room. A multicenter validation of the HEART score. Crit Path Cardiol 2010;9:164–9.10.1097/HPC.0b013e3181ec36d8Search in Google Scholar

4. Blackburn H, Keys A, Simonson E, Rautaharju P, Punsar S. The electrocardiogram in population studies: a classification system. Circulation 1960;21:1160–75.10.1161/01.CIR.21.6.1160Search in Google Scholar

5. Alpert JS, Thygesen K, Antman E, Bassand JP. Myocardial infarction redefined – a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:959–69.10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00804-4Search in Google Scholar

6. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD, Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction; Jaffe AS, Apple FS, et al. Universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation 2007;116:2634–53.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.187397Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983;148:839–43.10.1148/radiology.148.3.6878708Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB Sr, D’Agostino RB Jr, Vasan RS. Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond. Stat Med 2008;27:157–72.10.1002/sim.2929Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Hamm CW, Goldmann BU, Heeschen C, Kreymann G, Berger J, Meinertz T. Emergency room triage of patients with acute chest pain by means of rapid testing for cardiac troponin T or troponin I. N Engl J Med 1997;337:1648–53.10.1056/NEJM199712043372302Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Christenson J, Innes G, McKnight D, Boychuk B, Grafstein E, Thompson CR, et al. Safety and efficiency of emergency department assessment of chest discomfort. Can Med Assoc J 2004;170:1803–7.10.1503/cmaj.1031315Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Sanchis J, Bodí V, Núñez J, Bertomeu-González V, Gómez C, Bosch MJ, et al. New risk score for patients with acute chest pain, non-ST-segment deviation, and normal troponin concentrations: a comparison with the TIMI risk score. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;2;46:443–9.10.1016/j.jacc.2005.04.037Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Keller T, Zeller T, Ojeda F, Tzikas S, Lillpopp L, Sinning C, et al. Serial changes in highly sensitive troponin I assay and early diagnosis of myocardial infarction. J Am Med Assoc 2011;306:2684–93.10.1001/jama.2011.1896Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Apple FS, Murakami MM, Pearce LA, Herzog CA. Predictive value of cardiac troponin I and T for subsequent death in end-stage renal disease. Circulation 2002;106:2921–45.10.1161/01.CIR.0000041254.30637.34Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Di Nisio M, Smidt N, van Rijn JC, Bossuyt PM. Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies. Can Med Assoc J 2006;174:469–76.10.1503/cmaj.050090Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Reichlin T, Hochholzer W, Bassetti S, Steuer S, Stelzig C, Hartwiger S, et al. Early diagnosis of myocardial infarction with sensitive cardiac troponin assays. N Engl J Med 2009;361:858–67.10.1056/NEJMoa0900428Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Keller T, Zeller T, Peetz D, Tzikas S, Roth A, Czyz E, et al. Sensitive troponin I assay in early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2009;361:868–77.10.1056/NEJMoa0903515Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Van de Werf F, Bax J, Betrui A, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Crea F, Falk V, et al. Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 2008;29:2909–45.10.1093/eurheartj/ehn416Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Hamm CW, Bassand J, Agewall S, Bax J, Boersma E, Bueno H, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 2011;32:2999–3054.10.1093/eurheartj/ehr236Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Twerenbold R, Jaffe A, Reichlin T, Reiter M, Mueller C. High-sensitive troponin T measurements: what do we gain and what are the challenges? Eur Heart J 2012;33:579–86.10.1093/eurheartj/ehr492Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Scharnhorst V, Krasznai K, van’t Veer M, Michels R. Rapid detection of myocardial infarction with a sensitive troponin test. Clin Chem 2011;135:424–8.10.1309/AJCPA4G8AQOYEKLDSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2012-11-14
Accepted: 2013-7-15
Published Online: 2013-8-12
Published in Print: 2014-2-1

©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. The ten commandments of laboratory testing for emergency physicians
  4. Review
  5. Critical role of RAGE in lung physiology and tumorigenesis: a potential target of therapeutic intervention?
  6. Opinion Papers
  7. Do we really need high-sensitive troponin immunoassays in the emergency department? Definitely, yes!
  8. Do we really need high-sensitivity troponin immunoassays in the emergency department? Maybe not
  9. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  10. Cortisol and cortisone ratio in urine: LC-MS/MS method validation and preliminary clinical application
  11. Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) excretion increases in normal pregnancy but not in preeclampsia
  12. Influence of urine volume on the assessment of intestinal permeability in affected children by multiple sugar probes
  13. Measurement of amino terminal propeptide of type III procollagen (PIIINP) employing the ADVIA Centaur platform. Validation, reference interval and comparison to UniQ RIA
  14. Cancer Diagnostics
  15. Enrichment and enumeration of circulating tumor cells by efficient depletion of leukocyte fractions
  16. Immunological screening for tumor cells in serous body fluids has added value with the CELL-DYN Sapphire
  17. Cardiovascular Diseases
  18. The value of clinical and laboratory diagnostics for chest pain patients at the emergency department
  19. The concentration of high-sensitivity troponin I, galectin-3 and NT-proBNP substantially increase after a 60-km ultramarathon
  20. Autoantibody prevalence with an improved immunoassay for detecting cardiac troponin-specific autoantibodies
  21. Increased B-type natriuretic peptide levels in early-onset versus late-onset preeclampsia
  22. Association of the GCKR rs780094 polymorphism with metabolic traits including carotid intima-media thickness in Japanese community-dwelling men, but not in women
  23. Infectious Diseases
  24. Analysis of antibody response (IgM, IgG, IgG3) to Chikungunya virus using panel of peptides derived from envelope protein for serodiagnosis
  25. Letters to the Editor
  26. A short story on how the H-index may change the fate of scientists and scientific publishing
  27. A new and effective way for preventing pre-analytical laboratory errors
  28. Digital immunofluorescence enables automated detection of antinuclear antibody endpoint titers avoiding serial dilution
  29. Multicenter method evaluation of the ARK™ Methotrexate Immunoassay
  30. Haemoglobinopathies in nonendemic areas in recent years
  31. Clinical implications of a recent adjustment to the high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T assay: some results
  32. Effect of recalibration of the hs-TnT assay on diagnostic performance
Downloaded on 19.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2012-0771/html
Scroll to top button