Home Medicine Surface characteristics and wettability of novel gingival col designed 3-D printed dental sectional matrices
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Surface characteristics and wettability of novel gingival col designed 3-D printed dental sectional matrices

  • Zeynep Ceren Celik ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Cigdem Elbek Cubukcu ORCID logo and Halil Celik ORCID logo
Published/Copyright: July 28, 2023

Abstract

Objective

The physical properties and wettability of 3-D printed Polyethylene terephthalate – glycol (PET-G) and Poly(lactic) acid (PLA) dental sectional matrices were investigated.

Methods

Experimental matrices was designed in a rectangular shape one-side depression corresponds to gingival col and without sharp edges and printed on FDM machine Ender Pro 3 (Creality®, Shenzhen, China). The physical textures, thicknesses, water contact angles were compared to conventional stainless steel (SS) matrix.

Results

PETG and PLA sample matrices were clinically single-side smooth compared to SS matrix. PETG specimens had uniformly 0.055 mm whereas PLAs were non-uniformly ∼0.065–0.075 mm in thickness. The mean ± standard deviation (SS) of contact angle for SS was 78.29 ± 0.18, for PETG was 72.09 ± 0.94, for PLA was 73.03 ± 1.17.

Conclusion

PETG and PLA dental matrices might have desirable properties: being hydrophobic, non-charged, easy to manufacture and mimicking the gingival col depression in the dental interproximal contact area.


Corresponding author: Zeynep Ceren Celik, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Türkiye, E-mail: .

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  5. Ethical approval: All experimental procedures were carried out in accordance with the ethical rules and the principles of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.

References

1. Owens, BM, Phebus, JG. An evidence-based review of dental matrix systems. Gen Dent 2016;64:64–70.Search in Google Scholar

2. Yuan, Y, Lee, TR. Contact angle and wetting properties. In: Bracco, G, Holst, B, editors. Surface science techniques (Springer Series in Surface Sciences, vol 51). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2013.10.1007/978-3-642-34243-1_1Search in Google Scholar

3. Vogler, EA. Structure and reactivity of water at biomaterial surfaces. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 1998;74:69–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-8686(97)00040-7.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Matjie, R, Zhang, S, Zhao, Q, Mabuza, N, Bunt, JR. Tailored surface energy of stainless steel plate coupons to reduce the adhesion of aluminium silicate deposit. Fuel 2016;181:573–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.04.105.Search in Google Scholar

5. Prajitno, DH, Maulana, A, Syarif, DG. Effect of surface roughness on contact angle measurement of nanofluid on surface of stainless steel 304 by sessile drop method. J Phys Conf 2016;739:012029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/739/1/012029.Search in Google Scholar

6. Li, J, Pan, L, Fu, Q, Zhou, Y, Guo, N. Wettability and corrosion behavior of a Ni coating on 304 stainless steel surface. Surf Coating Technol 2019;357:740–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.10.050.Search in Google Scholar

7. DeStefano, V, Khan, S, Tabada, A. Applications of PLA in modern medicine. Eng Regen 2020;1:76–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engreg.2020.08.002.Search in Google Scholar

8. Yelten, A, Öztürk, MH, Yılmaz, S. 3-Dimensional printing of PLA scaffolds for medical applications. Turk J Eng 2022;6:262–7. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.958192.Search in Google Scholar

9. Hassan, MH, Omar, AM, Daskalakis, E, Liu, F, Bartolo, P. Preliminary studies on the suitability of PETG for 4D printing applications. MATEC Web Conf 2020;318:01010. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202031801010.Search in Google Scholar

10. Heymann, H, Swift, EJ, Ritter, AV, Sturdevant, CM. Sturdevant’s art and science of operative dentistry, 6th ed. St. Louis, Mo: Elsevier/Mosby; 2013.Search in Google Scholar

11. Kampouropoulos, D, Paximada, C, Loukidis, M, Kakaboura, A. The influence of matrix type on the proximal contact in Class II resin composite restorations. Operat Dent 2010;35:454–62. https://doi.org/10.2341/09-272-l.Search in Google Scholar

12. Saber, MH, El-Badrawy, W, Loomans, BA, Ahmed, DR, Dörfer, CE, El Zohairy, A. Creating tight proximal contacts for MOD resin composite restorations. Operat Dent 2011;36:304–10. https://doi.org/10.2341/10-210-L.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Patekar, VR, Mankar, N, Burde, K, Achanta, A. Choice of matrix system in dentistry. J Res Med Dent Sci 2022;10:120–6.Search in Google Scholar

14. Rahmatabadi, D, Aminzadeh, A, Aberoumand, M, Moradi, M. Mechanical characterization of fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printed parts. In: Dave, HK, Davim, JP, editors. Fused deposition modeling based 3D printing (Materials Forming, Machining and Tribology). Cham: Springer; 2021.10.1007/978-3-030-68024-4_7Search in Google Scholar

15. Hattan, MA, Pani, SC, Alomari, M. Composite bonding to stainless steel crowns using a new universal bonding and single-bottle systems. Int J Dent 2013;2013:607405. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/607405.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Sikka, N, Brizuela, M. Glass ionomer cement. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2022.Search in Google Scholar

17. Kingman, J, Dymond, MK. Fused filament fabrication and water contact angle anisotropy: the effect of layer height and raster width on the wettability of 3D printed polylactic acid parts. Chem. Data Collect. 2022;40:100884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cdc.2022.100884.Search in Google Scholar

18. Gutierrez-Villarreal, H, Rodríguez-Gonzalez, FJ, Perera-Mercado, Y. Estimation of surface free energy of poly(lactic acid) during UV-grafting with N-vinylpyrrolidone. Macromol Symp 2017;374:1600130. https://doi.org/10.1002/masy.201600130.Search in Google Scholar

19. Nicholson, JW. Maturation processes in glass-ionomer dental cements. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand 2018;4:63–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/23337931.2018.1497492.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

20. Deepak, S, Nivedhitha, MS. Proximal contact tightness between two different restorative materials – an in vitro study. J Adv Pharm Educ Res 2017;7:153–6.Search in Google Scholar

21. Dunn, WJ, Davis, JT, Casey, JA. Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) tape as a matrix in operative dentistry. Operat Dent 2004;29:470–2.Search in Google Scholar

22. Kuruoğlu, Y, Akgün, M, Demir, H. FDM yöntemiyle üretilen ABS, PLA ve PETG numunelerin yüzey pürüzlülüğü ve çekme dayanımının modellenmesi ve optimizasyonu. Int J 3D Print Technol Digit Ind 2022;6:358–69. https://doi.org/10.46519/ij3dptdi.1148923.Search in Google Scholar

23. Soleyman, E, Aberoumand, M, Rahmatabadi, D, Soltanmohammadi, K, Ghasemi, I, Baniassadi, M, et al.. Assessment of controllable shape transformation, potential applications, and tensile shape memory properties of 3D printed PETG. J Mater Res Technol 2022;18:4201–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.04.076.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-02-06
Accepted: 2023-06-30
Published Online: 2023-07-28
Published in Print: 2024-02-26

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 16.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/bmt-2023-0229/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button