Home A novel weighted cumulative delta-check method for highly sensitive detection of specimen mix-up in the clinical laboratory
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

A novel weighted cumulative delta-check method for highly sensitive detection of specimen mix-up in the clinical laboratory

  • Teppei Yamashita , Kiyoshi Ichihara EMAIL logo and Ayaho Miyamoto
Published/Copyright: February 6, 2013

Abstract

Background: We sought to detect specimen mix-up by developing a new cumulative delta-check method applicable to a mixture of test items with heterogeneous units and distribution patterns.

Methods: The distributions of all test results were successfully made Gaussian using power transformation. Values were then standardized into z-score (zx) based on reference interval (RI) so that limits of RI take zx=±1.96. To find a weight for summing absolute value of delta between current and previous zx (Dz), we evaluated the distribution of Dz. Its central portion was always regarded as Gaussian despite the presence of symmetrical long tails. Thus, an adjusted SD (aSD) representing the center was estimated with an iterative method. By setting 1/aSD2 as a weight factor, we computed a weighted mean of Dz as an index for specimen mix-up (wCDI).

Results: The performance of wCDI was evaluated, using a model laboratory database consisting of 32 basic test items, by a simulation study generating artificial cases of mix-up. When wCDI was computed from three commonly ordered test sets consisting of 6–9 items each, its diagnostic efficiency in detecting the artificial cases was 0.937–0.967 expressed as area under ROC curves (AUC). When the performance of wCDI was evaluated simply by the number of test items (p) included in the computation, AUC gradually increased from 0.944 (p=5) to 0.976 (p=8). However, when p≥10, AUC stayed at approximately 0.98.

Conclusions: wCDI was proven to be highly effective in uncovering cases of specimen mix-up. The diagnostic efficiency of wCDI depends only on the number of test items included in the computation.


Corresponding author: Kiyoshi Ichihara, MD, PhD, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Minami-Kogushi 1-1-1, Ube, 755-8505 Japan, Phone: +81 836 222884, Fax: +81 836 355213

References

1. Quillen K, Murphy K. Quality improvement to decrease specimen mislabeling in transfusion medicine. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2006;130:1196–8.10.5858/2006-130-1196-QITDSMSearch in Google Scholar

2. Morrison AP, Tanasijevic MJ, Goonan EM, Lobo MM, Bates MM, Lipsitz SR, etal. Reduction in specimen labeling errors after implementation of a positive patient identification system in phlebotomy. Am J Clin Pathol 2010;133:870–7.10.1309/AJCPC95YYMSLLRCXhttp://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000277846700007&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3Search in Google Scholar

3. Carraro P, Zago T, Plebani M. Exploring the initial steps of the testing process: frequency and nature of pre-preanalytic errors. Clin Chem 2012;58:638–42.http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000300934900023&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f310.1373/clinchem.2011.175711Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Dunn EJ, Moga PJ. Patient misidentification in laboratory medicine: a qualitative analysis of 227 root cause analysis reports in the Veterans Health Administration. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2010;134:244–55.10.5858/134.2.244Search in Google Scholar

5. Nosanchuk JS, Gottmann AW. CUMS and delta checks. A systematic approach to quality control. Am J Clin Pathol 1974;62:707–12.10.1093/ajcp/62.5.707Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Sheiner LB, Wheeler LA, Moore JK. The performance of delta check methods. Clin Chem 1979;25:2034–7.10.1093/clinchem/25.12.2034Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Iizuka Y, Kume H, Kitamura M. Multivariate delta check method for detecting specimen mix-up. Clin Chem 1982;28: 2244–8.10.1093/clinchem/28.11.2244Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Ichihara K, Boyd JC. IFCC Committee on Reference Intervals and Decision Limits (C-RIDL). An appraisal of statistical procedures used in derivation of reference intervals. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:1537–51.http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000284101000003&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f310.1515/CCLM.2010.319Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Ichihara K, Kawai T. An iterative method for improved estimation of the mean of peer-group distributions in proficiency testing. Clin Chem Lab Med 2005;43:412–21.10.1515/CCLM.2005.074Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Ichihara K, Kawai T. Determination of reference intervals for 13 plasma proteins based on IFCC international reference preparation (CRM470) and NCCLS proposed guideline (C28-P,1992): trial to select reference individuals by results of screening tests and application of maximal likelihood method. J Clin Lab Anal 1996;10:110–7.10.1002/(SICI)1098-2825(1996)10:2<110::AID-JCLA9>3.0.CO;2-GSearch in Google Scholar

11. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. The normal probability distribution. In: Biometry, 2nd ed. New York: WH Freeman & Company, 1981: 98–127.Search in Google Scholar

12. Bland M. The chi-squared goodness of fit test. In: An introduction to medical statistics, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press Inc., 1995:244–5.Search in Google Scholar

13. Zweig MH, Campbell G. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem 1993;39:561–77.10.1093/clinchem/39.4.561Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2012-11-04
Accepted: 2013-01-08
Published Online: 2013-02-06
Published in Print: 2013-04-01

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Letters to the Editor
  2. Missing agreement between the two IMMULITE® PSA assays
  3. “Cerebrovascular stressing”: dipyridamole-induced S100B elevation predicts ischemic cerebrovascular events
  4. Discrepancy in lamellar body counts (LBCs) between the Sysmex XE-2100 and Sysmex XT-2000i instruments
  5. Interphase fluorescent in situ hybridization detection of the 7q11.23 chromosomal inversion in a clinical laboratory: automated versus manual scoring
  6. Adrenocorticotropic hormone stability in preanalytical phase depends on temperature and proteolytic enzyme inhibitor
  7. The impact on costs and efficiency of reducing the number of collected tubes
  8. Improved software on the Sysmex XE-5000 BF mode for counting leukocytes in cerebrospinal fluid
  9. First trimester placental growth factor and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 are significantly related to PAPP-A levels
  10. Preliminary evaluation of complete blood cell count on Mindray BC-6800
  11. Rational use of laboratory tests: albuminuria
  12. Masthead
  13. Masthead
  14. Editorials
  15. Fifty years of CCLM – invitation to join us for a reception in Milan
  16. Personalized (laboratory) medicine: a bridge to the future
  17. PSA, PCA3 and the phi losophy of prostate cancer management
  18. Reviews
  19. Gender medicine: a task for the third millennium
  20. Evaluation of [−2] proPSA and Prostate Health Index (phi) for the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  21. Harmonization in laboratory medicine: the complete picture
  22. Opinion Papers
  23. Glycemic control in the clinical management of diabetic patients
  24. Time for a conceptual shift in assessment of internal quality control for whole blood or cell-based testing systems? An evaluation using platelet function and the PFA-100 as a case example
  25. Guidelines and Recommendations
  26. A position paper of the EFLM Committee on Education and Training and Working Group on Distance Education Programmes/E-Learning: developing an e-learning platform for the education of stakeholders in laboratory medicine
  27. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  28. A novel weighted cumulative delta-check method for highly sensitive detection of specimen mix-up in the clinical laboratory
  29. Identification and quantification of hemoglobins in whole blood: the analytical and organizational aspects of Capillarys 2 Flex Piercing compared with agarose electrophoresis and HPLC methods
  30. Determination of the fatty acid profile of neutral lipids, free fatty acids and phospholipids in human plasma
  31. Urinary iodine concentrations of pregnant women in Ukraine
  32. Delay in the measurement of eosin-5′-maleimide (EMA) binding does not affect the test result for the diagnosis of hereditary spherocytosis
  33. Faecal calprotectin: comparative study of the Quantum Blue rapid test and an established ELISA method
  34. Target analyte quantification by isotope dilution LC-MS/MS directly referring to internal standard concentrations – validation for serum cortisol measurement
  35. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  36. Reference values and upper reference limits for 26 trace elements in the urine of adults living in Belgium
  37. Biological variation and reference change values of common clinical chemistry and haematologic laboratory analytes in the elderly population
  38. Indirect determination of pediatric blood count reference intervals
  39. Cancer Diagnostics
  40. Suitability of quality control materials for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurement: inter-method variability of common tumor marker control materials
  41. Prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) RNA detection in blood and tissue samples for prostate cancer diagnosis
  42. Serum levels of cancer biomarkers in diabetic and non-diabetic proteinuric patients: a preliminary study
  43. Infectious Diseases
  44. Polymorphic mononuclear neutrophils CD64 index for diagnosis of sepsis in postoperative surgical patients and critically ill patients
  45. Plasma long pentraxin 3 (PTX3) concentration is a novel marker of disease activity in patients with community-acquired pneumonia
Downloaded on 15.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2012-0752/html
Scroll to top button